{"id":27385,"date":"2023-07-15T11:59:36","date_gmt":"2023-07-15T18:59:36","guid":{"rendered":"https:\/\/occupysf.net\/?p=27385"},"modified":"2023-07-15T11:59:37","modified_gmt":"2023-07-15T18:59:37","slug":"republicans-vision-for-america-putins-russia","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/occupysf.net\/index.php\/2023\/07\/15\/republicans-vision-for-america-putins-russia\/","title":{"rendered":"REPUBLICANS’ VISION FOR AMERICA: PUTIN’S RUSSIA"},"content":{"rendered":"\n

TUE, 7\/11\/2023 – BY\u00a0CARL GIBSON<\/a> (Occupy.com)<\/p>\n\n\n\n

\"\"\/<\/figure>\n\n\n\n

(This is part 2 of a series exploring the US Republican Party\u2019s increasingly criminal undertones. <\/em>Read part 1 here<\/em><\/a>.)<\/em><\/p>\n\n\n\n

Today\u2019s Republican Party isn\u2019t the party of Lincoln, or even the party of Eisenhower. As explained in part 1<\/a> of this series, today\u2019s Republican Party is the party of Nixon \u2013 a corrupt, lawless organization that won\u2019t hesitate to stoop to new lows to maintain and expand its political power. But rather than point to past examples, the Republican Party\u2019s ideal vision for the United States \u2013 should it prevail in the coming presidential election and expand its ranks in Congress in the next midterm election \u2013 could be best understood by examining Vladimir Putin\u2019s Russia.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

The government Republicans have repeatedly demonstrated they want is one in which the executive commands near-autocratic power with impunity, supplanted by a compliant legislature that rubber-stamps its actions, rigged elections that are effectively meaningless, and the super-rich using their bottomless wealth to bribe politicians, evade taxes and skirt regulations. Ethnic minorities, journalists, activists, undesirables, and anyone else who outwardly opposes the regime would be brutally persecuted by the state until they either stop making trouble for the regime or self-exile.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

Both the top candidates for the Republican presidential nomination \u2013 former President Donald Trump and Florida Governor Ron DeSantis \u2013 have been unabashedly outspoken about reshaping America in this way, and the most prominent Republicans in Congress have already demonstrated their intent to transform the US into a autocratic state in which those with the money make the rules and where democracy is a relic of the past. It\u2019s incumbent on both voters and the beltway press to put Republicans\u2019 words and actions in the proper context, and connect the dots on how their vision for America is fundamentally at odds with both multicultural democracy and transparent, representative government.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

\"\"\/<\/figure>\n\n\n\n

The Powell Memo is key to understanding today\u2019s GOP<\/strong><\/p>\n\n\n\n

While Republican presidents Nixon<\/a>, Ronald Reagan<\/a>, George W. Bush<\/a>, and Donald Trump<\/a> flouted both domestic and international law in their own way, it\u2019s important to understand where Republicans\u2019 drive for power at any cost comes from: The Powell Memo of 1971<\/a> (PDF link).<\/p>\n\n\n\n

52 years ago, before Nixon appointed him to the Supreme Court, corporate lawyer Lewis F. Powell authored a confidential memo to the US Chamber of Commerce \u2013 the chief lobbying organization for the biggest multinational corporations. The memo encouraged the chamber to embark on a campaign to unite big business in a campaign to conquer the courts, the media, and educational institutions. Powell\u2019s vision was an America in which big corporations not only benefited from policy, but played an active role in both crafting it and selling it to the public:<\/p>\n\n\n\n

\u201c[I]ndependent and uncoordinated activity by individual corporations, as important as this is, will not be sufficient. Strength lies in organization, in careful long-range planning and implementation, in consistency of action over an indefinite period of years, in the scale of financing available only through joint effort, and in the political power available only through united action and national organizations\u2026 Business must learn the lesson, long ago learned by Labor and other self-interest groups. This is the lesson that political power is necessary; that such power must be assiduously cultivated; and that when necessary, it must be used aggressively and with determination.\u201d<\/p>\n\n\n\n

The US Chamber of Commerce took Powell\u2019s advice to heart: According to Opensecrets.org, the US Chamber spent more than $11.4 million<\/a> on political campaign contributions going back to 1990, and a whopping $1.8 billion on lobbying Congress since 1998. In the 2022 and 2020 cycles, the chamber ranked #2 out of all groups in total lobbying expenditures, and #1 in every single election cycle between 2012 and 2018. <\/p>\n\n\n\n

