.

“As an adjudicated insurrectionist, Trump is an illegitimate president according to Section 3 of the 14th Amendment, and therefore every official act as president will be illegitimate.”

–Mike Zonta, co-editor of OccupySF.net

The 14th Amendment states: “No person shall be a Senator or Representative in Congress, or elector of President and Vice President, or hold any office, civil or military, under the United States, or under any state, who, having previously taken an oath, as a member of Congress, or as an officer of the United States, or as a member of any state legislature, or as an executive or judicial officer of any state, to support the Constitution of the United States, shall have engaged in insurrection or rebellion against the same, or given aid or comfort to the enemies thereof. But Congress may, by a vote of two-thirds of each House, remove such disability.”

Call your Congressperson and your U.S. Senators at (202) 224-3121

I went inside OpenAI’s secretive San Francisco headquarters

Journalist Thomas Smith got invited into the secretive glass-fronted tower in Mission Bay, and came away with a new perspective on the AI giant

A modern glass office building with a sky bridge and landscaped seating area, home to artificial intelligence company OpenAI, in San Francisco, May 27, 2025.Smith Collection/Gado

By Thomas Smith May 17, 2026 (SFGate.com)

Normally, when I approach the incognito San Francisco headquarters of OpenAI, a benignly terrifying security guard in a rugby shirt stares me down.

Last week, though, I got to waltz right past him. 

Well, almost. Apparently I waltzed a bit prematurely. As I first entered the lobby, he professionally but firmly walked me back outside and showed me how to properly scan a QR code that would grant me access to the beating heart of the buzziest, most controversial company in tech.

After that, the waltzing could continue unimpeded, because I had been formally invited inside OpenAI’s secretive mothership. And what I saw there told me a lot about the company’s future.

Kimpton’s baby

I was invited to OpenAI’s headquarters because of my role as a tech journalist, to attend an off-the-record educational seminar. 

Stepping off the MUNI T Line and arriving at OpenAI’s building, I was greeted, as I always am, by nothing. The AI giant’s offices are entirely unlabeled. There’s nary a sign or logo anywhere to tell the casual visitor that they’ve stumbled upon the locus of all AI power in the universe. Next door, Uber’s headquarters scream “UBER” from every glass-fronted, glimmering surface. OpenAI — subletting from Uber — keeps its building silent.

That ends as soon as you step inside.

After signing in with front desk staff (who have the friendly demeanor of people who know they’re being protected by a rugby-shirted man with biceps like tractor tires) I was escorted to a lobby to wait for our session to begin.

OpenAI’s lobby is loud — aesthetically, if not aurally. The space looks like a Kimpton hotel and a Victorian cabinet of curiosities had a baby.

Every object — a 1950s metal robot figurine, a copy of Roger Fouts’ “Next of Kin,” a vintage camera — had clearly been placed there with intention, to communicate a message.

A copy of “On the Origin of Time,” which details Stephen Hawking’s theories about the universe, lay open next to comfy reading chairs, as if to suggest that OpenAI’s engineers often casually thumb through such books. For reasons that are opaque to me, a vase of white flowers and also a disembodied deer antler sat beside it. 

A lone gold pocket watch, sitting nakedly in the middle of a vast wooden table, felt like a test. Grabbing it as a memento seems like it’d be easy, until you remember that it’s sitting in the house of the company building much of America’s AI surveillance apparatus.

After a brief wait, a staff member walked me and several colleagues back to a fairly unremarkable seminar room, somewhat surprising given all the quirky detritus I’d just passed by. 

Also surprisingly, though, OpenAI left us relatively free to wander before the presentation started (albeit with a directive not to photograph anything). So I left the room. 

Inside OpenAI’s lobby, I found a concert grand piano. It’s a player piano, and there’s not even a stool for a human musician to sit on. This feels ominously on-brand.

Deeper in the building, I found a booth filled with themed books and pamphlets that urge the visitor to “Feel the AGI immersion.” It was staffed by a gigantic, papier-mache frog. 

I took a pamphlet. It was covered in vague word soup about human flourishing. I realized ChatGPT almost certainly wrote it.

In the bathrooms, I found trays of toothbrushes and anti-redness eye drops, presumably to fix yourself up after a long night spent iterating on foundation models.

I circled back to the seminar room. A digital sign outside read, “We’re making AGI–and friends!”

The gospel of Sam

For OpenAI, that last bit has proven challenging. The company is facing a massive lawsuit from Elon Musk that’s revealing juicy details daily about the company’s origins and leadership. Another suit accuses it of wrongful death over ChatGPT’s alleged role in a school shooting.

Amid this onslaught, the company has lately felt walled-off. OpenAI’s building, again, is entirely incognito. Reaching an actual human at the company, even as a member of the media, feels almost impossible. Cryptic messages on X from Sam Altman are often the only hint that OpenAI is about to do something big.

