{"id":31478,"date":"2024-02-03T20:16:54","date_gmt":"2024-02-04T04:16:54","guid":{"rendered":"https:\/\/occupysf.net\/?p=31478"},"modified":"2024-02-03T20:16:55","modified_gmt":"2024-02-04T04:16:55","slug":"san-francisco-pissed-off-voter-guide-for-march-2024-election","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/occupysf.net\/index.php\/2024\/02\/03\/san-francisco-pissed-off-voter-guide-for-march-2024-election\/","title":{"rendered":"San Francisco Pissed Off Voter Guide for March 2024 Election"},"content":{"rendered":"\n<p>posted by&nbsp;<strong>SF LEAGUE OF PISSED OFF VOTERS<\/strong>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<em>-3sc<\/em><br>February 02, 2024<\/p>\n\n\n\n<p>Finally! The Pissed Off Voter Guide for San Francisco&#8217;s March 2024 election.<\/p>\n\n\n\n<h2 class=\"wp-block-heading\"><a><\/a><strong>March 5, 2024:<br>Don&#8217;t Feed the Trolls!<\/strong><\/h2>\n\n\n\n<p><strong>Democratic Party Offices<\/strong><\/p>\n\n\n\n<p>Member,&nbsp;<a href=\"https:\/\/www.theleaguesf.org\/san_francisco_pissed_off_voter_guide_march_2024#dccc\">Democratic County Central Committee<\/a>&nbsp;(DCCC): the&nbsp;<a href=\"https:\/\/www.laborandworkingfamilies.com\/\"><strong>Labor &amp; Working Families Slate<\/strong><\/a><\/p>\n\n\n\n<p><strong><a href=\"https:\/\/www.theleaguesf.org\/san_francisco_pissed_off_voter_guide_march_2024#dccc\">DCCC Assembly District 17<\/a>&nbsp;(East Side)<\/strong><\/p>\n\n\n\n<p>Peter Gallotta<br>Kristin Hardy<br>John Avalos<br>Jeremy Lee<br>Vick Chung<br>Patrick Bell<br>Gloria Berry<br>Adolfo Velasquez<br>Michael Nguyen<br>Sydney Simpson<br>Joshua Rudy Ochoa<br>Sal Rosselli<br>Jane Kim<br>Anita Martinez<\/p>\n\n\n\n<p><strong><a href=\"https:\/\/www.theleaguesf.org\/san_francisco_pissed_off_voter_guide_march_2024#dccc\">DCCC Assembly District 19<\/a>&nbsp;(West Side)<\/strong><\/p>\n\n\n\n<p>Natalie Gee<br>Greg Hardeman<br>Frances Hsieh<br>Leah LaCroix<br>Connie Chan<br>Queena Chen<br>Sandra Lee Fewer<br>Mano Raju<br>Hene Kelly<br>Gordon Mar<\/p>\n\n\n\n<p><strong>Federal Offices<\/strong><\/p>\n\n\n\n<p><a href=\"https:\/\/www.theleaguesf.org\/san_francisco_pissed_off_voter_guide_march_2024#senator\">US Senator<\/a>:&nbsp;<strong>Barbara Lee<\/strong><strong><br><\/strong><a href=\"https:\/\/www.theleaguesf.org\/san_francisco_pissed_off_voter_guide_march_2024#us_rep_11\">US Representative<\/a>, District 11: No Endorsement<br><a href=\"https:\/\/www.theleaguesf.org\/san_francisco_pissed_off_voter_guide_march_2024#us_rep_15\">US Representative<\/a>, District 15: No Endorsement<\/p>\n\n\n\n<p><strong>State Offices<\/strong><\/p>\n\n\n\n<p><a href=\"https:\/\/www.theleaguesf.org\/san_francisco_pissed_off_voter_guide_march_2024#state_senate\">State Senate<\/a>, District 11: No Endorsement<br><a href=\"https:\/\/www.theleaguesf.org\/san_francisco_pissed_off_voter_guide_march_2024#assembly_ad17\">State Assemblymember<\/a>, District 17: No Endorsement<br><a href=\"https:\/\/www.theleaguesf.org\/san_francisco_pissed_off_voter_guide_march_2024#assembly_ad19\">State Assemblymember<\/a>, District 19: No Endorsement<\/p>\n\n\n\n<p><strong>Judicial Offices<\/strong><\/p>\n\n\n\n<p><a href=\"https:\/\/www.theleaguesf.org\/san_francisco_pissed_off_voter_guide_march_2024#judges\">Superior Court Judge<\/a>, Seat 1:&nbsp;<strong>Michael Isaku Begert<\/strong><strong><br><\/strong><a href=\"https:\/\/www.theleaguesf.org\/san_francisco_pissed_off_voter_guide_march_2024#judges\">Superior Court Judge<\/a>, Seat 13:&nbsp;<strong>Patrick Thompson&nbsp;<\/strong><\/p>\n\n\n\n<p><strong>State Propositions<\/strong><\/p>\n\n\n\n<p><a href=\"https:\/\/www.theleaguesf.org\/san_francisco_pissed_off_voter_guide_march_2024#prop1\">Prop 1<\/a>: Money for Behavioral Health and Treatment Beds:&nbsp;<strong>Yes<\/strong>&nbsp;<\/p>\n\n\n\n<p><strong>City Propositions<\/strong><\/p>\n\n\n\n<p><a href=\"https:\/\/www.theleaguesf.org\/san_francisco_pissed_off_voter_guide_march_2024#propa\">Prop A<\/a>: Money for Affordable Housing:&nbsp;<strong>Yes<\/strong><strong><br><\/strong><a href=\"https:\/\/www.theleaguesf.org\/san_francisco_pissed_off_voter_guide_march_2024#propb\">Prop B<\/a>: More Tax Money for Cops:&nbsp;<strong>No<\/strong><strong><br><\/strong><a href=\"https:\/\/www.theleaguesf.org\/san_francisco_pissed_off_voter_guide_march_2024#propc\">Prop C<\/a>: Tax Breaks for Downtown Developers:&nbsp;<strong>No<\/strong><strong><br><\/strong><a href=\"https:\/\/www.theleaguesf.org\/san_francisco_pissed_off_voter_guide_march_2024#propd\">Prop D<\/a>: Tighten City Ethics Rules:&nbsp;<strong>Yes<\/strong><strong><br><\/strong><a href=\"https:\/\/www.theleaguesf.org\/san_francisco_pissed_off_voter_guide_march_2024#prope\">Prop E<\/a>: More Police Surveillance and Car Chases with Less Oversight:&nbsp;<strong>Hell No!<\/strong><strong><br><\/strong><a href=\"https:\/\/www.theleaguesf.org\/san_francisco_pissed_off_voter_guide_march_2024#propf\">Prop F<\/a>: Forced Drug Screening for the Poor:<strong>&nbsp;<\/strong><strong>Just Say No!<\/strong><br><a href=\"https:\/\/www.theleaguesf.org\/san_francisco_pissed_off_voter_guide_march_2024#propg\">Prop G<\/a>: Make Algebra Great Again:<strong>&nbsp;No<\/strong><\/p>\n\n\n\n<p>Want to know&nbsp;<strong>why<\/strong>&nbsp;we endorsed things this way?<br><a href=\"https:\/\/www.theleaguesf.org\/san_francisco_pissed_off_voter_guide_march_2024#dear_sf\">Keep reading<\/a>&nbsp;for our research and snarky analysis!<\/p>\n\n\n\n<hr class=\"wp-block-separator has-alpha-channel-opacity\"\/>\n\n\n\n<h2 class=\"wp-block-heading\"><a><\/a>Voting Logistics<\/h2>\n\n\n\n<p><strong>Register to Vote<\/strong>&nbsp;at the Post Office or online at&nbsp;<a href=\"https:\/\/registertovote.ca.gov\/\"><strong>RegisterToVote.ca.gov<\/strong><\/a><strong>.&nbsp;<\/strong>The deadline to register is Feb 20th, but in SF you can register in person at City Hall up until Election Day. You can also register at any polling place on Election Day: just ask to cast a provisional ballot.&nbsp;<strong>Call 415-554-4375 for more info.<\/strong>&nbsp;<\/p>\n\n\n\n<p><strong>Register as a Democrat:&nbsp;<\/strong>Unless you\u2019re registered as a Democrat, you can\u2019t vote for crucial local Democratic party offices (the DCCC). You can switch over before Feb 20th at&nbsp;<a href=\"https:\/\/www.sf.gov\/register-vote\"><strong>SFelections.org<\/strong><\/a>, or until Election Day at City Hall.&nbsp;(Note: If you\u2019re registered \u2018No Party Preference\u2019 you can request a Democratic ballot but it will only have the Presidential race on it. So switch if you can to weigh in on the local stuff!)<\/p>\n\n\n\n<p><strong>WHEN?<\/strong><\/p>\n\n\n\n<p><strong>February 5th:&nbsp;<\/strong>Early voting starts at City Hall, weekdays 8am-5pm.<\/p>\n\n\n\n<p><strong>February 24th:&nbsp;<\/strong>Weekend early voting starts at City Hall, Saturdays and Sundays 10am-4pm.&nbsp;<strong>&nbsp;<\/strong><\/p>\n\n\n\n<p><strong>March 5th: Election Day! Polls open 7am-8pm. If you\u2019re in line by 8pm you can vote.&nbsp;<\/strong>You can also drop your ballot off at any polling place on Election Day.<\/p>\n\n\n\n<p><strong>WHERE?<\/strong><\/p>\n\n\n\n<p><strong>Drop off your ballot early&nbsp;<\/strong>at one of the 34 official ballot drop boxes across the City, from February 5th through 8pm on Election Day, March 5th.&nbsp;<\/p>\n\n\n\n<p><strong>Mail your ballot&nbsp;<\/strong>if you can&#8217;t drop it off. You don&#8217;t need a stamp, but make sure you sign the envelope and that it&#8217;s postmarked by March 5th.<\/p>\n\n\n\n<p><strong>Where\u2019s your polling place?&nbsp;<\/strong>Check&nbsp;<a href=\"https:\/\/sfelections.org\/tools\/map_poll_time\/\">SF Elections&#8217; Voting Lookup Tool<\/a><a href=\"https:\/\/sfelections.org\/tools\/map_poll_time\/,\">,<\/a>&nbsp;call 311, or just go vote at City Hall.<\/p>\n\n\n\n<p><strong>WHAT ELSE?<\/strong><\/p>\n\n\n\n<p><strong>Did you forget to register? You can still vote!<\/strong>&nbsp;Go to City Hall or your polling place and tell them you want to &#8220;register conditionally and vote provisionally!&#8221;<\/p>\n\n\n\n<p><strong>People with felony convictions can vote!<\/strong>&nbsp;You can still vote even if you\u2019re on parole. Re-register at&nbsp;<strong><a href=\"https:\/\/www.sos.ca.gov\/elections\/restore-your-vote\">Restore Your Vote<\/a><\/strong>. Don\u2019t let the Man disenfranchise you.<\/p>\n\n\n\n<p><strong>Youth can (almost) vote!<\/strong>&nbsp;If you\u2019re 16 or 17,&nbsp;<a href=\"https:\/\/www.sos.ca.gov\/elections\/pre-register-16-vote-18\">pre-register to vote<\/a>&nbsp;and your registration will automatically be activated when you turn 18.<\/p>\n\n\n\n<figure class=\"wp-block-table\"><table><tbody><tr><td><strong>Like our voter guide?