{"id":31897,"date":"2024-02-20T13:36:55","date_gmt":"2024-02-20T21:36:55","guid":{"rendered":"https:\/\/occupysf.net\/?p=31897"},"modified":"2024-02-20T13:36:56","modified_gmt":"2024-02-20T21:36:56","slug":"garlon-the-dangers-of-triclopyr","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/occupysf.net\/index.php\/2024\/02\/20\/garlon-the-dangers-of-triclopyr\/","title":{"rendered":"Garlon \u2013 The Dangers of\u00a0Triclopyr"},"content":{"rendered":"\n<p>Posted on&nbsp;<a href=\"https:\/\/sfforest.org\/2024\/02\/20\/garlon-the-dangers-of-triclopyr\/\">February 20, 2024<\/a>&nbsp;by&nbsp;<a href=\"https:\/\/sfforest.org\/author\/sfforest\/\">SF Forest Alliance<\/a><\/p>\n\n\n<div class=\"wp-block-image\">\n<figure class=\"alignright\"><a href=\"https:\/\/sfforest.files.wordpress.com\/2015\/12\/barack-doggie.png\"><img decoding=\"async\" src=\"https:\/\/sfforest.files.wordpress.com\/2015\/12\/barack-doggie.png?w=640\" alt=\"\" class=\"wp-image-5183\"\/><\/a><\/figure><\/div>\n\n\n<p><em>This article was written in 2018. Since then, SFRPD has started using triclopyr in the form of Vastlan, and usage is not restricted to oxalis.<\/em><\/p>\n\n\n\n<p>Within the San Francisco Recreation and Parks Department, only the Natural Resources Department (formerly Natural Areas Program) uses Garlon. Nowadays, they use it only against yellow oxalis. This use is questionably for several reasons: The plant has been unreasonably demonized, based on little actual evidence; While the nativists hate the plant, most people love it \u2013 especially kids; it\u2019s doubtful that the herbicide is actually effective. What\u2019s known is that it is very toxic, and the balance of benefit vs risk really does not favor pesticide use.<\/p>\n\n\n\n<figure class=\"wp-block-image size-full\"><img decoding=\"async\" loading=\"lazy\" width=\"246\" height=\"217\" src=\"https:\/\/occupysf.net\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/02\/image-31.png\" alt=\"\" class=\"wp-image-31899\" srcset=\"https:\/\/occupysf.net\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/02\/image-31.png 246w, https:\/\/occupysf.net\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/02\/image-31-150x132.png 150w, https:\/\/occupysf.net\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/02\/image-31-170x150.png 170w\" sizes=\"(max-width: 246px) 100vw, 246px\" \/><\/figure>\n\n\n\n<p><a href=\"https:\/\/sfforest.files.wordpress.com\/2015\/05\/child-with-oxalis-photo-by-badjonni-creative-commons-flickr-cropped-from-original.jpg\"><\/a>Photo credit: Badjonni (Creative Commons \u2013 Flickr)<\/p>\n\n\n\n<p><strong>THE DANGERS OF GARLON<\/strong><\/p>\n\n\n\n<p><strong>Garlon 4 Ultra<\/strong>&nbsp;is a herbicide that the San Francisco Department of the Environment (abbreviated SF Environment) has declared a Tier I pesticide. SF Environment has a three Tier system hazard rating system, with Tier III being \u201c<em>Least Hazardous<\/em>,\u201d Tier II being&nbsp;<em>More Hazardous<\/em>, and Tier I being&nbsp;<em>Most Hazardous<\/em>. Though pesticides are sometimes moved between Tiers,&nbsp;<strong>Garlon has always been Tier I<\/strong>&nbsp;at least since 2008 when we started following pesticide use in our parks. It\u2019s been flagged as \u201cHIGH PRIORITY TO FIND AN ALTERNATIVE\u201d for as long.<\/p>\n\n\n\n<figure class=\"wp-block-image size-full\"><img decoding=\"async\" loading=\"lazy\" width=\"600\" height=\"357\" src=\"https:\/\/occupysf.net\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/02\/image-32.png\" alt=\"\" class=\"wp-image-31900\" srcset=\"https:\/\/occupysf.net\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/02\/image-32.png 600w, https:\/\/occupysf.net\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/02\/image-32-300x179.png 300w, https:\/\/occupysf.net\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/02\/image-32-150x89.png 150w, https:\/\/occupysf.net\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/02\/image-32-250x150.png 250w\" sizes=\"(max-width: 600px) 100vw, 600px\" \/><\/figure>\n\n\n\n<p><a href=\"https:\/\/sfforest.files.wordpress.com\/2018\/03\/garlon-aquamaster-milestone-on-mount-davidson-march-2018-oxalis-erhata-cape-ivy-sm1.jpg\"><\/a>Garlon, Aquamaster, Milestone on Mt Davidson. March 2018<\/p>\n\n\n\n<p><em>This article is based on one published on the SutroForest.com website in 2010, and is used with permission. It has been updated as far as we could; there is limited non-corporate research on triclopyr (the active ingredient in Garlon). The companies making these products don\u2019t always identify or publicize their dangers. In 2003, Dow<a href=\"https:\/\/ag.ny.gov\/press-release\/dow-subsidiary-pay-2-million-making-false-safety-claims-pesticide-ads\">&nbsp;was fined for misleading the public about the danger of one of its products<\/a>. More recently,&nbsp;<a