“As an adjudicated insurrectionist, Trump is an illegitimate president according to Section 3 of the 14th Amendment, and therefore every official act as president will be illegitimate.”
–Mike Zonta, co-editor of OccupySF.net
The 14th Amendment states: “No person shall be a Senator or Representative in Congress, or elector of President and Vice President, or hold any office, civil or military, under the United States, or under any state, who, having previously taken an oath, as a member of Congress, or as an officer of the United States, or as a member of any state legislature, or as an executive or judicial officer of any state, to support the Constitution of the United States, shall have engaged in insurrection or rebellion against the same, or given aid or comfort to the enemies thereof. But Congress may, by a vote of two-thirds of each House, remove such disability.”
Call your Congressperson and your U.S. Senators at (202) 224-3121
Democratic National Committee Chair Ken Martin speaks during a Labor Council meeting as part of the DNC Summer Meeting, Thursday, Aug. 13, 2026, in Austin, Texas. AP Photo/Joel Angel Juarez
Iowa and New Hampshire are out, though they may not go down without a fight. South Carolina and Nevada are in.
The Democratic National Committee formally approved sweeping changes to the party’s 2028 presidential primary calendar Saturday, putting states that are more racially diverse at the front of the line.
The order in which states vote typically plays a significant role in shaping the presidential primary — influencing both what issues are discussed and who ultimately emerges.
Party officials set South Carolina first on Jan. 22, 2028, followed by Nevada (Feb. 1), New Hampshire (Feb. 8), New Mexico (Feb. 15), Michigan (Feb. 22) and Virginia on (Feb. 29).
The new calendar represents a sea change from past competitive primaries. For decades, Iowa and New Hampshire, two states with largely white populations, had started the process. Now, two southern states and two Western states will be among the earliest contests, which is likely to expand the influence of Black and Latino voters. “Six states, different regions, different communities, different experiences but together as one our road map to the White House,” Ken Martin, the DNC party chair, said in a speech to the party on Saturday.
The earliest states will play an outsize role in winnowing what is expected to be an expansive field of candidates. The order was officially set by a vote of the DNC membership at a meeting in Austin, Texas, on Saturday.
After those first six states vote, each on their own day, a range of states will vote on Super Tuesday in early March.
The party’s new rules include stiff penalties for states that hold primaries in violation of the calendar, and for any candidates who might campaign in those states. But some uncertainty remains, especially in New Hampshire, where a state law requires its primary be the first in the nation. The DNC allows the state to hold a party-organized primary on Feb. 8.
Democrats in the state so far have resisted being relegated to third in line.
The party had tried to put South Carolina first in 2024, as well, but New Hampshire jumped the line. Former President Joe Biden declined to appear on the New Hampshire ballot, so his supporters instead organized a write-in campaign, and the party eventually rescinded its penalties and seated the state’s delegates at the convention.
San Francisco Historium Spotlight will explore The City’s development with shows, cuisine, tours and more
It is unclear when Iowa will hold a primary or caucus in 2028. The state has complained about the DNC’s new calendar, and some politicians in the state have threatened to hold an early event anyway, citing their own state law, which calls for Iowa to caucus at least eight days before any other presidential nominating contest.
On Saturday, Rita Hart, chair of the Iowa Democratic Party, said the new calendar “excludes huge swaths of the country and the voters Democrats need.”
And she warned that it was still possible the process could be “thrown into chaos” and an “unwelcome distraction” for Iowa Democrats trying to win this year.
Jamie Harrison, the former DNC chair and a former chair of the Democratic Party in South Carolina, made the case that, “We’re not erasing tradition. We’re building on it.”
Even with that uncertainty, potential 2028 candidates are already flooding into these early states. Pete Buttigieg, the former transportation secretary who now lives in Michigan, is headed to South Carolina for a political event next week. Gov. Gavin Newsom of California campaigned with Dr. Abdul El-Sayed, the progressive Democratic candidate running for Senate, this past weekend, after he won the nomination in Michigan. Rep. Alexandria Ocasio-Cortez of New York had campaigned for El-Sayed ahead of the primary, and she also appeared in a campaign commercial for him.
Some leaders in South Carolina are eager for all the attention the state — and the issues that its voters care about — is now about to get. Iowa’s premier place for years had meant candidates would talk about agricultural issues and ethanol, for instance.
Black voters generally have been a moderating force in Democratic politics, so the early position of South Carolina could lead the state to have a similar effect. In the past, South Carolina played the pivotal role of anointing the candidate with the most momentum headed into Super Tuesday. Now Michigan and Virginia — which are bigger and more expensive to campaign in — are set to hold that power.
Political strategists in both the moderate and progressive wings of the party have pored over how the new calendar might play out. Buttigieg, for instance, carried Iowa in 2020, but now that state has fallen out of the early slate. Sen. Bernie Sanders, a leading progressive, carried New Hampshire in both his presidential runs, but there is a debate over whether that was just ideological alignment or how much his decades representing nearby Vermont may have given him a boost.
Biden had placed South Carolina first in the calendar in 2024, elevating the state that delivered him the nomination in 2020 after bruising defeats in Iowa and New Hampshire. But it was far from certain that the state would keep that slot headed into 2028.
South Carolina had a fierce fight for the leadoff spot with Nevada, an important general election battleground.
The final order — which also includes New Mexico and its large Latino population — has received mostly positive reviews from Democrats as fair and geographically balanced. The biggest complaints have come from the Midwest, which now has only one state among the first six, Michigan, and it is only fifth.
Democratic House Majority Leader Hakeem Jeffries told viewers of NBC’s “Meet the Press” that he no longer supports Medicare for All on Sunday, August 16, 2026.