<\/strong><a href=\"https:\/\/twitter.com\/intent\/tweet?original_referer=http%3A%2F%2Fwww.theleaguesf.org&amp;ref_src=twsrc%5Etfw&amp;text=March%202024%20Voter%20Guide&amp;tw_p=tweetbutton&amp;url=http%3A%2F%2Ftheleaguesf.org&amp;via=TheLeagueSF\">Share it<\/a>&nbsp;with your friends, and&nbsp;<a href=\"https:\/\/theleaguesf.org\/donate\">kick us down a couple of bucks<\/a>&nbsp;so we can keep printing the guide. For the price of a few pupusas, we can print and distribute 100 voter guides.&nbsp;<a href=\"https:\/\/theleaguesf.org\/donate\">Help us out!<\/a><\/td><\/tr><\/tbody><\/table><\/figure>\n\n\n\n<hr class=\"wp-block-separator has-alpha-channel-opacity\"\/>\n\n\n\n<h2 class=\"wp-block-heading\"><a><\/a><strong>Dear San Francisco,<\/strong><\/h2>\n\n\n\n<p>Here is your Pissed Off Voter Guide for the March primary \u2013 an election that\u2019s way more important than it looks.<\/p>\n\n\n\n<p>There\u2019s a primary for President, of course, and&nbsp;<strong>Barbara Lee<\/strong>&nbsp;is our hope for U.S. Senator, but the other state and federal primary races are basically uncontested. As usual, the key shit is local.<\/p>\n\n\n\n<p>The&nbsp;<strong>DCCC races<\/strong>&nbsp;are&nbsp;<a href=\"https:\/\/sfstandard.com\/2023\/10\/16\/san-francisco-moderate-democrats-party-dccc\/\">crucial<\/a>. They could swing November\u2019s elections for mayor and the Board of Supervisors, because DCCC members will choose the \u201cofficial Democratic Party slate\u201d that thousands of SF voters follow. We\u2019re endorsing candidates who will fight for working families and battle City Hall corruption.<\/p>\n\n\n\n<p><strong>Two<\/strong>&nbsp;<strong>perfectly reasonable incumbent judges<\/strong>&nbsp;are being&nbsp;<a href=\"https:\/\/missionlocal.org\/2023\/11\/former-and-present-judges-peskin-denounce-tough-on-crime-challenges-for-judgeships\/\">challenged from the right<\/a>. It\u2019s a close race because of unlimited spending by fake \u201coutraged citizen\u201d PACs who are desperate to blame crime on anyone but the mayor and her D.A.<\/p>\n\n\n\n<p>And the&nbsp;<strong>ballot measures<\/strong>\u2026.are we being trolled? Unpopular Mayor London Breed is facing re-election in November, so she\u2019s&nbsp;<a href=\"https:\/\/missionlocal.org\/2023\/10\/mayor-breed-continues-to-abandon-governing-everything-is-politics\/\">veering to the right<\/a>&nbsp;with a trio of useless and cruel wedge issues (<strong>Prop C<\/strong>,&nbsp;<strong>Prop E<\/strong>, and&nbsp;<strong>Prop F)<\/strong>&nbsp;which would give tax breaks to downtown developers, weaken citizen oversight of the police, and&nbsp;<a href=\"https:\/\/missionlocal.org\/2023\/09\/sf-drug-users-welfare-forced-treatment\/\">drug-screen poor San Franciscans<\/a>. Which really is some bullshit. Reverting to these failed strategies would only make the City\u2019s problems worse.&nbsp;<\/p>\n\n\n\n<p>Cue the&nbsp;<strong>troll farms&nbsp;<\/strong>\u2013 a&nbsp;<a href=\"https:\/\/www.opensecrets.org\/news\/2022\/07\/big-donors-fueled-high-profile-recall-of-progressive-san-francisco-district-attorney-chesa-boudin\/\">well-funded<\/a>&nbsp;network of&nbsp;<a href=\"https:\/\/sfist.com\/2023\/04\/28\/big-money-sf-tech-groups-hoping-to-steer-friendlier-policy-toward-big-money-and-tech\/\">astroturf<\/a>&nbsp;PACs like GrowSF, TogetherSF, and Stop Crime SF. They\u2019re&nbsp;<a href=\"https:\/\/sfstandard.com\/2023\/12\/21\/chris-larsen-ripple-labs-san-francisco-london-breed-ballot-measures\/\">spending millions<\/a>&nbsp;on this election to convince us that the City is a cesspool run by progressive bleeding hearts and that the only solution is a tough-on-crime, tough-on-drugs, tough-on-schools, tough-on-poor-people crackdown.&nbsp;<\/p>\n\n\n\n<p>Don\u2019t be fooled, San Francisco \u2013 we can\u2019t buy into the doom-loop narrative. Let\u2019s flip the script and get ready for November, when we can vote for solutions to the City\u2019s real problems of wealth inequality, lack of affordable housing, and mismanaged government. In the meantime,&nbsp;<strong>don\u2019t feed the trolls!<\/strong><\/p>\n\n\n\n<p>Love,<\/p>\n\n\n\n<p>The League<\/p>\n\n\n\n<hr class=\"wp-block-separator has-alpha-channel-opacity\"\/>\n\n\n\n<h2 class=\"wp-block-heading\">Democratic Party Offices<\/h2>\n\n\n\n<p><strong>Democratic County Central Committee (DCCC): the&nbsp;<\/strong><a href=\"https:\/\/www.laborandworkingfamilies.com\/\"><strong>Labor and Working Families Slate<\/strong><\/a><\/p>\n\n\n\n<p>Two slates of candidates are competing to control the local Democratic party, and the winner will make official endorsements for the November 2024 election. Many voters turning out to defeat Trump in November will vote the Democratic slate for SF\u2019s down-ballot offices, trusting whatever names are splashed all over the party\u2019s well-funded barrage of election mail. In other words, whoever wins this race could ultimately pick the next mayor, as well as supervisors for Districts 1, 3, 5, 7, 9 and 11.&nbsp;<\/p>\n\n\n\n<p>If the DCCC is hijacked by the \u201cmoderate\u201d slate funded by billionaires and real estate developers, they\u2019ll try to sweep away renters, working families, and future district elections.<\/p>\n\n\n\n<p>Fortunately, there is an alternative: the&nbsp;<a href=\"https:\/\/www.laborandworkingfamilies.com\/\"><strong>Labor and Working Families slate<\/strong><\/a>.&nbsp;<\/p>\n\n\n\n<figure class=\"wp-block-image\"><img decoding=\"async\" src=\"https:\/\/assets.nationbuilder.com\/theleaguesf\/pages\/250\/attachments\/original\/1706856187\/labor-working-families-slate.png?1706856187\" alt=\"Labor and Working Families Slate\"\/><\/figure>\n\n\n\n<p>This badass team of union organizers, community leaders, educators and activists, is fighting for more affordable housing to address homelessness, more government oversight to tackle corruption,&nbsp;and more economic equality&nbsp;to keep working families in San Francisco.&nbsp;<\/p>\n\n\n\n<p><strong>Anita Martinez&nbsp;<\/strong>and<strong>&nbsp;Vick Chung&nbsp;<\/strong>are elected City College trustees, who ran on their own progressive slate in 2022 to stop class cuts at City.<\/p>\n\n\n\n<p><strong>Jane Kim, John Avalos, Sandra Lee Fewer,&nbsp;<\/strong>and<strong>&nbsp;Gordon Mar&nbsp;<\/strong>are former supervisors, all of whom have delivered significant legislation to help immigrants and working families gain economic independence, protect renters and fight for affordable housing, save City College, and help San Francisco transition to renewable energy.<\/p>\n\n\n\n<p><strong>Connie Chan&nbsp;<\/strong>is the current District 1 Supervisor and progressive hero who protected vital City services for renters and families as Budget chair during 2023\u2019s austerity budget cycle, including protecting funds for children, seniors, and the homeless. As Supervisor she has been a champion for immigrants, working families, and small businesses as they work to recover from the pandemic.<\/p>\n\n\n\n<p><strong>Mano Raju,&nbsp;<\/strong>as the City\u2019s elected Public Defender, advocates for supportive services to keep vulnerable San Franciscans out of court and out of jail, while pushing for resources to help people re-enter society and be good community stewards.<\/p>\n\n\n\n<p><strong>Leah LaCroix&nbsp;<\/strong>is a current Vice Chair of the DCCC and has helped deliver Free MUNI for Youth as chair of the SF Youth Commission.<\/p>\n\n\n\n<p><strong>Gloria Berry<\/strong>&nbsp;has fought for reparations for Black San Franciscans on the SF Reparations Committee.&nbsp;<\/p>\n\n\n\n<p><strong>Jeremy Lee&nbsp;<\/strong>is an affordable housing manager in Chinatown who fought for a fair district map on the 2021 redistricting task force.<\/p>\n\n\n\n<p><strong>Queena Chen&nbsp;<\/strong>and&nbsp;<strong>Natalie Gee<\/strong>, daughters of Chinese immigrants, got their start as community organizers in Chinatown.&nbsp;<strong>Queena<\/strong>&nbsp;is a transit activist serving on the SFMTA\u2019s Citizen Advisory Committee and co-founder of the Rose Pak Democratic Club.&nbsp;<strong>Natalie<\/strong>&nbsp;is a community organizer who has championed language access as a progressive legislative aide.<\/p>\n\n\n\n<p><strong>Greg Hardeman, Patrick Bell,&nbsp;<\/strong>and<strong>&nbsp;Kristin Hardy&nbsp;<\/strong>are longtime organizers with their labor unions, representing elevator workers, plumbers, and healthcare workers (IUEC Local 8, UA Local 38, and SEIU 1021).&nbsp;<\/p>\n\n\n\n<p><strong>Sal Rosselli&nbsp;<\/strong>is president of the National Union of Healthcare Workers.<\/p>\n\n\n\n<p><strong>Sydney Simpson&nbsp;<\/strong>is a progressive union nurse who organizes with the Harvey Milk LGBTQ Democratic Club.