That wasn’t always the case. When I served as an independent OpenAI beta tester in 2021, the company had a chummy, academic lab feel. You could send a Slack DM to OpenAI’s VP of product in the middle of the night and get an immediate response.

After ChatGPT took over the world, that vibe changed. OpenAI stepped back and locked down.

New models dropped at random times, and both tech journalists and the company’s own customers scrambled to understand what had landed in their laps. 

Besides a few high-profile stories — like the attempted ouster of CEO Sam Altman in 2023 — not much happening internally at OpenAI ever made it out to the broader public. 

On my visit, though, I saw indications that OpenAI is working to shift this narrative. That fact that I — a journalist who once accused the company of lobotomizing ChatGPT — was allowed in the door in the first place is one indicator of a change.

And while there’s plenty of bizarre kitsch inside OpenAI’s headquarters, the walls are also covered in signs that talk about the company’s origins and future, connecting its work to the artificial intelligence pioneers who came before it (including, encouragingly, early female scientists like Grace Hopper) and an imagined future where AGI becomes a utopian “infrastructure stretched across continents.”

Facebook famously had an on-site sign shop, too. But its blocky, letterpress signs always felt like tech-themed Soviet propaganda posters, sporting simple, vaguely Orwellian slogans like, “Do it faster” and, “Our work is never over.”

OpenAI’s signs are more deliberately crafted and narrative, with paragraphs of explanatory text, historical photos, charts and illustrations. They look like museum exhibits.

By signing up, you agree to our Terms Of Use and acknowledge that your information will be used as described in our Privacy Policy.

The company seems to be realizing — perhaps belatedly — that if it doesn’t actively tell its story, other people will. And other people’s version won’t necessarily be flattering.

OpenAI probably isn’t ready to send my rugby-shirted friend home and throw open its doors — or its models — to the world. But the company no longer seems content to sit, walled-off, in its glass-fronted Mission Bay tower either.

In Alabama, Organizers Declare ‘Day One’ of Mass Mobilization to Stop GOP Attacks on Voting Rights

US Rep. Alexandria Ocasio-Cortez (D-NY)

US Rep. Alexandria Ocasio-Cortez (D-NY) addresses voting rights supporters at the All Roads Lead to the South rally in Montgomery, Alabama on May 16, 2026. 

(Photo by @saedaaya/X)

Labor rights and voting rights groups were among those who gathered in Selma and Montgomery, Alabama for the All Roads Lead to the South Day of Action.

Julia Conley

May 16, 2026 (CommonDreams.org)

This is a developing story… Please check back for possible updates…

In a show of resistance to the US Supreme Court’s dismantling of the Voting Rights Act and Republicans’ efforts to redraw congressional districts across southern states in a bid to retain power despite their party’s unpopular agenda, labor and voting rights groups were among those that arrived in Montgomery, Alabama Saturday for “Day One” of a mass mobilization against GOP lawmakers who they said are intent on “resurrecting Jim Crow.”

RECOMMENDED…

No Kings Day in Charlotte

No Kings Movement and ‘All Roads Lead to the South’ to Protest GOP Voting Rights Attacks

Alabama statehouse.

Alabama, South Carolina Join GOP Push to Dilute Black, Democratic Districts

While groups including the Movement for Black Lives and National Jobs With Justice boarded buses in Atlanta Saturday morning to join more than 250 organizations at a rally at the Alabama State Capitol, other organizers began the “All Roads Lead to the South” National Day of Action with a march across the Edmund Pettus Bridge in Selma, Alabama—the same site of the historic 1965 voting rights march that became known as Bloody Sunday.”We started here because we wanted to stand on sacred ground and consecrate ourselves,” said organizer LaTosha Brown, co-founder of the group Black Voters Matter. “You cannot fight hate with hate, you have to stand in the spirit of love, and so look around—this is what love looks like.”

Twitter post: https://twitter.com/i/broadcasts/1pJdRbdXRoNKW

The march and rally were organized in response to a ramp-up of efforts by the Republican Party and right-wing courts, including the far-right majority on the US Supreme Court, to redraw electoral maps in states including Louisiana, Alabama, and Tennessee.

The mass mobilization was organized after the Supreme Court handed down its ruling in Louisiana v. Callais last month, effectively eviscerating Section 2 of the Voting Rights Act, which has held that voters of color have the right to legally challenge racially discriminatory congressional maps.

The Supreme Court this week allowed Alabama to revert back to an electoral map with just one majority-Black district out of seven, despite that fact that 26% of Alabama residents are Black.

Tennessee Republicans also adopted a new electoral map that splits up the state’s only majority-Black district, and the Missouri Supreme Court approved a congressional map that targets the state’s 5th District, represented by Rep. Emanuel Cleaver.