(Photo: Screengrab/via NBC News)
“Does Jeffries even pay attention to the overwhelming support of the Democratic Party base?” asked one labor movement veteran, citing a new poll showing 90% of the party want lawmakers to focus on passing universal healthcare.
Democratic House Majority Leader Hakeem Jeffries of New York sparked fresh outrage Sunday by saying he does not currently support Medicare for All legislation in Congress, a damning admission at a time when party voters—clamoring for bolder positions from leadership and a willingness to fight for the working class—are overwhelming in favor of proposals that would provide universal healthcare coverage for every person in the United States at a lower cost than the current system.
Appearing on Sunday’s “Meet the Press,” Jeffries was asked by host Kristen Welker—who noted his previous backing of such proposals from 2013 to 2021—if he would put Medicare for All legislation in the House up for a vote if Democrat’s win back the majority in November, Jeffries first tried to dodge the question by putting his focus on the shortcomings of the Republicans, who gutted have Medicaid and attacked Affordable Healthcare Act subsidies during President Donald Trump’s second term.
But pressed by Welker if he “personally” supports Medicare for All at this time, Jeffries said, “No,” explaining that “it’s not legislation that I currently am co-sponsoring or that I support.”
WELKER: As Democratic leader in the House, would you vote for or against Medicare for All?
JEFFRIES: It's not legislation that I currently am co-sponsoring or that I support, but I support the notion we've got to find a path forward to fix our broken healthcare system pic.twitter.com/U8UZ4TqSZQ
The remarks were hardly surprising, but landed hard for critics, who quickly pointed out that a new CBS/YouGov poll released Sunday showed—as survey after survey has also documented—that hunger for Medicare for All among Democratic voters is remarkably high.
As Common Dreams reported last week, a recent Yale University study found that Medicare for All, as drafted in a bill by Sen. Bernie Sanders (I-Vt.), would save over 114,000 lives annually and $1 trillion per year in US healthcare spending.
In the poll, conducted between Aug. 12-14, a full 90% of Democratic voters said they would “like to see the Democratic Party focus on plans for passing Medicare for All,” compared to just 10% who said it should not be a focus.
“A reminder that the vast majority of Democrats across the country support Medicare for All,” said progressive journalist Mehdi Hasan in response to Jeffries’ answer on the question. “This man is so out of touch with his party. How is he their leader?”
The Lever’s David Sirota also issued a rebuke, explaining that Jeffries’ comments, juxtaposed with the CBS/YouGov poll, show exactly “why Democratic voters are so enraged.”
Also notable from the poll were responses to two questions that preceded the question about the specific policies Democrats should focus on.
Asked if it was more important for the Democratic Party to “show they are fighting for people” or that “they have detailed policies,” 83% said it was more important for Democrats to show they are fighting, while just 17% said detailed policies were more important. Similarly, when it came to economic issues, voters—by a 68% to 29% margin—said they’d prefer “big or fundamental changes in policies and approach, even if they are harder to do” compared to those who wanted “smaller or incremental changes to policies and approach, that might be easier to do.”
Appearing after Jeffries on “Meet the Press,” Rep. Ro Khanna (D-Calif.), a top ally of Sanders and a current co-sponsor of the Medicare for All Bill introduced earlier this year in the House, disagreed with the Minority Leader’s position.
“Medicare for All is arguably the most important priority,” Khanna said. “It would save money, and it would save lives. Look, there was just a Yale study that came out. It would save $1 trillion in terms of costs, in terms of health care.”
Asked by Welker if he was “disappointed” in Jeffries’ remarks, Khanna said that while “I respect the difference” of opinion, “I will say this: it needs to have a vote on the House floor.”
“The majority of the House Democrats are going to support it,” he continued. “It is one of the most important policies if you actually believe in saving lives and in helping increase wages for working-class Americans. You talk to folks, and they’ll say, ‘The biggest thing that pushes me into bankruptcy is if someone gets cancer. And I can’t afford the bills.’ And even people who have insurance, look at how many premiums have been increasing. This would save money for ordinary Americans. And it would increase their wages. It’s the single biggest roadblock in our economic system hurting working families.”
In a social media post on Sunday, Sanders—while not mentioning the latest comments by Jeffries—said, “Our current healthcare system is broken. Progressives understand healthcare must be a human right, guaranteed to all, not a source of billions in profits for insurance and drug companies.
Our current healthcare system is broken.
Progressives understand healthcare must be a human right, guaranteed to all, not a source of billions in profits for insurance and drug companies.
A recent poll showed 64% of Americans want Medicare for All. They’re right. Let’s do it. pic.twitter.com/NFwOUk0QKB
WEDNESDAY (8pm ET/5pm PT): Join our first national Hands Off Our Vote election protection training to learn how YOU can help protect democratic elections from sabotage by the Trump regime. Protecting the midterms will require a trained, informed citizenry dedicated to defending our sacred right to vote and mobilizing to ensure that every vote is counted. If you’re ready to step up, join our first training this Wednesday where we’ll cover specific things you can do RIGHT NOW to help ensure all eligible voters can cast their ballots. We know this fight isn’t one-size-fits-all, so we’ll provide ways you can shape those actions to your local needs and capacity — whether you’re an individual, a group member, or a group leader, you’ll leave the training with action items to start making an impact right away.
Delete the DoorDash App until they stop fighting to give Trump more control over the District of Columbia. DoorDash has stood silently by while ICE detains and murders their delivery drivers. They said nothing when Trump flooded DC streets with the National Guard. But now, DoorDash has voiced their support for HR 9720, a bill that would give Trump more authority over DC and its residents, all so they can kill a 20-cent tax on delivery orders they don’t like (and which actually supports food stability programs). No matter where you live, you can have an impact by deleting your account until they meet the conditions laid out below.
