{"id":21864,"date":"2022-03-28T12:00:23","date_gmt":"2022-03-28T19:00:23","guid":{"rendered":"http:\/\/occupysf.net\/?p=21864"},"modified":"2022-03-28T12:01:16","modified_gmt":"2022-03-28T19:01:16","slug":"rip-madeleine-albright-and-her-awful-awful-career","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"http:\/\/occupysf.net\/index.php\/2022\/03\/28\/rip-madeleine-albright-and-her-awful-awful-career\/","title":{"rendered":"RIP Madeleine Albright and Her Awful, Awful Career"},"content":{"rendered":"\n<p>From setting the stage for the Iraq War to acting as a brand ambassador for a pyramid scheme, Clinton\u2019s secretary of state did it all.<\/p>\n\n\n\n\n\n<p><a href=\"https:\/\/theintercept.com\/staff\/jonschwarz\/\">Jon Schwarz<\/a>  March 25 2022, 11:02&nbsp;a.m.  (TheIntercept.com)<\/p>\n\n\n\n\n\n<p><em>Secretary of State Madeleine Albright holds a briefing on Israel in Washington, D.C., on Jan. 23, 1998.  Photo: Diana Walker\/Liaison via Getty Images<\/em><\/p>\n\n\n\n<p>TODAY, MADELEINE ALBRIGHT&nbsp;is remembered by few outside the U.S. elite.<\/p>\n\n\n\n<p>But Albright, who died Wednesday at the age of 84, was a leading figure in \u201cliberal internationalism,\u201d a foreign policy school associated with President Woodrow Wilson and his dream of \u201cmaking the world safe for democracy.\u201d She played a central role in America\u2019s foreign policy in the 1990s \u2014 first as a United Nations ambassador and then as secretary of state&nbsp;under&nbsp;President Bill Clinton. That period of history, and its consequences for&nbsp;the war on terror, can\u2019t be understood without understanding her actions.<\/p>\n\n\n\n<p>In particular, Albright spearheaded Clinton\u2019s disastrous stance toward Iraq. Albright\u2019s approach was both vicious in its own right and helped lay the foundation for the 2003 Iraq War.<\/p>\n\n\n\n<figure><iframe src=\"https:\/\/o.prod.theintercept.com\/checkout\/template\/cacheableShow?aid=hsZyoAWmIE&amp;templateId=OTEXERHVRCE9&amp;templateVariantId=OTVEIU52VT7IF&amp;offerId=fakeOfferId&amp;experienceId=EX3LBE28N473&amp;iframeId=offer_d95877cf7d9b23ea09ec-0&amp;displayMode=inline&amp;pianoIdUrl=https%3A%2F%2Fid.tinypass.com%2Fid%2F&amp;widget=template&amp;url=https%3A%2F%2Ftheintercept.com\"><\/iframe><\/figure>\n\n\n\n<p>It was in her role as U.N. ambassador in 1996 that Albright uttered the most infamous words of her career, in an appearance on \u201c60 Minutes.\u201d<\/p>\n\n\n\n<p>The show\u2019s correspondent Lesley Stahl asked Albright about the effect that U.N. sanctions&nbsp;were having&nbsp;on Iraqi society, saying, \u201cWe have heard that a half-million children have died. I mean, that\u2019s more children than died in Hiroshima. And, you know, is the price worth it?\u201d<\/p>\n\n\n\n<p>Albright responded with chilling equanimity: \u201cI think this is a very hard choice, but the price \u2014 we think the price is worth it.\u201d<\/p>\n\n\n\n<figure><iframe allowfullscreen=\"true\" class=\"\" src=\"https:\/\/platform.twitter.com\/embed\/Tweet.html?creatorScreenName=theintercept&amp;dnt=false&amp;embedId=twitter-widget-0&amp;features=eyJ0ZndfZXhwZXJpbWVudHNfY29va2llX2V4cGlyYXRpb24iOnsiYnVja2V0IjoxMjA5NjAwLCJ2ZXJzaW9uIjpudWxsfSwidGZ3X2hvcml6b25fdHdlZXRfZW1iZWRfOTU1NSI6eyJidWNrZXQiOiJodGUiLCJ2ZXJzaW9uIjpudWxsfSwidGZ3X3NrZWxldG9uX2xvYWRpbmdfMTMzOTgiOnsiYnVja2V0IjoiY3RhIiwidmVyc2lvbiI6bnVsbH0sInRmd19zcGFjZV9jYXJkIjp7ImJ1Y2tldCI6Im9mZiIsInZlcnNpb24iOm51bGx9fQ%3D%3D&amp;frame=false&amp;hideCard=false&amp;hideThread=false&amp;id=1506757975272214542&amp;lang=en&amp;origin=https%3A%2F%2Ftheintercept.com%2F2022%2F03%2F25%2Fmadeleine-albright-dead-iraq-war-herbalife%2F&amp;sessionId=11540c1b8e96fce8a54ffbdd17610d3c958f8b1c&amp;siteScreenName=theintercept&amp;theme=light&amp;widgetsVersion=2582c61%3A1645036219416&amp;width=500px\"><\/iframe><\/figure>\n\n\n\n<p>Out of context, this looks horrendous. In historical context, it\u2019s more complicated yet just as bad.