<\/p>\n\n\n\n<p><strong>Hene Kelly&nbsp;<\/strong>is a retired teacher and current Medicare For All activist who advocates for seniors and people with disabilities.<\/p>\n\n\n\n<p><strong>Peter Gallotta&nbsp;<\/strong>is a current Vice Chair of the DCCC. His leadership and organizing has kept the local Democratic Party progressive and a voice for the people. Peter is an activist for clean energy and LGBTQ+ rights.<\/p>\n\n\n\n<p><strong>Adolfo Velasquez&nbsp;<\/strong>is an educator at SF State who has supported low-income students at State and City College.<\/p>\n\n\n\n<p><strong>Joshua Rudy Ochoa&nbsp;<\/strong>works for the SF Youth Commission and, as a student activist, helped raise SF State\u2019s campus minimum wage.<\/p>\n\n\n\n<p><strong>Frances Hsieh&nbsp;<\/strong>is a labor organizer who champions the voices of immigrants, women and Asian-Americans in city government.&nbsp;<\/p>\n\n\n\n<p><strong>Michael Nguyen<\/strong>&nbsp;a.k.a. Juicy Liu, is an attorney, LGBTQ activist, and drag queen. Michael uses his performance drag to bridge the LGBTQ and API communities.<\/p>\n\n\n\n<p>Let\u2019s take back City Hall from corrupt downtown interests and build a city that works for everyone.&nbsp;<strong>Vote for the<\/strong>&nbsp;<a href=\"https:\/\/www.laborandworkingfamilies.com\/\"><strong>Labor and Working Families DCCC slate<\/strong><\/a>!<\/p>\n\n\n\n<figure class=\"wp-block-image\"><img decoding=\"async\" src=\"https:\/\/assets.nationbuilder.com\/theleaguesf\/pages\/250\/attachments\/original\/1706856395\/labor-working-families-slate-2.jpg?1706856395\" alt=\"Labor and Working Families Slate\"\/><\/figure>\n\n\n\n<p><strong>Hey!<\/strong>&nbsp;Remember, only registered Democrats can vote in this super important DCCC election. You can get a Democratic Party ballot by<a href=\"https:\/\/www.sf.gov\/register-vote\">&nbsp;registering as a Democrat<\/a>&nbsp;with the Department of Elections. See&nbsp;<a href=\"https:\/\/www.theleaguesf.org\/san_francisco_pissed_off_voter_guide_march_2024#voting\">Voting Logistics<\/a>&nbsp;for more info.<\/p>\n\n\n\n<p><a href=\"https:\/\/www.theleaguesf.org\/san_francisco_pissed_off_voter_guide_march_2024#top\">^Back to Top<\/a><\/p>\n\n\n\n<hr class=\"wp-block-separator has-alpha-channel-opacity\"\/>\n\n\n\n<h2 class=\"wp-block-heading\">Federal Offices<\/h2>\n\n\n\n<p><strong>US Senator: Barbara Lee<\/strong><\/p>\n\n\n\n<figure class=\"wp-block-image\"><img decoding=\"async\" src=\"https:\/\/assets.nationbuilder.com\/theleaguesf\/pages\/250\/attachments\/original\/1706860718\/barbara-lee.png?1706860718\" alt=\"\"\/><\/figure>\n\n\n\n<p>Most folks who know Congressperson Barbara Lee on the national stage remember her now legendary&nbsp;<a href=\"https:\/\/www.latimes.com\/politics\/story\/2021-08-20\/road-to-vindication-for-barbara-lee-the-only-member-of-congress-to-vote-against-afghanistan-wa\">refusal to vote for&nbsp; the disastrous open-ended authorization of war in Afghanistan<\/a>&nbsp;in the weeks after 9\/11\u2013 the only member of Congress to do so. Lee eloquently voiced her argument in favor of decency, patience, and healing, and set the standard for American leadership for decades.<\/p>\n\n\n\n<p>Lee\u2019s political life began as a volunteer with the Black Panther Party\u2019s breakfast program, then as president of the Black Student Union at Mills College. Lee was inspired to vote and enter electoral politics after a 1972 Mills visit by Shirley Chisholm, the political trailblazer who was then running for president, and became the first Black woman elected to the U.S. Congress. Lee&nbsp; joined the staff of Congressman Ron Dellums, a stalwart Black progressive who later served as&nbsp; Mayor of Oakland.&nbsp;<\/p>\n\n\n\n<p>In 1990, Lee was elected to the California State Assembly from Oakland; in 1996 she was elected to the California State Senate, and in 1998 she was elected to the U.S Congress, where she has served ever since.<\/p>\n\n\n\n<p>Lee opposes the death penalty, backs reproductive freedoms, and supports shrinking the U.S. military budget. She has worked to decriminalize cannabis and ensure equitable access to the marijuana industry, advocates for Medicare For All, and works for housing affordability. Lee chairs the Congressional HIV\/AIDS Caucus, the Congressional LGBTQ+ Equality Caucus, and the Task Force on Poverty and Opportunity, as well as many progressive congressional groups. Basically, she\u2019s a badass. Let\u2019s send Barbara Lee to DC!<\/p>\n\n\n\n<h4 class=\"wp-block-heading\"><strong>OMGs we get to vote for Barbara Lee twice!&nbsp;<\/strong><\/h4>\n\n\n\n<p>As with California\u2019s other Senate seat&nbsp;<a href=\"https:\/\/www.theleaguesf.org\/june_2022#Senate\">recently vacated under unusual circumstances<\/a>, this Senate seat also requires&nbsp;<strong>two separate, simultaneous, elections<\/strong>\u2014both on the same ballot. One election will be for the remaining few weeks of Feinstein\u2019s term, and one will be for a full six-year term.&nbsp;<strong>Vote for Lee twice in the March primary<\/strong>\u2013 but remember you will have to vote twice again on the November ballot.&nbsp;&nbsp;<\/p>\n\n\n\n<p><a href=\"https:\/\/www.theleaguesf.org\/san_francisco_pissed_off_voter_guide_march_2024#top\">^Back to Top<\/a><\/p>\n\n\n\n<p><strong>US Representative, District 11:&nbsp;<\/strong>No Endorsement<\/p>\n\n\n\n<p>Look, Nancy Pelosi is gonna win, no surprises here. She doesn\u2019t need our endorsement. Every two years our members debate if we should endorse her: do her national contributions outweigh her lack of leadership back at home and justify the shade she loves to throw at progressives? See our&nbsp;<a href=\"https:\/\/www.theleaguesf.org\/nov_2018#ca12\">2018<\/a>&nbsp;or&nbsp;<a href=\"https:\/\/www.theleaguesf.org\/nov_2014\">2014<\/a>&nbsp;voter guides for more thoughts on that. Her most recent unconscionable move in our book? Her insulting and witch-hunty&nbsp;<a href=\"https:\/\/www.nytimes.com\/2024\/01\/28\/us\/politics\/nancy-pelosi-fbi-russia-gaza-protesters.html\">calls for the FBI to investigate those of her constituents calling for a ceasefire in Gaza,&nbsp;<\/a>saying they might be getting paid by Russia\u2014or, as she suggested in October 2023, that they should \u201cgo back to China.\u201d&nbsp;<\/p>\n\n\n\n<p><a href=\"https:\/\/www.theleaguesf.org\/san_francisco_pissed_off_voter_guide_march_2024#top\">^Back to Top<\/a><\/p>\n\n\n\n<p><strong>US Representative, District 15:&nbsp;<\/strong>No Endorsement<\/p>\n\n\n\n<p>Okay, incumbent Kevin Mullin may be a \u201cproud member of the&nbsp;<a href=\"https:\/\/twitter.com\/DadsCaucus\">Dads Caucus<\/a>\u201d who brags about his high-school past as DJ \u201cCutmaster Kevvy Kev.\u201d But he\u2019s endorsed by the state establishment, gets lots of mainstream money, and has no serious opponent\u2013 so he doesn\u2019t need our endorsement. Side note: it\u2019s such a drag to have nothing but blah candidates for Congress. Until there\u2019s someone we can get excited about, we\u2019re staying out of it.<\/p>\n\n\n\n<hr class=\"wp-block-separator has-alpha-channel-opacity\"\/>\n\n\n\n<h2 class=\"wp-block-heading\">State Offices<\/h2>\n\n\n\n<p><strong>State Senate<\/strong>: No Endorsement<\/p>\n\n\n\n<p>Scott Wiener,&nbsp;<a href=\"https:\/\/www.politico.com\/news\/2023\/09\/08\/pelosi-speaker-san-francisco-00114753\">foiled in his ambitions for Congress<\/a>&nbsp;by Nancy Pelosi\u2019s iron grip on office, is reduced to running again for State Senate, challenged only by a handful of hopeless&nbsp;<a href=\"https:\/\/www.cynthia4senate.org\/\">wannabes<\/a>. Yes, he\u2019ll win, and will bring his pro-cop, pro-business, pro-development agenda back to Sacramento, while touting his \u201cprogressive\u201d bonafides nationally as a battler for trans rights. Even though he\u2019s good on some issues like transit, biking, and nightlife, we have serious policy disagreements with Wiener and can\u2019t support him. (See our&nbsp;<a href=\"https:\/\/www.theleaguesf.org\/march_2020\">2020<\/a>&nbsp;and&nbsp;<a href=\"https:\/\/www.theleaguesf.org\/nov_2016#jane\">2016<\/a>&nbsp;voter guides for more on that.) Since he\u2019s left for Sacramento, Wiener has personally authored some of the most cynical legislation ever, restructuring state and local government power for the profit of his&nbsp;<a href=\"https:\/\/sftu.org\/2020\/01\/16\/scott-wiener-takes-more-real-estate-money-than-any-other-politician-in-the-california-legislature\/\">real<\/a>&nbsp;<a href=\"https:\/\/www.housingisahumanright.org\/selling-out-california-scott-wiener-money-ties-to-big-real-estate\/\">estate<\/a>&nbsp;<a href=\"https:\/\/caanet.org\/package-of-caa-supported-housing-bills-signed-by-gov-newsom\/\">backers<\/a>. We\u2019re seriously worried about Wiener\u2019s&nbsp;<a href=\"https:\/\/sfstandard.com\/2023\/12\/03\/san-francisco-moderate-democrats-fight-dccc-march-2024\/\">stumping in San Francisco with Garry Tan for the reactionary DCCC slate<\/a>&nbsp;especially after Tan\u2019s image has been emblazoned on&nbsp;<a href=\"https:\/\/www.sfchronicle.com\/sf\/article\/sf-garry-tan-x-threatening-peskin-police-report-18637813.php\">death threats<\/a>&nbsp;to a&nbsp;<a href=\"https:\/\/sfstandard.com\/2024\/02\/01\/san-francisco-tech-tweet-millionaires\/\">number of politicians<\/a>. Wiener\u2019s endorsement of real estate and tech millionaire-funded candidates means no endorsement from us.