{"id":21156,"date":"2022-01-20T12:37:58","date_gmt":"2022-01-20T20:37:58","guid":{"rendered":"http:\/\/occupysf.net\/?p=21156"},"modified":"2022-01-20T12:40:50","modified_gmt":"2022-01-20T20:40:50","slug":"who-is-funding-the-school-board-recall","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"http:\/\/occupysf.net\/index.php\/2022\/01\/20\/who-is-funding-the-school-board-recall\/","title":{"rendered":"Who is funding the school board recall?"},"content":{"rendered":"\n<p>Pro-recall committees have raised 46 times more money than the anti-recall campaign, according to Ethics Commission data<\/p>\n\n\n\n<figure class=\"wp-block-image\"><img decoding=\"async\" loading=\"lazy\" width=\"1024\" height=\"577\" src=\"http:\/\/occupysf.net\/wp-content\/uploads\/2022\/01\/Missionlocal-1024x577.png\" alt=\"\" class=\"wp-image-21157\" srcset=\"http:\/\/occupysf.net\/wp-content\/uploads\/2022\/01\/Missionlocal-1024x577.png 1024w, http:\/\/occupysf.net\/wp-content\/uploads\/2022\/01\/Missionlocal-150x85.png 150w, http:\/\/occupysf.net\/wp-content\/uploads\/2022\/01\/Missionlocal-300x169.png 300w, http:\/\/occupysf.net\/wp-content\/uploads\/2022\/01\/Missionlocal-768x433.png 768w, http:\/\/occupysf.net\/wp-content\/uploads\/2022\/01\/Missionlocal-250x141.png 250w, http:\/\/occupysf.net\/wp-content\/uploads\/2022\/01\/Missionlocal.png 1200w\" sizes=\"(max-width: 1024px) 100vw, 1024px\" \/><\/figure>\n\n\n\n<figure class=\"wp-block-image\"><img decoding=\"async\" src=\"https:\/\/missionloca.s3.amazonaws.com\/mission\/wp-content\/uploads\/2021\/09\/willJarrett_profile-80x80.jpg\" alt=\"\"\/><\/figure>\n\n\n\n<p><em>(First published June 19, 2021, 6 a.m.)<\/em><\/p>\n\n\n\n<p>In only a few short weeks, San Francisco voters will go to the polls to decide whether three elected members of the city\u2019s school board will keep their jobs.<\/p>\n\n\n\n<p>Board President&nbsp;<a href=\"https:\/\/www.sfusd.edu\/about-sfusd\/board-education\/board-president-gabriela-lopez\">Gabriela L\u00f3pez<\/a>, Commissioner&nbsp;<a href=\"https:\/\/www.sfusd.edu\/about-sfusd\/board-education\/commissioner-alison-collins\">Alison Collins<\/a>, and Commissioner&nbsp;<a href=\"https:\/\/www.sfusd.edu\/about-sfusd\/board-education\/commissioner-faauuga-moliga\">Faauuga Moliga<\/a>&nbsp;will all be on the ballot on Feb. 15. Out of the seven members of the&nbsp;<a href=\"https:\/\/www.sfusd.edu\/about-sfusd\/board-education\">school board<\/a>, only those three were eligible to be recalled, as the other four had not served long enough.<\/p>\n\n\n\n<p>Leaders of the recall insist that, had they been eligible, at least a few of the other commissioners would have been on the recall ballot as well.<\/p>\n\n\n\n<p>Debate over the recall has been intense and, at times, polarizing. Supporters of the recall point toward the city\u2019s long school closures during the pandemic, the elimination of selective admission at Lowell High School and the attempt to rename&nbsp;<a href=\"https:\/\/missionlocal.org\/2021\/01\/the-san-francisco-school-districts-renaming-debacle-has-been-a-historic-travesty\/\">44 high schools during the pandemic<\/a>&nbsp;as evidence that the school board is unfit to serve. On the flip side, opponents say that the election is part of a wider pattern in which recalls of progressives are being funded by big money and right-wing activists.<\/p>\n\n\n\n<p>Buckets of ink have been spilled by savvier commentators than me on the pros and cons of the school board in particular and recalls in general. Instead of wading into fraught ideological territory, let\u2019s take a look at one concrete indicator of how the election is shaping up: funding.