WASHINGTON—Assuring the American people he would not let the legal system sway his judgment in any decision he makes, recently sworn-in Attorney General Todd Blanche vowed at a press conference Monday to remain fully independent of the law. “The autonomy of the Office of the Attorney General is paramount, and I will defend it against any act, statute, ordinance, or even basic common-law principle,” said Blanche, emphasizing that no federal law or constitutional restriction would have any influence whatsoever upon his investigations, prosecutions, or other official actions. “For far too long, the Department of Justice has displayed a prominent pro-law bias, but under my tenure that will be rectified immediately. As of this morning, I have shelved all cases against those accused of crimes and launched inquiries into several people toward whom the president has expressed a slight personal distaste.” Blanche added that he would wholeheartedly defend President Donald Trump from any attempt to restrain his actions using the U.S. Constitution.
This is your sign to take action for the midterm election. Common Power mobilizes volunteers to get out the vote across the country because we believe the most common power we should all have, is the power of our vote. By moving our volunteers towards political action through community, education, and investment in next-generation leadership, we work to sustain our fight for a democracy that serves us all.
GET MIDTERMS READY:
WE’RE DOORKNOCKING IN 20+ STATES AND 50+ ELECTIONS
Common Power is hitting the ground to talk to voters and get out the vote. We’re mobilizing on two critical fronts: fighting for candidates who can win seats in Congress now and leaders who can reshape the Democratic Party in the future.
We’re reaching voters across the country thanks to our state teams. You can join a team today to stay updated on travel information and connect with volunteers.
ALL OF OUR DOORKNOCKING OPPORTUNITIES IN ONE PLACE:
Ready to volunteer for the Midterms? Download the Common Power Action App to sign up for a trip. We’ve streamlined all our work for our volunteers and Team Leads in one place to make coordinating a breeze.
Consider helping CoPo bring another doorknocker instead! Sponsorships go towards transportation, lodging, and meals on the grounds for sponsored volunteers. We primarily sponsor Action Academy students and Institute Educators, our younger and more diverse pathways into the CoPo community.
Anne Richards, left, co-chair of DSA-SF, seen with Hazel Williams, a delegate on the group’s national political committee: “We are fighting for material gains for the working class in San Francisco, and we also are the working class in San Francisco.Craig Lee/The Examiner
A group spearheading the hot-button affordable-housing ballot measure that Mayor Daniel Lurie attacked this week is the San Francisco chapter of the Democratic Socialists of America, an organization in the headlines across the country this year with the election of member Zohran Mamdani as New York City mayor and a spate of other electoral wins.
Democratic Socialists of America — San Francisco — which decries the failings of capitalism and the concentration of wealth, aims to empower workers, and calls for city divestment from companies supporting Israel — is a leading champion of Proposition I, which would dedicate city transfer taxes on properties worth $10 million or more to housing-related purposes.
The left-wing group has had a significant effect on San Francisco government in recent years. It has seen two supervisors elected and backed a property-tax measure that has raised more than $500 million, among other things. It says its dues-paying membership in The City has surged more than 28% this year to 1,506 members in the wake of Mamdani’s victory.
“We are fighting for material gains for the working class in San Francisco, and we also are the working class in San Francisco,” said Anne Richards, one of the local group’s two co-chairs, who said she was “a tech worker” in The City.
The local chapter’s growth has been mirrored at the national level as DSA candidates have won elections in federal and state primaries, as well as for local offices in Colorado, Michigan, New York, Washington, D.C., and other places. The national organization said in July it had hit 120,000 members, making it the largest socialist organization in U.S. history.
“People are just seeing that the system is broken for all but a handful of people, and I think there’s a lot of people who are very disillusioned and disappointed with the establishment Democratic Party and are actively looking for something different.” Richards said.
In July, DSA issued a national platform that drew criticism from some Democratic and Republican figures alike.
The platform calls, among other things, for abolishing the U.S. Senate and the federal Immigration and Customs Enforcement agency; replacing the president and the supreme court with an executive and judiciary chosen by and subordinate to the House of Representatives; public financing for all elections; and redirecting “funding to public services as steps towards fully abolishing the police and prison system which protects the rich and jails the poor.”
Hazel Williams, who helped produce the platform as a San Francisco delegate on the organization’s national political committee, said parts of the platform “we want to do right away, and then there are some that represent the horizon for us.”
“The biggest point here is that we are winning. We are winning more than ever. Our message is resonating with people more than ever,” she said.
“This pushback is largely people that have been defending the status quo for a very long time, feeling threatened by this renewed energy, this progressive, radical energy that people are rallying around, and so they kind of weave this story,” Williams said. “DSA offers an alternative to the liberal status quo that has not been working for people.”
Along with the recent victories, nevertheless, have come defeats, including for a DSA candidate in Wisconsin who narrowly lost an Aug. 11 Democratic primary for governor after polls had shown her leading.
Asked about the Democratic Socialists of America, Nancy Tung — chair of the San Francisco Democratic Party — was measured in her response.
“I think generally the Democratic Party has to be a big tent, and we have to not be afraid of having conversation, whether or not there’s consensus or disagreement,” Tung said.
The San Francisco chapter’s recent growth has come after city voters in 2024 elected a more moderate majority on the Board of Supervisors and a popular business-friendly mayor who has emphasized the importance of public safety and clean and safe streets.