&nbsp;<\/p>\n\n\n\n<p><a href=\"https:\/\/www.theleaguesf.org\/san_francisco_pissed_off_voter_guide_march_2024#top\">^Back to Top<\/a><\/p>\n\n\n\n<p><strong>State Assemblymember, District 17:&nbsp;<\/strong>No Endorsement<\/p>\n\n\n\n<p>The League is not endorsing in this race this year. We supported incumbent Matt Haney in his previous runs for the&nbsp;<a href=\"https:\/\/www.theleaguesf.org\/nov_2016\">Board of Ed<\/a>&nbsp;and&nbsp;<a href=\"https:\/\/www.theleaguesf.org\/nov_2018\">Board of Supervisors<\/a>, and he\u2019s even been to several of our meetings. But by the time he ran for Assembly in&nbsp;<a href=\"https:\/\/www.theleaguesf.org\/nov_2022\">2022<\/a>, he was&nbsp;<a href=\"https:\/\/sfstandard.com\/2022\/04\/19\/analysis-matt-haney-david-campos-assembly-housing\/\">distancing himself<\/a>&nbsp;from his previously progressive record. While he\u2019s done&nbsp;<a href=\"https:\/\/www.kron4.com\/news\/bay-area\/new-bill-would-cap-apartment-security-deposits\/\">some good things<\/a>&nbsp;in Sacramento for renters like himself, Haney\u2019s 180 toward YIMBY housing doctrine and his willingness to attack former allies have given him a (<a href=\"https:\/\/cal-access.sos.ca.gov\/Campaign\/Committees\/Detail.aspx?id=1441330&amp;session=2021&amp;view=general\">well-funded<\/a>) seat at the moderate table. Now he\u2019s getting support from GrowSF, and his endorsement of real-estate funded candidates for supervisor in Districts 5 and 9 is just bonkers. We\u2019re sad that we can\u2019t endorse him this time around\u2013 do better, Matt!<br><\/p>\n\n\n\n<p><a href=\"https:\/\/www.theleaguesf.org\/san_francisco_pissed_off_voter_guide_march_2024#top\">^Back to Top<\/a><\/p>\n\n\n\n<p><strong>State Assemblymember, District 19:&nbsp;<\/strong>No Endorsement<\/p>\n\n\n\n<p>We didn\u2019t endorse either of the two front-runners in this race. David Lee and Catherine Stefani are the only serious contenders looking to replace Phil Ting in the State Assembly. If Stefani wins, the all-white delegation to Sacramento will underscore the tragic fact that San Francisco is&nbsp;<a href=\"https:\/\/sfstandard.com\/2023\/08\/18\/chinese-american-politcal-representation-san-francisco\/\">losing its Chinese-American representation<\/a>&nbsp;at all levels. Supervisor Catherine Stefani, hailing from the northern and eastern-most, (as well as wealthiest) corner of District 19, hopes to bring a politics of bland YIMBYism to Sacramento, as long as it is not applied too aggressively in her immediate backyard, in lockstep with her colleagues from the San Francisco delegation like Haney and Wiener. Stefani racked up endorsements and campaign donations from the field of moderate-leaning politicians, most of organized labor, and a coterie of old-money Pacific Heights donors including most of billionaire&nbsp;<a href=\"https:\/\/48hills.org\/2024\/01\/the-billionaire-plutocrats-set-their-sights-on-controlling-sfs-democratic-party\/\">Ron Conway<\/a>\u2019s extended family.<\/p>\n\n\n\n<p>David Lee is making a&nbsp;<a href=\"https:\/\/sfstandard.com\/2023\/09\/29\/david-lee-state-assembly-race\/\">fourth run<\/a>&nbsp;for office, this time with the backing of local progressive leaders from the west side and Chinese progressive communities. We didn\u2019t endorse Lee in his three previous runs for Supervisor of D1, because there&#8217;s always been a stronger candidate in the race. We\u2019re taking another look at him this time, considering our allies backing him like Connie Chan, Jane Kim, Mark Leno, Sandy Fewer, and Norman Yee. We like his focus on public education and uplifting AAPI community voices. But that wasn\u2019t enough to convince a majority of our members to back Lee, so we ended up with no endorsement.<\/p>\n\n\n\n<p><strong>Sacramento Reality Check<\/strong><\/p>\n\n\n\n<p>Look, outside the Bay Area, politicians like Wiener, Haney, and Stefani are seen as lefty progressives because they believe in gun control and are perfectly glad to be photographed with drag queens. But just because Moms for Liberty doesn\u2019t like you, it doesn\u2019t mean you share our values. If you\u2019re representing San Francisco, not being a bigoted asshole should be the floor, not the ceiling. We need champions for truly affordable housing, police accountability, policies that keep working families in the city, and systemic checks on the wealth inequality that\u2019s destroying our communities. If you look below their surface-level actions and, of course,&nbsp;<a href=\"https:\/\/www.followthemoney.org\/entity-details?eid=32203683&amp;default=candidate\">follow the money,<\/a>&nbsp;these guys don\u2019t cut it.&nbsp;<\/p>\n\n\n\n<p><a href=\"https:\/\/www.theleaguesf.org\/san_francisco_pissed_off_voter_guide_march_2024#top\">^Back to Top<\/a><\/p>\n\n\n\n<hr class=\"wp-block-separator has-alpha-channel-opacity\"\/>\n\n\n\n<h2 class=\"wp-block-heading\">Judicial Offices<\/h2>\n\n\n\n<p><strong>Superior Court Judge, Seat 1: Michael Isaku Begert<br>Superior Court Judge, Seat 13: Patrick Thompson<\/strong><\/p>\n\n\n\n<p>Superior Court judges oversee civil, criminal, and traffic courts. We heartily endorse the two incumbent judges.<\/p>\n\n\n\n<figure class=\"wp-block-image\"><img decoding=\"async\" src=\"https:\/\/assets.nationbuilder.com\/theleaguesf\/pages\/250\/attachments\/original\/1706859539\/judge-begert.png?1706859539\" alt=\"Judge Michael Isaku Begert\" title=\"Judge Michael Isaku Begert\"\/><\/figure>\n\n\n\n<p><strong>Seat 1: Judge Michael Isaku Begert<\/strong>&nbsp;presides over collaborative courts, which divert San Franciscans charged with minor crimes away from jail and into drug treatment, mental health, and job-counseling services. Begert knows these programs are effective and wants to see them continue. One of the good guys!<\/p>\n\n\n\n<figure class=\"wp-block-image\"><img decoding=\"async\" src=\"https:\/\/assets.nationbuilder.com\/theleaguesf\/pages\/250\/attachments\/original\/1706859371\/judge-patrick-thompson.png?1706859371\" alt=\"Judge Patrick Thompson\" title=\"Judge Patrick Thompson\"\/><\/figure>\n\n\n\n<p><strong>Seat 13: Judge Patrick Thompson<\/strong>&nbsp;is relatively new to the bench, currently working in the courts\u2019 pretrial system. We like his take on fairness: \u201cI don\u2019t coddle criminal defendants. I don\u2019t coddle defense attorneys. I don\u2019t coddle prosecutors.\u201d He\u2019s a stand-up judge who won\u2019t be bullied.<\/p>\n\n\n\n<p>Our courts are under attack by conservative PACs looking to blame anyone but the mayor and her DA for the fentanyl crisis and crime. They want to amplify a Fox News narrative in which San Francisco is a lawless hellhole that needs more cops, draconian laws, and hanging judges\u2026but that MAGA-uncle rant-at-Thanksgiving horseshit has no place in our political dialogue.<\/p>\n\n\n\n<p><strong>Our justice system is far from perfect, but these two judges are part of the solution.&nbsp;Vote for Judge Begert and Judge Thompson!<\/strong><\/p>\n\n\n\n<p><a href=\"https:\/\/www.theleaguesf.org\/san_francisco_pissed_off_voter_guide_march_2024#top\">^Back to Top<\/a><\/p>\n\n\n\n<hr class=\"wp-block-separator has-alpha-channel-opacity\"\/>\n\n\n\n<h2 class=\"wp-block-heading\">State Proposition<\/h2>\n\n\n\n<p><strong>Prop 1: Money for Behavioral Health and Treatment Beds: Yes<\/strong><\/p>\n\n\n\n<p>Prop 1 modifies an existing state tax (2004\u2019s Mental Health Services tax of 1% on incomes over $1 million) so the money can be used to address substance abuse, and would require a chunk of the money raised to go to housing and supportive services. This prop also includes a $6.38B state-level bond, put on the ballot by the state legislature, and supported by majorities there and by the governor. If it passes, CA borrows money now to address urgent needs and pays it back over time. The new money from this bond would go to:&nbsp;<\/p>\n\n\n\n<ul>\n<li>County health departments, with grants for organizations that provide behavioral health treatment to create more inpatient and residential treatment beds (about $4 billion)<\/li>\n\n\n\n<li>Permanent supportive housing for people with behavioral health disorders who are experiencing or are at risk of homelessness (about $2 billion, half earmarked for veterans)<\/li>\n<\/ul>\n\n\n\n<p>The bond money would provide an estimated 11,000 more treatment beds and supportive housing units, with outpatient services for over 27,000 people.