And while the chamber contributes to the campaigns of both Democrats and Republicans, the GOP benefits from the overwhelming majority<\/a> of its largesse. Opensecrets\u2019 campaign finance database shows that in every federal election cycle dating back to 1990, at least two-thirds of the chamber\u2019s contributions were to Republican candidates for House and Senate, but that figure is typically a lot higher. In 2014, for example, 99.54% of all the chamber\u2019s donations<\/a> went to Republicans.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

Powell\u2019s infamous memo also provides helpful context to the stridently conservative Roberts Court, and the fierce determination from both Senator Mitch McConnell (R-Kentucky) and Donald Trump in confirming 245 federal judges<\/a> (PDF link) to lifetime terms between 2017 and 2021 \u2013 including 54 appointees to the uniquely powerful regional appellate courts. On page 26 of the memo, Powell noted that the courts were an underutilized resource that could help big business reap big rewards for itself in the long term:<\/p>\n\n\n\n

\u201cUnder our constitutional system, especially with an activist-minded Supreme Court, the judiciary may be the most important instrument for social, economic and political change,\u201d Powell wrote.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

\"\"\/<\/figure>\n\n\n\n

Vladimir Putin\u2019s Russia: Republicans\u2019 political endgame<\/strong><\/p>\n\n\n\n

In the late 1990s, following years of instability after the fall of the USSR, a cabal of billionaires derisively called \u201coligarchs\u201d by the Russian populace funded Boris Yeltsin\u2019s political party, Unity, which later became known as United Russia under Vladimir Putin. Yeltsin helped Russian oligarchs become exceedingly rich through various post-Soviet privatization schemes, and they used their immense wealth to prop up Putin \u2013 whom Yeltsin appointed as Prime Minister \u2013 in the newspapers and TV stations they controlled.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

After Putin was elected president in 2000, he summoned business leaders to the Kremlin for a meeting. According to NPR<\/a>, Putin established a set of ground rules: Those who helped him would become even wealthier, while those who opposed him would face retribution:<\/p>\n\n\n\n

“I want to draw your attention to the fact that you built this state yourself, to a great degree, through the political or semi-political structures under your control,” Putin reportedly said<\/a> in the closed-door meeting. ”So there is no point in blaming the reflection in the mirror. So let us get down to the point and be open and do what is necessary to do to make our relationship in this field civilized and transparent.”<\/p>\n\n\n\n

Putin offered the oligarchs a deal: bend to my authority, stay out of my way, and you can keep your mansions, superyachts, private jets, and multibillion-dollar corporations (corporations that, just a few years before, had been owned by the Russian government). In the coming years, the oligarchs who reneged on this deal and undermined Putin would be thrown into a Siberian prison<\/a> or be forced into exile or die in suspicious circumstances<\/a>. The loyalists who remained \u2014 and the new ones who got filthy rich during Putin’s long reign \u2014 became like ATM machines for the president and his allies.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

Corruption and graft became the de facto way of doing business in Putin\u2019s Russia over the next 20 years. According to a 2017 article<\/a> in the Georgetown Journal of International Affairs by University of South Carolina associate professor Stanislav Markus, billionaires that saw their wealth balloon from the selling off of government resources became even richer under Putin, who steered vast sums of wealth to his benefactors in the form of contracts and kickbacks:<\/p>\n\n\n\n

\u201cPublic procurement in many sectors, including infrastructure, defense, and healthcare, has seen regular overcharging of the state treasury by private suppliers, sometimes at prices equal to double or triple times the market rate and with kickbacks to the state officials involved,\u201d Markus wrote.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

Putin\u2019s tenure as president has also historically been rife with allegations of election fraud and undemocratic behavior in each subsequent election, including pro-Putin agitators stuffing ballot boxes<\/a>, the jailing of political opponents like Alexei Navalny<\/a> and popular governor Sergei Furgal<\/a>, and mass arrests<\/a> of protesters. And just as Ron DeSantis has done<\/a> with Florida\u2019s LGBTQ+ residents, Putin has also severely antagonized Russia\u2019s LGBTQ+ community under the guise of safeguarding children.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

Last December, Putin signed a law into effect<\/a> building on a law passed a decade ago<\/a> that effectively bans non-heterosexual relationships from being promoted as normal, issuing fines amounting to thousands of dollars for \u201cLGBT propaganda\u201d and \u201cdemonstrations of LGBT and information that encourages a change of gender among teenagers.\u201d The prior law was effectively a \u201cDon\u2019t Say Gay<\/a>\u201d law, prohibiting any mention of homosexual relationships to minors, and was broadly written to where even just displaying a rainbow flag or having a Pride parade could result in imprisonment.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