<\/p>\n\n\n\n<p>But first \u2026<\/p>\n\n\n\n<h2 class=\"wp-block-heading\">A note about the data<\/h2>\n\n\n\n<p>As of this week, the&nbsp;<a href=\"https:\/\/sfethics.org\/ethics\/2021\/11\/campaign-finance-dashboards-february-15-2022.html\">San Francisco Ethics Commission data<\/a>&nbsp;shows donations up to Jan. 12, but it does not show&nbsp;<em>all<\/em>&nbsp;donations. Thanks to<a href=\"https:\/\/sfethics.org\/wp-content\/uploads\/2022\/01\/2022_Local_Feb_15_Measures.pdf\">&nbsp;baroque filing rules<\/a>, donations from mid-September to mid-November have not yet been declared. And, from November onward, donations of less than $1,000 are also left out.<\/p>\n\n\n\n<p>These gaps should be filled early next month, as all committees will be required to disclose donors from the past six months on Jan. 31. Until then, our data is incomplete.<\/p>\n\n\n\n<p>This all means that our analysis should be taken with a cautious asterisk. Nonetheless, the data currently available can still give us lots of insight into the recall campaign and can show us some of its biggest players.<\/p>\n\n\n\n<p>With that caveat acknowledged, let\u2019s dive in.<\/p>\n\n\n\n<h2 class=\"wp-block-heading\">Who is funding the recall effort?<\/h2>\n\n\n\n<p>There are two committees raising money in favor of the recall. The first is called Recall School Board Members Lopez, Collins, &amp; Moliga, and was&nbsp;<a href=\"https:\/\/public.netfile.com\/Pub2\/RequestPDF.aspx?id=198183899\">set up in February, 2021<\/a>.<\/p>\n\n\n\n<p>The committee is run jointly by&nbsp;<a href=\"https:\/\/twitter.com\/jaravis\">Siva Raj<\/a>&nbsp;and&nbsp;<a href=\"https:\/\/twitter.com\/autumnlooijen\">Autumn Looijen<\/a>. Raj has two children in public San Francisco schools, while Looijen\u2019s three children are in Los Altos. The pair, who moved to the city in December, 2020, came under some criticism for appearing on conservative commentator&nbsp;<a href=\"https:\/\/www.glennbeck.com\/radio\/parents-successfully-pushing-back-against-out-of-control-school-board-heres-how-you-can-too\">Glenn Beck\u2019s show<\/a>&nbsp;to promote the recall last March.<\/p>\n\n\n\n<p>The second committee is called Concerned Parents Supporting The Recall Of Collins, Lopez, And Moliga, and was set up more recently. They began taking donations in&nbsp;<a href=\"https:\/\/public.netfile.com\/Pub2\/AllFilingsByFiler.aspx?id=201362682&amp;aid=SFO\">late November, 2021<\/a>.<\/p>\n\n\n\n<p>This committee is run by&nbsp;<a href=\"https:\/\/www.linkedin.com\/in\/todd-david-7998473\/\">Todd David<\/a>, a public school parent and executive director of the advocacy group&nbsp;<a href=\"https:\/\/www.sfhac.org\/\">Housing Action Coalition<\/a>. David has been involved in several political causes in San Francisco: He was political director of the Scott Wiener\u2019s 2016 State Senate campaign, campaign manager for the 2016 campaign to secure Recreation and Parks funding, and a&nbsp;<a href=\"https:\/\/public.netfile.com\/Pub2\/AllFilingsByFiler.aspx?id=10944875&amp;aid=SFO\">founding member of the San Francisco Parents PAC<\/a>&nbsp;in 2010.<\/p>\n\n\n\n<p>Take a look at the chart below to see who has been donating to each committee. The size of the circle indicates the size of the donation and the color indicates donors\u2019 occupations. Hover over each point for more information and use the search bar to find specific donors.