Former Supervisor Dean Preston (seen in July): “It’s been a very active chapter. I think that the DSA chapter in San Francisco has had a big impact in The City in recent years.”Craig Lee/The Examiner
Former District 5 Supervisor Dean Preston, a member of DSA, lost his seat in that election to Supervisor Bilal Mahmood. Preston had won a special election in November 2019 to finish London Breed’s term after she was elected mayor, and he was re-elected in 2020.
Still on the board is District 9 Supervisor Jackie Fielder, a DSA member who won in 2024 with nearly 60% of the vote against a more centrist challenger.
In addition to Prop. I, the local DSA chapter is supporting a November ballot measure sponsored by Supervisor Chyanne Chen that would create a public bank — something Fielder and the organization have sought.
In an interview, Fielder talked about the organization’s various priorities.
“On a bigger level, it means an expanded weight of the people into the decisions that actually govern their lives,” she said.
“It means making sure that money does not obliterate representative democracy, and ensuring the economy works for all of the working class — not just the billionaires who have all the capital and means of production,” Fielder said.
Michael Martin oversees Fisherman’s Wharf remake, huge real-estate projects, and planning to protect The City’s waterfront
Lurie and The City’s police and firefighters unions on Wednesday warned that Prop. I would create “an unaccountable slush fund” while carving a hole in The City’s general fund by shifting what the City Controller said would be nearly $120 million a year to a House SF Fund for affordable-housing programs — a charge Prop. I backers vehemently rejected.
Max Szabo, a Lurie spokesperson on political matters, reiterated Friday that Prop. I “misleads voters” and that it would “tie The City’s hands by requiring millions to flow to a small group of nonprofits — such as those who wrote the measure — with no requirement that they actually build housing.”
But Prop. I proponents said that the mayor’s “slush fund” allegation made no sense because the measure puts the Mayor’s Office of Housing and Community Development in charge of administering the money, and it requires the city Controller’s Office to audit spending.
“[Lurie is] calling his own department an unaccountable slush fund,” Preston said.
A section in the measure says “[OHCD] shall administer the House SF Fund.” The same office also administers the Housing Trust Fund that would be extended and expanded by Proposition C — another ballot measure the mayor does support — according to The City’s website.
“These are the same rules that apply to any other housing funding measure that The City has passed in recent history,” said Quintin Mecke, executive director of the Council of Community Housing Organizations.
Prop. I also specifies percentages for how much of the tax proceeds must be spent on affordable-housing production, preservation or acquisition programs, tenant stabilization or homelessness prevention, and administration.
DSA victories
Former Supervisor Dean Preston said Proposition I follows a series of successful city ballot campaigns in which the local chapter of Democratic Socialists of America played a big role over the past eight years.
2018: Preston was the author of Proposition F, which established a right to city-funded legal representation for residential tenants facing eviction.
2018: The chapter was part of a coalition that opposed Proposition H, an unsuccessful measure to enact policies to equip San Francisco police officers with conductive-energy devices (also known as tasers) and to govern the use of such devices by police officers.
2018: Proposition C established the Homelessness Gross Receipts Tax, which imposes a tax on businesses with gross receipts of more than $25 million to feed the Our City, Our Home Fund. Proceeds go to services for people experiencing homelessness and to prevent homelessness.
2022: The Empty Homes Tax established penalties for leaving residential properties vacant for extended periods. The measure was struck down by a San Francisco Superior Court judge in a ruling The City is now appealing.
2020: Proposition I changed the City’s property transfer-tax rate on commercial and residential properties valued between $10 million and $24.99 million from 2.75% to 5.5%, and on properties valued at $25 million or more from 3% to 6%.
2020: Proposition K authorized The City to own, develop, construct, acquire or rehabilitate up to 10,000 units of low-income rental housing. Passed with more than 73% of the vote, it had no funding tied to the measure and was a companion piece to Prop. I.
2022: Proposition H changed the election cycle for mayor, sheriff, district attorney, city attorney and treasurer from odd-numbered years to even-numbered years concurrent with presidential elections.
Service Employees International Union Local 1021 — The City’s largest public-employees union — publicly endorsed the initiative this week, joining United Educators of San Francisco.
The money in question comes from an existing transfer tax on property transactions worth $10 million or more, which voters doubled in 2020 via a ballot measure sponsored by Preston.
Prop. I proponents say the measure is needed because even though the 2020 tax initiative was touted to voters as a housing measure — and the Board of Supervisors at the time unanimously stated the intent that the proceeds should go to housing-related programs — city officials have since used money from the tax for other purposes.
The tax had raised $504.6 million by February, about $200 million of which initially went to housing-related programs, advocates say.
“This one’s exciting because it’s a real solution to the housing affordability emergency that we have in The City,” Richards said. “It expands city investment in developing affordable housing and rent relief without raising taxes.”
Prop. I was also written to protect the high-end levy by removing the existing authority of the Board of Supervisors to reduce, suspend, or repeal the property transfer tax without voter approval.
Earlier this year, Lurie and Mahmood proposed eliminating the tax for transactions of multifamily housing, commercial real estate and other property— excluding single residences — valued at $10 million or more as a way to stimulate economic activity. They later suspended that effort in the face of massive budget deficits, but Mahmood said he hoped to revive the plan.
“We are defending this money that voters mandated to be put towards affordable housing — housing that San Franciscans can afford,” Richards said.
The San Francisco chapter of DSA was launched in the early 1980s. One of its founding members was Harry Britt, who was appointed to fill the vacancy on the San Francisco Board of Supervisors in 1979 left by the assassination of gay-rights activist Harvey Milk.
Members say the modern incarnation of the chapter traces its roots to 2016 and a surge of interest across the country sparked by the Democratic presidential campaign of U.S. Sen. Bernie Sanders.
