.

“As an adjudicated insurrectionist, Trump is an illegitimate president according to Section 3 of the 14th Amendment, and therefore every official act as president will be illegitimate.”

–Mike Zonta, co-editor of OccupySF.net

The 14th Amendment states: “No person shall be a Senator or Representative in Congress, or elector of President and Vice President, or hold any office, civil or military, under the United States, or under any state, who, having previously taken an oath, as a member of Congress, or as an officer of the United States, or as a member of any state legislature, or as an executive or judicial officer of any state, to support the Constitution of the United States, shall have engaged in insurrection or rebellion against the same, or given aid or comfort to the enemies thereof. But Congress may, by a vote of two-thirds of each House, remove such disability.”

Call your Congressperson and your U.S. Senators at (202) 224-3121

As Food Insecurity Rises, Elected City Officials Explore New — and Revive Old — Strategies to Address It 

Supervisor Bilal Mahmood pitches new policies for affordable grocers after setbacks to his Mamdani-inspired ballot measures.

Avatar photo by Lylah Schmedel-Permanna August 6, 2026 (SFPublicPress.org)

The 3,900 square-foot retail space that held a Whole Foods at 1177 Market Street has been vacant for more than three years. Supervisor Bilal Mahmood’s proposed tax on corporations that keep storefronts vacant did not make it onto the November ballot. He said 61% of voters in the city support this tactic to boost the availability of grocers. Credit: Lylah Schmedel-Permanna

On a Wednesday afternoon in July, just a block from City Hall, the Heart of the City Farmers’ Market is bustling with hundreds of customers. People from across San Francisco go to Civic Center each Wednesday and Sunday in search of healthful, affordable groceries, a resource many don’t have in their corners of the city. Piles of produce and other foods from dozens of northern and central California growers, from peaches and okra to habanero peppers and honey, nestle under canopies spanning Fulton Street between Hyde and Larkin Streets.

Elizabeth Yelton, 74, who has lived in the Mission district for 43 years, commutes to the farmers market on her bike. She said there are few affordable grocers in her neighborhood and she prefers to avoid Whole Foods. “Which is why I love coming here, because it’s the only affordable farmers market right now. You go to other farmers markets and, like, things are so expensive,” Yelton said.

That’s only one aspect of accessibility for Yelton. As she gets older, she worries, she won’t be able to get to the market on her bike. She doesn’t own a car. Last year, she was injured in a bike accident and struggled to access a grocer without her bike. “Having a close, affordable grocery store in that circumstance would make a huge difference.”

2023 city report found that people living in San Francisco were far more likely to face food insecurity than other Californians. Two-thirds of San Francisco adults who made less than $27,180 a year — that was twice the Federal Poverty Level for a single adult in 2022 — were food insecure, compared to forty-four percent statewide. One in five city residents fall into this income bracket. The report stated also that the rate of people facing food insecurity in the city more than doubled after the cessation of COVID-era food support and that by 2023, the city had the “highest rate of food insecurity for low-income San Francisco adults” since data collection began in 2001.

Despite these dire statistics, city officials disagree on how to address food insecurity. Supervisor Bilal Mahmood sought to put a tax on vacant storefronts on the November ballot but met opposition from his board colleagues. Now, Mahmood is proposing an ordinance to incentivize stores to open.

Customers come to the Heart of the City Farmers’ Market, just off of Civic Center Muni/BART station, for affordable produce. Credit: Lylah Schmedel-Permanna

People face food insecurity when they don’t have enough to eat and don’t know where their next meal will come from. According to the San Francisco Food Security Task Force, food costs rose by about 23% from 2020 to 2024.

This hurts many San Franciscans, with Black and Indigenous communities facing the highest concentration of nutrition-related health problems, like heart disease and diabetes. Black and Indigenous households make less than half of San Francisco’s median household income and represent less than 8% of the city’s population.

A supervisor makes multiple attempts to bring back affordable grocery stores

Mahmood’s 5th district stretches from the Tenderloin to the Golden Gate Park Panhandle. In an interview with the San Francisco Public Press, he said he’s been working to get an affordable grocer in his district since he was elected over a year ago.