<\/p>\n\n\n\n<h2 class=\"wp-block-heading\" id=\"h-two-committees-in-favor-of-the-recall-have-raised-almost-1-3-million-between-them\">Two committees in favor of the recall have raised almost $1.3 million between them<\/h2>\n\n\n\n<figure><iframe src=\"https:\/\/missionlocal.github.io\/interactives\/school-board-recall-finance-desktop\/#amp=1\"><\/iframe><\/figure>\n\n\n\n<figure><iframe allowfullscreen=\"\" src=\"https:\/\/missionlocal.github.io\/interactives\/thermometer-2\/#amp=1\"><\/iframe><\/figure>\n\n\n\n<p><em>Please note that not all donations are captured by this chart, due to filing deadlines. The occupation group of donors who gave less than $10,000 was determined by self-report; the occupation group of donors who gave more than $10,000 was determined by our investigations.<\/em><\/p>\n\n\n\n<p>The first committee has attracted a large number of smaller donations \u2014 their typical donation is $100 \u2014 while the Concerned Parents committee has gone after bigger fish.<\/p>\n\n\n\n<p>\u201cSiva and Autumn did a phenomenal job of grassroots organizing,\u201d said Todd David, the principal officer of the Concerned Parents committee. But his committee, he explained, was going to focus more on finding larger donors.<\/p>\n\n\n\n<p>\u201cWe cast a wide net for donors that we thought had a capacity to donate,\u201d he said.<\/p>\n\n\n\n<p>This includes the biggest donor to the campaign so far, 95-year-old billionaire Arthur Rock, who dropped $350,000 on Nov. 30. Rock had already donated $49,500 to the Recall School Board committee in August, bringing his total contribution up to $399,500.<\/p>\n\n\n\n<p>Rock was a major and early investor in Apple and other tech companies, and has recently been advocating for charter schools. In 2020, he made a&nbsp;<a href=\"https:\/\/eastbaymajority.com\/oakland-school-board-hutchinson-tapscott-bloomberg-charters-go-public\/\">significant donation<\/a>&nbsp;to the Oakland school board election, giving pro-charter school&nbsp;<a href=\"https:\/\/oaklandside.org\/2020\/10\/15\/oakland-school-board-campaign-finance-charter-schools\/\">PAC Power2Families $37,500<\/a>.<\/p>\n\n\n\n<p>The second largest contributor to the school board recall will be a familiar name to anyone following the recall effort against District Attorney&nbsp;<a href=\"https:\/\/missionlocal.org\/2021\/12\/explore-see-just-who-is-funding-the-boudin-recall\/\">Chesa Boudin<\/a>: the Neighbors for a Better San Francisco PAC.<\/p>\n\n\n\n<p>The Neighbors PAC gave $238,800 to the school board recall this January. The PAC is funded by a small number of extremely wealthy donors, including billionaires and multi-millionaires Miriam L. Haas, Paul Holden Spaht Jr., and Jason Moment. The majority of money for the Boudin recall&nbsp;<a href=\"https:\/\/missionlocal.org\/2021\/12\/explore-see-just-who-is-funding-the-boudin-recall\/\">came from this PAC<\/a>.<\/p>\n\n\n\n<h2 class=\"wp-block-heading\">FIND OUT MORE ABOUT THE NEIGHBORS PAC AND THE BOUDIN RECALL<\/h2>\n\n\n\n<h3 class=\"wp-block-heading\"><a href=\"https:\/\/missionlocal.org\/2021\/12\/explore-see-just-who-is-funding-the-boudin-recall\/\">Explore: See who is funding the Boudin recall<\/a><\/h3>\n\n\n\n<p><a href=\"https:\/\/missionlocal.org\/author\/wjarrett\/\"><\/a>by&nbsp;<strong><a href=\"https:\/\/missionlocal.org\/author\/wjarrett\/\">WILL JARRETT<\/a><\/strong>DECEMBER 15, 2021<\/p>\n\n\n\n<p>Here are the other top donors to the school board recall:<\/p>\n\n\n\n<ul><li><strong>David Sacks:<\/strong>&nbsp;Tech investor, former COO of PayPal, founder of Yammer, and financier of 2007 satirical anti-lobbying film&nbsp;<a href=\"https:\/\/en.wikipedia.org\/wiki\/Thank_You_for_Smoking\"><em>Thank You For Smoking<\/em><\/a>. He has given $74,500 to the school board recall. He also gave $75,000 to the Boudin recall.