{"id":43627,"date":"2025-09-02T13:47:31","date_gmt":"2025-09-02T20:47:31","guid":{"rendered":"https:\/\/occupysf.net\/?p=43627"},"modified":"2025-09-02T13:47:32","modified_gmt":"2025-09-02T20:47:32","slug":"s-f-democratic-party-we-believe-in-nothing","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/occupysf.net\/index.php\/2025\/09\/02\/s-f-democratic-party-we-believe-in-nothing\/","title":{"rendered":"S.F. Democratic Party: We believe in nothing"},"content":{"rendered":"\n

The billionaire-backed coalition of \u2018moderate\u2019 politicians running San Francisco\u2019s Democratic Party is in tatters. And Joel Engardio is out in the cold.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

\"A by\u00a0JOE ESKENAZI<\/a><\/strong> September 1, 2025 (MissionLocal.org)<\/p>\n\n\n\n

\"Traffic
A final sunset before the Great Highway closes. Photo by Abigail Van Neely, March 13, 2025.<\/figcaption><\/figure>\n\n\n\n
\"A<\/a><\/figure>\n\n\n\n

Are you a regular Joe Eskenazi reader?<\/h4>\n\n\n\n

Mission Local is home to San Francisco\u2019s premier political reporter<\/strong>, serving up analysis you can\u2019t get elsewhere. If you agree, help feed the city\u2019s news appetite \u2014 donate below<\/strong>.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

Donate<\/a><\/p>\n\n\n\n

It\u2019s a hell of a thing to move heaven and earth \u2014 and meeting dates and meeting venues \u2014 to ensure you don\u2019t have to do anything. It\u2019s a hell of a thing for the San Francisco Democratic Party to go out of its way to make its brand and position statements even less relevant. <\/em><\/p>\n\n\n\n

But that\u2019s what happened last week. <\/p>\n\n\n\n

Months ago, San Francisco Democratic Party chair Nancy Tung was already phoning up fellow party members and urging them to vote \u201cno endorsement\u201d in the pending recall<\/a> of District 4 Supervisor Joel Engardio. <\/p>\n\n\n\n

\"Mission<\/figure>\n\n\n\n

Want the latest on the Mission and San Francisco? Sign up for our free daily newsletter<\/strong> below.Sign up<\/p>\n\n\n\n

Engardio\u2019s pro-business, pro-law-enforcement, pro-building agenda has a constituency here in San Francisco. It certainly includes the billionaire tech and landlord donors who underwrote<\/a> the ascendant leadership of the Democratic Party, and are underwriting<\/a> Engardio\u2019s anti-recall campaign.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

But Engardio\u2019s championing of Prop. K, the measure to transform The Great Highway into a park, enraged<\/a> a broad swath of the Westside \u2014 including thousands of Chinese San Franciscans. <\/p>\n\n\n\n

Politicians being caught between their donors and the city\u2019s angriest voters turns out to also be a hell of a thing.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

In June, Democratic Party members were informed they\u2019d be voting to endorse or spurn the recall at the July 25 regular meeting. If they rejected it, that would give Engardio all of August and half of September to inundate Sunset District voters with flyers and ads blasting an \u201cEndorsed by the Democratic Party\u201d message. <\/p>\n\n\n\n

But Tung yanked the item from the July 25 meeting agenda. She moved it to a special meeting slated for July 30. And she then subsequently canceled that special meeting. <\/p>\n\n\n\n

The endorsement vote on the recall ended up being delayed for a full month, until last week <\/a>\u2014 nearly two weeks after<\/em> mail voting had commenced.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

At that belated Aug. 27 meeting, the party deadlocked between Tung\u2019s preferred \u201cno endorsement\u201d and \u201cno on the recall.\u201d As a result, the San Francisco Democratic Party will officially have no position<\/a> on the Sept. 16 election. <\/p>\n\n\n\n