Arriving in Montgomery, Tennessee state Rep. Justin Jones (D-52) said voters across the South need “a united front… to take on this new Confederacy… We know what the intent of these governors and state lawmakers are, to dismantle every gain made during the civil rights movement and dismantle the crown jewel of the civil rights movement, which was the Voting Rights Act.”

“Our parents and grandparents marched, organized, bled, and won,” said organizers ahead of the rally. “The Voting Rights Act was theirs. The fight to keep it is ours. Right now, state by state, that law is being dismantled. We know that we cannot fight the same battles the same way. New times demand new tactics—economic pressure, political organizing, community action, culture, and faith. But we know what we know: Organizing works. And we have unfinished business.”

At the rally, US Rep. Alexandria Ocasio-Cortez (D-NY) emphasized the need for solidarity from across the US, with supporters of voting rights mobilizing in states near and far from the South—the current center of the GOP’s attacks.

“They think they can draw us out of power. They do not know the sleeping giant they just awakened,” said Ocasio-Cortez. “When Black Americans have the right to vote and that vote is protected, our schools get funded. When voting rights are protected, healthcare gets expanded. When voting rights are protected, our country moves forward. And Montgomery, that’s what they’re actually afraid of.”

Erica Smiley, executive director of Jobs With Justice, said labor groups joined the mass mobilization because “the bridges we have to cross are not only in Selma.”

“Jim Crow didn’t just come for the ballot. It came for anyone who tried to organize and have a voice,” said Smiley. “Efforts to rollback equality and democracy are happening in the occupied cities, shop floors, and now the halls of the Capitol across the country.”

Rep. Terri Sewell (D-Ala.) called for the rally to mark the beginning of a “Freedom Summer,” with rallies at “every State House” in the country to pressure state legislators to end the GOP gerrymandering efforts, which President Donald Trump has explicitly called for.

“Let’s declare a Freedom Summer and go to every courthouse this summer, to tell those legislators, ‘We will not go back,’” said Sewell.

Dozens of satellite events were also taking place across the US on Saturday.

Our work is licensed under Creative Commons (CC BY-NC-ND 3.0). Feel free to republish and share widely.

Julia Conley

Julia Conley is a senior editor and staff writer for Common Dreams.

Full Bio >

‘Big News’: Hawaii Targets Citizens United With Law Clarifying Corporations Are Not People

Rally Held Marking 5th Anniversary Of Citzens United Decision Aims To Draw Attention To Corporate Money In Politics

Attendees hold signs as they listen to speakers during a rally calling for an end to corporate money on January 21, 2015 in Washington, DC. 

(Photo by Drew Angerer/Getty Images)

“The far-right Supreme Court hijacked the Constitution to let corporations spend in our elections. But we are not powerless. We can fight back,” said US Rep. Greg Casar.

Brad Reed

May 15, 2026

The state of Hawaii has passed a law that poses a direct challenge to the infamous 2010 Citizens United Supreme Court ruling, which opened the door to unlimited corporate spending in US elections.

Democratic Hawaii Gov. Josh Green on Thursday signed into law a bill that takes aim at the court’s ruling that corporations are effectively people with full free speech rights who can face no limits on what they can contribute to political organizations.

RECOMMENDED…

Creep State posters of Musk and Gates.

‘The Creep State Is Watching’: Guerilla Art Project Takes on Big Tech’s Power Grab​

US Treasury Secretary Scott Bessent and President Donald Trump

‘A $1,700,000,000 Fraud’: Trump Set to Drop IRS Suit in Exchange for MAGA Slush Fund

As explained by More Perfect Union, the law, which is set to take effect next July, classifies corporations as “artificial persons” who do not have a constitutional right to make political donations.

“The bill could limit the influence of super PACs,” noted More Perfect Union, “and be a model to challenge the influence of money in politics.”

Democratic Hawaii state Sen. Jarrett Keohokalole, a supporter of the law, said on Thursday he was proud that Hawaii has become “the first state in the nation” to take direct action challenging Citizens United.

“As elected leaders, we do not serve artificial entities,” Keohokalole said. “We serve the people.”

US Rep. Greg Casar (D-Texas), chair of the Congressional Progressive Caucus, hailed the law as “big news” that should inspire opponents of limitless corporate political spending across the US.

“The far-right Supreme Court hijacked the Constitution to let corporations spend in our elections,” said Casar. “But we are not powerless. We can fight back.”

The new law passed despite opposition from Hawaii Attorney General Anne Lopez, who argued that defending it in court could be difficult and expensive.

The law’s passage earned praise from campaign finance watchdogs who have long called for overturning Citizens United and reestablishing guardrails for corporate cash in US democracy.

