{"id":19272,"date":"2021-07-04T13:39:49","date_gmt":"2021-07-04T20:39:49","guid":{"rendered":"http:\/\/occupysf.net\/?p=19272"},"modified":"2021-07-04T13:39:51","modified_gmt":"2021-07-04T20:39:51","slug":"nearly-50-trees-on-san-franciscos-market-street-threatened","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"http:\/\/occupysf.net\/index.php\/2021\/07\/04\/nearly-50-trees-on-san-franciscos-market-street-threatened\/","title":{"rendered":"Nearly 50 Trees on San Francisco\u2019s Market Street Threatened"},"content":{"rendered":"\n<p>Posted on\u00a0<a href=\"https:\/\/sfforest.org\/2021\/07\/02\/nearly-50-trees-on-san-franciscos-market-street-threatened\/\">July 2, 2021<\/a>\u00a0by\u00a0<a href=\"https:\/\/sfforest.org\/author\/sfforest\/\">SF Forest Alliance<\/a> (sfforestorg)<\/p>\n\n\n\n<p>Here we go again.<\/p>\n\n\n\n<p>San Francisco\u2019s cutting down more trees, as though its paltry tree cover \u2013 less than any other major city \u2013 needed further depleting. This time,&nbsp;<strong>49 trees on Market Street are planned to be felled to make way for fancy new BART station entrances<\/strong>.<\/p>\n\n\n\n<figure class=\"wp-block-image\"><a href=\"https:\/\/sfforest.files.wordpress.com\/2021\/07\/currentrance-w-trees.jpg\"><img decoding=\"async\" src=\"https:\/\/sfforest.files.wordpress.com\/2021\/07\/currentrance-w-trees.jpg?w=640&amp;h=320\" alt=\"\" class=\"wp-image-7572\"\/><\/a><\/figure>\n\n\n\n<p>BART entrance with trees \u2013 Market St San Francisco. (Copyright Lance Carnes)<\/p>\n\n\n\n<p>These trees are part of San Francisco\u2019s green infrastructure that the city should strive to protect, not heedlessly destroy. And they\u2019re habitat.<\/p>\n\n\n\n<p><strong>THE WESTERN TIGER SWALLOWTAIL BUTTERFLY<\/strong><\/p>\n\n\n\n<div class=\"wp-block-image\"><figure class=\"aligncenter\"><img decoding=\"async\" src=\"https:\/\/sfforest.files.wordpress.com\/2012\/08\/western-tiger-swallow-tail-butterfly-public-domain.jpg?w=640\" alt=\"\" class=\"wp-image-1766\"\/><\/figure><\/div>\n\n\n\n<p>Aside from providing nest sites for birds, these trees are the nursery tree of the&nbsp;<strong>beautiful butterfly, the Western Tiger Swallowtail<\/strong>. As early as nine years ago, when the Market Street trees were threatened by an ill-conceived street plan, these butterflies were documented as breeding in the London Plane trees (sycamore) that line both sides of market street. (You can read about that&nbsp;<a href=\"https:\/\/jeffersonstreettrees.wordpress.com\/2012\/08\/31\/jefferson-street-and-the-western-tiger-swallowtail-butterfly\/\">here<\/a>&nbsp;with photos of a just-born butterfly.) These are the famous \u201cTigers of Market Street\u201d that have been written about in the&nbsp;<a href=\"https:\/\/www.smithsonianmag.com\/science-nature\/a-butterfly-species-settles-in-san-franciscos-market-street-2071710\/\">Smithsonian Magazine<\/a>, in&nbsp;<a href=\"https:\/\/fieldnotes.nationalgeographic.org\/expedition\/tigersonmarketstreet\">National Geographic\u2019s Field Notes<\/a>, in&nbsp;<a href=\"https:\/\/baynature.org\/article\/whats-a-tiger-swallowtail-doing-in-downtown-san-francisco\/\">Bay Nature<\/a>. This little urban ecosystem is a San Francisco treasure \u2013 a street that to a bug or bird\u2019s eye, resembles a tree-lined river canyon. Cutting down 50 of these trees is a terrible idea.<\/p>\n\n\n\n<p><em>(Though the public hearing is over, please do write to SFDPW, your supervisor and to BART about these trees. The relevant Order numbers are: 204929, 204930, 204931, 204932, 204933, 204934, 204935, 204936, 204937, 204938, 204939, 204940, 204941, 204942, 204943)<\/em><\/p>\n\n\n\n<p><strong>NOT ENOUGH TREES IN SAN FRANCISCO<\/strong><\/p>\n\n\n\n<p>Trees are a vital part of urban infrastructure.<\/p>\n\n\n\n<ul><li>Trees&nbsp;<strong>fight pollution<\/strong>, especially particulate pollution that is dangerous to human lungs.<\/li><li>Trees&nbsp;<strong>improve air quality<\/strong><\/li><li>Trees are&nbsp;<strong>good for physical and psychological health<\/strong>; to get the same benefit as living on a tree-lined street,&nbsp;<em>you would have to be ten years younger<\/em>.<\/li><li>Trees&nbsp;<strong>provide habitat<\/strong>&nbsp;for wildlife, especially birds and butterflies.<\/li><li>Trees&nbsp;<strong>help regulate water<\/strong>&nbsp;by absorbing it into their roots and gradually releasing it through their leaves.<\/li><li>Trees&nbsp;<strong>reduce crime and improve business<\/strong>.