{"id":32569,"date":"2024-03-30T20:31:39","date_gmt":"2024-03-31T03:31:39","guid":{"rendered":"https:\/\/occupysf.net\/?p=32569"},"modified":"2024-03-30T20:31:40","modified_gmt":"2024-03-31T03:31:40","slug":"more-trees-to-be-felled-mclaren-park","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/occupysf.net\/index.php\/2024\/03\/30\/more-trees-to-be-felled-mclaren-park\/","title":{"rendered":"More Trees To Be Felled \u2013 McLaren\u00a0Park"},"content":{"rendered":"\n<p>Posted on&nbsp;<a href=\"https:\/\/sfforest.org\/2024\/03\/29\/more-trees-to-be-felled-mclaren-park\/\">March 29, 2024<\/a>&nbsp;by&nbsp;<a href=\"https:\/\/sfforest.org\/author\/sfforest\/\">SF Forest Alliance<\/a><\/p>\n\n\n\n<p><em>San Francisco Forest Alliance recently received this email:<\/em><\/p>\n\n\n\n<p>\u201cI wanted to bring to your attention some new signs that went up around the Jerry Garcia amphitheater in McLaren Park announcing the removal of more than 50 mature trees as part of its \u201ctrail improvements project.\u201d<\/p>\n\n\n<div class=\"wp-block-image\">\n<figure class=\"aligncenter\"><a href=\"https:\/\/sfforest.files.wordpress.com\/2024\/03\/trail-improvement-should-not-mean-destroying-trees-copy.jpg\"><img decoding=\"async\" src=\"https:\/\/sfforest.files.wordpress.com\/2024\/03\/trail-improvement-should-not-mean-destroying-trees-copy.jpg?w=640\" alt=\"\" class=\"wp-image-7913\"\/><\/a><\/figure><\/div>\n\n\n<p><strong>INADEQUATE DISCUSSION, LITTLE SUPPORT<\/strong><\/p>\n\n\n\n<p>\u201cThis project does not have a lot of public support, but SFRPD [San Francisco Recreation and Parks Department] is moving forward with it. The trees being removed include many towering Monterey Cypress trees, which were among the first to be planted in the park when it was developed last century.<\/p>\n\n\n<div class=\"wp-block-image\">\n<figure class=\"aligncenter\"><a href=\"https:\/\/sfforest.files.wordpress.com\/2024\/03\/tree-to-be-cut-down-mclaren-600px.jpg\"><img decoding=\"async\" src=\"https:\/\/sfforest.files.wordpress.com\/2024\/03\/tree-to-be-cut-down-mclaren-600px.jpg?w=640\" alt=\"\" class=\"wp-image-7914\"\/><\/a><\/figure><\/div>\n\n\n<p>\u201cI am very involved in park events and park issues, and I believe these trees are being removed without adequate public discussion and public involvement. The signs that went up suggest it\u2019s a foregone conclusion that the trees will be removed.<\/p>\n\n\n\n<p>Is there anything the Forest Alliance can do to help to stop the massacre?\u201d<\/p>\n\n\n\n<p>An SF Forest Alliance supporter added:\u00a0 \u201cI just drove by and saw this.\u00a0 The area just below the Vis. Valley Middle School along Visitacion Avenue has been clear cut.\u00a0 This used to be covered with large trees.\u00a0 The cutting continues all the way down to Hahn Avenue. I guess I missed the project announcements and meeting notices where the NRD [Natural Resources Department, the renamed NAP or Natural Areas Program] let us know all of these trees were hazardous.\u201d<a href=\"https:\/\/sfforest.files.wordpress.com\/2024\/03\/tom-borden-clearcut-in-mclaren-march-2024-600px.jpg\"><\/a><\/p>\n\n\n\n<p id=\"caption-attachment-7927\">Clearcut slope where there used to be trees \u2013 McLaren Park<\/p>\n\n\n\n<p><strong>NESTING SEASON<\/strong><\/p>\n\n\n\n<p><strong>This is all happening during the nesting season for birds and other wildlife.<\/strong>&nbsp;According to WildCare, a wildlife rescue and rehabilitation organization, the nesting season is March through October in the Bay area. (See&nbsp;<a href=\"https:\/\/sutroforest.com\/2021\/03\/05\/wildcares-request-respect-the-nest\/\">this article<\/a>&nbsp;at Sutroforest.com)<\/p>\n\n\n<div class=\"wp-block-image\">\n<figure class=\"aligncenter\"><a href=\"https:\/\/sfforest.files.wordpress.com\/2012\/06\/silver-tree-2-robin-and-nestlings-sm.jpg\"><img decoding=\"async\" src=\"https:\/\/sfforest.files.wordpress.com\/2012\/06\/silver-tree-2-robin-and-nestlings-sm.jpg?w=640\" alt=\"\" class=\"wp-image-1235\"\/><\/a><\/figure><\/div>\n\n\n<p>An experienced observer with 7500-8000 hours in the field points out:<\/p>\n\n\n\n<p>\u201cThey need to do thorough nesting surveys by a qualified biologist who will reveal all details of their survey in notes.<\/p>\n\n\n\n<p>\u201cI\u2019ve done these surveys.&nbsp;<strong>Raptors and other birds protected under MBTA [Migratory Bird Treaty Act] don\u2019t fly around advertising their nests.