“We are seeing an escalating food desert crisis emerging in multiple neighborhoods throughout the city, including in District 5,” he said. He pointed to the closure of a Lucky’s on Fulton Street, a Whole Foods in Mid-Market that closed just one year after opening, and the Safeway that served residents in the Fillmore District — about a mile from the farmers’ market — for 40 years before shutting its doors in 2025. It was the only full-service grocer in the historically Black, low-income neighborhood.

“That’s problematic for our district, because these are all neighborhoods that have some vulnerable, important communities. The Tenderloin has the highest concentration of children — 3,500 kids, more than any other neighborhood in the city — and families,” Mahmood said.

On July 21, Mahmood announced that he was drafting a set of local laws that he will present to the Board of Supervisors. He calls the package the New Affordable Groceries Act.

The ordinance is intended to resuscitate a city program that helped corner stores provide healthful produce. It would also exempt new grocers from certain permit fees, as well as expand the Storefront Opportunity Grant to provide funding for new grocers in food deserts. It would offer incentives for housing developments that include new grocers on the ground floor, modeled on NYC’s FRESH program.

Mahmood said he would spend the next few months working out the logistics of these programs.

The HOTC Farmers’ Market offers affordable, healthful food. A Safeway grocery store served residents in the Fillmore District, about a mile from the market, for 40 years before shutting its doors in early 2025. It was the only full-service grocer in the historically Black and low-income neighborhood. Credit: Lylah Schmedel-Permanna

The ordinances mark Mahmood’s second attempt to propose solutions to food insecurity to the Board of Supervisors. In July, he proposed two ambitious measures that needed board approval to appear on the November ballot but they died in committee.

The Abandoned Pharmacy and Grocery Tax would have taxed companies that have let supermarkets and pharmacies sit vacant for years, like the Fillmore Safeway and the Mid-Market Whole Foods.

The Affordable Grocery Fund could have utilized funds generated by the tax to convert corner stores into low-cost, fresh produce stores and cover costs associated with bringing grocers into a neighborhood through grants and loans. The fund would also have enabled the city to purchase land to lease directly to affordable grocers at below-market rates.

Board Budget Committee Chair Connie Chan said the tax proposal “wasn’t ready” and pulled it from the committee’s agenda on July 8. Mahmood claimed she did so at Mayor Daniel Lurie’s request and that Amazon, Whole Foods’ parent company, had exerted pressure against it.

He said 61% of San Francisco voters, meanwhile, supported a vacant-grocery tax. Sprouts, Grocery Outlet and Smart & Final have bid to take over the empty Fillmore Safeway. Negotiations failed for all three.

“And so the narrative that grocery operators don’t want to come to San Francisco is not true,” Mahmood said. “It is in their interest to keep it vacant to block competition.”

Mahmood gets inspiration from near and far

Mahmood said he was inspired by New York City Mayor Zohran Mamdani’s strides in proposing bold solutions to persistent city problems.

“I think what people really want here is solutions, and that’s the core of what was effective about Mamdani. He didn’t just describe a problem; he provided a vision on how to solve it. And I think that’s what’s been missing in San Francisco for a long time,” Mahmood said.

pillar of Mamdani’s mayoral campaign was a proposal to bring a new grocer to each of New York’s five boroughs by 2029. His administration created the NYC Fresh Program, which aims to create a network of city-owned grocers with food available at 30% below typical retail prices.

The program prioritizes using city-owned sites to create grocery stores and has allocated $70 million for their construction. It has earmarked $30 million so far to build a store in East Harlem. A second store will be integrated into the conversion of a juvenile detention center to 100% affordable housing.

Under this model, the city also covers overhead costs like rent and construction. A private operator manages daily operations and is contractually required to pass these savings directly to customers.

Mahmood acknowledges that the political realities here are much different from those in New York. For example, San Francisco is less densely populated and the median income is higher.