If the ardent campaign to keep the Democratic Party from taking a position in the District 4 recall was done to preserve the party\u2019s reputation with heavily Chinese and conservative-leaning Sunset District voters, it has come at the potential expense of the party\u2019s reputation with nearly anyone else. <\/p>\n\n\n\n

The national Democratic Party\u2019s brand is in tatters, despite existential threats to American democracy, because of its inability to articulate a coherent ethos and steadfast unwillingness to take strong positions.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

The particulars here in San Francisco are far different \u2014 but, broadly, the same situation applies.  <\/p>\n\n\n\n

The coalition of moderates running the local party is also in tatters. In the past year and change, YIMBY urbanist moderates have gritted their teeth in the name of unity and supported measures pushed by get-off-my-lawn, law-and-order moderates. <\/p>\n\n\n\n

They have now been definitively shown that there will be no reciprocity. <\/p>\n\n\n\n

\"People
Residents gathered at Ruth Williams Bayview Opera House to weigh in on the San Francisco Democratic County Central Committee\u2019s vote on its endorsement on the recall of Joel Engardio. Photo by Junyao Yang on Aug. 27, 2025.<\/figcaption><\/figure>\n\n\n\n

Tung, in an interview with Mission Local,<\/em> denied intentionally driving the San Francisco Democratic Party into a ditch. <\/p>\n\n\n\n

She said she moved the endorsement vote from the regular July meeting to a special meeting because the venue for the regular meeting, the Central Chinese High School<\/a> in Chinatown, was potentially too small to accommodate the throngs that might show up and opine on the recall. <\/p>\n\n\n\n

Tung denied moving the vote to specifically avoid the specter of holding an endorsement vote in Chinatown. The recall is an issue of fervent interest to many San Francisco Chinese voters \u2014 with a majority, and likely a firm majority, skewing pro-recall. <\/p>\n\n\n\n

She also denied delaying the vote until late August \u2014 when it would be meaningless \u2014 because she hadn\u2019t in July nailed down enough \u201cno endorsement\u201d votes to reach her desired outcome.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

Rather, she said she canceled the July 30 special meeting because of bylaws indicating that special meeting votes would require a supermajority to pass, not a simple majority.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

Tung did not deny calling her colleagues to push a \u201cno endorsement\u201d vote, however, because that happened. Mission Local <\/em>spoke to numerous recipients of these calls.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

When asked why she advocated this position, she said, \u201cI want to say I think it\u2019s important for the party to think about these sorts of elections, especially when they\u2019re so localized. We need to be sensitive to the communities that have to make these decisions.\u201d<\/p>\n\n\n\n

This is confusing. The Democratic Party endorses in every election, be it federal, state, citywide or districtwide. It endorsed Prop. K<\/a>, the Engardio-led ballot measure to close the Great Highway that rests at the core of the recall. It endorsed a slate of district supervisor candidates in November. It will do so again in 2026. <\/p>\n\n\n\n

The ostensible power of these endorsements \u2014 and the supposed allure of the Democratic brand in a city where registered Dems outnumber<\/a> Republicans by a factor of eight \u2014 was a major reason why tech executives and landlord interests invested heavily<\/a> last year in their preferred candidates to oust the labor-backed politicos running the party. <\/p>\n\n\n\n

So it\u2019s confusing<\/em> for the chair of the Democratic Party to now say that District 4 voters need to be given their space to decide the fate of their supervisor \u2014 a supervisor who, notably, was pushing Prop. K and other Democratic Party-endorsed positions. <\/p>\n\n\n\n

No Democratic Party member I spoke with took seriously the claim that the vote was moved out of the Chinatown venue hosting the July 25 meeting because the hall was too tiny.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

Nor was anyone particularly swayed by Tung\u2019s argument about the rules carved onto the Stone Table of the county Democratic Party regarding endorsement votes at special meetings. <\/p>\n\n\n\n

Tung countered that she sought the input of a \u201cprofessional parliamentarian\u201d on the matter, whose opinion compelled her to cancel the special meeting. But she declined to identify who this person was or disclose if they had been compensated.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

