{"id":31891,"date":"2024-02-20T12:27:05","date_gmt":"2024-02-20T20:27:05","guid":{"rendered":"https:\/\/occupysf.net\/?p=31891"},"modified":"2024-02-20T12:27:05","modified_gmt":"2024-02-20T20:27:05","slug":"meet-the-district-9-candidates-should-police-chase-guidelines-be-loosened","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/occupysf.net\/index.php\/2024\/02\/20\/meet-the-district-9-candidates-should-police-chase-guidelines-be-loosened\/","title":{"rendered":"Meet the District 9 candidates: \u2018Should police chase guidelines be loosened?\u2019"},"content":{"rendered":"\n

\"Avatar by\u00a0WILL JARRETT<\/a><\/strong> FEBRUARY 19, 2024, 5:00 AM (MissionLocal.org)<\/p>\n\n\n\n

\"District<\/figure>\n\n\n\n

Welcome back to our \u201cMeet the candidates\u201d series, in which District 9 supervisorial hopefuls respond to a question in 100 words or fewer.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

This week\u2019s question concerns an element of Prop. E<\/a>, which will be on the March ballot. Currently, a police officer can chase someone in a vehicle \u201cwhen the officer suspects the person committed a violent felony, or when the officer believes the person poses an immediate risk to public safety.\u201d Prop. E would allow pursuits \u201cwhen an officer has reasonable suspicion that a person committed, is committing or is likely to commit a felony or violent misdemeanor.\u201d<\/p>\n\n\n\n

Thus, our week six question: Do you support the use of car chases in response to violent misdemeanors?<\/strong><\/p>\n\n\n\n

\n\n\n\n
\"A<\/figure>\n\n\n\n

Julian Bermudez<\/h2>\n\n\n\n

No, I do not. This is real life and not a movie. People die when anyone, regardless of reason, drives at high speeds. A quick Google search of \u201ccar chase deaths\u201d, and you\u2019ll be greeted with the fact that almost half of the deaths that happen in a car chase have been innocent bystanders.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

I am aiming to be a major advocate for street safety and I am part of the movement to reach one year with no traffic deaths. The ends do not justify the means, that\u2019s common sense thinking. Vote No On Prop E.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

\n\n\n\n
\"Supervisory<\/figure>\n\n\n\n

h brown<\/h2>\n\n\n\n

Let\u2019s see.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

100 words on why I don\u2019t want SFPD to have any more power at doing anything.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

They are incompetent and poorly led, and have lots of racist members.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

I watch every minute of these Max Carter-Oberstone\/Cindy Elias meetings.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

Counting the airport, they have 2,300 members. 10 are assigned a regular foot patrol.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

[Editor\u2019s note: As of Feb. 2024<\/a>, the police department reports having some 1,865 sworn officers \u2014 although not all of these are \u201cfull duty\u201d.]<\/em><\/p>\n\n\n\n

We need an elected Police Chief as Michael Hennessey has suggested for decades.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

Elect a powerful leader with a platform reflecting SF Values.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

It will be a nice change.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

\n\n\n\n
\"A<\/figure>\n\n\n\n

Trevor Chandler<\/h2>\n\n\n\n

Yes. This is a common-sense update to our law that is in line with jurisdictions in surrounding counties. By having an accountable, responsive and fully staffed police department, we can ensure San Franciscans don\u2019t have a target placed on their back by those who come to San Francisco to commit crimes knowing they cannot be pursued.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

I have heard from too many District 9 residents who have been the victims of violent crime; they and all San Franciscans deserve to be fully protected by their police department.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

\n\n\n\n
\"A<\/figure>\n\n\n\n

Jackie Fielder<\/h2>\n\n\n\n

SFPD already has authority to chase a car when they believe someone \u201cposes an immediate risk to public safety.\u201d And still, we see headlines of SFPD car crashes practically every other month.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

Last June was the infamous crash into Lucca Ravioli on Valencia that sent an adult and child to the hospital. Three months later, there was a fatal accident in Portola. We can create safe neighborhoods without putting pedestrians, cyclists, and drivers at risk. I support proven strategies to make our neighborhoods safe, and accountability for people who cause harm to others, but Prop. E isn\u2019t one of them.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

\n\n\n\n
\"A<\/figure>\n\n\n\n

Jaime Gutierrez<\/h2>\n\n\n\n

Public safety has to be all-inclusive \u2014 meaning that preserving life should always be considered. This includes all parties involved.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