“We have to work with the tools that are available to us and what is possible to pass with this current Board of Supervisors and with this mayor,” Mahmood said. He said he wished the local government was more keen on corporate accountability. “But we have to make sure that we’re passing what we can to make as much progress as we can right now.”

New York isn’t his only inspiration. Mahmood said he’s also looking at efforts that San Francisco failed to renew. For instance, his proposal would resurrect the Healthy Retail SF program, which transformed 10 tobacco and liquor stores across the city nearly a decade ago into stores with fresh produce. The program reported bringing in more revenue for participating stores and increasing access to healthful foods in areas like Bayview, Hunters Point and the Tenderloin.

Support our local in-depth reporting and investigations.

Donate Now!

People without access to healthful foods are likely to experience adverse health effects. Food deserts in San Francisco are largely concentrated in areas with higher populations of Black and Indigenous residents, like the Fillmore and the Tenderloin, which are in Supervisor Bilal Mahmood’s 5th District. Credit: Lylah Schmedel-Permanna

The mayor’s Office of Economic and Workforce Development operated the program. Katie Reardon, the office’s senior project manager, told the San Francisco Public Press that the program ended in 2021 due to “contractual delays and funding.” She said most of the program’s funding came from the Sugary Beverage Tax, which is still active.

The intention, however, was to help stores encourage healthy purchases. “The Healthy Retail SF program was never designed to address food grocery affordability,” Reardon said.

In the next year, Mahmood said he hopes to secure funding for at least a couple of stores to pilot the program. His long-term objective, though, is getting a full-service grocer back in the Fillmore.

Lurie is taking a different approach. On July 28, he announced legislation that would create an Office of Food Security Coordination within the San Francisco Human Services Agency, which would coordinate citywide efforts to remedy food insecurity. He also proposed a Food Security Council to focus on solutions for healthful food access. The Food Security Task Force, an advisory board that studied food insecurity and provided recommendations to the city since 2022, disbanded on July 1.

Lura Jones, a member of the task force and senior program manager at Leah’s Pantry, a nonprofit in the Mission, noted that the task force had spent years researching and organizing solutions around food insecurity. In 2024, the task force recommended creating an Office of Food to implement and oversee a citywide food security plan, coordinate various city departments and track data on local food systems. They continued to make this recommendation through this year.

Jones says she’s disappointed that this effort never actualized, but she hopes Lurie’s plan will include the community behind the recommendations. “They’re seeing a problem. They come up with a solution without a lot of community input around it, and that’s why I think that the things they’ve tried haven’t succeeded,” Jones said.

Mahmood says the mayor’s office has not reached out to his office about the proposals, but he looks forward to reading the legislation when it’s complete.

Your weekly to-dos

  1. Join our Hands Off Our Vote: Election Protection 101 virtual training next Wednesday, August 19 to learn how to mobilize to defend voting rights and ensure every eligible voter can cast their ballot (8pm ET/5pm PT). No matter where you live or how much experience you have, you can have a national impact on election protection. In this working training, we’ll cover FAQs and help you think through your current actions as well as how to prepare for further activations this fall. More than 30,000 Indivisibles have already joined Hands Off Our Vote, and we hope you’ll be next! (If you’re ready to dive into election protection work right now, check out our toolkit for actions you and your community can take today.)
  2. Join our Immigrant Justice Summer call next Thursday, August 20 to learn how to get your community trained up and ready to demand accountability and ensure protection before an ICE surge hits (8pm ET/5pm PT). When ICE shows up in our neighborhoods, it’s crucial that we have a grounded system to channel people, training, and resources in the right direction. Without a plan in place, energy scatters and well-intentioned neighbors sometimes create structures parallel to the immigrant-led response already in progress. This call guides you on the training necessary to build a link tree, an online tool that acts as your community’s front door so neighbors can easily find the information they need to show up in an immigrant-aligned, hyper-local, and safe response.
  3. Now that the House and Senate are both on August recess, schedule an in-district office visit or plan an event in your community using our Indivisible recess resources. While the August recess should be a time for our Members of Congress to host town halls and meet with constituents, they too often use that time to avoid scrutiny. If you have Republican MoCs, take some time this month to voice your opposition to the SAVE America Act (Trump’s repulsive voter suppression bill), more funding for ICE and CBP, and Trump’s demand for billions to fuel his illegal war with Iran. If you have Democratic MoCs, continue to raise the alarm about Trump’s authoritarianism and demand they not give an inch to the GOP when Congress returns in full after Labor Day.
  4. Peggy Flanagan’s Minnesota Senate primary is TOMORROW! Join our phone bank TONIGHT at 6:30pm ET/5:30pm CT/3:30pm PT to make calls to Minnesotans before they head to the polls. We’ll be joined by Indivisible’s co-executive director Ezra Levin! Flanagan is in a tight race against Angie Craig — yet another establishment Dem who shamefully voted to thank ICE for their service. Craig has a huge cash advantage from corporate PACs and crypto, but we have people power. Right now, every single call counts to help get Flanagan across the finish line so Minnesotans can be represented by a true progressive fighter. Paid for by Indivisible Action. Not authorized by any candidate or candidate committee.