<\/strong>&nbsp;So it\u2019s not easy \u2013 someone needs to be qualified and understand bird behavior. For example, if a bird is flitting from perch to perch carrying food in its beak without consuming it, that\u2019s a sure sign that bird is saving the item. In this season, it\u2019s likely saving the food for chicks in a nest but reluctant to go there with someone watching.<\/p>\n\n\n\n<p>\u201cIt\u2019s that type of observation that separates qualified biologists&nbsp;<strong>from ones who are interested in signing the dotted line without doing the real work.<\/strong>\u201d<\/p>\n\n\n\n<p>This observer further notes the relevant questions to which we should get answers if harm to birds is to be avoided:<\/p>\n\n\n\n<ul>\n<li>How long before tree removal will you do a nesting bird survey?<\/li>\n\n\n\n<li>Are you taking a look at snags (standing dead trees \u2013 literally the best nesting habitat for nuthatches, woodpeckers, chickadees).<\/li>\n\n\n\n<li>What buffer distances are you leaving if birds are nesting?<\/li>\n\n\n\n<li>What buffer distances are you leaving if raptors are nesting?<\/li>\n\n\n\n<li>Why have you already taken down trees during the nesting season?<\/li>\n\n\n\n<li>Are you placing flagging at appropriate distances from nests so crews will not enter sensitive zones?<\/li>\n\n\n\n<li>What system are you using if birds are found nesting \u2013 how many weeks till the chicks fledge?<\/li>\n\n\n\n<li>Have you talked to CDFW (CA Dept. Fish &amp; Wildlife) to discuss if those buffer distances are appropriate?<\/li>\n\n\n\n<li>May we see your communications with resource agencies?<\/li>\n\n\n\n<li>May we see the names\/ firms of biologists doing the surveys?<\/li>\n\n\n\n<li>Will the biologist be present throughout, monitoring these crews?<\/li>\n\n\n\n<li>How are you mitigating for losses?<\/li>\n\n\n\n<li>What is the reporting system you have?<\/li>\n\n\n\n<li>What will you do if you find stranded chicks?<\/li>\n<\/ul>\n\n\n\n<p>Unfortunately, it appears that SFRPD\u2019s interest in protecting wildlife is perfunctory at best. In Glen Canyon, they&nbsp;<a href=\"https:\/\/sfforest.org\/2013\/01\/07\/bats-about-glen-canyon-park\/\">removed trees that were known to be used by bats.<\/a><br>Now they are cutting down trees during the bird nesting season.<\/p>\n\n\n<div class=\"wp-block-image\">\n<figure class=\"aligncenter\"><a href=\"https:\/\/sfforest.files.wordpress.com\/2013\/05\/2012-04-11-bewicks-wren-nesting.jpg\"><img decoding=\"async\" src=\"https:\/\/sfforest.files.wordpress.com\/2013\/05\/2012-04-11-bewicks-wren-nesting.jpg?w=640&amp;h=480\" alt=\"\" class=\"wp-image-2899\"\/><\/a><\/figure><\/div>\n\n\n<p><strong>NRD TREE REMOVAL PRACTICES \u2013 UNSATISFACTORY<\/strong><\/p>\n\n\n\n<p>An observer also wrote to Lauren Chavez, the city employee who spoke at a meeting of the McLaren Park Collaborative.<\/p>\n\n\n\n<p>\u201cLauren,<\/p>\n\n\n\n<p>\u201cYou made some worrisome statements at the McLaren Park Collaborative<br>meeting yesterday evening.&nbsp; Based on them, it appears the NRD is<br>disregarding its obligations under the SNRAMP [Significant Natural Resource Areas Management Program]<\/p>\n\n\n\n<p>\u201cThe SNRAMP calls for 1:1 tree replacements for trees removed.&nbsp; You said<br>you did not know if RPD has a database to track tree removals and<br>replacements.&nbsp; Such a database is fundamental to meeting RPD\u2019s tree<br>replacement commitments, especially considering that replacements are<br>made at a later time, possibly in different parks and not necessarily in<br>Natural Areas.&nbsp; If there is not a well tended database, then there is no<br>way RPD can be meeting the 1:1 commitment.<\/p>\n\n\n\n<p>\u201cNo one in the NRD seems to have told you the correct definition of a<br>\u201ctree\u201d for the purpose of counting removals. You indicated that you used<br>a standard of either 6\u2033 or 8\u2033 diameter at breast height. Neither of<br>those is correct.&nbsp; \u201cFor accounting purposes, the SNRAMP defines a tree<br>as any plant having a dominant vertical trunk that is over 15 feet<br>tall.\u201d&nbsp; I suspect the entire NRD is using 6\u2033 or 8\u2033 DBH as the reporting<br>cutoff.&nbsp; Most trees that are 6\u2033 to 8\u2033 DBH are much taller than 15 feet,<br>especially eucalyptus and pines.&nbsp; This means that San Francisco is<br>losing many Trees that are not counted and or replaced.<\/p>\n\n\n\n<p>\u201cWe didn\u2019t discuss it last night, but clearly you are unaware that<br>massive tree removals in localized areas are not allowed under the<br>SNRAMP.&nbsp; The Plan puts limits on concentrated tree removals to moderate<br>the shock to the environment, control erosion, etc.