In addition to electoral activities, the San Francisco chapter has working groups focused on specific areas such as labor unions, homelessness, immigrant rights, tenants’ rights, “ecosocialism” and “Palestine solidarity.”
Members have raised money for and walked picket lines with striking workers and delivered food and clothes to people who are homeless.
“It’s been a very active chapter,” Preston said. “I think that the DSA chapter in San Francisco has had a big impact in The City in recent years.”
Santa Clara County and the state filed a lawsuit in federal court to block a proposed 26-acre Immigration and Customs Enforcement detention facility outside of Gilroy.Godofredo A. Vásquez/For the S.F. Chronicle
Public meetings packed with fearful residents and anti-ICE advocates. Highway bridges transformed into protest sites. Small-town mayors fielding questions about the limits of federal power.
This summer, these scenes played out in the Bay Area city of Gilroy, the state’s garlic capital, and farther south in the Mojave Desert town of California City (Kern County), as the rural localities grappled with how to effectively oppose immigration detention centers imposed on their communities.
The communities have transformed into battlegrounds against the Trump administration’s planned multibillion-dollar detention center network expansion, a linchpin of its campaign to deport millions of immigrants without permanent legal status living in the United States.
Both communities are struggling with the question of what, if anything, residents can do to stop a detention center in their backyard.
Gilroy, a small, majority-Latino town about 30 miles south of San Jose, has a long history of agriculture sustained by immigrant workers, Mayor Greg Bozzo said. Santa Clara County’s residents are already fearful amid actions by Immigration and Customs Enforcement. Bozzo said that fear would deepen if a federal lockup opened nearby.
“We want the city of Gilroy to know every one of their elected leaders is opposed to the detention center,” Bozzo said.
Santa Clara County and the state filed a lawsuit in federal court to block the facility, which sits just outside Gilroy’s jurisdiction on unincorporated county land.
The lawsuit, filed on June 10, argues the federal government violated a slew of environmental laws and administrative procedures when it began building the facility for 150 detainees on Holslaw Road. The federal government voluntarily halted construction until a September hearing.
The Department of Homeland Security told the Chronicle it has no new detention centers planned at the Gilroy location, despite acknowledging in court papers it had been doing construction at the location.
“Every day, DHS is conducting law enforcement activities across the country to keep Americans safe,” said the spokesperson, who declined to provide a name. “It should not come as news that ICE will be making arrests in states across the U.S. and is actively working to expand detention space.”
The lawsuit argues that DHS violated state and federal laws when it began construction. Santa Clara County Counsel Tony LoPresti said he believed there was solid legal basis for their arguments.
That said, the federal government is generally exempt from local laws, including zoning, by the U.S. Constitution’s supremacy clause, which asserts that federal law trumps local laws when the two are at odds.
“The biggest challenge is that states and localities’ ability to regulate the federal government is limited,” said Rick Su, a law professor at the University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill School of Law specializing in the intersection between cities and federal immigration. “Especially with regard to something that is within the core (federal) government powers, it’s traditionally understood that states and localities cannot regulate them, cannot stop them, cannot block them.”
But across the country, successful challenges to new detention centers have alleged violations of federal law, Su said. In Maryland, for example, the attorney general sued to halt a new immigration detention center, saying the feds violated the National Environmental Policy Act. In April, a federal judge temporarily blocked the project, which involved converting a large warehouse.
The lawsuit over the site near Gilroy alleges a violation of the same law, among others.
It also argues that under the California Land Conservation Act of 1965, the county and landowner entered into an agreement designating it exclusively for agricultural use in exchange for tax benefits. As a tenant of the property, the lawsuit argues, the federal government is subject to those restrictions. The plaintiffs are asking the court to permanently block the federal government from constructing an immigration detention facility at the site.
Unlike the lawsuit over the Gilroy site, the lawsuit over the California City Detention Facility doesn’t involve suing the federal government. The target of the California City facility lawsuit is the private prison company contracted by the federal government to operate the site and the city that approved the project.
The nonprofit Dignity Not Detention Coalition and an anonymous man detained there since September are suing CoreCivic, one of the nation’s largest immigration detention operators, and California City itself, alleging they failed to follow proper permitting procedures and violated a California law passed in 2017 that limits the circumstances in which cities can enter into contracts with private detention operators.
The California City lawsuit argues that CoreCivic is subject to local and state laws, especially because the contract it signed with the Department of Homeland Security explicitly stated it would be.
The facility, built in 1999, had been operated by CoreCivic as a state and federal prison for years until 2024, when the California Department of Corrections and Rehabilitation decided not to renew its lease with the company. After President Donald Trump took office last year, it was converted into a detention facility and began holding immigrants in August.
The lawsuit argues the company did not obtain the proper city approvals, including a permit and business license, before detaining immigrants.
In a statement, CoreCivic said it doesn’t comment on pending litigation. The company’s attorney, Dan Struck, has said during city meetings that the California City facility can operate today under the same conditional use permit the company obtained when it ran a state prison at the site.
The city quietly granted CoreCivic the business license in February. The plaintiffs appealed the decision, but California City’s planning commission rejected it before a packed room of protesters in June. A second appeal is pending before the City Council.
Joseph Petta, an attorney representing the plaintiffs, said he is confident in their legal arguments, but acknowledged it won’t be an “easy fight.”
Petta argued that private operators of federal detention facilities are still subject to state and local laws. He pointed to a case in which the 9th U.S. Circuit Court of Appeals found that Washington state health and safety requirements applied to the Tacoma, Wash., immigration detention center run by a private contractor. In another case, decided in January 2025, judges found that GEO Group violated Washington’s minimum wage laws by paying detainees $1 a day for labor.