<\/p>\n\n\n\n<p>After Iraq\u2019s invasion of Kuwait in August 1990, the U.N. instituted a punishing sanctions regime on the country. Iraq was pushed out of Kuwait during the Gulf War the next year. U.N. Security Council Resolution 687 then mandated that Iraq declare and accept the destruction of all aspects of its biological, chemical, and nuclear weapons programs. Once it did, the resolution&nbsp;stated that sanctions \u201cshall have no further force or effect.\u201d<\/p>\n\n\n\n<p>A small U.N. survey in 1995 found a giant spike in the mortality rate of young Iraqi children following the Gulf War, one that implied over 500,000 extra deaths. It was this to which Stahl was certainly referring. A 1999 UNICEF report found similar results.<\/p>\n\n\n\n<p>These shocking numbers were widely publicized, not least by the Iraqi government. However, a&nbsp;<a href=\"https:\/\/gh.bmj.com\/content\/bmjgh\/2\/2\/e000311.full.pdf\" target=\"_blank\" rel=\"noreferrer noopener\">2017 article<\/a>&nbsp;in the prestigious medical journal The BMJ makes a strong case, based on multiple surveys conducted after the U.S.-led 2003 invasion of Iraq, that the 1990s spike in child mortality rates did not actuallyoccur. The article calls these claims \u201ca spectacular lie,\u201d based on the assumption that they involved conscious deceit on the part of Iraqi staff who participated in the 1990s surveys.Thus the premise of Stahl\u2019s question was inaccurate, though Stahl would have had no way of knowing that.<\/p>\n\n\n\n<p>That\u2019s not the whole story, however. As The BMJ\u2019s article illustrates, the child mortality rate in Middle Eastern countries such as Jordan, Iran, Turkey, and Saudi Arabia fell precipitously from 1970 onward. In Iraq, it also fell but then plateaued, especially after 1990. The rate in Iraq is now, the article explains, \u201croughly twice that of the other countries.\u201d<\/p>\n\n\n\n<p>The complicated reality, then, is that the sanctions did have a brutal impact on Iraqi society; anyone familiar with the reality of 1990s Iraq knows it could hardly have been otherwise. The sanctions almost certainly did cause many children to die who would otherwise have lived \u2014&nbsp;though probably due not to a large, sustained increase in the child mortality rate but rather the fact that the rate did not continue to decline.<\/p>\n\n\n\n<p>So Albright can certainly be indicted for her depraved indifference to the effect of U.S. policies on Iraqi children, even if Stahl got the magnitude wrong. (Albright did later apologize for her words, in a way that&nbsp;<a href=\"https:\/\/www.fff.org\/explore-freedom\/article\/albright-apologizes\/\">made it clear<\/a>&nbsp;she was sorry she\u2019d accidentally revealed her sincere perspective.) But what\u2019s even worse is the nature of what Albright believed was \u201cworth it.\u201d<\/p>\n\n\n\n<p>We now know for certain that Iraq did comply with its disarmament obligations under Resolution 687 \u2014 arguably by the end of 1991 and definitely by 1995. Yet while in Albright\u2019s book \u201cMadam Secretary\u201d she declared that \u201cSaddam Hussein could have prevented any child from suffering simply by meeting his obligations,\u201d the sanctions were never lifted.Albright can certainly be indicted for her depraved indifference to the effect of U.S. policies on Iraqi children.&nbsp;But what\u2019s worse is the nature of what Albright believed was \u201cworth it.\u201d<\/p>\n\n\n\n<p>In retrospect, it\u2019s clear why. As soon as Resolution 687 was passed, then-President George H.W. Bush explained that the sanctions should never be removed \u2014 whatever the text of the resolution \u2014 \u201cas long as Saddam Hussein is in power.