Hegseth: Honor Lindsey Graham by Giving Pentagon $1.5 Trillion

Key federal officials attended the renaming ceremony for Joint Base Lindsey Graham

Key federal officials attended the renaming ceremony for Joint Base Lindsey Graham in South Carolina on August 10, 2026.

 (Photo by DOW Rapid Response/X.com)

“Lindsey himself said to me, in his office, ‘This is the best military budget I’ve seen since I’ve been in Congress,’” the Pentagon chief claimed.

Jessica Corbett

Aug 10, 2026 (CommonDreams.org)

US Defense Secretary Pete Hegseth “can’t persuade Republicans to back his big budget,” but that didn’t stop him from pushing the $1.5 trillion proposal during a Monday event to rename Joint Base Charleston after the late Sen. Lindsey Graham.

When Graham, who served in the Air Force, unexpectedly died last month, critics remembered the South Carolina Republican as someone who “never met a war he didn’t want to send your kids to,” as well as “a bloodthirsty bastard who cheered the killing of Muslims and sold his soul to the fascists.”

RECOMMENDED…

Hegseth Is Demanding US Households Pay $5,000 More Per Year to Fund the Pentagon, Economist Says

Hegseth Is Demanding US Households Pay $5,000 More Per Year to Fund the Pentagon, Economist Says

Sen. Sanders Holds Press Conference On Arms Sales To Israel Ahead Of Wednesday's Vote

Senators Block $1.15 Trillion Pentagon Bill Over Trump’s Illegal Iran War, Israel Integration

On Monday, Hegseth—who deployed to Afghanistan and Iraq—fondly recalled meeting with Graham while part of the group Vets for Freedom. Joined at the base by the senator’s replacement, his sister Darline Graham, and Treasury Secretary Scott Bessent, who is from South Carolina, the Pentagon chief declared that “it falls to us to complete the work that Lindsey Graham began and advocated for for decades.”

“As we gather here today, the War Department is seeking a historic, generational investment of $1.5 trillion for America’s warriors, and Lindsey himself said to me, in his office, ‘This is the best military budget I’ve seen since I’ve been in Congress,’” Hegseth claimed, using President Donald Trump’s preferred name for the Department of Defense.

“This department pays tribute to Lindsey Graham in the naming of this base, but there could be no greater tribute than for Congress to give and invest in our warriors for the full $1.5 trillion,” he added.

The GOP narrowly controls both chambers of Congress, but as Politico reported just hours before the event, “Hegseth hasn’t persuaded Republicans to steamroll Democrats and advance the record-breaking plan, despite regularly trekking to the Hill in recent weeks and hobnobbing with lawmakers. Instead, an increasingly vocal group of GOP lawmakers argue the administration hasn’t explained why Republicans should burn valuable political capital in pursuit of Trump’s vision—especially with the midterms just months away.”

