“As an adjudicated insurrectionist, Trump is an illegitimate president according to Section 3 of the 14th Amendment, and therefore every official act as president will be illegitimate.”
–Mike Zonta, co-editor of OccupySF.net
The 14th Amendment states: “No person shall be a Senator or Representative in Congress, or elector of President and Vice President, or hold any office, civil or military, under the United States, or under any state, who, having previously taken an oath, as a member of Congress, or as an officer of the United States, or as a member of any state legislature, or as an executive or judicial officer of any state, to support the Constitution of the United States, shall have engaged in insurrection or rebellion against the same, or given aid or comfort to the enemies thereof. But Congress may, by a vote of two-thirds of each House, remove such disability.”
Call your Congressperson and your U.S. Senators at (202) 224-3121
Then, call your US senators and tell them to oppose legislation that would entrench Trump-Netanyahu military partnership. Last week, the House narrowly passed the National Defense Authorization Act (NDAA) with provisions that would further interweave the US and the Israeli militaries through weapons development and intelligence sharing. However, Democrats were nearly united in opposition — proof that we do not have to rubber-stamp Trump’s partnership with Netanyahu. Our senators must reject these provisions in the NDAA, but they need to hear from their constituents. For further reading, check out today’s Substack post for more history, context, and actions you can take.
While your Members of Congress are home for August recess, use our Indivisible resources to schedule an in-district visit or event. If you have Republican Members of Congress, this is a great opportunity to raise your voice in opposition to their attempts to pass voter suppression legislation, pour billions into Trump’s illegal war, and hand more money over to ICE and CBP. If you have Democratic Members of Congress, urge them to refuse to give a single inch to Trump’s authoritarian takeover and illegal and unconstitutional power grabs. Read on for more about the August recess and what our MoCs left unaddressed until September.
Troy Jackson, Democratic nominee for Maine Senate, greets delegates after winning the vote at the Maine Democrats Senate Nominating Convention in Bangor, Maine, on July 25, 2026.
(Photo by Tom Williams/CQ-Roll Call, Inc. via Getty Images)
“People across Maine and the country are ready to come together and finish the job” of defeating Susan Collins, said the Democratic candidate.
With Maine Republican Sen. Susan Collins backed by nearly 100 billionaires, Democratic Senate candidate Troy Jackson has been open about the fact that beating Collins in November will be an uphill battle—but he said Monday that $2 million that’s poured in from small donors in recent days gave him hope about the “extraordinary grassroots momentum” behind his campaign.
Jackson officially became the Democratic nominee on Saturday at the party’s convention—planned in a matter of weeks after former nominee Graham Platner dropped out due to rape allegations—with Democrats across the state apparently eager to throw their support behind a candidate who backs the same progressive policies that his predecessor did.
Since securing the nomination, said Jackson’s campaign Monday, he has raised $2 million from more than 58,000 donors, including 30,000 new contributors.
“I’m humbled beyond words by the tens of thousands of people who have stepped up to become part of this campaign,” said Jackson in a statement. “Every contribution—whether it was $5, $20, or more—is a vote of confidence in the working-class movement we’re building together.”
Without a billionaire-backed super political action committee (PAC) like the one set up by Collins’ allies, Pine Tree Results—which is planning to spend $20 million on attack ads against Jackson this fall, according to The New York Times, the fifth-generation logger and former state Senate president is relying on donations that must be $3,500 or smaller per donor.
Collins’ campaign and her allies have reserved about $60 million in air time for ads through the fall, according to AdImpact, while the Democrats have allocated about $24 million for ads in Maine.
Jackson told The New York Times Monday that he will likely need to raise at least $40 million-$50 million to beat Collins due to her fundraising advantage, but emphasized that he believes he is in a good position to win voters over based on the issues they’ll be voting on in November.
“I’m going to definitely bust my ass in these next four months to make up the difference,” Jackson said regarding the fundraising challenge. “And in the end, I think I’m on the right side of the issues compared to Susan Collins. So I feel very good about the race.”
“In the end, I think I’m on the right side of the issues compared to Susan Collins. So I feel very good about the race.”
He has condemned Collins, the chair of the powerful Senate Appropriations Committee, in recent weeks for backing President Donald Trump’s agenda and for her vote to fund ICE earlier this year—expressing anger over the vote after a federal agent fatally shot a young father in Biddeford, Maine earlier this month.
A poll released by University of New Hampshire last week showed 49% of respondents backing Jackson, compared with 46% who supported Collins.
“Susan Collins has spent years voting with Donald Trump 96% of the time, helping him stack the Supreme Court to overturn Roe v. Wade and supporting an agenda that guts healthcare while handing more power to billionaires and corporations,” said Jackson Monday. “Defeating her won’t be easy, and we’ll need everyone in this fight.”
The early fundraising numbers, said Jackson, prove “that people across Maine and the country are ready to come together and finish the job.”
Our work is licensed under Creative Commons (CC BY-NC-ND 3.0). Feel free to republish and share widely.