\u201d As Clinton came into office, he said there would be no difference between his policy and that of Bush. Albright herself&nbsp;<a href=\"https:\/\/awpc.cattcenter.iastate.edu\/2017\/03\/21\/policy-speech-on-iraq-march-26-1997\/\">said<\/a>, soon after she became secretary of state in 1997, that \u201cwe do not agree with the nations who argue that if Iraq complies with its obligations concerning weapons of mass destruction, sanctions should be lifted\u201d and that what would be required was Saddam\u2019s removal.<\/p>\n\n\n\n<p>The purpose of the sanctions, then, was indeed to punish Iraqi society. But from the U.S. perspective, the goal was not to induce Iraq to disarm but to encourage the Iraqi military to overthrow Saddam. This was&nbsp;<a href=\"https:\/\/www.nytimes.com\/1991\/07\/07\/weekinreview\/the-world-a-rising-sense-that-iraq-s-hussein-must-go.html\">described<\/a>&nbsp;by New York Times columnist Thomas Friedman as \u201cthe best of all worlds: an iron-fisted Iraqi junta without Saddam Hussein.\u201d<\/p>\n\n\n\n<p>Accepting a lot of dead children as an acceptable price for this ambition is grim indeed, but that was Albright.<\/p>\n\n\n\n<p>ALBRIGHT\u2019S VOCIFEROUS SUPPORT&nbsp;for violence and regime change as U.S. policy helped set the stage for the war that took place a few years after she departed the government.<\/p>\n\n\n\n<p>In 1993, Albright herself conducted a presentation at the U.N. Security Council that was uncannily similar to that of future Secretary of State Colin Powell&nbsp;10 years later. In it, with various visual aids, she&nbsp;<a href=\"https:\/\/www.nytimes.com\/1993\/06\/28\/world\/raid-baghdad-united-nations-us-presents-evidence-un-justifying-its-missile.html\">adamantly condemned<\/a>&nbsp;Iraq for purportedly trying to assassinate the elder Bush when he visited Kuwait after leaving office. Just like Powell\u2019s, Albright\u2019s case was used to justify the killing of Iraqis (though on a much smaller scale). Just like Powell\u2019s evidence, Albright\u2019s was&nbsp;<a href=\"https:\/\/www.baltimoresun.com\/news\/bs-xpm-2003-02-23-0302230456-story.html\">fabricated<\/a>. And just as we learned after the invasion of Iraq that it had no weapons of mass destruction, we learned that it&nbsp;<a href=\"https:\/\/www.newsweek.com\/saddams-files-84273\">had not<\/a>&nbsp;attempted to kill Bush.Albright\u2019s rhetoric on Iraq matched the childish dishonesty of the neoconservatives in the next administration.<\/p>\n\n\n\n<p>This was not&nbsp;the only way that Albright foreshadowed the coming George W. Bush administration deceit. Hugh Shelton, chair of the Joints Chiefs of Staff&nbsp;in the late 1990s,&nbsp;<a href=\"https:\/\/books.google.com\/books?id=8H47MngWhq0C&amp;lpg=PA2&amp;ots=2jYse3xfQx&amp;dq=%22what%20we%20really%20need%20in%20order%20to%20go%20in%20and%20take%20out%20Saddam%20is%20a%20precipitous%20event%22&amp;pg=PA2#v=onepage&amp;q=%22what%20we%20really%20need%20in%20order%20to%20go%20in%20and%20take%20out%20Saddam%20is%20a%20precipitous%20event%22&amp;f=false\">has described<\/a>&nbsp;a 1997 exchange with a Cabinet member who is&nbsp;<a href=\"https:\/\/www.cato.org\/commentary\/madeleine-albright-back-she-still-living-past\">widely<\/a><a href=\"https:\/\/www.cato.org\/commentary\/madeleine-albright-back-she-still-living-past\">&nbsp;assumed<\/a>&nbsp;in Washington&nbsp;<a href=\"https:\/\/www.huffpost.com\/entry\/hugh-shelton-book-clinton-iraq-war-albright_n_764403\">to be Albright<\/a>. (Shelton names several Cabinet members who were present, then immediately rules out the non-Albright ones.) This official, Shelton claims, said to him: \u201cHugh, I know I shouldn\u2019t even be asking you this, but what we really need in order to go in and take out Saddam is a precipitous event \u2014 something that would make us look good in the eyes of the world. Could you have one of our U-2s fly low enough \u2014 and slow enough \u2014 so as to guarantee that Saddam could shoot it down?