“Several top Republicans are skeptical about the Trump administration’s two-track approach to clinching $1.5 trillion. This relies on the GOP using the partisan reconciliation process—which allows the majority to bypass Democrats entirely—to provide $350 billion, the bulk of the increase,” the outlet detailed. The Republican majority “has—mostly—had Hegseth’s back” since the battle to confirm him, despite widely condemned bombings of boats allegedly trafficking drugs on the high seas and the ongoing war on Iran.

Hegseth on Monday shared some supposed details from his last meeting with Graham, who chaired the Senate Budget Committee.

“Mr. Secretary, what do you need for a reconciliation?” Graham said, according to Hegseth. “I said: ‘Well, in total, sir, we’re going to need $350 billion for our military. That’s what we believe gets us to $1.5 trillion—$115 [billion] in the base budget, $350 [billion] in reconciliation, and we’ll be ready.’”

“He looked at me and said, ‘How’s $355 [billion] sound to you?’ He wanted to give even more than $350 [billion],” Hegseth continued. “I saw firsthand as a young first lieutenant, as a captain in a combat zone, and as a secretary, the unwavering commitment of Lindsey Graham.”

Hegseth’s recounting of their meeting isn’t the first time Graham’s pro-war ideology has been highlighted since he died. As Common Dreams reported late last month, footage filmed for a documentary that was in the works shows the then-senator joyfully reacting to Trump’s Iran War. He said: “I almost cried. I mean, like, how long have we been pushing this?”

Responding to the release of that footage, Brian Finucane, senior adviser to the US Program at the International Crisis Group, said that “the warmonger got his wish and the result has been a catastrophe.”

Our work is licensed under Creative Commons (CC BY-NC-ND 3.0). Feel free to republish and share widely.

Jessica Corbett

Jessica Corbett is a senior editor and staff writer for Common Dreams.

Full Bio >

‘Must Be Done’: Sanders Calls for Ban on Super PAC Spending in Democratic Primaries​

Sen. Bernie Sanders speaks at a rally in Michigan

US Sen. Bernie Sanders (I-Vt.) speaks at a rally on July 18, 2026 in Detroit, Michigan.

 (Photo by Sarah Rice/Getty Images)

“I would hope that we can all agree that Republican special interests should not play a role in determining the outcome of Democratic primaries. The time to act is now.”

Jake Johnson

Aug 10, 2026 (CommonDreams.org)

US Sen. Bernie Sanders on Monday urged national Democratic leaders to impose a total ban on super PAC spending in primary contests, a change that the progressive senator said is necessary to prevent corporate interests from heavily influencing the party’s electoral outcomes.

In a letter addressed to Senate Minority Leader Chuck Schumer (D-NY), House Minority Leader Hakeem Jeffries (D-NY), and Democratic National Committee Chair Ken Martin, Sanders (I-Vt.) wrote that “what is particularly obscene is not only the outrageous amount of money coming into Democratic primaries from billionaire-funded super PACs, but the reality that these special interests have no particular desire to see Democrats win.”

RECOMMENDED…

Michigan Democratic Senate Candidate Haley Stevens Campaigns In Lansing

Stevens Dismisses Concerns About Campaign Finance, Super PAC Funding as ‘Educated Issue’

Kansas City Prepares to Host FIFA World Cup 2026

Sports Betting Giants Join Unprecedented Corporate Efforts to Buy 2026 Midterms

Sanders, who caucuses with the Democratic Party, cited as a telling example the American Israel Public Affairs Committee’s $30 million intervention in the Democratic primary for a critical US Senate seat in Michigan. The organization, known as AIPAC, spent heavily to boost Rep. Haley Stevens (D-Mich.) and attempt to tear down her progressive opponent, Abdul El-Sayed—who went on to win the race despite being massively outspent.

AIPAC is now reportedly planning to spend big in support of El-Sayed’s Republican general election opponent, Mike Rogers.

“It is absurd that they spend tens of millions of dollars to try to determine who the Democratic nominee is and, if they fail, then proceed to support the Republican candidate in the general election,” Sandres wrote. “That is not democracy. That is not what Democratic voters want.”