The Planning Commission has been down to four members, the minimum to hold a meeting, for more than a month now, after the terms of three members appointed by the Board of Supes ended. It’s taken Board President Rafael Mandelman a while to make his nominations to fill those slots.
Now we know the three names, and two of them will come before the full board Tuesday/28.
Since the voters changed the City Charter in 2002 to split appointments between the mayor and the board, the supes appointees have almost always been the most independent, progressive—and qualified. Kathrin Moore, an architect with a deep understanding of local planning issues, served for 20 years as a board appointee, often challenging developers (and planning directors).
Board President Rafael Mandelman named one bad, and two interesting Planning Commission members
On many key issues, particularly housing, critical votes came down 4-3, with the board-nominated commissioners siding with the community and the mayor’s folks siding with the developers.
Mandelman is much more of a moderate centrist on planning issues than was Aaron Peskin, who served as board president for several terms and made some excellent appointments. So we’ve all been waiting to see who was on the list.
He announced his nominees, which still need full board approval, July 22: Malea Chavez, Elizabeth Macdonald, and Joel Koppel.
Chavez is chief program officer at Mission Economic Development Agency, and a former executive director of the Women’s Building and deputy director of the Homeless Pre-Natal Program. Macdonald is a planning professor at UC Berkeley who mostly has worked on urban design.
Koppel, a career electrician and leader in IBEW Local 6, already served two terms on the commission, where he was mostly a bad vote under the late Mayor Ed Lee and former Mayor London Breed.
At the Rules Committee today, Koppel said he is a strong supporter of the mayor’s upzoning plan, and said nothing about affordability. He will join the mayor’s four members as a supporter of just about every developer who shows up with just about any plan. So at best, the votes will be 5-2.
The committee couldn’t consider Chavez, since her paperwork wasn’t complete. That will wait until after the August recess.
Macdonald presented an interesting case. She said she supported the upzoning plan, and nobody on the committee asked anything about the impact of density on affordability. But she actually mentioned climate change, and said that planning decisions—including the placement of new housing—need to consider sea level rise. Sup. Stephen Sherill pushed her on whether she would demand urban design changes that could make housing more expensive, and she said “good design doesn’t have to be more expensive.”
Sherrill, one of the most pro-development board members who says the free market will solve most of the city’s problems, then came out in support of her.
The Yimbys did not. Three speakers from SF Yimby said they weren’t convinced she was sufficiently supportive of market-rate housing, and asked for her nomination to be continued.
The Sierra Club, which has been taken over by Yimbys, also declined to support her.
I sent Macdonald an email asking one question:
Do you agree with Profs. Condon and Storper that allowing more market-rate housing will not help with the affordability crisis? If you dispute their findings, esp. the new Storper study, can you explain why?
She did not respond.
The support of Sherrill means both nominees will likely be approved by the full board.
San Francisco for years has moved to limit parking in most new highrise housing development. The idea is that putting housing on transit lines, and limiting parking spaces, will encourage new residents to take public transportation.
That policy was put in place before Uber, Lyft, Waymo, Doordash, and Amazon started clogging the streets and giving people ways to increase vehicle traffic without personally owning a car—or using public transportation. But it’s still part of an effort, however feeble, to reduce private vehicle use.
Now, Sup. Matt Dorsey wants to scrap that concept for any building that is converted from commercial to residential use. A lot of older commercial buildings have large underground garages.
The Planning Commission, perhaps with two new members, will consider July 30 a proposal that would change to code to allow all existing parking to remain in place for conversions:
Parking maximums would not apply to any existing off-street parking that serves new residential uses under the Commercial to Residential Adaptive Reuse Program, as long as the parking is within or on the same lot as the existing structure.
The proposal would also eliminate floor-area ratios for housing conversions, and eliminate
active uses of the ground floor, transparency, and building design elements relative to the street.
I wonder how Macdonald, who has built a career promoting good urban design, will respond to this.
That hearing starts at noon.
48 Hills welcomes comments in the form of letters to the editor, which you can submit here. We also invite you to join the conversation on our Facebook, Twitter, and Instagram.
Tim Redmond has been a political and investigative reporter in San Francisco for more than 30 years. He spent much of that time as executive editor of the Bay Guardian. He is the founder of 48hills.
Glass Empires investigates the architects of constitutional rot. Free subscribers receive every article. Devoted readers who became patrons sponsored today’s work.
The Pentagon scheduled the National Guard’s Washington, D.C., crime-emergency deployment to end on January 20, 2029. Federal officials simultaneously committed taxpayers to a three-year apartment lease extending five months beyond that date, yet omitted that obligation from their public announcement. The deployment carries a projected price tag of roughly $2.5 billion.
Art credit: Winslow Homer, Searchlight on Harbor Entrance, Santiago de Cuba (1901). Homer directs a searchlight across the harbor to examine surveillance, military authority, and American power after the Spanish-American War. He confines visibility to a narrow beam, leaving most of the harbor dark and emphasizing occupation, uncertainty, and control.
Pentagon leaders extended the Washington, D.C., National Guard deployment through January 20, 2029. On June 22, contracting officers awarded Placemakr $292 million for as many as 2,000 apartments.