<\/li><li><strong>The California Association Of Realtors Issues Mobilization PAC<\/strong>: A PAC associated with the&nbsp;<a href=\"https:\/\/www.car.org\/\">real estate trade organization<\/a>&nbsp;of the same name, it has given $55,900.<\/li><li><strong>The California Real Estate PAC<\/strong>:&nbsp;<em>Another&nbsp;<\/em>PAC associated with the same real estate trade organization, it has given $29,000.<\/li><li><strong>Garry Tan<\/strong>: Tech investor and founder of&nbsp;<a href=\"https:\/\/initialized.com\/\">Initialized Capital<\/a>. He has donated $15,001 to the school board recall. He also gave $50,500 to the Boudin recall.<\/li><li><strong>Zach Rosen<\/strong>: Co-founder of tech company&nbsp;<a href=\"https:\/\/pantheon.io\/\">Pantheon Systems<\/a>. He has donated $15,001 to the school board recall.<\/li><\/ul>\n\n\n\n<h2 class=\"wp-block-heading\">So, how grassroots is the campaign funding?<\/h2>\n\n\n\n<p>It depends on how you slice the data.<\/p>\n\n\n\n<p>The typical donation sits at $100, and the vast majority of donors gave less than $1,000. The first committee, run by Raj and Looijen, saw several hundred of these small donations.<\/p>\n\n\n\n<figure class=\"wp-block-image\"><img decoding=\"async\" src=\"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/missionloca.s3.amazonaws.com\/mission\/wp-content\/uploads\/2022\/01\/TypesOfDonors_Desktop_Artboard_1.png?w=780&amp;ssl=1\" alt=\"\"\/><\/figure>\n\n\n\n<p>The vast majority of donors<\/p>\n\n\n\n<p>donated less than $1,000.<\/p>\n\n\n\n<p>88 donors gave<\/p>\n\n\n\n<p>between $1,000 and $10,000<\/p>\n\n\n\n<p>17 donors gave<\/p>\n\n\n\n<p>$10,000 or more<\/p>\n\n\n\n<p>780 donors gave<\/p>\n\n\n\n<p>less than $1,000<\/p>\n\n\n\n<p>However, because of just how exceedingly&nbsp;<em>big&nbsp;<\/em>the campaign\u2019s big donations were, the vast majority of dollars raised were nonetheless from wealthy donors.<\/p>\n\n\n\n<figure class=\"wp-block-image\"><img decoding=\"async\" src=\"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/missionloca.s3.amazonaws.com\/mission\/wp-content\/uploads\/2022\/01\/MoneyRaisedByDonors_Desktop_Artboard_1.png?w=780&amp;ssl=1\" alt=\"\"\/><\/figure>\n\n\n\n<p>The vast majority of&nbsp;<em>money<\/em><\/p>\n\n\n\n<p><em>raised<\/em>&nbsp;is from large donors.<\/p>\n\n\n\n<p>$123,602 has been raised by donors who gave less than $1,000<\/p>\n\n\n\n<p>$930,702 has been raised<\/p>\n\n\n\n<p>by donors who gave<\/p>\n\n\n\n<p>$10,000 or more<\/p>\n\n\n\n<p>$238,268 has been raised<\/p>\n\n\n\n<p>by donors who gave<\/p>\n\n\n\n<p>between $1,000 and $10,000<\/p>\n\n\n\n<h2 class=\"wp-block-heading\">How is the money being spent?<\/h2>\n\n\n\n<p>We do not have all the committees\u2019&nbsp;<a href=\"https:\/\/sfethics.org\/ethics\/2021\/11\/campaign-finance-dashboards-february-15-2022.html\">spending data<\/a>, as the campaign is ongoing and it has not all been released yet. However, we can still see a hefty chunk of their spending.<\/p>\n\n\n\n<p>In current&nbsp;<a href=\"https:\/\/sfethics.org\/ethics\/2021\/11\/campaign-finance-dashboards-february-15-2022.html\">Ethics Commission data<\/a>, the primary expense for the recall is paid signature-gatherers. A little over half a million dollars went to a handful of companies used for&nbsp; circulating petitions, chief among them&nbsp;<a href=\"https:\/\/www.accelevate2020.com\/\">Accelevate 2020<\/a>&nbsp;and Prosperb Media.