<\/p>\n\n\n\n<p>If you\u2019re running a clean-up-the-streets campaign (and who isn\u2019t? See, for example, London Breed, the mods\u2019 DCCC slate, future President Newsom, or SF\u2019s Prop F) it\u2019s mandatory to rage against all those \u201chomeless crazy people\u201d and \u201cdrug addicts\u201d who refuse to get treatment. But here\u2019s the reality: there are nowhere near enough treatment beds for people who need them. Not in San Francisco, with our county hospital\u2019s grand total of 44 acute psychiatric beds, and definitely not in California\u2019s poor rural counties. And any unhoused person lucky enough to get past bureaucratic requirements,and move into short-term rehab is unfortunately out of luck when it\u2019s over: most folks who come from the street are<a href=\"https:\/\/www.sfchronicle.com\/sf\/article\/mental-illness-san-francisco-hospitals-homeless-17772797.php\">&nbsp;discharged right back to the street<\/a>.&nbsp;<\/p>\n\n\n\n<p>The state desperately needs more clinicians, treatment beds, and housing to help Californians struggling with mental health and\/or substance use disorders that aren\u2019t getting what they need from existing outpatient services with limited capacity. Right now their only options are languishing on waiting lists, cycling through emergency rooms\u2014or ending up in jails and prisons, which have become the state\u2019s de facto psych and drug treatment centers.&nbsp;<a href=\"https:\/\/lao.ca.gov\/BallotAnalysis\/Proposition?number=1&amp;year=2024\">This bond would also allow mental health money to also be spent on substance use disorder treatment and housing<\/a>&nbsp;so people can&nbsp;<em>stay<\/em>&nbsp;mentally healthy.&nbsp;<\/p>\n\n\n\n<p>Dear readers, we do want you to know that this one is a little tricky. While a majority of our members ultimately voted to endorse Prop 1, our discussion was more nuanced. Of course, we&nbsp; worried about endorsing anything&nbsp;<a href=\"https:\/\/calmatters.org\/politics\/elections\/2024\/01\/mental-health-proposition-1\/\">with this much money<\/a>&nbsp;backed by the supremely slippery Gavin Newsom, whose Prop 1 catchphrase \u201ctreatment not tents\u201d (ugh eyeroll) recalls his notorious \u201c<a href=\"https:\/\/www.kqed.org\/news\/11802346\/gov-newsom-once-again-takes-on-homelessness-this-time-statewide\">Care Not Cash\u201d initiative from way back when he was SF mayor, which helped cause the problem he now decries<\/a>.&nbsp;<\/p>\n\n\n\n<p>More importantly, some in the&nbsp;<a href=\"https:\/\/www.disabilityrightsca.org\/latest-news\/disability-rights-california-opposes-proposition-1\">mental health and disability rights communities are concerned<\/a>&nbsp;that the facilities built with the bond money from Prop 1 could include forced treatment programs, potentially opening the door to a return to the bad old days of nightmarish asylums (the&nbsp;<a href=\"https:\/\/leginfo.legislature.ca.gov\/faces\/billVersionsCompareClient.xhtml?bill_id=202320240AB531&amp;cversion=20230AB53197AMD\">words \u201cvoluntary\u201d and \u201cunlocked\u201d were removed<\/a>&nbsp;from earlier versions of the legislation). And we agree with mental health advocates that it\u2019s majorly effed up for the legislature to craft these bills without consulting or centering the needs of folks who access these services. This is especially important because&nbsp;<a href=\"https:\/\/calmatters.org\/health\/mental-health\/2023\/07\/california-mental-health-newsom-proposal\/\">Prop 1 changes how money from the long-standing tax should be spent,<\/a>&nbsp;effectively diverting money from some existing services to expand programs that include substance use disorder treatment and housing support. There are ways to fill these gaps with new funds from Medi-Cal and other sources, but Prop 1 places the burden on local health systems to figure that out.<\/p>\n\n\n\n<p>So yes, this prop has its faults and this isn\u2019t going to single-handedly fix our clusterf*ck of a behavioral health system. But ultimately, we\u2019re going with a yes on this one. The tax funds will still go through local health departments that can determine how to best meet their communities\u2019 needs, they\u2019ll have more resources to address substance use disorder in addition to mental health, and the bond puts money toward a persistent gap in the system. While nobody wants to see a return to draconian institutions, we&nbsp;<em>do&nbsp;<\/em>need more money for supportive housing, and treatment facilities that offer an alternative to jails.<\/p>\n\n\n\n<p>We say Vote Yes!<\/p>\n\n\n\n<p><a href=\"https:\/\/www.theleaguesf.org\/san_francisco_pissed_off_voter_guide_march_2024#top\">^Back to Top<\/a><\/p>\n\n\n\n<hr class=\"wp-block-separator has-alpha-channel-opacity\"\/>\n\n\n\n<h2 class=\"wp-block-heading\">City &amp; County Propositions<\/h2>\n\n\n\n<p><strong>Prop A: Money for Affordable Housing: Yes<\/strong><\/p>\n\n\n\n<p>San Francisco\u2019s affordable housing has mostly been funded by federal and state money. But that\u2019s been cut, so the city needs to rely more on taxes, developer fees, and\/or bonds.&nbsp;Unfortunately,&nbsp;<a href=\"https:\/\/www.sfchronicle.com\/sf\/article\/s-f-housing-fees-affordable-18258604.php\">the city reduced the amount that developers are required to kick in for affordable housing,<\/a>&nbsp;and no politician is gonna risk floating a new property tax before an election\u2026 but San Francisco still has to&nbsp;&nbsp;<a href=\"https:\/\/www.sfexaminer.com\/news\/housing\/latest-sf-housing-reforms-get-vital-california-approval\/article_7c9c6794-99f7-11ee-97fd-53c965901986.html\">build 46,000 affordable units by 2031 or be penalized by the state.<\/a>&nbsp;Thus, this bond.<strong>&nbsp;<\/strong><\/p>\n\n\n\n<p>Most of it\u2014&nbsp;$240 million \u2014is for funding just 1,500 units already in the housing pipeline, but stalled for lack of money. Another $30 million is for preserving sites like those in the Small Sites Program (about 60 units) and $30 million goes to 120 beds of supportive housing for domestic violence survivors. All worthwhile and necessary, in our book.<\/p>\n\n\n\n<p><strong>This measure is supported by the supes and the mayor. It requires a two-thirds vote to pass: As if that pressure weren\u2019t enough, it will also be a predictor for the popularity of future bonds. If it fails (the way the transit bond did last year) despite our obvious need for housing funds and&nbsp; support from all the players, that would be very bad news for any future affordable housing measures, and for other public infrastructure initiatives. Eeek. So tell all your friends:&nbsp;Vote Yes on Prop A!<\/strong><\/p>\n\n\n\n<p><strong>Side Plot on Climate Bond Drama<\/strong><\/p>\n\n\n\n<p><strong>Climate activists pushed to&nbsp;<a href=\"https:\/\/www.sfclimateemergency.org\/pushing-for-a-climate-bond.html\">add $50-100 million to this bond<\/a>&nbsp;for electrification and efficiency retrofits of existing affordable housing, but the Supervisors and Mayor said no, because there isn\u2019t room in the City\u2019s capital plan. The capital plan&nbsp;<a href=\"https:\/\/onesanfrancisco.org\/cap-plan-2024\/introduction-policies-principles-and-goals\">established a policy<\/a>&nbsp;that we will only issue new bonds as old bonds are paid off, trying to keep City property taxes at the same level since 2006. We think it\u2019s time to reconsider that policy for key needs like housing and climate. That makes it even more important that Governor Newsom step up on leading a state climate bond for the November ballot. Unfortunately it looks like we&nbsp;<a href=\"https:\/\/www.politico.com\/newsletters\/california-climate\/2024\/01\/19\/someones-missing-from-the-climate-bond-talks-00136714\">shouldn\u2019t get our hopes up<\/a>. :\/<\/strong><\/p>\n\n\n\n<p><a href=\"https:\/\/www.theleaguesf.org\/san_francisco_pissed_off_voter_guide_march_2024#top\">^Back to Top<\/a><\/p>\n\n\n\n<p><strong>Prop B: More Tax Money for Cops: No<\/strong><\/p>\n\n\n\n<p>You know it\u2019s bad when progressives and conservatives agree on anything related to&nbsp;the San Francisco Police Department.&nbsp;And\u2014get ready\u2014 the League is on Mayor Breed\u2019s side here!