The county Democratic Party, incidentally, has in-house parliamentarians, and it\u2019s unclear why their opinions weren\u2019t good enough. It also has veteran members who don\u2019t recall this ever before being an issue over the course of many years and many special meetings.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

If a two-thirds endorsement vote really is required at a special meeting, scheduling a special meeting for such a vote was extremely careless \u2014 at best.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

In short, many of Tung\u2019s colleagues, regardless of how they voted on Aug. 27, do not buy her explanation that the endorsement vote was repeatedly moved and repeatedly delayed purely through a series of unfortunate events.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

\"A
Joel Engardio talks to voters at Sunset Dunes on Aug. 21, 2025. Photo by Junyao Yang.<\/figcaption><\/figure>\n\n\n\n

If Prop. K exposed the fissures in the moderates\u2019 urbanist-old school coalition, the strange and terrible recall endorsement saga may have snapped them.  <\/p>\n\n\n\n

Urbanists were already deeply irritated by the San Francisco Democratic Party opting to simply drop Prop. K off of 2024 mailers sent to the Westside \u2014 party recommendations blithely skipped<\/a> from Prop. J to Prop. L,<\/a> like excising the 13th floor from a high-rise. <\/p>\n\n\n\n

Following the endorsement debacle and the probable defeat of Engardio come Sept. 16 (anything could happen \u2014 but if you bet on Engardio, you should ask for odds), expect internecine conflict and further dysfunction within San Francisco\u2019s Democratic Party: \u201cModerate cannibalism,\u201d in the words of one observer.  <\/p>\n\n\n\n

Following the Aug. 27 Democratic Party meeting, a number of the members who voted to not make a recall endorsement went out for drinks. A smiling group photo was, inexplicably, posted<\/a> on social media. \u201cWe got through our vote!\u201d was the gaudy caption. <\/p>\n\n\n\n

It\u2019s a hell of a thing to be caught between your billionaire donor base and the city\u2019s most vehement and outspoken voters. A drink is understandable. But it doesn\u2019t alleviate the problem. <\/p>\n\n\n\n

After Sept. 16, this Democratic Party will have to move on to the next <\/em>problem, and the one after that.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

San Francisco, alas, is not wholly immune from our national condition: Whatever\u2019s coming down the pike figures to be more consequential than the fate of a windswept highway and the elected official who, with our county Democratic Party\u2019s blessing, moved to close it. <\/p>\n\n\n\n

In the weeks and months to come, we may all <\/em>need a drink. <\/p>\n\n\n\n

LATEST NEWS<\/mark><\/h2>\n\n\n\n
\"Diego<\/a><\/figure>\n\n\n\n

Diego Rivera\u2019s \u2018Mexican Mona Lisa\u2019 hangs in an SF home. But not for long.<\/a><\/h3>\n\n\n\n
\"The<\/a><\/figure>\n\n\n\n

The Excelsior: Resisting change, or ready for a new business model? <\/a><\/h3>\n\n\n\n
\"Hundreds<\/a><\/figure>\n\n\n\n

Hundreds march in S.F. Labor Day rally to protest \u2018billionaire takeover\u2019<\/a><\/h3>\n\n\n\n

Support the Mission Local team<\/h4>\n\n\n\n
\"A<\/figure>\n\n\n\n

We’re a small, independent, nonprofit newsroom<\/strong> that works hard to bring you news you can’t get elsewhere.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

In 2025, we have a lofty goal: 5,000 donors by the end of the year \u2014 more than double the number we had last year. We are 20 percent of the way there: Donate today and help us reach our goal!<\/strong><\/p>\n\n\n\n

Donate!<\/a><\/a><\/p>\n\n\n\n

JOE ESKENAZI<\/a><\/h2>\n\n\n\n

getbackjoejoe@gmail.com<\/a><\/p>\n\n\n\n