Putin also has rampant antipathy for the free press: In April, his regime sentenced journalist Vladimir Kara-Murza to 25 years in prison<\/a> for treason, following Kara-Murza\u2019s criticism of Putin\u2019s war in Ukraine. Reporters Without Borders (RSF) currently ranks Russia 164 out of 180 countries<\/a> in press freedom (to compare, the US is ranked 45). There are at least 22 journalists and media workers imprisoned in Russia, which is the highest number<\/a> since RSF started collecting data.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

\u201cSince Russia invaded Ukraine in February 2022, almost all independent media have been banned, blocked, and\/or declared \u2018foreign agents\u2019 or \u2018undesirable organizations,\u2019 the organization wrote. \u201cAll others are subject to military censorship.\u201d<\/p>\n\n\n\n

Even though Russia\u2019s constitution prevented a president from holding more than two consecutive terms, Putin has successfully maneuvered his way into maintaining power for more than two decades \u2013 in 2008, after Putin\u2019s first two terms, Russian President Dmitry Medvedev appointed Putin as his Prime Minister, allowing Putin to stay in the Kremlin and remain Russia\u2019s de facto leader. And even though Putin promised in 2018<\/a> to not run again in 2024 given constitutionally established term limits, he later amended the constitution in 2020<\/a>, at the height of the Covid-19 pandemic, to allow him to remain in his role until 2036.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

When he was running for reelection in August of 2020, Donald Trump similarly flirted with the idea<\/a> of running for a third term in defiance of the US Constitution, saying he should get a \u201credo\u201d of four years after accusing the FBI of spying on his 2016 campaign. If Trump won reelection, and embarked on an effort to stay in the White House in 2024, such an effort would likely be supported by the Republican National Committee. In 2020, the RNC didn\u2019t even adopt a platform, instead opting to publish a document<\/a> that simply stated \u201cthe Republican Party has and will continue to enthusiastically support the president\u2019s America-first agenda.\u201d<\/p>\n\n\n\n

And as 147 Republicans<\/a> in Congress demonstrated on January 6, 2021, just hours after Trump told thousands of his supporters to go to the US Capitol and \u201cfight like hell,\u201d there is little to no resistance within the GOP to Trump\u2019s autocratic aims. Before the bodies of the people killed in the Capitol insurrection were even buried, eight Republican US senators and 139 Republican members of the House of Representatives voted to overturn a lawful election and install Trump against the will of the people. Even as Trump became the first-ever former president to be indicted on criminal charges, several Republican presidential candidates have already promised to pardon him<\/a> if elected.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

Just as Putin and his party\u2019s control of the Duma demonstrate, a fully Republican-run US government would run roughshod on democracy, override the rule of law, bully marginalized communities with punitive actions, jail the protesters and journalists they deem to be the \u201cenemy of the people,\u201d allow big business to have a feeding frenzy over public dollars, and outright ignore the Constitution when it conflicts with their power-grab. And unless we the people organize to stop them, their success will be inevitable.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

Carl Gibson is an independent journalist and columnist whose work has been published in CNN, the Guardian, the Washington Post, the Houston Chronicle, the Louisville Courier-Journal, Barron\u2019s, Business Insider, the Independent, and NPR, among others. Follow him on Bluesky @crgibs@bsky.social<\/a>.<\/em><\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"

TUE, 7\/11\/2023 – BY\u00a0CARL GIBSON (Occupy.com) (This is part 2 of a series exploring the US Republican Party\u2019s increasingly criminal undertones. Read part 1 here.) Today\u2019s Republican Party isn\u2019t the party of Lincoln, or even the party of Eisenhower. As explained in part 1 of this series, today\u2019s Republican Party… Continue reading → <\/span><\/a><\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":1,"featured_media":0,"comment_status":"open","ping_status":"open","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"footnotes":""},"categories":[1],"tags":[725,798],"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/occupysf.net\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/27385"}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/occupysf.net\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/occupysf.net\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/occupysf.net\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/1"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/occupysf.net\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=27385"}],"version-history":[{"count":1,"href":"https:\/\/occupysf.net\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/27385\/revisions"}],"predecessor-version":[{"id":27386,"href":"https:\/\/occupysf.net\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/27385\/revisions\/27386"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/occupysf.net\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=27385"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/occupysf.net\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=27385"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/occupysf.net\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=27385"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}