<\/p>\n\n\n\n<p>Interestingly, the owner of Prosperb Media is Josephine Zhao, who ran to be on the school board in 2018. Her campaign failed after she became embroiled in a&nbsp;<a href=\"https:\/\/missionlocal.org\/2018\/09\/josephine-zhao-publicly-apologizes-for-past-transphobic-behavior-privately-school-board-candidate-boasts-she-is-now-even-more-well-known\/\">transphobia scandal<\/a>. Back in 2018, she publicly apologized for transphobic remarks made in newspapers five years prior. At the same time, she sent private messages over Chinese language app WeChat decrying the&nbsp;<a href=\"https:\/\/en.wikipedia.org\/wiki\/Cow_demons_and_snake_spirits\">cow demons and snake spirits<\/a>&nbsp;who called out her comments, and celebrated that the controversy had made her \u201ceven more well-known.\u201d<\/p>\n\n\n\n<p>Zhao\u2019s company has received $111,202 from the recall campaign.<\/p>\n\n\n\n<p>Now that the recall is firmly on the ballot, Todd David said that the primary focus of spending will shift to \u201cpolitical communications,\u201d meaning social media ads, leaflet drops, and other ways of getting out the message.<\/p>\n\n\n\n<h2 class=\"wp-block-heading\">But wait. What about the anti-recall effort?<\/h2>\n\n\n\n<p>Finances on the anti-recall side of the fence look drastically different.<\/p>\n\n\n\n<p>There are two committees opposing the recall. One is called No On Recalls Of School Board Commissioners Lopez, Collins And Moliga, and the other is No On C! Stop The Recall Of Faauuga Moliga. Both were established in&nbsp;<a href=\"https:\/\/public.netfile.com\/Pub2\/AllFilingsByFiler.aspx?id=201274493&amp;aid=SFO\">October<\/a>,&nbsp;<a href=\"https:\/\/public.netfile.com\/Pub2\/AllFilingsByFiler.aspx?id=201239931&amp;aid=SFO\">2021<\/a>.<\/p>\n\n\n\n<p>While the first committee is dedicated to stopping the recall of all three members, the second is purely interested in stopping the recall of Moliga. But neither has raised much of a war chest. According to&nbsp;<a href=\"https:\/\/sfethics.org\/ethics\/2021\/11\/campaign-finance-dashboards-february-15-2022.html\">Ethics Commission data<\/a>, the first committee has raised $5,000 and the Moliga-only committee has raised $23,000, for a combined total of $28,000.<\/p>\n\n\n\n<p>This means that the pro-recall campaign has raised roughly 46 times as much, so far.<\/p>\n\n\n\n<p>\u201cI\u2019m not raising money, and I\u2019m not campaigning,\u201d said Collins, when asked why the anti-recall committees were lagging in funding. \u201cI am working twenty-four seven to do my job, which is helping students in San Francisco with their education.\u201d<\/p>\n\n\n\n<p>Collins said that the same was true of L\u00f3pez. L\u00f3pez did not respond to an email asking for comment.<\/p>\n\n\n\n<p>\u201cI am pleased with how our fundraising is going,\u201d wrote Moliga over email. \u201cI still have work to do, but we are right on target, and are implementing a strong voter outreach program.\u201d<\/p>\n\n\n\n<p>David from the Concerned Parents committee sees the lack of funds on the anti-recall side as an indication of their lack of support: \u201cSeeing the lack of resources going to defend them, that speaks for itself,\u201d he said. \u201cOverwhelmingly, the public seem to believe that these members have failed.