The Trump administration last month purchased two private prisons it was already contracting with to house immigrants, including the California City facility. Petta said he did not think the federal government’s purchase of the land diminished the lawsuit, because CoreCivic is still the operator of the facility.
In recent earnings calls, however, CoreCivic and GEO Group both told investors the federal government’s purchase of their properties could strengthen their legal position.
GEO Group CEO George C. Zoley said the federal government’s ownership “will provide stronger credibility” in arguments over the supremacy clause, and “that these are federal facilities carrying out the congressional priorities of immigration programs … and that states can only have very limited involvement.”
Local elected officials want to make sure that if the federal government plans to open detention facilities in other parts of California or expand existing ones, cities and counties have tools to fight them.
Earlier this month, Rep. Sam Liccardo, D-San Jose, shared a step-by-step guide designed to help local governments create new ordinances intended to insulate them from ICE and the federal government. Liccardo said local codes that strengthen health and safety zoning requirements could help deter detention center conversions and expansions.
“Experience has taught us that putting the head in the sand is not a successful strategy for deterring authoritarian aggressions,” he said.
These ordinances are modeled after a law passed in Tacoma in 2018 in response to environmental hazards and public safety concerns posed by an ICE processing center, and effectively prevented an existing facility from expanding. GEO Group, the private contractor that operated the center, sued over the ordinance, but a federal judge determined Tacoma leaders were acting within their authority to regulate residents’ health and safety.
“The courts are going to be at the middle of this,” Liccardo said.
Beyond lawsuits are the public pressure campaigns that advocates are pressing in both areas of the state.
Su, the North Carolina law professor, said the most successful pushback against detention centers he’s seen has come through public protest, not the courts.
“The law might not be in their favor, but half of these battles are not won by law,” Su said. “Half of these battles are political opposition.”
He pointed to Social City, Ga., where the federal government called off plans to convert a massive warehouse into a detention center after widespread pushback from the majority-Republican city. The local government argued such a facility would severely strain the city’s utilities and emergency response system. It would have held up to 10,000 immigrants, almost twice the city’s population.
That resistance has inspired local advocates.
“I do believe we could win,” said Rebeca Armendariz, a fourth-generation Gilroy resident who is leading the ICE Out of Gilroy coalition. “The amount of community pressure is lending to this hope that drives us, that compels us to keep doing action after action to keep it in the public eye.”
Armendariz recalled pulling into a Gilroy home’s driveway in July just as armed immigration agents who’d come in souped-up cars with tinted windows handcuffed a father in front of his three daughters. Armendariz was called to the home as a volunteer with a Santa Clara County group that provides rapid response services to people detained by ICE and their families.
“It was just so incredibly painful to experience their pain,” she said.
To keep the pressure on, her group organized a 2-mile protest walk to the site of the proposed Gilroy detention center. On July 3, one of the busiest travel days, she and other protesters hung anti-detention banners over freeways in 30 locations across Monterey, San Mateo and Santa Clara counties.
“We’re a small town,” she said. “There’s a lot of learning that our community has to do and a lot of organizing we have to do.”
Similarly, advocates have organized vigils, protests and marches in California City opposing the facility and the reports of medical neglect endured by detainees since it opened.
On a sunny day in late July, dozens of protesters gathered in San Jose’s Japantown alongside elected officials to celebrate the construction pause on the Gilroy facility.
One was Susan Hayase, a third-generation Japanese American whose parents, aunts and uncles were all incarcerated during World War II under the government’s mass detention of people of Japanese descent.
During the first Trump administration, she started San Jose Nikkei Resisters to oppose what she considered racist immigration policies.
When she learned about the Gilroy site, she was alarmed. But she also was determined.
“The struggle we’re in now is very complex, it’s daunting,” she said. “There’s no one thing that’s going to do it. We have to organize communities to be ready to do different things at different times because this is going to be a prolonged struggle.”
Sara DiNatale covers politics and the Trump administration’s impact on the Bay Area. She joined the Chronicle in 2025, after a decade reporting across the southern U.S. for the San Antonio Express-News, the Tampa Bay Times and Mississippi Today. DiNatale was the recipient of a 2024 George Polk Award for her investigation on the Texas residential solar industry, which led Texas to adopt new state laws to regulate bad actors and scammers. She’s a graduate of the University at Buffalo and a native of Western New York.
Ko Lyn is a reporter on the metro team covering Asian American and Pacific Islander communities and immigration for the Chronicle, which she joined in January 2024. She previously covered housing and city government for the Indianapolis Star, and her work, including reporting on jail deaths and immigration detention, has been recognized by the Investigative Reporters and Editors Awards, the Goldsmith Prize, the Sidney Awards, the San Francisco Press Club’s Greater Bay Area Journalism Awards and the Connecticut and Indiana Societies for Professional Journalists. She’s a graduate of Yale College and speaks Mandarin.
How to reach Ko Lyn
To provide story tips or feedback, email kolyn.cheang@sfchronicle.com or contact her on Signal or her cell phone at 415-961-7047.
Congressman Ro Khanna said in a speech at the Democratic National Committee’s summer meeting on Saturday that the party must support cutting off military assistance to Israel, pointing to the country’s ongoing genocidal assault on the Gaza Strip and imposition of an “apartheid system” in the West Bank.
Khanna (D-Calif.), who is considering a presidential run in 2028, told DNC members gathered in Austin, Texas that “Israel has committed a genocide in Gaza, and we should have the courage to say so.” The congressman’s remark was met with enthusiastic applause.