<\/p>\n\n\n\n<p>This is one of two measures on this ballot aiming to turn back the clock on policing reforms (see also Prop E). In the summer of 2020, following George Floyd\u2019s murder, there was a flurry of activism against over-policing, with a focus on alternative community safety strategies. In the&nbsp;<a href=\"https:\/\/www.theleaguesf.org\/nov_2020_real#PropE\">November 2020 election<\/a>, our supervisors&nbsp;<a href=\"https:\/\/sfgov.legistar.com\/LegislationDetail.aspx?ID=4543262&amp;GUID=AAAC140A-23B3-4045-9ACF-7554C9CE1FC0&amp;Options=ID%7CText%7C&amp;Search=minimum+staffing#\"><em>unanimously<\/em><\/a>&nbsp;submitted a&nbsp;<a href=\"https:\/\/www.spur.org\/voter-guide\/2020-11\/sf-prop-e-police-staffing\">ballot measure<\/a>&nbsp;to remove&nbsp;<a href=\"https:\/\/www.sfchronicle.com\/crime\/article\/Supervisor-Yee-pushes-ballot-measure-to-decide-15284475.php\">minimum staffing rules<\/a>&nbsp;for the SFPD, saying; \u201cFor the last 25 years, the minimum staffing requirement has handcuffed San Franciscans and our budget, and it hasn\u2019t made our city safer.\u201d Voters&nbsp;<a href=\"https:\/\/www.vox.com\/2020\/11\/4\/21537593\/san-francisco-proposition-e-police-staffing-results\">agreed at the ballot<\/a>, and police staffing minimums were&nbsp;<a href=\"https:\/\/www.sfchronicle.com\/local-politics\/article\/S-F-Prop-D-and-E-S-F-s-law-enforcement-15699791.php\">removed<\/a>&nbsp;from The City charter. Yay! Victory!&nbsp;<\/p>\n\n\n\n<p>So wait, why are we even talking about establishing a minimum again?&nbsp;<\/p>\n\n\n\n<p>Here\u2019s the background:&nbsp;Supervisor (and former SFPD spokesman and \u201c<a href=\"https:\/\/twitter.com\/equalityAlec\/status\/1522231336261632000\">copaganda<\/a>\u201d strategist) Matt Dorsey drafted a proposition to mandate more new police hiring and retention without a source of funding, which is policy code for \u201ccut other City services to pay for recruiting bonuses\u201d. Then Supervisor (and mayoral challenger) Ahsha Safa\u00ed amended the prop, making police hiring dependent on future new funding, most likely a tax, and the supes voted to put it on the ballot. Breed and Dorsey went ballistic,&nbsp;<a href=\"https:\/\/abc7news.com\/san-francisco-board-of-supervisors-sfpd-police-staffing-staff-shortage\/14119177\/\">calling the amended version a devious \u201ccop tax.\u201d&nbsp;<\/a>Now public-sector unions (which want more public safety hiring, including medics and firefighters) are backing it, and&nbsp;<a href=\"https:\/\/www.sfchronicle.com\/sf\/article\/sf-police-staffing-crime-breed-voters-march-2024-18472260.php\">Breed and her allies are urging voters to vote no.&nbsp;<\/a>&nbsp;<\/p>\n\n\n\n<p>On top of the minimum staffing nonsense, Prop B would require an expensive new tax, take money away from the city\u2019s general fund, and establish a \u201cPolice Officer Staffing Fund\u201d which the department would then have&nbsp; broad discretion over \u2014 i.e. a nice little SFPD recruiting slush fund. What could possibly go wrong? (Dorsey wants to do a&nbsp;<a href=\"https:\/\/missionlocal.org\/2022\/12\/the-real-streets-of-san-francisco-matt-dorsey-sfpd-documentary\/\">pro-SFPD reality show<\/a>&nbsp;and SFPD recently did&nbsp;<a href=\"https:\/\/sfstandard.com\/2023\/09\/18\/san-francisco-police-hunt-for-recruits-at-texas-colleges\/\">recruiting trips to friggin Texas<\/a>, hunting for new cops!)<\/p>\n\n\n\n<p><strong>We are sticking with the&nbsp;<a href=\"https:\/\/sfpl.org\/locations\/main-library\/government-information-center\/san-francisco-government\/san-francisco-1\/san-1?title_value=&amp;description_value=&amp;prop_letter_value=E&amp;month=11&amp;year=2020\">voters\u2019 previous decision<\/a>, and saying no to more cops. Just like our dear friend London Breed:&nbsp;<\/strong><strong>Vote No on Prop B.<\/strong><\/p>\n\n\n\n<p><a href=\"https:\/\/www.theleaguesf.org\/san_francisco_pissed_off_voter_guide_march_2024#top\">^Back to Top<\/a><\/p>\n\n\n\n<p><strong>Prop C: Tax Breaks for Downtown Developers: No<\/strong><\/p>\n\n\n\n<p>Prop C would give tax breaks to downtown developers who sell their commercial property after converting it to residential use. We can debate the merits of that given our affordable housing shortage, but there\u2019s also a sneaky backdoor clause that could remove the entire property transfer tax entirely. No, thanks!<\/p>\n\n\n\n<p>Backstory: In November 2020, we won a huge victory with&nbsp;<a href=\"https:\/\/www.theleaguesf.org\/nov_2020_real#PropI\">Prop I<\/a>, which increased the City\u2019s property transfer tax on luxury properties sold for over $10 million, generating over $300 million to stabilize the budget and fund affordable housing. (The Supervisors created the&nbsp;<a href=\"https:\/\/sfgov.legistar.com\/LegislationDetail.aspx?ID=4673117&amp;GUID=7E0D4562-5A99-474A-ACE8-675E272D6952\">Housing Stability Fund<\/a>&nbsp;to direct Prop I money to social housing, but the&nbsp;<a href=\"https:\/\/missionlocal.org\/2022\/05\/prop-i-could-make-social-housing-a-reality-if-the-mayor-disperses-funds\/\">Mayor refused to spend that money<\/a>&nbsp;on housing. WTF?!)<\/p>\n\n\n\n<p>So for decades, the City let developers build gobs of office towers downtown without including enough housing. Now with the work-from-home revolution, downtown is empty, and the office vacancy rate has skyrocketed to 34%. The City desperately needs housing, so, yeah, maybe it makes sense to convert some empty offices to homes.<\/p>\n\n\n\n<p>But do we really need to give fatcats a tax break for what will almost certainly be high-priced condos? And does poor Mr. Moneybags who made a bad investment in office space deserve to be bailed out? Plus, we lose out on tax money that would have gone toward affordable housing? Yuck.<\/p>\n\n\n\n<p>If all that weren\u2019t bad enough, Prop C slips in a clause allowing the real estate transfer tax itself to be changed by the Board of Supervisors, which means a pro-real estate Board could completely eliminate it. And y\u2019all know how we feel about undoing the will of the voters \u2013 not on our watch!&nbsp;<strong>Vote No on Prop C.<\/strong><\/p>\n\n\n\n<p><a href=\"https:\/\/www.theleaguesf.org\/san_francisco_pissed_off_voter_guide_march_2024#top\">^Back to Top<\/a><\/p>\n\n\n\n<p><strong>Prop D: Tighten City Ethics Rules: Yes<\/strong><\/p>\n\n\n\n<p>The San Francisco Ethics Commission was created by voters in 1993. It\u2019s in charge of everything connected to clean government: anti-bribery rules, election campaign finance, lobbying, preventing conflicts of interest, and so on. It advises City employees on how not to break the ethics rules, enforces the rules, and sometimes pushes for even better and stronger rules.<\/p>\n\n\n\n<p>The Ethics Commission put this prop on the ballot to firm up the City\u2019s lax laws on gift-giving, tighten various loopholes, and make it harder for the Board of Supervisors to monkey around with ethics rules in the future. They started drafting it a few years ago, in response to the&nbsp;<a href=\"https:\/\/missionlocal.org\/2021\/11\/web-of-corruption-explore-the-cronyism-lies-and-federal-crimes-at-the-heart-of-san-franciscos-government\/\">bonkers corruption kablooie<\/a>&nbsp;that put former&nbsp;<a href=\"https:\/\/missionlocal.org\/2021\/11\/web-of-corruption-explore-the-cronyism-lies-and-federal-crimes-at-the-heart-of-san-franciscos-government\/\">DPW head Mohammed Nuru in federal prison<\/a>&nbsp;(and ended the careers of various other City bigwigs and contractors.)&nbsp; The Ethics Commission tactfully said it wanted to \u201caddress demonstrated shortcomings in the City\u2019s ethics laws and help prevent future acts of corruption like those identified through numerous recent investigations into the conduct of City officials and those doing business with the City.\u201d<\/p>\n\n\n\n<p>The details are pretty arcane, and it\u2019s hard to write comprehensive regulations to prevent impropriety without getting too&nbsp; finicky. For example, the rules specify that City officials can\u2019t enjoy \u201coffice courtesies\u201d like tea or bagels at a business more than four times a year, which makes sense\u2026 but imagine the recordkeeping!<\/p>\n\n\n\n<p>It\u2019s hard to draw the lines in the right place when you\u2019re regulating the relationship&nbsp;<a href=\"https:\/\/www.sf.gov\/news\/controllers-office-releases-findings-san-francisco-department-environments-relationship\">between government employees and the businesses, nonprofit contractors and &nbsp; individuals they need to work closely with day in and day out.