Michael Beckel, who directs the Money in Politics project for the advocacy group Issue One, said the Hawaii law is a “model for the country” that other states should rush to emulate.

“This measure… is among the most innovative and impactful ideas to curb corporate and dark money spending in campaigns since the Supreme Court’s disastrous Citizens United ruling in 2010,” Beckel said. “Those looking to bring more transparency and accountability to elections should embrace this powerful proposal and follow Hawaii’s lead.”

End Citizens United, the nonprofit campaign finance reform organization dedicated to overturning the 2010 Supreme Court ruling, also pushed other states to look at Hawaii’s law as a roadmap for their own legislation.

“Hawaii has provided a blueprint for how to prevent super PACs from spending dark money by passing state law,” the group said in a social media post. “Let this win be a testament to the ability states have to put power back in the hands of everyday people by neutralizing the effects of the Citizens United ruling.”

Tom Moore, senior fellow at the Center for American Progress, praised the Hawaii law in an interview with The Associated Press, calling it “a brave and bold step to get corporate and dark money out of America’s politics” that “will send a powerful message that will be heard loud and clear across the Pacific and across the mainland.”

Our work is licensed under Creative Commons (CC BY-NC-ND 3.0). Feel free to republish and share widely.

Brad Reed

Brad Reed is a staff writer for Common Dreams.

Full Bio >

California Officials Accuse Trump Admin of ‘Political Retribution’ as Vance Suspends Medicaid Payments

JD Vance

US Vice President JD Vance speaks alongside Centers for Medicare and Medicaid Services Administrator Mehmet Oz during a press conference on anti-fraud initiatives at the White House in Washington, DC, on May 13, 2026.

 (Photo by Kent Nishimura/AFP via Getty Images)

“Withholding reimbursements only further hurts patients, strains providers, and drives up costs,” said one Democratic congresswoman. “We will fight this with everything we’ve got.”

Julia Conley

May 14, 2026 (CommonDreams.org)

“Political retribution, plain and simple,” was how US Sen. Alex Padilla described an announcement by Vice President JD Vance late Wednesday regarding the White House’s decision to withhold $1.3 billion in Medicaid reimbursement payments to California.

Vance and Mehmet Oz, administrator of the Centers for Medicare and Medicaid Services, claimed the state’s Medicaid records have generated “red flags” and demanded officials clarify $630 million in billing, $500 million that’s been spent on home health services, and $200 million in what Oz called “questionable expenditures,” which he claimed had been used to provide coverage for undocumented immigrants, who are not eligible for Medicaid.

RECOMMENDED…

Remote medical clinic

900 Health Facilities Shutting Down or at Risk of Collapse as Trump-GOP Cuts ‘Ripple Across the Country’

US Treasury Secretary Scott Bessent and President Donald Trump

‘A $1,700,000,000 Fraud’: Trump Set to Drop IRS Suit in Exchange for MAGA Slush Fund

The announcement came a month after Vance’s federal anti-fraud task force suspended the licenses of nearly 450 hospice care facilities and 23 home health agencies in the Los Angeles area, accusing them of fraud.

Vance also warned that all 50 states could soon see federal funding for their Medicaid Fraud Control Units frozen if they fail to “aggressively prosecute Medicaid fraud.”

“We can turn off other resources within their state Medicaid programs as well,” said the vice president.

California Gov. Gavin Newsom, who has frequently sparred with the Trump administration, said Vance and Oz were “attacking programs that keep seniors and people with disabilities OUT of nursing homes,” which are far more expensive to run than home healthcare agencies.

Newsom said the growth of the state’s In-Home Supportive Services program has saved taxpayers “$107,000 per person” by reducing reliance on nursing homes.

“MAGA hates in-home support programs—which help people stay out of costly institutional settings like nursing homes and get the care they deserve, typically from loved ones,” said Newsom.

X post: https://x.com/GovPressOffice/status/2054620092336681428?ref_src=twsrc%5Etfw%7Ctwcamp%5Etweetembed%7Ctwterm%5E2054620092336681428%7Ctwgr%5E8e0af225366c36e828918f7fe3e9cf4ec9fbff31%7Ctwcon%5Es1_c10&ref_url=https%3A%2F%2Fwww.commondreams.org%2Fnews%2Fcalifornia-home-health

Newsom also said the Trump administration had informed state officials that the deadline to review California’s Medicaid records “before deciding whether to defer funding” would be later in the month.

Democratic members of Congress warned that their constituents rely heavily on Medicaid, with seven out of 10 of the congressional districts with the highest Medicaid enrollment located in California.

Rep. Sydney Kamlager-Dove (D-Calif.) said that 56% of her constituents rely on “this lifesaving program,” and many have already been harmed by the Republican Party’s slashing of Medicaid funding in the One Big Beautiful Bill Act last year.