Khanna, who also said the Hamas-led October 7, 2023 attack on Israel “must be condemned unequivocally,” cited his recent trip to the illegally occupied West Bank, where the lawmaker was detained by armed settlers and the Israeli military.
“Zero aid to Israel,” Khanna declared Saturday. “No military sales of weapons used to kill civilians. And let me be clear: If our party cannot stand for these principles, it will never convince a generation that watched the horrors of Gaza on their iPhones that we mean what we say about justice.”
Khanna’s remarks came after the DNC approved by voice vote a package of resolutions that included one calling for full enforcement of the so-called Leahy Laws, which prohibit the transfer of US weaponry to governments credibly accused of human rights violations.
A United Nations commission said last month that “even after the October 2025 ceasefire, children continue to be killed and seriously injured, with continued disregard by Israel for the ceasefire and for the protection owed to Palestinian children under international law.”
Demonstrators make noise outside of hotels thought to house Immigration and Customs Enforcement and other federal agents in Minneapolis on Jan. 9, 2026. Photo: Michael Nigro/Sipa USA via AP
Organizers in Minneapolis long suspected they were being surveilled by the federal government during the height of the winter protests against Immigration and Customs Enforcement. It was not until a court filing on Thursday, however, that the youth-led Sunrise Movement and other groups learned the depths of infiltration.
The Sunrise Movement has long preached nonviolence even as it pursues aggressive tactics, such as making a racket outside of the hotels where ICE agents sleep.
But the group’s public commitment to peaceful protest did not spare it from a months-long, aggressive campaign of government snooping that included ICE agents attending its meetings and protests undercover, subpoenas of its financial records, and at least one apparent attempt to entice an organizer into backing more confrontational tactics.
Sunrise Movement Executive Director Aru Shiney-Ajay said in an interview Thursday that the government’s tactics are a sign that the Trump administration is losing the battle for public opinion.
“What this is meant to do is scare protesters and scare people away from joining protest groups,” she said. “It is very essential that we remember that actually what we are doing is incredibly normal, it is incredibly popular, and we cannot let ourselves be scared out of organizing.”
The revelations about the tactics ICE used against Sunrise, along with a wide variety of labor unions and protest groups, came in a court filing from a defense attorney for one of 15 Minnesota activists charged in June for trying to stop the federal government’s immigration crackdown in the Twin Cities.
Shortly after federal agents killed Alex Pretti on January 24, ICE’s Homeland Security Investigations opened two investigations it called “Operation Puppet Master” and “Project Whipple Shield,” the latter a reference to the federal building that was the site of many ICE protests.
Supposedly, those probes would focus on a network supporting “violent opportunists and agitators.” In reality, the investigative reports that the federal government has turned over to defense attorneys show that undercover ICE agents secretly recorded at churches, libraries, and schools even when organizers stressed the importance of nonviolence.
In the case of Sunrise, undercover agents were already targeting the group before the killings of Pretti and Renee Good.
Sunrise is a national organization with a Twin Cities chapter. Long known for its aggressive climate advocacy, the youth-led group pivoted just before the start of the federal government’s crackdown on immigrants in Minnesota to fighting the Trump administration’s authoritarianism.
One of the group’s most famous early acts was occupying then-Rep. Nancy Pelosi’s office in support of the Green New Deal. It brought that same energy to the protests in Minneapolis, playing a key role in the nighttime noise protests targeting hotels in the Twin Cities that were allegedly hosting ICE agents. But it has always counseled its supporters to remain peaceful, Shiney-Ajay said.
“We are a strictly nonviolent movement. We make that very clear in almost every training we run, in all the meetings we run,” she said.
Yet almost as soon as Operation Metro Surge started, ICE agents were attending Sunrise trainings on the sly.
Undercover agents attended a “How to stop ICE” training that Sunrise hosted at a church on December 13. By December 22, an undercover agent had been added to the Signal group for planning one of Sunrise’s hotel protests. On January 9, two undercover agents attended a noise demonstration outside a Hilton Hotel, noting that a member of the crowd set off fireworks at one point.
The killing of Pretti — and the ensuing nationwide backlash against ICE — appears to have done nothing to slow the investigation. One week after Pretti’s slaying, two undercover agents attended a Sunrise Movement Twin Cities training on “resistance skills” hosted at a public library.
The meeting included primers on deescalation at protests, and the ICE agent noted that it was “made clear that the Sunrise Movement organization focused on ‘peaceful’ protests.”
That did not stop the undercover agent from making a private approach to one of the organizers, according to a report the agent produced. The agent told the organizer that he worked in construction and “could build items that might assist other groups with more ‘direct-action’ protests.” When the undercover agent declared that “going to jail did not bother him,” the organizer “acknowledged” the agent’s comments and took down his phone number, according to the report.
Kevin Riach, the attorney representing one of the defendants in the indictment targeting Minneapolis activists, said in a court filing this week that that report was one of several showing that ICE’s undercover agents “actively participated in organizing and directing the groups they were surveilling, at times working to entice people into discussing or committing crimes.”
By the start of March, the federal government had scaled down its immigration crackdown in Minneapolis — but it was continuing to investigate groups such as Sunrise.
On March 9, ICE sent a subpoena to the Federal Reserve Bank of New York for the nonprofit’s wire transactions dating back to January 1, 2023, long before Trump was even elected to his second term. That same date, ICE also sent a subpoena to the Clearing House, a private wire transfer company, for years of financial records from Sunrise and several labor unions.
The Sunrise Movement was never given notice of those subpoenas or an opportunity to contest them, Shiney-Ajay said.
Training for This Moment
None of the activists who were eventually charged in a June 16 indictment were members of the Sunrise Movement, Shiney-Ajay said.
