{"id":8559,"date":"2018-05-07T10:51:53","date_gmt":"2018-05-07T17:51:53","guid":{"rendered":"http:\/\/occupysf.net\/?p=8559"},"modified":"2018-05-07T10:52:20","modified_gmt":"2018-05-07T17:52:20","slug":"8559","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"http:\/\/occupysf.net\/index.php\/2018\/05\/07\/8559\/","title":{"rendered":"Berniecrats push parcel tax for city-owned, city-run affordable housing"},"content":{"rendered":"
\n

\"\"<\/p>\n

Benjamin Becker, left, and Laksh Bhasin, co-authors of the San Francisco Community Housing Act, are seen at South Park in the South of Market neighborhood on Friday. (Kevin N. Hume\/S.F. Examiner)<\/em><\/p>\n

By\u00a0Joe Fitzgerald Rodriguez<\/a>\u00a0on May 6, 2018 (SFExaminer.com)<\/p>\n

Progressives are finally putting their ideas where their mouths are.<\/p>\n

A new local ballot measure crafted by the Berniecrats, a political club, would levy a parcel tax to create community-based affordable housing in San Francisco. And in a nod to European models, The City would own and operate that housing.<\/p>\n

\u201cIt\u2019s very ambitious and very creative,\u201d said Peter Cohen, co-director of the Council of Community and Housing Organizations. \u201cIt\u2019s not just another source of funding. It\u2019s not nibbling around the edges. It\u2019s presenting a complete rethinking of our affordable housing system.\u201d<\/p>\n

It\u2019s also an answer to center-left, moderate Democrats, who often promote a \u201cbuild, build, build\u201d mantra with little affordable housing attached. The usual song and dance that takes place in San Francisco politics goes as such: Moderates call for new development to bring down rental prices by increasing housing supply; progressives say that development may lead to displacement of nearby low-income communities; the housing is blocked; moderates (fairly) ask, \u201cOK, so what\u2019s your solution?\u201d<\/p>\n

Now, the Berniecrats are finally proposing one.<\/p>\n

The group filed at City Hall to run the initiative in November, but first they\u2019ll need to start collecting signatures, with a deadline of July 9.<\/p>\n

\u201cIt\u2019s a really bridge building measure for housing in San Francisco because it doesn\u2019t set a YIMBY NIMBY, doesn\u2019t fall into that stupid dichotomy,\u201d said Benjamin Becker, co-chair of the Berniecrats. \u201cIt focuses on what is the problem, and how do we solve it.\u201d<\/p>\n

The San Francisco Community Housing Act, as its called, would create a 43 cents-per-square-foot parcel tax in San Francisco that would raise more than $210 million per year. The Berniecrats claim buildings like Salesforce Tower would pay close to $600,000 annually under the tax. That cash would go toward development within 0.4 miles of transit like BART, Caltrain and Muni stations, an echo of state Sen. Scott Wiener\u2019s senate bill 827 \u2014 only with affordable housing available to low- and moderate-income tenants.<\/p>\n

The Berniecrats are also very fired up about the measure\u2019s tenant-voted community council, which would oversee tenant well-being. Childcare and other neighbor-friendly amenities would exist onsite.
\n\u201cWe want to think about what communities need to thrive,\u201d said Laksh Bhasin, a member of the Berniecrats.<\/p>\n

Now, though this all sounds well and good, I\u2019m told the measure has an uphill battle. Insiders with knowledge of housing policy pointed to a provision in the community housing act that bars landlords from passing down the costs of the tax to tenants, which my sources (rightfully) said would likely raise the ire of the Association of Realtors and Apartment Association, prominent landlord-friendly groups.<\/p>\n

But pro-tenant organizations may feel the squeeze, too.<\/p>\n

Gen Fujoika, policy director at the Chinatown Community Development Center, said public housing they operate would likely be charged the parcel tax as well, as no exemptions exist in the community housing act for nonprofit public housing. CCDC houses families and seniors in Chinatown and across The City.<\/p>\n

\u201cIt\u2019s a potential big hit,\u201d Fujioka said. \u201cWe haven\u2019t quantified it yet, but clearly for some of our larger buildings its hundreds of thousands of dollars of funding that goes to affordable housing.\u201d<\/p>\n

The only exemption in the tax that I could find was for below-median income homeowners. That\u2019s also a hitch, some insiders said, because other groups who will end up paying the parcel tax may become the Berniecrats\u2019 fiercest opposition.<\/p>\n

\u201cWe only did a first pass at it, but there was so much in it that was troubling,\u201d Fujioka said. \u201cWe appreciate the intention, but man.\u201d<\/p>\n

Hey, at least they\u2019re trying.<\/p>\n

On Guard prints the news and raises hell each week. Email Fitz at\u00a0<\/i>joe@sfexaminer.com<\/a><\/i>, follow him on Twitter and Instagram @FitztheReporter, and Facebook at\u00a0facebook.com\/FitztheReporter<\/a>.<\/i><\/p>\n<\/div>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"

Benjamin Becker, left, and Laksh Bhasin, co-authors of the San Francisco Community Housing Act, are seen at South Park in the South of Market neighborhood on Friday. (Kevin N. Hume\/S.F. Examiner) By\u00a0Joe Fitzgerald Rodriguez\u00a0on May 6, 2018 (SFExaminer.com) Progressives are finally putting their ideas where their mouths are. A new… Continue reading → <\/span><\/a><\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":1,"featured_media":0,"comment_status":"open","ping_status":"open","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"footnotes":""},"categories":[1],"tags":[],"_links":{"self":[{"href":"http:\/\/occupysf.net\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/8559"}],"collection":[{"href":"http:\/\/occupysf.net\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"http:\/\/occupysf.net\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"http:\/\/occupysf.net\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/1"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"http:\/\/occupysf.net\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=8559"}],"version-history":[{"count":2,"href":"http:\/\/occupysf.net\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/8559\/revisions"}],"predecessor-version":[{"id":8561,"href":"http:\/\/occupysf.net\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/8559\/revisions\/8561"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"http:\/\/occupysf.net\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=8559"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"http:\/\/occupysf.net\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=8559"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"http:\/\/occupysf.net\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=8559"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}