It is difficult to say at face value that it is prudent to get into a high-speed chase anytime a crime is committed, whether it is a felony or misdemeanor. The police should attempt to always be sure that the public at large is protected. This cannot be handled with a knee-jerk reaction. It needs further insight. This being the case, this issue needs to be looked at closely. I support justice. Pragmatism should be the watchword here.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

\n\n\n\n
\"A<\/figure>\n\n\n\n

Roberto Hernandez<\/h2>\n\n\n\n

At this time of community need, it\u2019s unfortunate that public safety has become politicized to the point that there are multiple ballot measures on the March ballot regarding policing. For me, this question is not about misdemeanors or felonies, but what\u2019s happening under the circumstances. If there is violence involved, we are counting on police to intervene, including the potential for a police officer to safely engage in a car chase.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

But we shouldn\u2019t need ballot measures to achieve that policy position. We need a comprehensive safety plan for our City and can achieve that through collaborative policy discussions.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

\n\n\n\n
\"A<\/figure>\n\n\n\n

Michael Petrelis<\/h2>\n\n\n\n

The SFPD car-chase policy should be flexible, given the situation. But generally, on our tight urban streets, I\u2019m opposed to high-speed chases.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

As seen in the Sept. video making news<\/a>, I obtained the Castro\u2019s Lookout bar robbers getaway car escaping capture, even though an SFPD cop was parked behind their vehicle and didn\u2019t attempt blocking them.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

I strongly oppose Prop E, because it is bad community policing to create SFPD policies at the ballot box, when it\u2019s better to do that at police commission meetings after much public discussion at City Hall and in the community.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

\n\n\n\n
\"A<\/figure>\n\n\n\n

Stephen Torres<\/h2>\n\n\n\n

Last year, a car barreled through the wall of the former Lucca on Valencia following a high speed chase. In December, another chase resulted in a lockdown order at Flynn Elementary. Fifty-seven police chases since 2018 have ended in a car crash, including 23 where someone was injured.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

When I talk to District 9 voters, they want a police department that is responsive to street-level safety needs and crimes that harm small businesses and residents. Changing the current car chase policy, which even SFPD says is sufficient, to further enable more reckless pursuits is the wrong solution to the wrong problem.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

\n\n\n\n

Candidates are ordered alphabetically. Answers may be lightly edited for formatting, spelling, and grammar.<\/em> If you have questions for the candidates, please let us know at will@missionlocal.com<\/a>.<\/em><\/p>\n\n\n\n

Read the rest of the series here<\/a>. Illustrations for the series by Neil Ballard.<\/em><\/p>\n\n\n\n

You can register to vote via the sf.gov website<\/a>.<\/em><\/p>\n\n\n\n

READ MORE CANDIDATE ANSWERS<\/h2>\n\n\n\n
\"Meet<\/a><\/figure>\n\n\n\n

Meet the candidates: SF\u2019s District 9 supe race<\/a><\/h3>\n\n\n\n

<\/a>by WILL JARRETT<\/a><\/strong>JANUARY 15, 2024, 5:00 AM<\/p>\n\n\n\n

A nonprofit newsroom that digs deep — thanks to donors like you.<\/strong>ONE-TIMEMONTHLYANNUALLYDonation amount<\/a><\/p>\n\n\n\n

WILL JARRETT<\/a><\/h2>\n\n\n\n

Will@MissionLocal.com<\/a><\/a><\/p>\n\n\n\n

DATA REPORTER. Will was born in the UK and studied English at Oxford University. After a few years in publishing, he absconded to the USA where he studied data journalism in New York. Will has strong views on healthcare, the environment, and the Oxford comma.More by Will Jarrett<\/a><\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"

by\u00a0WILL JARRETT FEBRUARY 19, 2024, 5:00 AM (MissionLocal.org) Welcome back to our \u201cMeet the candidates\u201d series, in which District 9 supervisorial hopefuls respond to a question in 100 words or fewer. This week\u2019s question concerns an element of Prop. E, which will be on the March ballot. Currently, a police officer… Continue reading → <\/span><\/a><\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":1,"featured_media":0,"comment_status":"open","ping_status":"open","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"footnotes":""},"categories":[1],"tags":[],"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/occupysf.net\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/31891"}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/occupysf.net\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/occupysf.net\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/occupysf.net\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/1"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/occupysf.net\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=31891"}],"version-history":[{"count":1,"href":"https:\/\/occupysf.net\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/31891\/revisions"}],"predecessor-version":[{"id":31892,"href":"https:\/\/occupysf.net\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/31891\/revisions\/31892"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/occupysf.net\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=31891"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/occupysf.net\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=31891"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/occupysf.net\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=31891"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}