ICE declined to offer an explanation for why it investigated Sunrise and the other groups.
“HSI investigates individuals and organizations when there is just and legal cause to do so and within the scope of its legal authorities. To preserve the integrity of our work and protect law enforcement sensitivities, we do not comment on ongoing investigations, investigative tactics, or procedures,” an agency spokesperson said.
“It will likely make many Americans think twice before joining a protest, attending a meeting, donating to an advocacy organization, or speaking out at all.”
While it had never been confirmed that ICE was closely studying the Sunrise Movement before this week, Shiney-Ajay said it had long been treated as a possibility. The group was specifically concerned that federal agents might act as provocateurs at protests.
“We put a lot of work into training de-escalation and safety leads at all of our protests,” she said. “I certainly think that that was a worthwhile investment, reading these things now.”
She said it was “telling” that the investigation was led by the Department of Homeland Security rather than the FBI, which might be constrained by more “rules and regulations.”
The revelation of the widespread ICE probe has already sparked another backlash.
We’re independent of corporate interests — and powered by members. Join us.
The Foundation for Individual Rights and Expression, which has received funding from conservative and libertarian donors, said it found the investigation disturbing.
“Some activists have violated federal law, and the government is entirely justified in investigating and prosecuting them. But criminal conduct by some members of a movement does not justify government surveillance and investigation of anyone who shares their broader political goals. That type of aggressive scrutiny chills protected speech and association. It will likely make many Americans think twice before joining a protest, attending a meeting, donating to an advocacy organization, or speaking out at all,” said Aaron Terr, the group’s director of public advocacy.
On Thursday, a coalition of dozens of Minnesota groups promised that that they would not be cowed.
“We know the truth, and we will not be intimidated,” the groups said. “When self-serving politicians are losing, they lie and attempt political repression, trying to silence the voices of those who bravely stand up to them. Minnesotans will not be intimidated or divided by sham accusations or investigations of some of the countless groups and community members who organized, acted, and stood up together to protect their neighbors during Operation Metro Surge.”
IT’S BEEN A DEVASTATING year for journalism — the worst in modern U.S. history.
We have a president with utter contempt for truth aggressively using the government’s full powers to dismantle the free press. Corporate news outlets have cowered, becoming accessories in Trump’s project to create a post-truth America. Right-wing billionaires have pounced, buying up media organizations and rebuilding the information environment to their liking.
In this most perilous moment for democracy, The Intercept is fighting back. But to do so effectively, we need to grow.
That’s where you come in. Will you help us expand our reporting capacity in time to hit the ground running in 2026?
We’re independent of corporate interests. Will you help us?
One Million Rising: Strategic Non-Cooperation to Fight Authoritarianism Virtual Event · Hosted by No Kings Time Wednesdays 8 – 9:30pm EDT Location Virtual event Join from anywhere About this event Across the country, authoritarian forces are getting bolder and more dangerous. Trump and his allies are not hiding their agenda: mass deportations,... Continue reading →
THURSDAY, JUNE 29, 2023 AT 2 AM – 4 AM PDT How to create trust in a group? Details Event by Extinction Rebellion Empathy Circles online EMPATHY CAFE Duration: 2 hr Public · Anyone on or off Facebook How to create trust in a group? This is the question that arose in our... Continue reading →
Trump Regime Takedown: Every Saturday Saturday, March 7, 2026 12:00 PM 2:00 PM Tesla San Francisco999 Van Ness AvenueSan Francisco, CA, 94109United States (map) Google Calendar ICS Keep democracy alive every Saturday by showing up, taking a stand, and sticking together for the long haul. Standing together is better than standing alone. Let’s get together... Continue reading →
HBD Marsha- An All-Trans Drag Show Celebrating Marsha P. Johnson’s Birthday and Trans History Month Date: Saturday, August 22 Time: 4PM Location: Jane Warner Plaza, F-Line Castro Stop Come through to Jane Warner Plaza this Saturday at 4 PM for an All-Trans Drag Extravaganza hosted by Lady Adjacent. Featuring the best talent in the... Continue reading →
Meeting Agenda August 22, 2026 The San Francisco Democratic County Central Committee’s Endorsements Committee and Issues and Resolutions Committee will hold a joint meeting on August 22nd, 2026 at 4:00 pm via Zoom to interview candidates for local elected office and ballot measure proponents and opponents for the November 3,... Continue reading →
This Sunday’s Town Hall: Announcing This Week’s Progressive Town Hall: Every Sunday at 4pm ET/1pm PT RSVP HERE Join PDA activists online from across the country to discuss the importance of progressives reclaiming the American story from the MAGA right, an issue of heightened importance as we’re now within one... Continue reading →
Who’s ready for another election? Read on to find out how to get involved with the League of Pissed Off Voters. Save the Date: August 23rd Endorsement Meeting OMFG this ballot is so long (25 propositions!). We will host our endorsement meeting on Sunday, August 23rd, and we’d love for... Continue reading →
We protest Heritage Foundation EVERY MONDAY (Join us!!!!) By admin | September 2, 2025 | Uncategorized Cliff Cash Comedy Premiered Jul 26, 2025 Every Monday at The Heritage Foundation 214 Massachusetts Ave. Washington D.C. 4pm protest 6pm pizza Every Friday at Fox News D.C. 400 N. Capitol St. Washington D.C. 4pm protest 6pm pizza We are... Continue reading →
Milk Club Trans Caucus Meeting Date: Tuesday, August 25 Time: 5-7 PM Join: Meeting info available to members of the Milk Club Trans Caucus. Please reach out to trans@milkclub.org if you would like to join the Milk Club Trans Caucus.