\u201d According to Shelton, he was infuriated and informed this Cabinet member that he\u2019d be happy to set this up as soon as they learned how to fly a U-2 themselves.<\/p>\n\n\n\n<p>Albright\u2019s rhetoric on Iraq also matched the childish dishonesty of the neoconservatives in the next administration. In 1998 she was asked at a town hall at the Ohio State&nbsp;University why the U.S. was attacking Iraq while arming allied countries like Indonesia that had committed comparable crimes. She responded, \u201cI really am surprised that people feel it is necessary to defend the rights of Saddam Hussein.\u201d Albright then told the crowd that \u201cas a former professor, I would be delighted to spend 50 minutes with you describing exactly what we are doing on those subjects\u201d \u2014 in other words, there was an obvious answer, but she just didn\u2019t have time to go into it at the moment. Amusingly, this tack was later taken by&nbsp;Saddam himself when he was tried for genocide. Asked for an explanation of his actions, he said: \u201cThat would require volumes of books.\u201d<\/p>\n\n\n\n<figure><iframe loading=\"lazy\" allowfullscreen=\"1\" width=\"100%\" height=\"100%\" src=\"https:\/\/www.youtube.com\/embed\/fcLaKGNDtzo?autoplay=0&amp;rel=0&amp;enablejsapi=1&amp;origin=https%3A%2F%2Ftheintercept.com&amp;widgetid=1\"><\/iframe><\/figure>\n\n\n\n<p>Finally, Albright\u2019s arrogance was similar to that of George W. Bush and company. In 1998 she&nbsp;<a href=\"https:\/\/1997-2001.state.gov\/statements\/1998\/980219a.html\">expounded<\/a>&nbsp;on America\u2019s right to bomb Iraq, proclaiming, \u201cIf we have to use force, it is because we are America; we are the indispensable nation. We stand tall and we see further than other countries into the future.\u201d This was a bizarrely precise embodiment of what John Adams&nbsp;<a href=\"https:\/\/founders.archives.gov\/documents\/Jefferson\/03-09-02-0285\">once wrote<\/a>&nbsp;to Thomas Jefferson about the corruptions of power: \u201cPower always thinks it has a great Soul, and vast Views, beyond the Comprehension of the Weak.\u201d<\/p>\n\n\n\n<p>AND WHILE ALBRIGHT\u2019S&nbsp;actions on Iraq were her most significant, they were only part of&nbsp;her&nbsp;ugly machinations that illustrated the hollowness of her liberal internationalism.<\/p>\n\n\n\n<p>In August 1996, Israel bombed a U.N. peacekeeping compound in Qana, a village in Lebanon, killing 106 civilians. The outrage in the Arab world was enormous, so much so that the attack was cited in Osama bin Laden\u2019s \u201cDeclaration of War\u201d later the same year. A U.N. investigation soon&nbsp;<a href=\"https:\/\/web.archive.org\/web\/20191120170106\/http:\/www.bintjbeil.com\/E\/un\/s1996337.html\">found<\/a>&nbsp;that it was \u201cunlikely that the shelling of the United Nations compound was the result of technical and\/or procedural errors.\u201d<\/p>\n\n\n\n<p>Albright already felt animus toward then-U.N. Secretary-General Boutros Boutros-Ghali&nbsp;for the fact that the&nbsp;international body did not always bend completely to the will of the U.S. But this was&nbsp;<a href=\"https:\/\/www.tni.org\/es\/node\/10751\">the final straw<\/a>. She and others formed what National Security Council official Richard Clarke called a \u201csecret plan,\u201d&nbsp;<a href=\"https:\/\/www.google.com\/books\/edition\/Against_All_Enemies\/PvrvHJyxfnwC?hl=en&amp;gbpv=1&amp;dq=%22operation%20orient%20express%22%20%22against%20all%20enemies%22&amp;pg=PT140&amp;printsec=frontcover&amp;bsq=%22operation%20orient%20express%22%20%22against%20all%20enemies%22\">dubbed<\/a>&nbsp;\u201cOperation