Federal officials waited 31 days to announce the agreement. Their July 23 release named the cost and apartment total but concealed a three-year term running five months past the deployment’s end date.
Steve Bannon urged Trump on a February podcast to invoke the Insurrection Act and call up the 82nd and 101st Airborne. Bannon wanted those soldiers stationed at polling places during the November 2026 midterms. Defense Secretary Pete Hegseth declined to say whether he would refuse such an order.
The Insurrection Act lets a president deploy federal troops inside the United States without a governor’s consent. Trump has already deployed Guard units in Washington, D.C.
Former NSA litigation counsel George Croner expects Trump to invoke the Insurrection Act. Congress gave presidents broad discretion under the statute and did not set an expiration date.
GSA and District Guard officials arranged the agreement. Bureau officials called the purchase the largest interagency lodging acquisition in National Guard history. Bureau officials say the apartments cost nearly 50 percent less than projected hotel rates and 27 percent less than standard GSA rates.
The reported financial savings fail to explain the three-year commitment. Contracting officers typically could have chosen a one-year base period with separate option years. Acquisition officials selected the longer term without explaining their decision. The government still may cancel the order for convenience, while Placemakr may recover only costs already incurred.
On January 28, 2026, Congressional Budget Office analysts told Senator Jeff Merkley that city deployments cost $93 million monthly. Analysts priced the District at $55 million monthly for more than 2,690 personnel. However, current costs exceed that estimate.
Analysts project $2.5 billion by the lease expiration. Taxpayers will spend $330 million from January through June 2026 and $1.98 billion during the remaining 36 months. CBO analysts priced lodging into that monthly rate. Officers awarded Placemakr the apartment contract five months afterward.
CBO analysts priced each Guard member at $607 daily, the highest rate among deployment cities. Niskanen researchers priced a Metropolitan Police officer at $384 daily. Taxpayers paid more and received fewer measurable results.
Independent investigations cannot continue at the rate of one -two upgrades per week for this level of work. Can you upgrade with a paid membership?
President Trump signed Executive Order 14333 on August 11, 2025, declaring a crime emergency in Washington. Trump claimed the capital was unsafe for federal employees and visitors.
Presidents command the District Guard without a governor’s consent. Section 12406 requires governors to approve state Guard federalization, but Congress placed the District in a separate legal category. Administration lawyers cited that distinction, and Judge Patricia Millett accepted their argument in her December stay.
Niskanen Center analysts reviewed police data behind the Trump administration’s claims of high crime levels. They found a 24 percent decline in opportunistic property crime, but there was no change in violent crime, although officials used violent crime to justify the deployment.
The researchers also mapped troop assignments. Commanders placed Guard members in commercial districts, transit centers, and tourist areas but sent none southeast of the Anacostia River, where residents reported the highest violent-crime levels. Senators Andy Kim and Gary Peters identified that disparity in a February report.
Roughly 5,000 Guard members now patrol the capital after Trump mobilized 800 in August 2025.
Officials described the mission as a temporary response to a crime emergency. Yet, in September 2025, Guard members told CNN they still lacked a clear purpose for the deployment. A Tennessee guardsman patrolled Chinatown from 4 p.m. until 4 a.m. A Louisiana member told his wife he did not understand the assignment.
Another Guard member said morale was “falling fast.” In January, a District guardsman called the mission “bungled and immoral” in Washingtonian. Each member spoke anonymously because they feared retaliation.
A gunman shot two Guard members near the White House on November 26, 2025. West Virginia National Guard Specialist Sarah Beckstrom, twenty, died the following day. Sergeant Andrew Wolfe of the same unit survived serious injuries. Trump then sent 500 additional soldiers into Washington.
D.C. Attorney General Brian Schwalb sued the administration on September 4, 2025. Schwalb cited the Home Rule Act and the Posse Comitatus Act. Schwalb wrote that “armed soldiers should not be policing American citizens on American soil.” Judge Jia Cobb granted a preliminary injunction on November 20, 2025. Cobb ruled that Trump lacked authority to deploy the Guard for crime control.
Three D.C. Circuit judges stayed that injunction on December 17. Judge Patricia Millett cited the District’s separate legal status. Six justices ruled on December 23, 2025, that Trump likely lacked authority to federalize Illinois Guard units. Seventh Circuit judges had written on October 16 that “political opposition is not rebellion.”
Congress wrote Section 12406 to route state federalization orders through governors. Officials send District orders directly to the D.C. Guard commanding general. The justices addressed Illinois alone. Guard units, therefore, will remain in the District.
The contract’s duration matters because governments often extend temporary military measures beyond their original justification. American officials called the August 2025 deployment temporary. Myanmar’s generals also promised only one year of emergency rule.
On February 1, 2021, acting president Myint Swe transferred all three government branches to armed forces commander Min Aung Hlaing. Hlaing promised elected civilian rule, extended emergency rule four times, and still commands Myanmar five years later.