“Withholding reimbursements only further hurts patients, strains providers, and drives up costs,” said Kamlager-Dove. “We will fight this with everything we’ve got.”

Rep. Jimmy Panetta (D-Calif.) said more than 120,000 people in his district depend on the federal healthcare program for low-income households and people with disabilities.

“This administration needs to stop playing politics with people’s health and lives,” said Panetta. “When people commit fraud, they should be punished accordingly. However, this administration continues to punish California for political purposes, including penalizing innocent people by taking their healthcare away.”

State Attorney General Rob Bonta noted that California has “not hesitated to challenge unlawful actions by the Trump administration,” and suggested the state could file a legal challenge against the withholding of Medicaid funds.

He also accused the administration of targeting the heavily Democratic state “for political reasons.”

The anti-fraud task force led by Vance has so far exclusively focused on rooting out alleged fraud in federal programs in blue states. The White House suspended $259 million in federal payments to Minnesota earlier this year after a scandal regarding the state’s social services system.

“The Trump administration is attacking California over claims that they can’t back up,” said Padilla. “Let’s be real, this isn’t about fraud—it’s about punishing a state that didn’t vote for” President Donald Trump.

Our work is licensed under Creative Commons (CC BY-NC-ND 3.0). Feel free to republish and share widely.

Julia Conley

Julia Conley is a senior editor and staff writer for Common Dreams.

Full Bio >

Your Power in Action: What You Can Do Today

Your Power in Action: What You Can Do Today

The movement for progress and power to the people starts here.

Taiwan says it is a ‘sovereign’ nation with US ‘security commitment’ after Trump’s warning

Asia / Pacific

Taiwan on Saturday maintained it is a “sovereign and independent” nation and that US arms sales were part of Washington’s security commitment to the island. The foreign ministry statement came a day after President Donald Trump warned Taiwan against declaring formal independence following his meeting with Chinese President Xi Jinping during a state visit to China. 

Issued on: 16/05/2026

By: FRANCE 24

File photo of Taiwan's President Lai Ching-te taken at a business conference in Taipei February 3, 2026.
File photo of Taiwan’s President Lai Ching-te taken at a business conference in Taipei February 3, 2026. © AP (File)

⁠Taiwan on Saturday said it is ​thankful for ​US President Donald Trump‘s long-standing support for ​peace ‌and stability ⁠across the Taiwan ‌Strait and asserted it was a “sovereign and independent” nation.

The statement was issued a day after Trump, following his visit to China, warned the democratic island against declaring formal independence.

Read moreTrump warns Taiwan against declaring independence from China after meeting Xi

Taiwan “is a sovereign and independent democratic nation, and is not subordinate to the People’s Republic of China”, Taiwan’s foreign ministry said in a statement.

The ministry also insisted that US arms sales were part of Washington’s security commitment to Taiwan, after Trump flagged that he was considering the issue.

“Regarding Taiwan-US arms sales, this is not only a US security commitment to Taiwan clearly stipulated in the Taiwan Relations Act, but also a form of joint deterrence against regional threats,” the ministry said.

Speaking to reporters in Taipei on ‌Saturday, Taiwan Deputy Foreign Minister Chen Ming-chi also asserted that US arms sales are confirmed under the Taiwan Relations Act.

“Taiwan-US arms sales have always been a cornerstone of regional peace ‌and stability,” he said.

In December, the Trump administration approved a record $11 billion arms sale package for Taiwan. Reuters ​has reported a second one, worth around $14 billion, still awaits Trump’s approval.

Chen declined to comment on the second package because it has yet to be made public, saying ​Taiwan will continue to communicate with and understand the situation from the US side.

Taiwan’s statements came a day after Trump wrapped up a visit to Beijing where Chinese President Xi Jinping had pressed him not to support the self-ruling island, which China claims is part of its territory. 

Taiwan vs China: Is conflict inevitable?

Is conflict inevitable? (Photo test)
Is conflict inevitable? (Photo test) © France 24

‘I want them to cool down’

Trump on Friday made it clear that he opposed a declaration of independence by Taiwan and appeared to question why the United States would defend the island in case of attack.

“I’m not looking to have somebody go independent. And, you know, we’re supposed to travel 9,500 miles to fight a war. I’m not looking for that,” he told Fox News host Brett Baier.

“I want them to cool down. I want China to cool down,” Trump said.

“We’re not looking to have wars, and if you kept it the way it is, I think China’s going to be OK with that.”

The US recognises only Beijing and does not support formal independence by Taiwan, but historically has also stopped short of explicitly saying it opposes independence.

Under US law, the US is required to provide weapons to Taiwan for its defence, but it has been ambiguous on whether US forces would come to the island’s aid.

Xi had begun the summit with a warning on Taiwan, whose President Lai Ching-te considers the island already independent, making a declaration unnecessary.

