{"id":39968,"date":"2025-03-04T12:30:45","date_gmt":"2025-03-04T20:30:45","guid":{"rendered":"https:\/\/occupysf.net\/?p=39968"},"modified":"2025-03-04T12:30:48","modified_gmt":"2025-03-04T20:30:48","slug":"the-central-subway-will-cripple-muni-for-years-to-come","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/occupysf.net\/index.php\/2025\/03\/04\/the-central-subway-will-cripple-muni-for-years-to-come\/","title":{"rendered":"The Central Subway will cripple Muni for years to come"},"content":{"rendered":"\n

The diminutive rail line is massively over budget and behind schedule. But the real pain will come when it opens.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

\"A by\u00a0JOE ESKENAZI<\/a><\/strong> SEPTEMBER 12, 2022 (MissionLocal.org)<\/p>\n\n\n\n

\"This
‘Information gladly given, but safety requires avoiding unnecessary conversation.’<\/figcaption><\/figure>\n\n\n\n

Secretary of Transportation Pete Buttigieg was in town last week to tubthump the slow-rolling disaster that is the Central Subway project and to claim that, on the undetermined date it does commence service, it\u2019ll be worth the wait<\/a>. <\/p>\n\n\n\n

That\u2019s a hell of a thing to say, considering this project has been in conception since he was in high school and was put before voters when he was just out of college. <\/p>\n\n\n\n

In that time, the price tag for this project has more than tripled; the final cost is now tabbed at upwards of $1.9 billion, and will all but certainly be significantly higher than that. Close to half a billion of those dollars figure to come from local sources. That\u2019s something to think about the next time your bus doesn\u2019t show up; Muni is a system with infinite needs and finite resources. And this is how it\u2019s spending them.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

The sclerotic process of the Central Subway is, by definition, an old story. We\u2019ve had lots of time to write about how it\u2019s taking lots of time. That doesn\u2019t make it okay, but you\u2019ve read this. The exploding cost <\/a>is also not a revelation, and San Francisco officials have long since given up feigning concern about a couple hundred million here or couple hundred million there. Hey! Stuff costs money! So get off it!<\/a> <\/p>\n\n\n\n

\"Mission<\/figure>\n\n\n\n

Want the latest on the Mission and San Francisco? Sign up for our free daily newsletter<\/strong> below.Sign up<\/p>\n\n\n\n

If the Central Subway was a good and useful project, no one would remember the inveterate delays or obscene cost overruns. The BART extension to SFO also went grotesquely over budget \u2014 and, perversely, local transit agencies serving put-upon riderships were made to fund a rail line for more affluent airport passengers<\/a>. But nobody talks about that anymore, because the BART line to the airport is so useful. You can go to the airport without even meaning <\/em>to! Now that\u2019s <\/em>convenience.   <\/p>\n\n\n\n

It is exceedingly difficult to foresee many future San Franciscans saying this about the Central Subway. That\u2019s because it\u2019s exceedingly difficult to overstate how poorly designed this subway line is. Though it could\u2019ve been worse: Earlier iterations of the project neglected to include air ducts<\/a>, which would have resulted in rail patrons being asphyxiated. <\/p>\n\n\n\n

Future riders on the Central Subway figure to be able to breathe and survive. That\u2019s for the good. But it\u2019s a remarkably limited rail line, divorced from the rest of the Muni Metro system and accessible from Muni Metro and BART only via an onerous transfer seemingly designed by Rube Goldberg<\/a>.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

That\u2019s not for the good. And it gets worse: As an ostensible cost-saving measure, the Central Subway tunnel platforms were designed to only accommodate two-car trains<\/a> \u2014 a disastrous decision, among so many disastrous decisions, that singularly dooms this multi-billion dollar project to failure. <\/p>\n\n\n\n

Someday in the future, the Central Subway will finally open. And someday after that, the transit riders of San Francisco will pine for the days that it was closed. <\/p>\n\n\n\n

\"March<\/a><\/figure>\n\n\n\n

\u201cAs a transit nerd and subway fan, it is painful how badly they built this subway,\u201d laments former longtime BART commissioner Tom Radulovich. <\/p>\n\n\n\n

\u201cThere is incredible awkwardness built into the Central Subway, and we\u2019re going to be reckoning with it for a long time.\u201d <\/p>\n\n\n\n

\"\"
Map of the Central Subway route via SFMTA. Note the lengthy transfer between Union Square\/Market Street and Powell.<\/figcaption><\/figure>\n\n\n\n

Like the Central Subway, let\u2019s slow down. Let\u2019s focus on the decision to build subway platforms only large enough to handle two-car trains. There have been so many awful decisions regarding this subway project, but this one may be the worst. <\/p>\n\n\n\n

It\u2019s O. Henry-like in its tragic irony: The ridership capacity that would have justified this multi-billion dollar project is now impossible to achieve. Even if people flock to take this rail line, two-car trains will quickly fill up and be overwhelmed. <\/p>\n\n\n\n

\"3\/\/31\"\/<\/a><\/figure>\n\n\n\n

It will be difficult for Muni to extend this line to North Beach and the Marina (no one is lining up to give San Francisco the necessary money after this debacle, and Muni additionally ceded control of key tracts of land). And that\u2019s a damn shame: Extending this line to Fisherman\u2019s Wharf is the only thing that would make it a worthwhile transit project. But even if this comes to pass, saddled with puny two-car trains, the Central Subway cannot handle augmented ridership; during peak demand, trains departing the Marina would be full before they reached Chinatown. <\/p>\n\n\n\n