The Tatmadaw justified the takeover with fraud claims about the November 2020 election. Election commission staff found insufficient evidence of decisive irregularities, and outside monitors agreed. Junta-appointed commissioners annulled the results in July 2021.
Myanmar held elections between December 2025 and January 2026. Officials banned the National League for Democracy and dozens of rival parties, then cancelled voting across rebel territory. The military’s proxy party won most contested seats. UN Special Rapporteur Tom Andrews urged foreign governments to reject the results.
Four key differences limit the comparison. Myanmar’s generals drafted the 2008 Constitution and wrote Articles 417 and 418. International IDEA scholars later found the emergency declaration unlawful under that charter. Myanmar’s generals command one unified army, while American governors command separate Guard units.
At the May 30, 2021, For God & Country Patriot Roundup in Dallas, a Marine asked Michael Flynn why Americans could not repeat Myanmar’s coup. Flynn replied that such an outcome “should happen” in America, and the audience applauded. Flynn denied that meaning on Telegram the next night, but PolitiFact reviewers confirmed the exchange on video.
Out-of-state Guard members serve under Title 32. Congress funds those deployments, while governors retain command. Judge Cobb explained the command arrangement in her November 2025 opinion. South Carolina Governor Henry McMaster wrote that he “can and will” recall his soldiers immediately during a hurricane.
Governors can recall troops for reasons beyond storms. Kentucky Governor Andy Beshear withdrew his sole Guard member after officials reassigned the soldier without permission.
All thirteen District Council members sent recall letters to Michigan Governor Gretchen Whitmer and U.S. Virgin Islands Governor Albert Bryan. Minnesota Governor Tim Walz recalled his troops later that month.
Two governors have recalled their troops, while every remaining governor retains the same power and can act.
Two Questions That Could End the Deployment
Residents of states with troops in Washington can ask their governor: “Will you recall our state’s National Guard members from the District of Columbia deployment?”
Readers can ask their representative and both senators: “Will you support legislation setting an end date for the District deployment?”
Keep every message brief, factual, and signed with a real name.
Every investigation exists because a small number of remarkable readers refused to assume someone else would step up. Annual membership is the best value at just 22¢ per day and helps me cover ongoing production expenses. Vanguard members help expand the work for 51¢ per day.
Congressional Budget Office. “Estimating the Costs of Troop Deployments to U.S. Cities.” Letter to Senator Jeff Merkley, January 28, 2026. https://www.cbo.gov/publication/61943
You read Glass Empires by Wendy A. Lawrence as a free subscriber. Patrons fund the context hot takes skip and reach my inbox and Notes DMs. Annual is the best value at a quarter a day. Become a Patron
Speaker Emerita Nancy Pelosi and her communications director Ian Krager on Capitol Hill on Dec. 17, 2025. Photo courtesy of Pelosi’s office.
Speaker Emerita Nancy Pelosi’s communications director, Ian Krager, will be Supervisor Connie Chan’s congressional campaign’s communications director starting Aug. 1, according to Chan’s campaign.
Political consultants say the move is yet another sign that Pelosi is putting her thumb on the scale for Chan. Pelosi endorsed Chan on May 18 and has since shepherded her through major fundraising opportunities in Washington. And, now, she is offering Chan the top talent on her team.
Krager, 26, is one of the last two communications staffers left in Pelosi’s office.
“It has been the honor of a lifetime to help tell the story of Speaker Pelosi’s historic leadership for San Francisco and America,” Krager, who’s been Pelosi’s communications director since July 2024, said in a statement. “I’m thrilled to join Connie Chan’s campaign at this pivotal moment.”
Krager, who will relocate to San Francisco, is expected to bring Chan more news coverage in more prominent newspapers.
“She’s doing everything she can to get [Chan] elected,” said Nadia Rahman, who was the political director of Saikat Chakrabarti’s congressional campaign and now supports Chan.
Campaigns are a different beast versus communications work in the capital, but Krager has the experience of dealing with and building relationships with reporters at every level from local news to international news as Pelosi’s spokesperson, said Rahman. It’s something no one else in this race currently has, she added.
Chan’s current campaign spokesperson and consultant Julie Edwards will stay on as a consultant.
The decision followed Chan’s two-day trip to Washington last week that included a meeting with Pelosi on Wednesday early afternoon, and an evening reception hosted by both Pelosi and Sen. Adam Schiff.
The two days were filled with at least 10 meetings, events and media appearances, which would help build Chan a national Democratic coalition around the themes of labor, abortion rights, gun safety, education and climate.
She also recorded a segment for The Dean Obeidallah Show, a national radio show that examines current issues from a Muslim American perspective.
We won’t ignore your neighborhood
When a San Francisco neighborhood has a Mission Local reporter, it means someone is there. We’re following new housing projects proposed on your block, keeping tabs on what your district supervisor is up to at City Hall, and letting you know when longtime businesses close (and new ones open). When big news breaks, we already know the context.
Most neighborhoods don’t have that. Yours could.
That’s what Mission Local is building. Our reporters don’t parachute in — they write consistently on San Francisco, so you’re never reading about your neighborhood from someone who just looked it up.