Xi had told Trump that missteps on the sensitive issue could push their two countries into “conflict”.

(FRANCE 24 with AFP and Reuters)

Book: “The True Believer: Thoughts on the Nature of Mass Movements”

The True Believer: Thoughts on the Nature of Mass Movements

Eric Hoffer

A stevedore on the San Francisco docks in the 1940s, Eric Hoffer wrote philosophical treatises in his spare time while living in the railroad yards. The True Believer — the first and most famous of his books — was made into a bestseller when President Eisenhower cited it during one of the earliest television press conferences. Completely relevant and essential for understanding the world today, The True Believer is a visionary, highly provocative look into the mind of the fanatic and a penetrating study of how an individual becomes one.

About the author

Eric Hoffer

Eric Hoffer was an American social writer and philosopher. He produced ten books and was awarded the Presidential Medal of Freedom in February 1983 by President of the United States Ronald Reagan. His first book, The True Believer, published in 1951, was widely recognized as a classic, receiving critical acclaim from both scholars and laymen, although Hoffer believed that his book The Ordeal of Change was his finest work. In 2001, the Eric Hoffer Award was established in his honor with permission granted by the Eric Hoffer Estate in 2005.

Early life

Hoffer was born in the Bronx, New York City in 1902 (or possibly 1898), the son of Knut and Elsa Hoffer, immigrants from Alsace. By the age of five, he could read in both German and English. When he was age five, his mother fell down a flight of stairs with Eric in her arms. Hoffer went blind for unknown medical reasons two years later, but later in life he said he thought it might have been due to trauma. (“I lost my sight at the age of seven. Two years before, my mother and I fell down a flight of stairs. She did not recover and died in that second year after the fall.I lost my sight and for a time my memory”). After his mother’s death he was raised by a live-in relative or servant, a German woman named Martha. His eyesight inexplicably returned when he was 15. Fearing he would again go blind, he seized upon the opportunity to read as much as he could for as long as he could. His eyesight remained, and Hoffer never abandoned his habit of voracious reading.

Hoffer was a young man when his father, a cabinetmaker, died. The cabinetmaker’s union paid for the funeral and gave Hoffer a little over three hundred dollars. Sensing that warm Los Angeles was the best place for a poor man, Hoffer took a bus there in 1920. He spent the next 10 years on Los Angeles’ skid row, reading, occasionally writing, and working odd jobs. On one such job, selling oranges door-to-door, he discovered he was a natural salesman and could easily make good money. Uncomfortable with this discovery, he quit after one day.

In 1931, he attempted suicide by drinking a solution of oxalic acid, but the attempt failed as he could not bring himself to swallow the poison. The experience gave him a new determination to live adventurously. It was then he left skid row and became a migrant worker. Following the harvests along the length of California, he collected library cards for each town near the fields where he worked and, living by preference, “between the books and the brothels.” A seminal event for Hoffer occurred in the mountains where he had gone in search of gold. Snowed in for the winter, he read the Essays by Michel de Montaigne. Montaigne’s book impressed Hoffer deeply, and he often made reference to its importance for him. He also developed a great respect for America’s underclass, which, he declared, was “lumpy with talent.”

Longshoreman

Hoffer was in San Francisco by 1941. He attempted to enlist in the Armed forces there in 1942 but was rejected because of a hernia. Wanting to contribute to the war effort, he found ample opportunity as a longshoreman on the docks of The Embarcadero. It was there he felt at home and finally settled down. He continued reading voraciously and soon began to write while earning a living loading and unloading ships. He continued this work until he retired at age 65.

Hoffer considered his best work to be The True Believer, a landmark explanation of fanaticism and mass movements. The Ordeal of Change is also a literary favorite. In 1970 he endowed the Lili Fabilli and Eric Hoffer Laconic Essay Prize for students, faculty, and staff at the University of California, Berkeley.

Hoffer was a charismatic individual and persuasive public speaker, but said that he didn’t really care about people. Despite authoring 10 books and a newspaper column, in retirement Hoffer continued his robust life of the mind, thinking and writing alone, in an apartment.

‘Building a Movement for the Future,’ Bernie Sanders Endorses 61 State and Local Progressives

Bernie Sanders

US Sen. Bernie Sanders (I-Vt.) brought his Fighting Oligarchy Tour to Mumford High School in Detroit, Michigan on May 3, 2026, appearing with Senate candidate Dr. Abdul El-Sayed.

 (Photo by Sarah Rice/Getty Images)

“Our political revolution is a multiracial, multigenerational working-class movement built from the ground up,” ready to “fight for the kind of changes our country desperately needs,” the senator said.

Jessica Corbett

May 15, 2026 (CommonDreams.org)

US Sen. Bernie Sanders on Friday announced his endorsement of more than five dozen progressives running for local and state political offices across the country, from Arizona and Missouri to Georgia and New Jersey.