&nbsp;<\/a>&nbsp;You want to outlaw<a href=\"https:\/\/missionlocal.org\/2024\/01\/florence-kong-who-bribed-nuru-with-gold-watch-to-be-fined-750k\/\">&nbsp;sketchy gift-giving,&nbsp;<\/a>but not accidentally block valid partnerships or make it illegal to invite your next-door neighbor to your BBQ, because the ribs you got were kinda expensive and six months from now the company she works for is going to apply for a permit from a board you sit on. But it\u2019s not&nbsp;<em>that<\/em>&nbsp;hard to smell when&nbsp;<a href=\"https:\/\/missionlocal.org\/2024\/01\/san-francisco-stanley-ellicott-hr-manager-arrested-charged-in-kickback-scheme\/\">something\u2019s fishy.<\/a>&nbsp;<\/p>\n\n\n\n<p><em>Side note: The Ethics Commission is supposed to be able to advise people about the ethics of sticky situations, but it\u2019s severely understaffed. We think the commission&nbsp; should receive guaranteed funding in proportion to the City budget, to help our government and our elections stay squeaky clean.&nbsp;<\/em><\/p>\n\n\n\n<p><strong>Ethics rules are complex and tricky to get right. But ultimately, we\u2019d prefer to weed out the corruption that\u2019s plagued City government for years, so we lean toward strictness rather than laxness. And we trust the Ethics Commission. In fact, if&nbsp;<a href=\"https:\/\/missionlocal.org\/2023\/10\/report-sf-grant-admin-accused-of-bribery-may-have-fabricated-scores\/\">recent egregious scandals&nbsp;<\/a>weren\u2019t enough to convince you that this prop is needed, check this out: The union for highly-paid and powerful City managers, the Municipal Executives Association, was required to have a series of meetings with the Ethics Commission before the commission could submit Proposition D to the voters. The MEA tried to kill the prop by&nbsp;<a href=\"https:\/\/sfstandard.com\/2022\/08\/10\/ethics-commission-blames-union-for-derailing-anti-corruption-ballot-measure\/\">dragging their feet so obnoxiously<\/a>&nbsp;during the meeting-scheduling process that they forced the Ethics Commission to miss two different deadlines to get it on the ballot? If the people who would be regulated by this prop are already resisting it, it\u2019s definitely needed. Vote Yes on Prop D.<\/strong><\/p>\n\n\n\n<p><a href=\"https:\/\/www.theleaguesf.org\/san_francisco_pissed_off_voter_guide_march_2024#top\">^Back to Top<\/a><\/p>\n\n\n\n<p><strong>Prop E: More Police Surveillance and Car Chases with Less Oversight: Hell No!<\/strong><\/p>\n\n\n\n<p>Prop E would remove citizen oversight of SFPD\u2019s surveillance and technology policies, encourage more dangerous police chases for low-level crimes, and bog down any Police Commission reforms the Chief of Police doesn\u2019t like.&nbsp; (The Police Commission itself, whose members are appointed by the mayor and the supervisors, has recently been a focus of right-wing&nbsp;<a href=\"https:\/\/missionlocal.org\/2023\/09\/critics-sf-police-commission-get-facts-wrong\/\">misinformation campaigns&nbsp;<\/a>but remains a super-important check on abuses of power by the SFPD.)&nbsp;<\/p>\n\n\n\n<p>Currently, the SFPD can only adopt a new technology after filing a request with the Police Commission that explains how it will be used (and, more importantly, how it won\u2019t be abused). Prop E allows the SFPD to use<a href=\"https:\/\/abc7news.com\/killer-robots-san-francisco-sfpd-deadly-force\/12761983\/\"><em>&nbsp;any&nbsp;<\/em>new technology<\/a>&nbsp;immediately, as they wish, without formal policy, for a full year. Police drones following people? Arming police drones with bombs? AI-powered facial recognition? The cops could run wild with any of those.<\/p>\n\n\n\n<p>On the \u201cchase\u201d front, Prop E allows police to chase anyone \u201clikely\u201d to commit a felony or violent misdemeanor. WTF does that even mean? Sounds like some Orwellian&nbsp;<a href=\"https:\/\/en.wikipedia.org\/wiki\/Thought_Police\">Thought Police<\/a>&nbsp;or Philip K. Dick\u2019ian&nbsp;<a href=\"https:\/\/en.wikipedia.org\/wiki\/Pre-crime\">Pre-Crime<\/a>&nbsp;shit to us. And even&nbsp;<a href=\"https:\/\/missionlocal.org\/2024\/01\/sfpd-backs-car-chase-policy-question-breeds-opposition\/\">Police Chief Bill Scott supported SFPD\u2019s current car chase policy<\/a>&nbsp;before the Mayor put Prop E on the ballot without even holding a hearing at the Police Commission. Since 2018,&nbsp;<a href=\"https:\/\/sfstandard.com\/2024\/01\/10\/san-francisco-police-chases-crash-data-police-commission\/\">38% of SFPD chases have ended in a collision<\/a>&nbsp;with 36 injuries and 2 deaths. We don\u2019t need&nbsp;<a href=\"https:\/\/www.sfchronicle.com\/bayarea\/article\/police-chase-san-francisco-18578592.php\">any more of these,<\/a>&nbsp;thank you.<\/p>\n\n\n\n<p>Hmm, what else? Prop E would allow the cops to delay any Police Commission reforms at the Chief\u2019s request, requiring&nbsp; a 90-day wait and meetings in all ten police stations before the commission could even hold a meeting to&nbsp;<em>consider&nbsp;<\/em>the policy. It would also reduce transparency, limiting the time cops are allowed to spend on reporting use-of-force incidents.<\/p>\n\n\n\n<p>This measure, backed by the police union, got a hefty&nbsp;<a href=\"https:\/\/www.sfchronicle.com\/sf\/article\/march-2024-prop-e-tech-money-conway-larsen-police-18570659.php\">$250,000 from crypto billionaire Chris Larsen, and another $100,000 from notorious billionaire powerbroker Ron Conway.<\/a>&nbsp;But big-money ads can\u2019t hide the fact that this is the opposite of how police oversight should work. Prop E is a cynical, poorly written, fear-mongering attempt by fear-mongering politicians to appear \u201ctough on crime\u201d by&nbsp;<a href=\"https:\/\/missionlocal.org\/2021\/07\/feds-recommended-reforms-to-the-sfpd-are-moving-alongslowly\/\">reversing important police reforms<\/a>&nbsp;and letting SFPD go ham with dangerous car chases and unproven technologies. It will make San Franciscans&nbsp;<em>less&nbsp;<\/em>safe.&nbsp;<strong>Vote Hell No on Prop E!<\/strong><\/p>\n\n\n\n<p><a href=\"https:\/\/www.theleaguesf.org\/san_francisco_pissed_off_voter_guide_march_2024#top\">^Back to Top<\/a><\/p>\n\n\n\n<p><strong>Prop F: Forced Drug Screening for the Poor: Just Say No!<\/strong><\/p>\n\n\n\n<p>Prop F is a hateful piece of tough-love posturing by Mayor Breed that would revive the&nbsp;<a href=\"https:\/\/www.clasp.org\/press-room\/news-clips\/states-waste-hundreds-thousands-drug-testing-welfare-have-little-show-it\/\">nastiest and least effective aspects of the failed War on Drugs<\/a>. It would withhold money, shelter, and meals from any recipient of the County Adult Assistance Program (CAAP) who refuses to be screened for substance abuse or refuses mandatory treatment if found to be using by a \u201cprofessional evaluation.\u201d CAAP is a lifeline for the very poorest San Franciscans, including immigrants and refugees. It provides a measly $712\/month for housed recipients who make under $7,500 a year (homeless adults get $109\/month and a shelter bed in return for 12 hours a week of work.) Prop F threatens to take away these benefits in the name of cleaning up downtown.&nbsp;<\/p>\n\n\n\n<p>It\u2019s a joke to pretend that this proposition would solve anything. San Francisco is already desperately short on staff and rehab beds, and&nbsp;<a href=\"https:\/\/sfstandard.com\/2023\/09\/27\/half-of-san-francisco-drug-users-seeking-treatment-werent-admitted-data-shows-its-scandalous\/\">can\u2019t provide help<\/a>&nbsp;even to those who&nbsp;<em>want<\/em>&nbsp;treatment for substance use disorders.&nbsp;<a href=\"https:\/\/www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov\/pmc\/articles\/PMC4752879\/#:~:text=Summary%20of%20evidence&amp;text=Further%2C%20only%20two%20studies%20(22,of%20release%20from%20compulsory%20treatment.\">Extensive research<\/a>&nbsp;shows forcing people into treatment simply doesn\u2019t work.<\/p>\n\n\n\n<p><strong>Prop F would almost certainly increase homelessness and cost the City money. If housed CAAP recipients lose their monthly $712, they\u2019ll lose their homes, which means more unhoused people on the streets \u2013 each of whom would cost the city over&nbsp;<a href=\"https:\/\/www.sfexaminer.com\/news\/what-should-solving-sfs-unsheltered-homelessness-cost\/article_3431cdcc-ae44-11ed-814f-e7827eb49891.html\">$5,000 a month<\/a>&nbsp;for shelter alone. It\u2019s cruel&nbsp;<em>and<\/em>&nbsp;it\u2019s stupid.&nbsp;Just Say No to Prop F.<\/strong><\/p>\n\n\n\n<p><a href=\"https:\/\/www.theleaguesf.org\/san_francisco_pissed_off_voter_guide_march_2024#top\">^Back to Top<\/a><\/p>\n\n\n\n<p><strong>Prop G: Make Algebra Great Again: No<\/strong><\/p>\n\n\n\n<p>Aaand rounding out the wedge salad, we have Prop G: a pointless attempt to tell the school district how to teach math. Wait, are we living in a red state somewhere? What\u2019s with these anti-woke school board takeovers and ballot measures dictating curriculum? School politics have felt especially toxic and disorienting in recent years (spoiler alert: the recalls didn\u2019t fix anything), but since we\u2019re here, this is the backstory on the algebra thing:&nbsp;<\/p>\n\n\n\n<p>For years, San Francisco Unified School District offered Algebra 1 in 8th grade for all students.