So far we are in five of San Francisco’s neighborhoods. But we know all San Franciscans deserve our kind of coverage. Will you join us?
Yujie is a staff reporter covering city hall with a focus on the Asian community. She came on as an intern after graduating from Columbia University’s Graduate School of Journalism and became a full-time staff reporter as a Report for America corps member and has stayed on. Before falling in love with San Francisco, Yujie covered New York City, studied politics through the “street clashes” in Hong Kong, and earned a wine-tasting certificate in two days. She’s proud to be a bilingual journalist. Find her on Signal @Yujie_ZZ.01More by Yujie Zhou
Former mayor Art Agnos pulling away the string to reveal the Art Agnos Way street named after him on July 27, 2026. Photo by Zoe Malen.
Art Agnos stepped off a Greyhound Bus in San Francisco on Labor Day weekend in 1966 as the son of a shoeshine man.
Christ “Christy” Agnos, a Greek immigrant, sold cigars, blocked men’s hats and, yes, shined shoes in a storefront in Springfield, Mass. Art shined shoes next to his father until Christy died of cancer in 1955. Art, 16, went on shining shoes alone and his mother, Mary, blocked and cleaned the hats.
“I couldn’t date certain girls in high school because my father shined shoes for a living and cleaned hats. I never got over that,” says Agnos, now 87. “Springfield was a good city, a nice city to grow up in. But I came here to look for a better life. Our family did not belong to the right class: I could never have been mayor of Springfield.”
At mid-day on the corner of Connecticut and 20th streets, just outside Loard’s Ice Cream, a gathering of friends, family and a who’s-who of San Francisco’s political yesteryear cheered as Agnos yanked a strand of twine. A small, silver sign was unveiled reading “Art Agnos Way.”
San Francisco is a place to reinvent yourself. It’s a place to be who you are. And it’s a place to do big things. Ten years after stepping off the bus, Agnos was elected to the state legislature. Eleven years after that, he was elected mayor. And, 39 years after that — today, in fact — his name went up on a street sign.
The sign is here because of the things he did after stepping off that bus in ’66: Among them, shepherding San Francisco through the weeks and months after the Loma Prieta earthquake in 1989 and making the politically fateful — and damaging — decision to raze the Embarcadero Freeway and re-open San Francisco’s waterfront.
In San Francisco, said Agnos, “Nobody asked me where I went to school.” (For the record: Bates College undergrad, Florida State for a master’s in social work; all three of Christ and Mary Agnos’ children went to college or beyond).
“People asked me who I was and what I did and how I was going to get involved in the city,” Agnos continued. “Man, I loved that.”
Potrero Hill, and Connecticut Street, said Agnos, “had people on it who were my teachers about San Francisco and the West Coast. They oriented me, exposed me to so much, taught me so much about this city. I was propelled by them into public service. When I got married, they celebrated with me. When I got shot, they looked out for me.”
Yes, shot. “Art Agnos Way” is a stone’s throw from both where Agnos has long lived — and where he nearly died.
Former Mayor Art Agnos at the reveal of the Art Agnos Way street named after him on July 27, 2026. Photo by Zoe Malen.
On Dec. 13, 1973, Agnos, a field representative for Assemblyman Leo McCarthy, was finishing up a community meeting near Wisconsin and 23rd streets in Potrero Hill. And while he was talking to a group of women he heard “firecrackers going off.” People scattered.
“The women started running away … and asking me to come with them,” Agnos recounted in a TV news interview shortly after the incident. “I started chasing them to calm them down and reassure them that no one was going to hurt them. At that point they told me the man was trying to kill me.”
Agnos turned and saw a man standing eight or 10 yards off and staring at him, blankly, still holding a gun. “He probably was trying to figure out why I didn’t fall,” Agnos said at the time. “Mainly because I didn’t know I’d been shot.”
The “Zebra Killers,” a group of fanatical extremist Black revolutionaries targeting random white people across the city, murdered at least 15 San Franciscans. Another seven were gravely wounded.
Of those, Agnos said, he was the only victim who wasn’t permanently disabled; had his shooter held the gun level instead of pointing down, the bullets would’ve pierced Agnos’ heart and he would’ve died at age 35, just up the street from his street sign.
Many years ago, Agnos told me that being shot felt a bit like taking an elbow to the chest when you’re going up for a rebound. He didn’t, at the time, mention the year of medical hardships and a deeply unpleasant recovery that followed his attempted murder.
When asked by a 1970s TV interviewer if the experience would keep him from going out and working with the people in his neighborhood, Agnos immediately replied, “Not at all. Not at all.”
“If anything, it’s gonna just put me back on the street working as hard as I can to continue developing programs that the community thinks they need,” he said. “So that we can establish the services that people need to put an end to the kinds of conditions that would lead a man or two men or a group of men to hate somebody so much to do this kind of thing.”
Remember, what was important was where you were going.