“In this pivotal and dangerous moment in our country’s history, we need leaders at every level of government who are prepared to take on the billionaire class and fight for working families. We need bold solutions to the crises we face, not tinkering around the edges,” Sanders (I-Vt.) said in a statement.

RECOMMENDED…

US Treasury Secretary Scott Bessent and President Donald Trump

‘A $1,700,000,000 Fraud’: Trump Set to Drop IRS Suit in Exchange for MAGA Slush Fund

Pete Hegseth

Leaked CIA Analysis Shows Trump and Hegseth ‘Lied Through Their Teeth’ About Iran War, Says Murphy

The 84-year-old caucuses with Democrats in the Senate and twice sought the party’s presidential nomination, in 2016 and 2020. During those campaigns and since—particularly with the Fighting Oligarchy Tour he launched shortly after Republican President Donald Trump returned to office last year—he has encouraged Americans, especially younger people, to get involved in US politics.

“In the last 15 months, we have recruited over 8,500 Americans to run for office, many of whom are Independents,” the senator noted. “Our political revolution is a multiracial, multigenerational working-class movement built from the ground up.”

“Today, I am proud to endorse 61 progressives running for state and local office across America,” said Sanders. “They will fight for the kind of changes our country desperately needs.”

In Arizona, Sanders is supporting Bobby Nichols for Tempe City Council, Analise Ortiz for state Senate District 24, Mariana Sandoval for state House District 23, Brian Garcia for state House District 8, and two candidates for state House District 9: Lorena Austin and Jacob Martinez.

In California, he is backing four state Assembly candidates: Jessie Lopez for District 68, Ada Briceño for District 67, Fatima Iqbal-Zubair for District 65, and Sandra Celedon for District 31. He’s also endorsing Joz Sida for Fontana mayor, Marissa Roy for Los Angeles city attorney, and multiple people running for LA City Council: Hugo Soto-Martinez for District 13, Faizah Malik for District 11, Estuardo Mazariegos for District 9, and Eunisses Hernandez for District 1.

In Colorado, he is endorsing Chela Garcia Irlando for state Senate District 34, Gabriel Cervantes for state House District 31, and Tyler Quick for Adams County Commission. In Delaware, Sanders is backing Shay Frisby for state Senate District 5, Adriana Leela Bohm for state Senate District 1, and Rae Krantz for state House District 6.

X post: https://x.com/BernieSanders/status/2055273015517020568?ref_src=twsrc%5Etfw%7Ctwcamp%5Etweetembed%7Ctwterm%5E2055273015517020568%7Ctwgr%5E2b03ec6f72507fe4b1fda598d70b0f733fbe1c90%7Ctwcon%5Es1_c10&ref_url=https%3A%2F%2Fwww.commondreams.org%2Fnews%2Fbernie-sanders-endorsement

In Florida, he is supporting Kyandra Darling for state House District 62, and in Georgia, he is backing Ruwa Romman for state Senate District 7. In Iowa, the senator is endorsing India May for state House District 58, Leila Staton for state House District 54, and three Johnson County supervisor candidates: V. Fixmer-Oraiz, Jon Green, and Mandi Remington.

Sanders is also supporting Scott Houldieson for Indiana Senate District 1, Frank Henderson for Kansas House District 6, Robert LeVertis Bell for Kentucky House District 43, Eboni Taylor for Michigan Senate District 3, Justice Horn for the 1st District in Missouri’s Jackson County Legislature, Tick Segerblom for Nevada’s Clark County Commission, Ali Aljarrah for New Jersey’s Passaic County Commission, and Daisy Maldonado for New Mexico’s Doña Ana County Commission.

In New York, where Sanders was notably an early supporter of democratic socialist NYC Mayor Zohran Mamdani, he is now endorsing three state Senate candidates—Yuh-Line Niou for District 27, Jessica Gonzalez-Rojas for District 13, and, Aber Kawas for District 12—as well as several state Assembly hopefuls: Adam Bojak for District 149, Maurice Brown for District 129, Dan Livingston for District 123, Conrad Blackburn for District 70, Eli Northup for District 69, Illapa Sairitupac for state Assembly District 65, Eon Huntley for District 56, Christian Celeste-Tate for District 54, David Orkin for District 38, Samantha Kattan for District 37, Diana Moreno for District 36, and Shamsul Haque for District 30.

In Pennsylvania, the senator is supporting Mark Pinsley for state Senate District 16, Sierra McNeil for state House District 195, and Brad Chambers for State House District 41. He’s also backing David Morales for mayor of Providence, Rhode Island; Julio Salinas for Texas House District 41; and Jaelynn Scott for Washington House District 37. In West Virginia, he’s endorsing three state House candidates: Olivia Miller for District 80, Cody Cumpston for District 6, and Dave Cantrell for District 3.