href=\"https:\/\/www.huffingtonpost.com\/carey-gillam\/questions-about-epa-monsa_b_14727648.html\">Monsanto may have interfered<\/a>&nbsp;with the Environmental Protection Agency\u2019s assessment of Roundup. The main source of information is the chapter on Triclopyr in the Marin Municipal Water District Report on herbicides. (You can read that here as a PDF:&nbsp;<a href=\"https:\/\/sfforest.files.wordpress.com\/2015\/02\/chap4_triclopyr_8_27_08.pdf\">Chap4_Triclopyr_8_27_08<\/a>&nbsp;. It\u2019s technically written. Here is another paper that is more accessible for the layperson:&nbsp;<a href=\"https:\/\/sfforest.files.wordpress.com\/2018\/03\/caroline-cox-triclopyr-2000.pdf\">Caroline Cox Triclopyr 2000<\/a>&nbsp;)<\/em><\/p>\n\n\n\n<p>Usually, when looking at herbicides, researchers start by looking at Acute Toxicity \u2013 how much would it take to kill or injure you immediately. Separately, they look at Chronic Toxicity \u2013 a longer-term impact. What should also be followed, but often isn\u2019t, is the long-term effects of low-level exposure. This is an issue with Garlon.<\/p>\n\n\n\n<p>What stands out when attempting to research Garlon is how much is not known, particularly about the effects of repeated low-level exposure. There simply isn\u2019t that much research out there, and few human studies. \u201cAlthough triclopyr has been registered in the US since 1979, there are still very few studies on triclopyr that are not part of the EPA registration process.\u201d Most of the research that exists is on Garlon 4. What is used on Twin Peaks is Garlon 4 Ultra. It\u2019s similar but isn\u2019t mixed in kerosene. It\u2019s mixed in a less flammable but apparently equally toxic methylated seed oil.<\/p>\n\n\n\n<p>What is known makes uncomfortable reading.<\/p>\n\n\n\n<ul>\n<li>Triclopyr is&nbsp;<strong>poisonous enough that it can be used to commit suicide<\/strong>. There\u2019s<a href=\"https:\/\/www.sciencedirect.com\/science\/article\/pii\/S2352007815000736\">&nbsp;a paper in French about the effects of triclopyr and another chemical, fluoxypyr<\/a>.&nbsp; The \u201cGoogle Translate\u201d version of its conclusion:<em>&nbsp;These results are consistent with ingestion of potentially fatal triclopyr and fluroxypyr. To our knowledge, no blood concentration has been described so far in a context of voluntary ingestion for fluroxypyr, however a case has already been described for triclopyr of the same order of magnitude.<\/em><\/li>\n\n\n\n<li>Garlon \u201c<strong>causes severe birth defects in rats at relatively low levels of exposure<\/strong>.\u201d The rats were born with brains outside their skulls, or without eyelids. \u201cMaternal toxicity was high\u201d and exposed rats also had more failed pregnancies.<\/li>\n\n\n\n<li>Rat and dog studies showed<strong>&nbsp;damage to the kidneys, the liver, and the blood<\/strong>. It\u2019s insidious, because there\u2019s no immediate effect that\u2019s apparent.&nbsp;<strong>If someone\u2019s being poisoned, they wouldn\u2019t even know it<\/strong>. In a study on six Shetland ponies, high doses killed two ponies in a week, and two others were destroyed.<\/li>\n\n\n\n<li>About<strong>&nbsp;1-2% of Garlon falling on human skin is absorbed within a day<\/strong>. For rodents, its absorbed twelve times as fast. Too bad for the gophers\u2026<\/li>\n\n\n\n<li>It isn\u2019t considered a carcinogen under today\u2019s more lenient guidelines, but would have been one under the stricter 1986 guidelines.<\/li>\n\n\n\n<li><strong>Dogs may be particularly vulnerable<\/strong>; their kidneys may not be able to handle Garlon as well as rats or humans. \u201cThe pharmacokinetics of triclopyr is very different in the dog, which is unique in its limited capacity to clear weak acids from the blood and excrete them in the urine.\u201d Dow Chemical objected when EPA said that decreased red-dye excretion was an adverse effect, so now it\u2019s just listed as an \u201ceffect.\u201d<\/li>\n\n\n\n<li>There was&nbsp;<strong>insufficient information about Garlon\u2019s potential effect on the immune system, or as an endocrine disruptor.<\/strong><\/li>\n\n\n\n<li>It very&nbsp;<strong>probably alters soil biology<\/strong>. \u201cThere is little information on the toxicity of triclopyr to terrestrial microorganisms. Garlon 4 can inhibit growth in the mycorrhizal fungi\u2026\u201d (These are funguses in the soil that help plant nutrition.) No one knows what it does to soil microbes, because it hasn\u2019t been studied.<\/li>\n\n\n\n<li>It\u2019s&nbsp;<strong>particularly dangerous to aquatic creature<\/strong>s: fish (particularly salmon); invertebrates; and aquatic plants.<br>It&nbsp;<strong>doesn\u2019t generally kill adult honeybees<\/strong>, but there are no studies of other insects. [ETA: Some studies show slight \u201cacute toxicity\u201d to honeybees.]<\/li>\n\n\n\n<li>Garlon&nbsp;<strong>can persist in dead vegetation for up to two years<\/strong>.