\u201d<\/p>\n\n\n\n<p>It is worth noting that some campaign activity does not involve money, and will therefore not be captured in these figures. Brandee Marckmann, public school parent and chair of the&nbsp;<a href=\"https:\/\/sfberniecrats.com\/\">San Francisco Berniecrats<\/a>, has been volunteering 10 hours a week to oppose the recall. She and other members of the Berniecrats are set to begin phone-banking and emailing in support of the school board next week.<\/p>\n\n\n\n<h2 class=\"wp-block-heading\">What is next for the campaigns?<\/h2>\n\n\n\n<p>Fundraising will only increase in the run-up to the election on Feb. 15. If money really does speak in elections, then the anti-recall campaign will have a long way to go to make sure its voice is heard.<\/p>\n\n\n\n<p>We aim to follow-up on this piece with analysis in the week before the election, when more funding data will be available.<\/p>\n\n\n\n<figure class=\"wp-block-image\"><img decoding=\"async\" src=\"https:\/\/missionloca.s3.amazonaws.com\/mission\/wp-content\/uploads\/2021\/09\/willJarrett_profile-80x80.jpg\" alt=\"\"\/><\/figure>\n\n\n\n<h2 class=\"wp-block-heading\">WILL JARRETT<\/h2>\n\n\n\n<p><a href=\"mailto:Will@MissionLocal.com\">Will@MissionLocal.com<\/a><\/p>\n\n\n\n<p>Will was born in the UK and studied English at Oxford University. After a few years in publishing, he absconded to the USA where he studied data journalism in New York. Will has strong views on healthcare, the environment, and the Oxford comma.<a href=\"https:\/\/missionlocal.org\/author\/wjarrett\/\">More by Will Jarrett<\/a><\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"<p>Pro-recall committees have raised 46 times more money than the anti-recall campaign, according to Ethics Commission data (First published June 19, 2021, 6 a.m.) In only a few short weeks, San Francisco voters will go to the polls to decide whether three elected members of the city\u2019s school board will&#8230; <a class=\"continue-reading-link\" href=\"http:\/\/occupysf.net\/index.php\/2022\/01\/20\/who-is-funding-the-school-board-recall\/\"> Continue reading <span class=\"meta-nav\">&rarr; <\/span><\/a><\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":1,"featured_media":0,"comment_status":"open","ping_status":"open","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"footnotes":""},"categories":[1],"tags":[],"_links":{"self":[{"href":"http:\/\/occupysf.net\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/21156"}],"collection":[{"href":"http:\/\/occupysf.net\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"http:\/\/occupysf.net\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"http:\/\/occupysf.net\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/1"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"http:\/\/occupysf.net\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=21156"}],"version-history":[{"count":3,"href":"http:\/\/occupysf.net\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/21156\/revisions"}],"predecessor-version":[{"id":21161,"href":"http:\/\/occupysf.net\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/21156\/revisions\/21161"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"http:\/\/occupysf.net\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=21156"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"http:\/\/occupysf.net\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=21156"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"http:\/\/occupysf.net\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=21156"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}