Sanders had previously announced his support for US Senate candidates Peggy Flanagan in Minnesota, Dr. Abdul El-Sayed in Michigan, and Graham Platner in Maine, as well as multiple progressives running for the House of Representatives, including Dr. Adam Hamawy in New Jersey’s 12th Congressional District earlier this month.

“We’re building a movement for the future,” Sanders told The New York Times, which first reported on his new endorsements Friday.

“Our effort is to lead a national movement against Trump’s authoritarianism and kleptocracy and unnecessary wars and his contempt for the Constitution,” he explained. “But equally important, the American people need an alternative to the Democratic establishment, which is significantly dominated by big-money interests.”

Our work is licensed under Creative Commons (CC BY-NC-ND 3.0). Feel free to republish and share widely.

Jessica Corbett

Jessica Corbett is a senior editor and staff writer for Common Dreams.

Full Bio >

‘Big News’: Hawaii Targets Citizens United With Law Clarifying Corporations Are Not People

Rally Held Marking 5th Anniversary Of Citzens United Decision Aims To Draw Attention To Corporate Money In Politics

Attendees hold signs as they listen to speakers during a rally calling for an end to corporate money on January 21, 2015 in Washington, DC. 

(Photo by Drew Angerer/Getty Images)

“The far-right Supreme Court hijacked the Constitution to let corporations spend in our elections. But we are not powerless. We can fight back,” said US Rep. Greg Casar.

Brad Reed

May 15, 2026 (CommonDreams.org)

The state of Hawaii has passed a law that poses a direct challenge to the infamous 2010 Citizens United Supreme Court ruling, which opened the door to unlimited corporate spending in US elections.

Democratic Hawaii Gov. Josh Green on Thursday signed into law a bill that takes aim at the court’s ruling that corporations are effectively people with full free speech rights who can face no limits on what they can contribute to political organizations.

RECOMMENDED…

Creep State posters of Musk and Gates.

‘The Creep State Is Watching’: Guerilla Art Project Takes on Big Tech’s Power Grab​

US Treasury Secretary Scott Bessent and President Donald Trump

‘A $1,700,000,000 Fraud’: Trump Set to Drop IRS Suit in Exchange for MAGA Slush Fund

As explained by More Perfect Union, the law, which is set to take effect next July, classifies corporations as “artificial persons” who do not have a constitutional right to make political donations.

“The bill could limit the influence of super PACs,” noted More Perfect Union, “and be a model to challenge the influence of money in politics.”

Democratic Hawaii state Sen. Jarrett Keohokalole, a supporter of the law, said on Thursday he was proud that Hawaii has become “the first state in the nation” to take direct action challenging Citizens United.

“As elected leaders, we do not serve artificial entities,” Keohokalole said. “We serve the people.”

US Rep. Greg Casar (D-Texas), chair of the Congressional Progressive Caucus, hailed the law as “big news” that should inspire opponents of limitless corporate political spending across the US.

“The far-right Supreme Court hijacked the Constitution to let corporations spend in our elections,” said Casar. “But we are not powerless. We can fight back.”

The new law passed despite opposition from Hawaii Attorney General Anne Lopez, who argued that defending it in court could be difficult and expensive.

The law’s passage earned praise from campaign finance watchdogs who have long called for overturning Citizens United and reestablishing guardrails for corporate cash in US democracy.

Michael Beckel, who directs the Money in Politics project for the advocacy group Issue One, said the Hawaii law is a “model for the country” that other states should rush to emulate.

“This measure… is among the most innovative and impactful ideas to curb corporate and dark money spending in campaigns since the Supreme Court’s disastrous Citizens United ruling in 2010,” Beckel said. “Those looking to bring more transparency and accountability to elections should embrace this powerful proposal and follow Hawaii’s lead.”

End Citizens United, the nonprofit campaign finance reform organization dedicated to overturning the 2010 Supreme Court ruling, also pushed other states to look at Hawaii’s law as a roadmap for their own legislation.

“Hawaii has provided a blueprint for how to prevent super PACs from spending dark money by passing state law,” the group said in a social media post. “Let this win be a testament to the ability states have to put power back in the hands of everyday people by neutralizing the effects of the Citizens United ruling.”

Tom Moore, senior fellow at the Center for American Progress, praised the Hawaii law in an interview with The Associated Press, calling it “a brave and bold step to get corporate and dark money out of America’s politics” that “will send a powerful message that will be heard loud and clear across the Pacific and across the mainland.”

Our work is licensed under Creative Commons (CC BY-NC-ND 3.0). Feel free to republish and share widely.

Brad Reed

Brad Reed is a staff writer for Common Dreams.

Full Bio >