&nbsp;But in 2014 the district changed its math sequencing to respond to a troubling pattern: Black, Latinx and low-income students were&nbsp;<a href=\"https:\/\/edworkingpapers.com\/sites\/default\/files\/ai23-734.pdf\">getting stuck in lower-level math classes<\/a>, while their peers made it to AP calculus and AP statistics. 8th grade Algebra I was the starting point for this&nbsp; de-facto racialized tracking that carried through high school. SFUSD moved Algebra I to 9th grade to promote racial equity and improve overall learning, while introducing algebraic concepts in younger grades to help students prepare for higher math. While this change was supported by the district\u2019s African American Advisory Council and in line with updates to the&nbsp;<a href=\"https:\/\/www.cde.ca.gov\/ci\/ma\/cf\/documents\/mathfw-appendixd.pdf\">California Common Core<\/a>&nbsp;standards, some parents felt their kids were being \u201cdiscriminated against&#8221; for being good at math, both sides called each other racist, and it all flowed riiiight into the raging shitstorm of pandemic-era school battles.&nbsp;&nbsp;<\/p>\n\n\n\n<p>Anyway, THAT happened and now, nearly a decade after Algebra 1 was moved to 9th grade, it turns out&nbsp;<a href=\"https:\/\/www.sfgate.com\/news\/bayarea\/article\/Calmatters-Controversial-Math-Guidelines-Have-16687743.php\">results have been mixed<\/a>. More students are passing algebra, but&nbsp;<a href=\"https:\/\/www.edweek.org\/teaching-learning\/san-francisco-insisted-on-algebra-in-9th-grade-did-it-improve-equity\/2023\/03\">racial disparities in upper grades haven\u2019t decreased<\/a>. There are a million possible explanations for this, including huge gaps in resources between schools, flawed testing systems, and the common practice of some families paying out of pocket for extra math classes so their kids still get ahead. To make matters even more confusing, the&nbsp;<a href=\"https:\/\/www.chronicle.com\/article\/did-the-university-of-california-try-to-bury-a-consequential-vote-on-math\">University of California has updated their requirements<\/a>&nbsp;for which classes count toward admission, and the&nbsp;<a href=\"https:\/\/edsource.org\/2023\/state-board-of-education-passes-new-california-math-curriculum\/693990\">state Board of Education<\/a>&nbsp;has new guidance on this exact same algebra question.<\/p>\n\n\n\n<p>So everyone agrees it\u2019s time to take another look at math sequencing, and guess what?&nbsp;<a href=\"https:\/\/www.sfusd.edu\/about-sfusd\/sfusd-news\/press-releases\/2023-10-02-sfusd-focus-group-examine-access-and-implementation-algebra-1-8th-grade\"><strong>SFUSD has already committed<\/strong><\/a><strong>&nbsp;to bringing Algebra 1 back to 8th grade<\/strong>. SFUSD is&nbsp;<a href=\"https:\/\/www.axios.com\/local\/san-francisco\/2024\/01\/29\/sf-algebra-middle-school\">collecting input<\/a>&nbsp;from parents and educators on a new math sequencing plan that\u2019s headed to the school board&nbsp;<a href=\"https:\/\/drive.google.com\/file\/d\/19LPsASeOKuvpiH1xgbmlI4TE0XoAUVzR\/view\">for consideration<\/a>&nbsp;on&nbsp;<a href=\"https:\/\/www.sfusd.edu\/about-sfusd\/board-education\/board-education-meetings\/2024-meeting-documents\">February 13th<\/a>\u2026That\u2019s right,&nbsp;<em>before we even vote on this prop<\/em>!&nbsp;<a href=\"https:\/\/www.sfchronicle.com\/bayarea\/article\/sf-algebra-18380914.php\">Astroturf mods<\/a>&nbsp;knew this change was in the works, but they put this resolution on the ballot&nbsp;<em>anyway<\/em>&nbsp;to supercharge the rage machine and bait us into (yet another) draining culture-war fight.<\/p>\n\n\n\n<p>How pointless is Prop G? The reason it\u2019s last on the ballot is because it\u2019s non-binding.. That\u2019s right:&nbsp;<em>The City has no legal authority over the school district, so Prop G won\u2019t even do anything if it passes<\/em>. Now, SFUSD is far from perfect and we\u2019ll be watching to see how their new plan plays out. But at least that process is happening, you know, at the legal body that&nbsp;<em>actually has jurisdiction<\/em>&nbsp;over how math is taught.&nbsp;<\/p>\n\n\n\n<p>Voting no on Prop G doesn\u2019t mean you hate algebra or don\u2019t want kids to go to college. It means you trust educators to do their jobs, understand that the City doesn\u2019t actually have jurisdiction over school curricula, and reject dog-whistle attempts to undermine public education in the minds of SF parents and voters.<\/p>\n\n\n\n<p>Ignore the blowhards. Your eighth-grader certainly will.&nbsp;<\/p>\n\n\n\n<p><a href=\"https:\/\/www.theleaguesf.org\/san_francisco_pissed_off_voter_guide_march_2024#top\">^Back to Top<\/a><\/p>\n\n\n\n<hr class=\"wp-block-separator has-alpha-channel-opacity\"\/>\n\n\n\n<p><strong>Meet the SF League of Pissed Off Voters<\/strong><\/p>\n\n\n\n<p>We&#8217;re a bunch of political geeks in a torrid love affair with San Francisco. The League formed in 2004 with the goal of building a progressive governing majority in our lifetime. Our contribution is this voter guide\u2060:&nbsp;a secret decoder ring for SF politics. All of us lucky enough to enjoy the San Francisco magic owe it to our City to fight to keep it diverse, just, and healthy.<\/p>\n\n\n\n<p>This voter guide (our 32nd in SF!) is thoroughly researched and thoroughly biased. It\u2019s how we educate our friends on the issues, excite pissed-off progressive voters, and remind sellout politicians that we\u2019re paying attention.<\/p>\n\n\n\n<p><strong>Hang Out with the League!<\/strong><\/p>\n\n\n\n<p>Want to get involved, got a question about this stuff, or just wanna have a drink with us?<\/p>\n\n\n\n<p>Stay up to date:<\/p>\n\n\n\n<ul>\n<li>theLeagueSF.org<\/li>\n\n\n\n<li><a href=\"mailto:theleaguesf@gmail.com\">theLeagueSF@gmail.com<\/a>&nbsp;<\/li>\n\n\n\n<li>IG:&nbsp;<a href=\"https:\/\/www.instagram.com\/sfpissedoffvoters\/\">@sfpissedoffvoters<\/a><\/li>\n\n\n\n<li>FB:&nbsp;<a href=\"https:\/\/www.facebook.com\/theLeagueSF\">TheLeagueSF<\/a><\/li>\n<\/ul>\n\n\n\n<p>Paid for by the San Francisco League of Pissed Off Voters. Financial disclosures available at&nbsp;<a href=\"https:\/\/www.theleaguesf.org\/sfethics.org\">sfethics.org<\/a>.<\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"<p>posted by&nbsp;SF LEAGUE OF PISSED OFF VOTERS&nbsp;|&nbsp;-3scFebruary 02, 2024 Finally! The Pissed Off Voter Guide for San Francisco&#8217;s March 2024 election. March 5, 2024:Don&#8217;t Feed the Trolls! Democratic Party Offices Member,&nbsp;Democratic County Central Committee&nbsp;(DCCC): the&nbsp;Labor &amp; Working Families Slate DCCC Assembly District 17&nbsp;(East Side) Peter GallottaKristin HardyJohn AvalosJeremy LeeVick ChungPatrick&#8230; <a class=\"continue-reading-link\" href=\"https:\/\/occupysf.net\/index.php\/2024\/02\/03\/san-francisco-pissed-off-voter-guide-for-march-2024-election\/\"> Continue reading <span class=\"meta-nav\">&rarr; <\/span><\/a><\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":1,"featured_media":0,"comment_status":"open","ping_status":"open","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"footnotes":""},"categories":[1],"tags":[],"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/occupysf.net\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/31478"}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/occupysf.net\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/occupysf.net\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/occupysf.net\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/1"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/occupysf.net\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=31478"}],"version-history":[{"count":1,"href":"https:\/\/occupysf.net\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/31478\/revisions"}],"predecessor-version":[{"id":31479,"href":"https:\/\/occupysf.net\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/31478\/revisions\/31479"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/occupysf.net\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=31478"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/occupysf.net\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=31478"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/occupysf.net\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=31478"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}