Sanders emphasized his support for passage of a constitutional amendment to repeal the US Supreme Court’s 2010 Citizens United decision, which paved the way for the establishment and proliferation of super PACs—entities that can raise and spend unlimited sums supporting or opposing political campaigns.

“BUT WE DO NOT HAVE TO WAIT,” Sanders wrote in all caps. “Right now, the Democratic Party has the power to prohibit super PACs from participating in its primaries. That can be done. That must be done. I urge you to take action and make clear that the Democratic Party will no longer maintain this corrupt system.”

“While there are ideological differences of opinion within the big tent of the party, I would hope that we can all agree that Republican special interests should not play a role in determining the outcome of Democratic primaries,” the senator continued. “The time to act is now.”

The DNC has repeatedly faced calls in recent years to curb or eliminate the influence of super PACs in Democratic primaries—but has yet to take concrete action.

Earlier this year, the DNC Rules Committee rejected a proposed resolution that condemned the “growing influence” of AIPAC and other organizations pumping huge sums into Democratic primaries. The rules panel instead advanced a resolution broadly condemning dark money and expressing the DNC’s “commitment to campaign finance practices that align with the party’s core values.”

Nearly a third of all corporate political spending on elections since the Supreme Court’s Citizens United ruling has come during the 2026 election cycle, according to a June report by Public Citizen.

“Cryptocurrency, artificial intelligenceBig Tech, and online betting corporations have collectively spent $294 million to influence federal elections in the 2026 midterm cycle, reflecting a strategic move to spend directly on political action committees to influence federal elections,” the report found. “These corporate super PAC political contributions make up 57% of the $517 million that corporations have reported spending on the 2026 midterms so far.”

Our work is licensed under Creative Commons (CC BY-NC-ND 3.0). Feel free to republish and share widely.

Jake Johnson

Jake Johnson is a senior editor and staff writer for Common Dreams.

Full Bio >

‘It’s Not Radical to Believe You Should Have Healthcare’: El-Sayed Hits Back at Trump, GOP Attacks

Michigan Democrats Hold General Election Kickoff Event In Detroit

Democratic US Senate nominee Abdul El-Sayed speaks during a rally on August 7, 2026 in Detroit, Michigan.

 (Photo by Bill Pugliano/Getty Images)

“Donald Trump’s vision is the one you’re living in right now,” said the Democratic US Senate nominee. “Can you afford your gas? Can you afford your groceries?”

Jake Johnson

Aug 10, 2026

Fresh off his victory in the Democratic primary race for US Senate in Michigan, progressive epidemiologist Abdul El-Sayed used television appearances on Sunday to respond to increasingly hysterical attacks by Republicans and President Donald Trump while offering a positive vision for the future, underscoring his support for Medicare for All and a humane foreign policy that doesn’t fund genocide.

“It’s not radical to believe that people should be able to afford their groceries,” El-Sayed, who is set to face Republican Mike Rogers in November, told NBC’s Kristen Welker in response to the Senate GOP’s first attack ad of the general election. “It’s not radical to believe that you should have healthcare in this country. It’s not radical to believe that you don’t think the president should be able to deny elections or make $2.2 billion off of his role in office. It’s not radical to believe that all of us should be able to breathe clean air and drink clean water. Those are the things that I’ve been fighting for.”

RECOMMENDED…

Trump and Melania on NYE 2024.

‘Racist and Bigoted’: Trump Rebuked for Grotesque Attack on Abdul El-Sayed and Wife

Democratic Leaders Rally Voters In Michigan For Senate Candidate Abdul El-Sayed

Dem Establishment Intensifies Attacks on El-Sayed as New Poll Shows Him Leading by Double Digits

Trump and congressional Republicans wasted no time launching unhinged and bigoted attacks on El-Sayed following his primary victory last week. In a Truth Social post on Saturday, Trump posted an image showing a photo of himself and First Lady Melania Trump alongside a photo of El-Sayed and his wife, psychiatrist Sarah Jukaku. The caption of the photo blared, “Two VERY DIFFERENT America’s [sic].”