Orient Express,\u201d to oust Boutros-Ghali after his first term expired. That November the U.N. Security Council voted 14-1 to reappoint him. The sole \u201cno\u201d vote was cast by Albright for the U.S. \u2014 and since America holds a veto as a permanent member of the Security Council, Boutros-Ghali was gone. The New York Times&nbsp;<a href=\"https:\/\/www.nytimes.com\/1996\/12\/05\/world\/un-leader-halts-bid-for-new-term-but-does-not-quit.html\">reported<\/a>&nbsp;that an \u201cAmerican official remarked before the veto that hostility toward the United States had never been so palpable, as diplomats from around the world watched the Clinton Administration attack Mr. Boutros-Ghali\u2019s record with dwindling credibility.\u201d On the other hand, Clarke&nbsp;<a href=\"https:\/\/www.google.com\/books\/edition\/Against_All_Enemies\/PvrvHJyxfnwC?hl=en&amp;gbpv=1&amp;bsq=%22the%20entire%20operation%22\">said in&nbsp;<\/a><a href=\"https:\/\/www.google.com\/books\/edition\/Against_All_Enemies\/PvrvHJyxfnwC?hl=en&amp;gbpv=1&amp;bsq=%22the%20entire%20operation%22\">his book<\/a>&nbsp;\u201cAgainst All Enemies,\u201d&nbsp;the \u201centire operation had strengthened Albright\u2019s hand in the competition to be Secretary of State in the second Clinton administration.\u201d<\/p>\n\n\n\n\n\n<p><em>Secretary of State Madeleine Albright and President Bill Clinton during NATO\u2019s 50th anniversary summit on March 31, 1999.  Photo: Dirck Halstead\/Getty Images<\/em><\/p>\n\n\n\n<p>Then there was the 1999 NATO bombing of Serbia,&nbsp;<a href=\"https:\/\/www.washingtonpost.com\/wp-srv\/inatl\/longterm\/balkans\/stories\/albright040799.htm\">known in some circles<\/a>&nbsp;as \u201cAlbright\u2019s war.\u201d In retrospect, it seems clear that Albright and others in the Clinton administration did not want any peaceful settlement of the specific issues regarding Kosovo. Rather, they wished to punish Serbian President Slobodan Milo\u0161evi\u0107&nbsp;for his grisly actions during the Bosnian War earlier in the decade. At the time, analyst William Hartung&nbsp;<a href=\"https:\/\/www.thenation.com\/article\/archive\/preventive-diplomacy\/\">wrote<\/a>&nbsp;that the Serbia bombing would help \u201cspark a sort of postmodern cold war, in which Russia seeks ways to act against US interests to assert its independence on the world stage and to assuage nationalist resentments at home.\u201d<\/p>\n\n\n\n<p>After leaving office, Albright followed the standard path of self-enrichment for figures with her pedigree. She founded the Albright Stonebridge Group, a \u201cglobal strategic advisory and commercial diplomacy firm,\u201d and its partner firm, Albright Capital. Washington is full of such enterprises, which allow former public officials to leverage the connections they made while espousing democracy and human rights for less rosy business ends. At one point in 2012, one of Albright\u2019s companies&nbsp;<a href=\"https:\/\/www.nytimes.com\/2012\/12\/12\/world\/europe\/americans-who-helped-free-kosovo-return-as-entrepreneurs.html\">was in the running<\/a>&nbsp;to buy the state telecommunication firm of Kosovo, a country that exists in large part thanks to her. Among Albright Stonebridge\u2019s many clients&nbsp;<a href=\"https:\/\/theintercept.com\/2021\/03\/24\/covid-vaccine-stocks-biden-conflict\/\">is Pfizer<\/a>; during the last year of her life, Albright was&nbsp;<a href=\"https:\/\/www.nbr.org\/wp-content\/uploads\/pdfs\/events\/ip-commission-event-secretary-albright-remarks-032921.pdf\">doggedly urging<\/a>&nbsp;the Biden administration during the midst of the coronavirus&nbsp;pandemic to protect American intellectual property.