&nbsp; Your planned<br>removals in the Gray Fox Creek area certainly exceed the 20-tree limit,<br>especially if you count \u201cTrees\u201d correctly.<\/p>\n\n\n\n<p>\u201cThe clearcutting the NRD performed along Visitacion is a serious<br>violation of this proscription.<\/p>\n\n\n\n<p>\u201cI refer you to the Final Environmental Impact Report for the Significant<br>Natural Resource Areas Management Plan (Volume I).&nbsp; You can find it on<br>the SF Planning website cataloged under case number 2005.0912E.&nbsp; In<br>reference to the current subject of tree removals, see pages 95-96.&nbsp; A<br>copy of those pages is attached.<\/p>\n\n\n\n<p>Extracted pages from FEIR Vol. 1<\/p>\n\n\n\n<p>\u201cI just noticed that the area East of Visitacion between the middle<br>school and Hahn Avenue is not included in the SNRAMP\/NRAMP.&nbsp; It seems a<br>separate EIR should have been required for the scale of transformation<br>the NRD is implementing there.\u201d<\/p>\n\n\n\n<p><strong>MC LAREN PARK\u2019S BEEN TARGETED FOR TREE DESTRUCTION<\/strong><\/p>\n\n\n\n<p>According to the SF RPD\u2019s plan that we have been opposing for many years, at least 809 trees were planned to be cut down in McLaren Park.&nbsp; (See this article from 2012 \u2013&nbsp;<a href=\"https:\/\/sfforest.org\/2012\/03\/01\/the-natural-areas-program-fells-trees\/\">The \u201cNatural\u201d Areas Program Fells Trees<\/a>. and this one from 2015&nbsp; McLaren Park Walk:&nbsp;<a href=\"https:\/\/sfforest.org\/2015\/09\/09\/mclaren-park-natural-areas-walk\/\">Looking at the Future with 800 Fewer Trees<\/a>)<\/p>\n\n\n\n<p>And the destruction has been continuous, probably tied to funding availability. Monies for trail work seem to be one important source of funds for tree-felling.<\/p>\n\n\n\n<p>In 2022, we posted a report from another park-goer, Lance Mellon:&nbsp;<a href=\"https:\/\/sfforest.org\/2022\/07\/07\/mclaren-park-loses-more-trees\/\">McLaren Park Loses More Trees.<\/a><br>In 2020, we reported&nbsp;<a href=\"https:\/\/sfforest.org\/2020\/09\/12\/surprise-tree-removals-for-mclaren-park-native-plant-garden\/\">Surprise Tree Removals for McLaren Park Native Plant Garden<\/a><br>In 2017, we wrote&nbsp;<a href=\"https:\/\/sfforest.org\/2017\/09\/16\/trees-cut-down-in-mclaren-park-with-no-warning\/\">Trees Cut Down in McLaren Park with no Warning<\/a>.<\/p>\n\n\n\n<p><strong>We very likely have not seen the last of it, unless public opposition can stem the tree-massacre.<\/strong><\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"<p>Posted on&nbsp;March 29, 2024&nbsp;by&nbsp;SF Forest Alliance San Francisco Forest Alliance recently received this email: \u201cI wanted to bring to your attention some new signs that went up around the Jerry Garcia amphitheater in McLaren Park announcing the removal of more than 50 mature trees as part of its \u201ctrail improvements&#8230; <a class=\"continue-reading-link\" href=\"https:\/\/occupysf.net\/index.php\/2024\/03\/30\/more-trees-to-be-felled-mclaren-park\/\"> Continue reading <span class=\"meta-nav\">&rarr; <\/span><\/a><\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":1,"featured_media":0,"comment_status":"open","ping_status":"open","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"footnotes":""},"categories":[1],"tags":[],"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/occupysf.net\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/32569"}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/occupysf.net\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/occupysf.net\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/occupysf.net\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/1"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/occupysf.net\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=32569"}],"version-history":[{"count":1,"href":"https:\/\/occupysf.net\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/32569\/revisions"}],"predecessor-version":[{"id":32570,"href":"https:\/\/occupysf.net\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/32569\/revisions\/32570"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/occupysf.net\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=32569"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/occupysf.net\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=32569"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/occupysf.net\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=32569"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}