<\/li>\n<\/ul>\n\n\n\n<p>Given all the information we do have on this chemical (and all the information we don\u2019t have ) we have to question why native plant restoration is worth spraying poisons on some of the highest points in our city. Garlon must be used when the weather is wet; if the plants don\u2019t have water, they will not grow and the chemical won\u2019t work. But the runoff from these hills is enormous during the rain \u2013 it washes down in rivulets and streams, and it will end in the reservoirs, the groundwater, and the bay.<\/p>\n\n\n\n<p>SFRPD has made strides since the earlier version of this article was published in 2010. At the time, Garlon was being widely used for a lot of purposes.&nbsp; In the last two years,&nbsp; NRD was the<strong>&nbsp;only<\/strong>&nbsp;user of Garlon in our parks.<\/p>\n\n\n<div class=\"wp-block-image\">\n<figure class=\"aligncenter\"><a href=\"https:\/\/sfforest.files.wordpress.com\/2018\/03\/graph-of-sfrpd-garlon-use-2015-2017.png\"><img decoding=\"async\" src=\"https:\/\/sfforest.files.wordpress.com\/2018\/03\/graph-of-sfrpd-garlon-use-2015-2017.png?w=640\" alt=\"\" class=\"wp-image-6994\"\/><\/a><\/figure><\/div>\n\n\n<p>And the only purpose for which they use it is to spray oxalis, the yellow-blooming flower than heralds spring in San Francisco. So Garlon us is&nbsp;down to the war on oxalis, which we have written about before.<\/p>\n\n\n\n<p>See:<a href=\"https:\/\/sfforest.org\/2015\/05\/11\/five-reasons-its-okay-to-love-oxalis-and-stop-poisoning-it\/\">&nbsp;Five Reasons it\u2019s Okay to Love Oxalis and Stop Poisoning It<\/a><\/p>\n\n\n\n<p>See:&nbsp;<a href=\"https:\/\/sfforest.org\/2017\/03\/07\/garlon-v-oxalis-in-10-easy-slides\/\">Garlon v Oxalis in Ten Easy Slides<\/a><\/p>\n\n\n\n<p>If NRD were to declare an end to this war \u2013 it would have the best possible \u201cALTERNATIVE\u201d \u2013 the Natural solution.<\/p>\n\n\n\n<figure class=\"wp-block-image size-full\"><img decoding=\"async\" loading=\"lazy\" width=\"374\" height=\"341\" src=\"https:\/\/occupysf.net\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/02\/image-30.png\" alt=\"\" class=\"wp-image-31898\" srcset=\"https:\/\/occupysf.net\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/02\/image-30.png 374w, https:\/\/occupysf.net\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/02\/image-30-300x274.png 300w, https:\/\/occupysf.net\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/02\/image-30-150x137.png 150w, https:\/\/occupysf.net\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/02\/image-30-165x150.png 165w\" sizes=\"(max-width: 374px) 100vw, 374px\" \/><\/figure>\n\n\n\n<p><a href=\"https:\/\/sfforest.files.wordpress.com\/2015\/05\/honey-bee-in-oxalis.jpg\"><\/a><\/p>\n\n\n\n<p id=\"caption-attachment-4668\">Honeybee in oxalis flower<\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"<p>Posted on&nbsp;February 20, 2024&nbsp;by&nbsp;SF Forest Alliance This article was written in 2018. Since then, SFRPD has started using triclopyr in the form of Vastlan, and usage is not restricted to oxalis. Within the San Francisco Recreation and Parks Department, only the Natural Resources Department (formerly Natural Areas Program) uses Garlon&#8230;. <a class=\"continue-reading-link\" href=\"https:\/\/occupysf.net\/index.php\/2024\/02\/20\/garlon-the-dangers-of-triclopyr\/\"> Continue reading <span class=\"meta-nav\">&rarr; <\/span><\/a><\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":1,"featured_media":0,"comment_status":"open","ping_status":"open","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"footnotes":""},"categories":[1],"tags":[],"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/occupysf.net\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/31897"}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/occupysf.net\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/occupysf.net\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/occupysf.net\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/1"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/occupysf.net\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=31897"}],"version-history":[{"count":1,"href":"https:\/\/occupysf.net\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/31897\/revisions"}],"predecessor-version":[{"id":31901,"href":"https:\/\/occupysf.net\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/31897\/revisions\/31901"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/occupysf.net\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=31897"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/occupysf.net\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=31897"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/occupysf.net\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=31897"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}