Simply put: The Central Subway cannot carry the ridership numbers that were used to justify its existence. And post-facto enlarging the platforms in the now-completed subterranean stations would be fantastically disruptive and costly \u2014 if it were even possible at all.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

\u201cThese two-car trains \u2014 it\u2019s like the Toonerville Trolley<\/a>,\u201d quips Gerald Cauthen, a transit engineer and former Muni employee who helped plan and build the Metro system four decades ago. <\/p>\n\n\n\n

\u201cSubways can provide high-capacity transit for a lot of people. This subway won\u2019t,\u201d sums up Radulovich. \u201cThey designed it with very short platforms.\u201d<\/p>\n\n\n\n

\"Brava.<\/a><\/figure>\n\n\n\n

And this, he continues, will lead to cascading problems. The dense development planned along the path of the Central Subway was meant to be served by a high-ridership line. \u201cBut it\u2019s N-Judah capacity,\u201d Radulovich says, \u201cnot BART capacity.\u201d <\/p>\n\n\n\n

The plan was, \u201clet\u2019s basically build New York-style density. But on a streetcar line that can only run two-car trains,\u201d he adds. \u201cIt\u2019s a real mismatch.\u201d <\/p>\n\n\n\n

\"\"
All aboard the Toonerville Trolley \u2026<\/figcaption><\/figure>\n\n\n\n

Who will the Central Subway work for? For anyone hoping to take a straight shot from the Third Street corridor up to Chinatown and back, it could be all right, provided you don\u2019t require additional transit to get to or from your departure point, and that your preferred destination is near one of the relatively few stops. <\/p>\n\n\n\n

For well-heeled visitors staying at Union Square hotels and hoping to attend a Dubs game at Chase Center or a convention at Moscone, it\u2019ll be great. <\/em><\/p>\n\n\n\n

It\u2019ll be a bit surreal for passengers coming or going elsewhere via Muni or BART and hoping to make a transfer to or from the Central Subway. This rail line is essentially an orphan, and its failure to be a step toward establishing a true subway network represents a spectacular missed opportunity for San Francisco. As it is, the transfer from the Central Subway\u2019s Union Square\/Market Street station to Powell Street Station requires a 1,018-foot walk \u2014 nearly three football fields. There\u2019s also an 85-foot ascent and an estimated travel time of seven minutes, six seconds.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

And that\u2019s for an able-bodied adult.  <\/p>\n\n\n\n

\n

\u201cAs a transit nerd and subway fan, it is painful how badly they built this subway. There is incredible awkwardness built into the Central Subway and we\u2019re going to be reckoning with it for a long time.\u201d FORMER BART COMMISSIONER TOM RADULOVICH.<\/p>\n<\/blockquote>\n\n\n\n

Even the term \u201cCentral Subway\u201d is a misnomer; that name described a project originally envisioned to serve both the Stockton Street corridor and <\/em>the Geary corridor. That plan would\u2019ve been truly useful. But, alas: Along with long-enough platforms, it has been relegated to the city\u2019s transit history dustbin.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

Perhaps that\u2019s for the best. Who knows if they\u2019d have remembered to put in the air ducts?  <\/p>\n\n\n\n

\"\"<\/figure>\n\n\n\n

In 2008, Muni made the audacious claim that the Central Subway would be a moneymaker, to the tune of $23.9 million a year. That was an unbelievable claim \u2014 as in, one couldn\u2019t believe it. By 2012, Muni had changed its tune and admitted that the Subway would drain $15.2 million a year from the system. <\/p>\n\n\n\n

Muni didn\u2019t respond to requests last week for the current projections of the Central Subway\u2019s annual operating cost. But considering the passage of time, and the patterns for this project, it\u2019s hard not to see it being greater than $15.2 million. Perhaps far<\/em> greater. This money is going to come from a system that was strapped, even before Covid-19. So your commute will be affected, even if you never get near the Central Subway.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

\u201cThey\u2019re moving so much money to one small part of the city and ignoring the rest,\u201d says Howard Wong, an architect and longtime Central Subway foe. \u201cIf just the local matching funds for large projects were invested in the overall Muni system, San Francisco would have a more robust transit system today.\u201d<\/p>\n\n\n\n

Perhaps, one day, San Francisco may design a transit project with the actual needs of transit riders in mind. Won\u2019t\u00a0that<\/em>\u00a0be worth the wait.\u00a0<\/p>\n\n\n\n

LATEST NEWS<\/mark><\/a><\/p>\n\n\n\n

\"The<\/a><\/figure>\n\n\n\n

The Central Subway has been shut down. Will anyone notice?<\/a><\/h3>\n\n\n\n
\"Lawyer<\/a><\/figure>\n\n\n\n

Lawyer by day, dinosaur by night: Meet the man who keeps Dolores Park weird<\/a><\/h3>\n\n\n\n
\"Meet<\/a><\/figure>\n\n\n\n

Meet the Mission Local staff: Problems facing San Francisco<\/a><\/h3>\n\n\n\n

Support the Mission Local team<\/h4>\n\n\n\n
\"A<\/figure>\n\n\n\n

We’re a small,\u00a0independent, nonprofit newsroom<\/strong>\u00a0that works hard to bring you news you can’t get elsewhere.<\/a><\/p>\n\n\n\n

JOE ESKENAZI<\/a><\/h2>\n\n\n\n

getbackjoejoe@gmail.com<\/a><\/p>\n\n\n\n