Former supervisor Matt Gonzalez and former mayor Art Agnos at the ‘Art Agnos Way’ event. Photo by Zoe Malen
The unveiling of Art Agnos Way was something of a hot ticket. Rep. Nancy Pelosi was there. So was Mayor Daniel Lurie. Mayor Willie Brown — who, like Agnos, got his start shining shoes — RSVPed but did not show. He purportedly had trouble getting a taxi. “Willie Brown is late, as usual,” Agnos told the crowd, which laughed knowingly.
The legislation to, in Yogi Berra’s words, make this day necessary, was carried by Potrero’s home supervisor, Shamann Walton. Former Board President and longtime Agnos ally Aaron Peskin was the master of ceremonies.
It was, as so many San Francisco political fêtes tend to be, an extremely tight-knit affair. At one point, Pelosi pointed into the crowd at Agnos’ son, Steve. “I babysat you!” she said. “I remember!” Steve replied.
Agnos was honored, he said, but, in a discussion last week, seemed a bit sheepish at all the fuss. He’d just wanted to have a neighborhood affair in his longtime neighborhood. “This isn’t worth your time!” he protested. “Send an intern.”
The unveiling of a small sign is indeed a small affair, albeit a pleasant one. But there are larger issues at play, which is why Agnos is still politically involved generations after last holding elective office.
When Christ and Mary Agnos’ son stepped off the bus 60 years ago, he could land a two-bedroom apartment (with a deck and a fireplace) for $150 a month ($1,532 in 2026 dollars).
He could wander through a blue-collar neighborhood that reminded him of home, and just bump into and befriend folks like Jim Herman, who’d go on to be national president of the International Longshore and Warehouse Union.
Speaker Emerita Nancy Pelosi at the reveal of the Art Agnos Way street named after former mayor, Art Agnos, on July 27, 2026. Photo by Zoe Malen.
Agnos could tell you better than most that present-day San Francisco is far safer than its prior iterations. Crime, particularly violent crime, is at near-historic lows. The notion of a racial terror operation preying on indiscriminate victims is now near-incomprehensible; Fox News would surely cover it the way networks covered the Iran Hostage Crisis.
So, that’s for the good. But Agnos could also tell you that Potrero Hill is no longer the affordable blue-collar haven that nurtured him when he needed it the most.
“That’s why I fight so hard, in part, to keep this city the way it is,” he says. “This is a city that lets you be who you want to be.”
This has been Agnos’ fight for the past 60 years.
“The same fight that sustains my Dad,” Steve Agnos said today, “is the fight necessary to sustain San Francisco.”
“Look at the view,” Art Agnos mused today. “I love it every time. It’s changing — not just the skyline. But I still love it.”
As a social worker and a cub politician, he’d head down the hill and wonder, “What can I do today down there to make that place a little better?” As mayor, he’d think, “What are they going to do to me today?”
Art Agnos will be 88 in September. Steve Agnos sends him material about centenarians like Mel Brooks and Dick Van Dyke who remain lucid and active into their 11th decade. But we are only immortal for a limited time.
“I hope one day,” said Agnos, addressing the crowd, “when I’m no longer here and someone is here eating an ice cream and says ‘Who was that guy?’ some of you will respond: ‘He was one of us.’”
Agnos paused and tightened his jaw. He took a deep breath and composed himself. So did everyone else.
“He was a neighbor. Who lived with us while he fulfilled the Ancient Greek promise of the Athenians when they became citizens of their city. They said ‘I promise to leave my city better than I found it.’”
Art Agnos kept this promise. And now he has the sign to prove it.
Lisa Ryers (left) and Pamela Pastrana display the 40-year-old campaign sign treasured by Pastrana’s mother, Lucy, at the unveiling of ‘Art Agnos Way.’ Photo by Joe Eskenazi
We won’t ignore your neighborhood
When a San Francisco neighborhood has a Mission Local reporter, it means someone is there. We’re following new housing projects proposed on your block, keeping tabs on what your district supervisor is up to at City Hall, and letting you know when longtime businesses close (and new ones open). When big news breaks, we already know the context.
Most neighborhoods don’t have that. Yours could.
That’s what Mission Local is building. Our reporters don’t parachute in — they write consistently on San Francisco, so you’re never reading about your neighborhood from someone who just looked it up.
So far we are in five of San Francisco’s neighborhoods. But we know all San Franciscans deserve our kind of coverage. Will you join us?
Joe is a columnist and the managing editor of Mission Local. He was born in San Francisco, raised in the Bay Area, and attended U.C. Berkeley. He never left.
“Your humble narrator” was a writer and columnist for SF Weekly from 2007 to 2015, and a senior editor at San Francisco Magazine from 2015 to 2017. You may also have read his work in the Guardian (U.S. and U.K.); San Francisco Public Press; San Francisco Chronicle; San Francisco Examiner; Dallas Morning News; and elsewhere.
He resides in the Excelsior with his wife and three (!) kids, 4.3 miles from his birthplace and 5,474 from hers.