<\/li><\/ul>\n\n\n\n<p>For a detailed list of benefits, read&nbsp;<strong><a href=\"https:\/\/sfforest.org\/2014\/10\/07\/why-urban-trees-are-important-to-us-all\/\">Twenty Reasons Why Urban Trees are Important to Us All<\/a><\/strong><\/p>\n\n\n\n<p>A group that is trying to save these trees estimates their value at $500,000. In fact, given the infrastructure benefits of trees, that is an underestimate. It\u2019s like putting a value on air: It\u2019s free until you don\u2019t have it, and then it\u2019s infinitely valuable.<\/p>\n\n\n\n<p><strong>San Francisco has too few trees.<\/strong><\/p>\n\n\n\n<p>Unfortunately, every project seems to start with destroying trees \u2013 and neighbors never know about it until it\u2019s a done deal and the trees have 30-days-to-death notices on them. Then they object\u2026 but the odds are against them. Though they sometimes succeed in saving the trees, more often it\u2019s too late.&nbsp;&nbsp;Meanwhile, the City seems to be entirely accepting of tree destruction for any and all reasons.<\/p>\n\n\n\n<p>As of 2013, San Francisco had a tree canopy of only 13.7%, the lowest of any major city, and nearly half the appropriate canopy cover of 25%.&nbsp; Given that this data is now 8 years old, in an administrative environment that favors cutting down trees over saving them, we expect the current situation is worse.<\/p>\n\n\n\n<p>(From SF Data<em>: In preparation for the San Francisco Urban Forest Plan (2013), the Planning Department performed an Urban Tree Canopy (UTC) Analysis using aerial imagery and additional data sets to determine a canopy estimate for the City &amp; County of San Francisco. This analysis estimated San Francisco\u2019s tree canopy at 13.7%&nbsp;&nbsp;<\/em>)<\/p>\n\n\n\n<figure class=\"wp-block-image\"><a href=\"https:\/\/sfforest.files.wordpress.com\/2016\/03\/urban-tree-canopy.png\"><img decoding=\"async\" src=\"https:\/\/sfforest.files.wordpress.com\/2016\/03\/urban-tree-canopy.png?w=640\" alt=\"Graph showing urban tree canopy cover in major US cities\" class=\"wp-image-5425\"\/><\/a><\/figure>\n\n\n\n<p>San Francisco Has the Least Canopy Cover of any Major US City<\/p>\n\n\n\n<p>This is an embarrassment for a \u201cgreen\u201d city, quite aside from the ecological, environmental and health reasons for saving our trees. Unfortunately, between Nativists, developers, and project managers, there seems to be a wave of tree cutting hitting San Francisco. We\u2019re not augmenting our canopy, we\u2019re shrinking it.<\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"<p>Posted on\u00a0July 2, 2021\u00a0by\u00a0SF Forest Alliance (sfforestorg) Here we go again. San Francisco\u2019s cutting down more trees, as though its paltry tree cover \u2013 less than any other major city \u2013 needed further depleting. This time,&nbsp;49 trees on Market Street are planned to be felled to make way for fancy&#8230; <a class=\"continue-reading-link\" href=\"http:\/\/occupysf.net\/index.php\/2021\/07\/04\/nearly-50-trees-on-san-franciscos-market-street-threatened\/\"> Continue reading <span class=\"meta-nav\">&rarr; <\/span><\/a><\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":1,"featured_media":0,"comment_status":"open","ping_status":"open","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"footnotes":""},"categories":[1],"tags":[],"_links":{"self":[{"href":"http:\/\/occupysf.net\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/19272"}],"collection":[{"href":"http:\/\/occupysf.net\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"http:\/\/occupysf.net\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"http:\/\/occupysf.net\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/1"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"http:\/\/occupysf.net\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=19272"}],"version-history":[{"count":1,"href":"http:\/\/occupysf.net\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/19272\/revisions"}],"predecessor-version":[{"id":19273,"href":"http:\/\/occupysf.net\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/19272\/revisions\/19273"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"http:\/\/occupysf.net\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=19272"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"http:\/\/occupysf.net\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=19272"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"http:\/\/occupysf.net\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=19272"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}