Asked by CNN’s Jake Tapper to respond to the post, El-Sayed said Sunday that the caption is “right.”

“One [America] in which your overlords are two people who don’t like each other, but joint in the interest of making billions of dollars off of you, or two people who genuinely love each other, enjoyed some pancakes together, want to come together to build the kind of America where they can raise a family and know that that family is going to have the good things,” said the Michigan Democrat.

“So, yes, you got two different visions of America. Donald Trump’s vision is the one you’re living in right now,” he continued. “Can you afford your gas? Can you afford your groceries? Do you believe, when you look your kids in the eye, that they’re going to have a better future than you did?”

El-Sayed overcame more than $30 million in spending by the American Israel Public Affairs Committee (AIPAC)—and over $60 million in total outside spending—to defeat Rep. Haley Stevens (D-Mich.) in last week’s primary contest. Throughout his primary campaign, El-Sayed criticized AIPAC as a destructive force in US politics and spoke out in support of ending American military aid to Israel—a stance that Trump and Republicans have sought to equate to antisemitism.

“He doesn’t love Israel. He doesn’t love Jewish people,” Trump said of El-Sayed last week. “He hates them. He hates them with a passion that burns in his heart.”

During his CNN appearance on Sunday, El-Sayed hit back at the president’s smear, saying, “I love and revere Judaism and the Jewish people.”

“They are not the same as AIPAC in Israel,” he said. “I want our tax dollars spent to provide good schools, to pay for healthcare, to rebuild our roads here in Michigan, rather than it being sent abroad to subsidize foreign militaries. That’s not just Israel, by the way. That is also Egypt and Saudi Arabia and Jordan and Pakistan.”

“So I believe in international law,” El-Sayed continued. “I believe in equal rights to peace, dignity, and self-determination for all people. I believe in a process that allows a free Palestinian people and free Jewish Israeli people to come together around what they believe the ultimate peace should look like.”

Our work is licensed under Creative Commons (CC BY-NC-ND 3.0). Feel free to republish and share widely.

Jake Johnson

Jake Johnson is a senior editor and staff writer for Common Dreams.

Full Bio >

‘Has Trump’s Invasion of Greenland Already Begun?’: Experts Fearful as MAGA-Linked Oil Company Prepares Unauthorized Drilling

Greenland: Every Day Life And General Views

People walk past a shop’s placard that reads “Greenland is not for sale!” on July 24, 2026 in Nuuk, Greenland.

 (Photo by Sean Gallup/Getty Images)

“Let nobody think Trump has given up on taking Greenland,” warned one professor of European politics.

Stephen Prager

Aug 08, 2026 (CommonDreams.org)

After appearing to back off earlier this year, President Donald Trump this week renewed his threats to seize Greenland. A Saturday report that a Texas oil company with ties to Trump had begun preparing to drill in the Arctic territory without permission has raised fresh concerns that his push for control of the island may already be moving beyond rhetoric.

As The Guardian reported, Greenland’s government issued a “strong warning” last week after learning that a Texas oil company called Greenland Energy had begun making unauthorized preparations for oil extraction in Jameson Land, a remote area of eastern Greenland, including bringing drilling materials ashore.

RECOMMENDED…

US President Donald Trump

‘Recipe for Catastrophe’: Trump Moves to Weaken Arctic Drilling Safeguards

Golden Pass LNG plant

Report Shows How Trump’s Fossil Fuel Agenda Is ‘Making Everyone’s Lives More Expensive’

The company, founded last year, has claimed that Jameson Land may contain $1 trillion worth of crude oil and announced plans to drill two wells there—a project that requires approval from Greenland’s government.