The Northern California branch of the Society of Professional Journalists named Eskenazi the 2019 Journalist of the Year.More by Joe Eskenazi
The St. Louis Commune of 1877 was a brief worker-led uprising, marked by the first general strike in U.S. history and the temporary control of a major American city by socialist and communist organizers. [1, 2]
Key Events of the Uprising
The Great Railroad Strike: Grew out of national wage cuts in July 1877, spreading quickly to St. Louis, Missouri, where thousands of multiracial industrial and transport workers shut down local commerce. [1, 2, 3, 4, 5]
Workers’ Leadership: The Marxist Workingmen’s Party helped direct the movement, setting up an executive committee that functioned as a temporary municipal authority. [1, 2, 3]
City Control: For about a week, the coalition maintained public order, negotiated work terms, and paralyzed standard capitalist operations before federal troops and local militias suppressed the movement. [1, 2, 3]
India’s Cockroach Janta Party ended its five-week multi-city protest on Saturday after the youth-led movement’s key demand—the resignation of Education Minister Dharmendra Pradhan—was met.
“We have done it,” CJP spokesperson Saurav Das told a jubilant crowd at New Delhi’s Jantar Mantar. “Pradhan has sent in his resignation, which means that our first demand has been met.”
Das said that the protesters’ second main demand, the withdrawal of criminal investigations targeting CJP members, was also met. However, members and supporters of the movement noted that some cockroach protesters remain in detention and vowed to continue pressing for their release.
Pradhan’s resignation is the first such surrender to public pressure during the 12-year tenure of Hindu nationalist Indian Prime Minister Narendra Modi.
धर्मेंद्र प्रधान के मंत्री पद से इस्तीफ़े के बाद मुंबई के शिवाजी पार्क में जश्न मनाते लोग।
— Cockroach Janta Party (@CJP_for_India) July 26, 2026
“Considering the situation at Jantar Mantar and elsewhere in the country, and so that anti-national forces do not take advantage of the circumstances, national unity is maintained, no student’s future gets entangled in legal complications, and our children can focus on their studies and building their careers, I have submitted my resignation,” Pradhan said in a statement.
Pradhan’s tenure was marred by repeated leaks of National Eligibility Entrance Test (NEET) papers in a scandal that has upended the lives of millions of students by forcing them to retake the grueling exams and delaying their university admissions. CJP organizers said more than 20 students have killed themselves over the matter.
The now-ex education minister had dismissed the protesters as “the B-team of terrorists.”
On Sunday, Modi said he would authorize the creation of an examination reform task force headed by Nandan Nilekani, co-founder of Indian tech giant Infosys.
“The government of India is continuously taking various measures for the future of students,” the Bharatiya Janata Party prime minister said in a video posted on social media. “However, we must look to the future. Our examination system needs to be reliable and transparent, and it must make maximum use of technology.”
मोदी जी, आपने कई बार पहले भी पेपर लीक रोकने को बोला है, पर अभी तक सफलता नहीं पाए है, हमेशा पेपर लीक माफिया ने पेपर लीक करवाने में सफलता पाई है, जो छात्रों के भविष्य को बहुत ही कष्टदाई बनाया है, इस बार ऐसा ना हो तो ही बेहतर होगा। pic.twitter.com/J5QtwBytdG
— Cockroach Janta Party (@CJP_for_India) July 26, 2026
The protest movement began in May after Chief Justice of India Surya Kant reportedly compared unemployed young people to “cockroaches.” The protesters, led by political strategist Abhijeet Dipke, satirically reclaimed the slur as the symbol of a movement that has grown into a broader challenge to Modi’s increasingly authoritarian rule, which has seen mounting repression of protest and dissent, including restrictions on journalists and activists, and the use of “lawfare” to target critics.
Last week, tens of thousands of youth-led protesters marched in New Delhi, where they were met and attacked by police batons and tear gas. Indian media reported thousands of injuries.
The mood was markedly different following Pradhan’s resignation.
Celebrations after the resignation of the education minister in India, “Cockroaches won, democracy won!” says the Cockroach Janta Party. pic.twitter.com/4YPCInDiI5
“Now that the cockroaches have won their first battle, may they win many more,” Tavleen Singh, a columnist for The Indian Express, wrote on X. “May they become a real political party in the near future.”
Sonam Wangchuk, an environmentalist whose hunger strike was a focal point of the cockroach protests, was released Sunday from a Gurugram hospital, where he had been recovering from his 26-day fast since Thursday.
Emboldened by the CJP victory, members of the Communist Party of India (CPI)-affiliated All-India Youth Federation and All-India Students’ Federation marched on the Chennai residence of Tamil Nadu Gov. Rajendra Vishwanath Arlekar demanding the abolition of the NEET. According to Indian media reports, police detained more than 200 of the demonstrators.
Election workers process mailed ballots in Riverside, California on June 1, 2026.
(Photo by Anjali Sharif-Paul/MediaNews Group/The Sun via Getty Images)
A majority of the three-judge appellate panel called part of the president’s March executive order “an unprecedented federal incursion into states’ exclusive power to determine voter eligibility.”