<\/p>\n\n\n\n<p>But even that is not the whole Madeleine Albright story. Perhaps the most edifying act in Albright\u2019s life has been almost completely forgotten, and has been mentioned in none of the glowing mainstream Albright obituaries: Albright was a longtime brand ambassador for Herbalife Nutrition, a&nbsp;dietary supplement company. According to the&nbsp;<a href=\"https:\/\/nypost.com\/2014\/04\/17\/ex-secretary-of-state-albright-sweats-herbalife-ties\/\">New York Post<\/a>, she was paid $10 million for these efforts over six years. Below she can be seen enthusing about Herbalife in an infomercial, saying, \u201cYou have a great product. That makes all the difference. I\u2019m a product of the product!\u201d<\/p>\n\n\n\n<p>In a 2016 settlement with the Federal Trade Commission, Herbalife&nbsp;<a href=\"https:\/\/www.ftc.gov\/news-events\/news\/press-releases\/2016\/07\/herbalife-will-restructure-its-multi-level-marketing-operations-pay-200-million-consumer-redress\">agreed<\/a>&nbsp;to pay $200 million in response to charges that it had \u201cdeceived consumers\u201d into participating as the dupes in a pyramid scheme. No wonder Herbalife wanted Albright \u2014 there were few better at drawing marks into the great multilevel marketing scam that is U.S. foreign policy.<\/p>\n\n\n\n<figure><iframe loading=\"lazy\" allowfullscreen=\"1\" width=\"100%\" height=\"100%\" src=\"https:\/\/www.youtube.com\/embed\/9SIwtamrPGY?autoplay=0&amp;rel=0&amp;enablejsapi=1&amp;origin=https%3A%2F%2Ftheintercept.com&amp;widgetid=3\"><\/iframe><\/figure>\n\n\n\n<h3 class=\"wp-block-heading\">CONTACT THE AUTHOR:<\/h3>\n\n\n\n<p><a href=\"https:\/\/theintercept.com\/staff\/jonschwarz\/\">Jon Schwarz<\/a><a href=\"mailto:jon.schwarz@theintercept.com\">jon.schwarz@\u200btheintercept.com<\/a><a target=\"_blank\" href=\"https:\/\/twitter.com\/@Schwarz\" rel=\"noreferrer noopener\">@Schwarz<\/a><\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"<p>From setting the stage for the Iraq War to acting as a brand ambassador for a pyramid scheme, Clinton\u2019s secretary of state did it all. Jon Schwarz March 25 2022, 11:02&nbsp;a.m. (TheIntercept.com) Secretary of State Madeleine Albright holds a briefing on Israel in Washington, D.C., on Jan. 23, 1998. Photo:&#8230; <a class=\"continue-reading-link\" href=\"http:\/\/occupysf.net\/index.php\/2022\/03\/28\/rip-madeleine-albright-and-her-awful-awful-career\/\"> Continue reading <span class=\"meta-nav\">&rarr; <\/span><\/a><\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":1,"featured_media":0,"comment_status":"open","ping_status":"open","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"footnotes":""},"categories":[1],"tags":[],"_links":{"self":[{"href":"http:\/\/occupysf.net\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/21864"}],"collection":[{"href":"http:\/\/occupysf.net\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"http:\/\/occupysf.net\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"http:\/\/occupysf.net\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/1"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"http:\/\/occupysf.net\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=21864"}],"version-history":[{"count":2,"href":"http:\/\/occupysf.net\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/21864\/revisions"}],"predecessor-version":[{"id":21866,"href":"http:\/\/occupysf.net\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/21864\/revisions\/21866"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"http:\/\/occupysf.net\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=21864"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"http:\/\/occupysf.net\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=21864"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"http:\/\/occupysf.net\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=21864"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}