X post: https://x.com/KenRoth/status/2086035678677041477?ref_src=twsrc%5Etfw%7Ctwcamp%5Etweetembed%7Ctwterm%5E2086035678677041477%7Ctwgr%5E62138366a91d04a0f9f66eeb38c775a8b4ffb3f0%7Ctwcon%5Es1_c10&ref_url=https%3A%2F%2Fwww.commondreams.org%2Fnews%2Ftrump-greenland-oil

The company also has ties to several Trump allies and associates. According to The Guardian:

Greenland Energy has retained Phil McGraw, better known as Dr. Phil, a prominent right-wing former chatshow host who served on Trump’s religious freedom commission, to make a documentary series that will “capture the mission of these modern-day wildcatters.”

It has also appointed as a director a US Navy veteran who is working on Golden Dome, the missile defense plan for which Trump says controlling Greenland is “vital.”

Larry Swets, Greenland Energy’s chair and a big shareholder, appears to enjoy access to Trump’s circle. He has said the oil project is “not related to American annexation.”

A Greenland Energy representative falsely claimed in June that the company had permission to place equipment on Jameson Land, before later saying there had been confusion.

But the following month, residents saw a barge arrive with drilling equipment. A Danish outlet confirmed that the delivery was intended for Greenland Energy.

Following the delivery, Greenland’s government said on July 30 that the company “did not have the necessary approvals from the mineral resources authority” and would receive a warning that “all future logistical matters must be advised and approved by the mineral resources authority—before they are carried out.”

Two days later, Trump posted an ominious digitally altered image to Truth Social depicting himself as a giant looming over a Greenlandic town, captioned “Hello, Greenland!”

A day earlier, Trump had appeared on the right-wing network Real America’s Voice, where host Steve Gruber reminded him that he had predicted Greenland would be under US control by the time he leaves office in 2029.

“You’ll be right,” Trump replied. “Greenland is important. Not from their standpoint, from our standpoint. You should make that bet.”

Before this week’s comments, Trump had spoken far less publicly about Greenland since January, when he threatened to use military force to take over the island if Denmark did not cede it. To pressure NATO allies, Trump threatened steep tariffs on several European countries, but backed off after Europe pledged retaliatory tariffs, causing panic in the financial markets.

“Let nobody think Trump has given up on taking Greenland,” said John O’Brennan, professor of European politics at Maynooth University in Ireland. He added that Greenland Energy’s unauthorized activity “is the latest act of lawlessness his acolytes are engaged in.”

Kenneth Roth, the former executive director of Human Rights Watch, responded to the story by asking, “Has Trump’s invasion of Greenland already begun?”

Historian Ruth Ben-Ghiat suggested it was possible. “Invasions,” she said, “often start with ‘technical’ projects that justify the presence of operatives and ‘technical experts’ who are also doing recon and advance prep.”

The Greenlandic government ultimately said it “would not be proportionate” to order Greenland Energy to remove the drilling equipment, a decision that The Guardian said underscored the difficult position facing its officials.

“They could grant permission for oil drilling, even though the planned wells appear to fall within a conservation area protected by the Ramsar convention on wetlands,” the report explained. “Or they could refuse and, some worry, give Trump a pretext to advance his imperialist agenda.”

Although the project has not been approved, a Greenland Energy representative said a vessel carrying additional drilling equipment would depart Canada in September, with drilling set to begin in October.

Jessica Berlin, a senior fellow at the Center for European Policy Analysis, warned that allowing the equipment to remain would signal weakness that Trump could exploit.

“Don’t even think about allowing this,” she wrote in a post directed to the Greenlandic and Danish governments. “If you give them an inch, they’ll take 100 miles. Kick them out now or accept that you just opened the floodgates.”

“Like Putin, you can’t negotiate with Trump,” she added. “Showing weakness will just guarantee the next outrage.”

As part of the Kingdom of Denmark, Greenland is covered by NATO’s Article 5 collective-defense clause, which obligates member nations to defend one another from armed attack. But NATO has no precedent for how Article 5 would apply if one member—the US—attacked another.

O’Brennan warned, “Europe—you are about to be seriously tested.”

Our work is licensed under Creative Commons (CC BY-NC-ND 3.0). Feel free to republish and share widely.

Stephen Prager

Stephen Prager is a staff writer for Common Dreams.

Full Bio >