A federal appellate panel on Saturday rejected the Trump administration’s request to lift a lower court’s injunction blocking the US Postal Service from enforcing President Donald Trump’s March executive order targeting mail-in ballots as part of Republicans’ broader attack on voting rights.
A three-judge panel of the Boston-based 1st US Circuit Court of Appeals ruled 2-1 against a motion by the administration seeking a pause on US District Judge Indira Talwani’s June order blocking major portions of Trump’s directive, which is aimed at restricting postal voting, including by directing the USPS to ensure that mailed ballots have unique barcodes and envelope logos.
“Under the Constitution, state and local officials are responsible for administering federal elections,” Judges Gustavo Gelpí and Julie Rikelman—both appointed by former President Joe Biden—wrote in a joint opinion. “In the spring of 2026, President Trump issued an executive order with nationwide effects on how state and local officials can administer federal elections, including the upcoming primary and general elections in September and November. In particular, the executive order directed substantial involvement by the United States Postal Service in deciding which ballots sent to and from voters would be delivered.”
Judge Joshua Dunlap, a Trump appointee, partially dissented from the majority. The decision applies to the 23 states and District of Columbia that filed a lawsuit challenging the executive order.
The ruling also focuses on the executive order’s threats to criminally punish any state or local officials who refuse to comply. Under the order, the USPS would only send mail ballots to states that send their unredacted voter files to [the US Department of Homeland Security], which would approve voter eligibility via a national voter registration database. This is an unprecedented federal incursion into states’ exclusive power to determine voter eligibility as deemed by the US Constitution.
Saturday’s ruling comes just over three weeks after Judge Emmet Sullivan of the US District Court for the District of Columbia halted the USPS’ implementation of Trump’s executive order. Sullivan granted a request by the NAACP to enforce a 2021 settlement agreement requiring the USPS to protect mail-in voting and prioritize delivery of mail related to elections through 2028.
That decision followed a June ruling by Chief US District Judge Denise Casper in Massachusetts that blocked portions of the president’s order requiring people to show proof of citizenship when registering to vote.
Trump’s March order is part of a broader attack on voting rights that includes pushing an updated version of Republicans’ so-called SAVE America Act, which would mandate proof of citizenship and strict photo ID requirements to register to vote in federal elections. The legislation, which was passed by the House of Representatives in February, is stalled in the narrowly split Senate, where it lacks the support of 60 lawmakers needed to avoid a Democrat filibuster.
Milk Club Trans Caucus Meeting Date: Tuesday, July 28 Time: 5-7 PM Location and Zoom Link: Meeting info available to members of the Milk Club Trans Caucus. Please reach out to trans@milkclub.org if you would like to join the Milk Club Trans Caucus.
Milk Club Joint Caucus Meeting & Trivia Night! Date: Tuesday, July 28 Meeting: 6:30 PM – 7:30 PM Trivia: 7:30 PM Where: Teeth – 2323 Mission Street, San Francisco Milk Club invites you to our Joint Caucus Meeting featuring the HIV Caucus, Trans Caucus, and BIPOC Caucus. This is a space to organize, connect,... Continue reading →
One Million Rising: Strategic Non-Cooperation to Fight Authoritarianism Virtual Event · Hosted by No Kings Time Wednesdays 8 – 9:30pm EDT Location Virtual event Join from anywhere About this event Across the country, authoritarian forces are getting bolder and more dangerous. Trump and his allies are not hiding their agenda: mass deportations,... Continue reading →
We’re celebrating a huge birthday this Thursday: the 61st anniversary of Medicare! Over six decades ago, brave civil rights organizers fought to make sure our seniors got the health care they deserved. With over 163 million people entitled to coverage over the program’s lifetime, it’s been a resounding success. But... Continue reading →
THURSDAY, JUNE 29, 2023 AT 2 AM – 4 AM PDT How to create trust in a group? Details Event by Extinction Rebellion Empathy Circles online EMPATHY CAFE Duration: 2 hr Public · Anyone on or off Facebook How to create trust in a group? This is the question that arose in our... Continue reading →
Milk Club East Bay Caucus Kiki & Organizing Meeting Date: Thursday, July 30 Time: 6 PM Location: Hella Bees – 2340 Harrison St, Oakland RSVP: bit.ly/MilkClubEBKiki Milk Club is launching the East Bay Caucus and we want YOU there! Come out to Hella Bees in Oakland for an evening of food, drinks, dancing,... Continue reading →
Trump Regime Takedown: Every Saturday Saturday, March 7, 2026 12:00 PM 2:00 PM Tesla San Francisco999 Van Ness AvenueSan Francisco, CA, 94109United States (map) Google Calendar ICS Keep democracy alive every Saturday by showing up, taking a stand, and sticking together for the long haul. Standing together is better than standing alone. Let’s get together... Continue reading →
This Sunday’s Town Hall: Announcing This Week’s Progressive Town Hall: Every Sunday at 4pm ET/1pm PT RSVP HERE Join PDA activists online from across the country to discuss the importance of progressives reclaiming the American story from the MAGA right, an issue of heightened importance as we’re now within one... Continue reading →
by 
by 
Top 1% Commenter
