{"id":48993,"date":"2026-07-03T12:35:03","date_gmt":"2026-07-03T19:35:03","guid":{"rendered":"https:\/\/occupysf.net\/?p=48993"},"modified":"2026-07-03T12:35:05","modified_gmt":"2026-07-03T19:35:05","slug":"omg-socialism","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/occupysf.net\/index.php\/2026\/07\/03\/omg-socialism\/","title":{"rendered":"OMG\u2014Socialism!"},"content":{"rendered":"\n<p><strong>KUTTNER ON TAP<\/strong><\/p>\n\n\n\n<p>July 1, 2026 (Prospect.org)<\/p>\n\n\n\n<figure class=\"wp-block-table\"><table><tbody><tr><td><em>The misleading panic attack on the part of the right and the center in the face of the Democratic left\u2019s recent electoral victories<\/em>In the past week, candidates backed by the Democratic Socialists of America (DSA) won nine out of the ten state and federal primaries contested in New York, including upsets in two congressional districts. Pennsylvania Democrats chose socialist Chris Rabb as the party\u2019s candidate for the state\u2019s Third Congressional District. Democratic socialist Janeese Lewis George will almost certainly become the next mayor of Washington, D.C. In Colorado, DSA-backed Melat Kiros won the primary for the First Congressional District, unseating 15-term incumbent Rep. Diana DeGette.<br><br>These and other gains have led to borderline hysterical commentaries from the center and right, many of them self-interested, all of them misleading.<br><br><a rel=\"noreferrer noopener\" href=\"https:\/\/americanprospect.bluelena.io\/lt.php?x=4lZy~GDMInSe5K38-d1Jh.Bw1aAjiQHxjM0wkKY6I6PM65N5yUy7xeVu3XUnjEA0_ueglPPHKXei95B70NQYUOS-1Xyoi_fx\" target=\"_blank\"><u>According to a\u00a0<\/u><em><u>Wall Street Journal<\/u><\/em><u>\u00a0editorial<\/u><\/a>, \u201cTraditional Democrats are now facing a hostile takeover from the socialist left, and so far few are willing to put up a fight.\u201d This is false. Corporate Democrats are fighting, with millions of dollars in super PAC ads; they\u2019re just losing. They have only money. Democratic socialists have committed activists as ground troops.<br><br>Many commentators are also alarmed that the success of the economic left is often linked to a critique both of Israel\u2019s policies of ethnic cleansing in Gaza and the West Bank and of the excessive influence of AIPAC in domestic policies, often in bed with the corporate right and dark-money PACs. These critiques invariably raise the specter of antisemitism.<br><br><a rel=\"noreferrer noopener\" href=\"https:\/\/americanprospect.bluelena.io\/lt.php?x=4lZy~GDMInSe5K38-d1Jh.Bw1aAjiQHxjM0wkKY6I6PM65N5yUy7xeVu3XUnjEA0_ueglPPHKXei95B70NQYUOS-1Xyoi_fy\" target=\"_blank\"><u>The Jewish Insider newsletter<\/u><\/a>\u00a0warned, \u201cThe Colorado results suggest that, far from being contained to a few scattered congressional districts in New York City, the momentum for far-left, anti-Israel candidates is only growing within the Democratic Party, especially within urban population centers.\u201d I have yet to read any such critique which candidly acknowledges that the backlash might have something to do with Israel\u2019s appalling behavior.<br><br>Even more nuanced commentaries get it partly wrong.\u00a0<a rel=\"noreferrer noopener\" href=\"https:\/\/americanprospect.bluelena.io\/lt.php?x=4lZy~GDMInSe5K38-d1Jh.Bw1aAjiQHxjM0wkKY6I6PM65N5yUy7xeVu3XUnjEA0_ueglPPHKXei95B70NQYUOS-1Xyoi_fz\" target=\"_blank\"><u>Paul Krugman writes<\/u><\/a>\u00a0in a recent Substack post: \u201cThe fact is that very few Americans\u2014even among politicians who call themselves \u2018democratic socialists\u2019\u2014are really socialists. What many, I\u2019d say a majority, of Americans support is what Europeans call social democracy\u2014an ideology that is OK with living in a mostly market-driven economic system in which some people make much more money than others, but one that advocates policies to tame markets and inequality with progressive taxation, safety net programs, and regulations.\u201d<br><br>Since his liberation from the timorously censorial\u00a0<em>New York Times<\/em>, Krugman has become an indispensable source of insight on all things economic. But here Krugman is partly off because he doesn\u2019t pay enough attention to the politics.<\/td><\/tr><tr><td><a rel=\"noreferrer noopener\" target=\"_blank\" href=\"https:\/\/americanprospect.bluelena.io\/lt.php?x=4lZy~GDMInSe5K38-d1Jh.Bw1aAjiQHxjM0wkKY6I6PM65N5yUy7xeVu3XUnjEA0_ueglPPHKXei95B70NQYUOS-1Xyoi_Py\"><\/a><\/td><\/tr><tr><td>Social democracy is indeed popular throughout the West. Large majorities of people like universal health care, social retirement programs, good public transit, progressive taxation, and the rest of the \u201csafety net\u201d package. But social democracy is politically weak, and on the defensive, everywhere, because capitalists have too much wealth and power and use their power to destroy the social democratic compromise with capitalism.<br><br>That\u2019s why the shrewdest progressives have long understood that social transfers and regulatory strategies are not enough to keep capital contained. You need a good dose of socialist public ownership as well, combined with social movements like trade unions.<br><br>Franklin Roosevelt understood this. The original Fannie Mae, The Federal National Mortgage Association, which made home mortgages more plentiful, was a public institution. The Reconstruction Finance Corporation was a public investment bank. Social Security is not just a government-sponsored and -guaranteed system of retirement. It is frankly socialist. Capitalist financial institutions play no role in it whatsoever.<br><br>Krugman writes that socialism seems to be on the rise \u201cbecause right-wing propagandists continually smear social democratic policies as socialist, trying to make popular, mainstream policy ideas sound extreme.\u201d While the right does try to smear progressives as communists, I don\u2019t think Krugman gets that quite right. As young people personally experience the ravages of American capitalism, socialism is on the rise because it is being transformed from a bad word into a good word.<br><a rel=\"noreferrer noopener\" href=\"https:\/\/americanprospect.bluelena.io\/lt.php?x=4lZy~GDMInSe5K38-d1Jh.Bw1aAjiQHxjM0wkKY6I6PM65N5yUy7xeVu3XUnjEA0_ueglPPHKXei95B70NQYUOS-1Xyoi_f0\" target=\"_blank\"><u>According to Gallup<\/u><\/a>, 66 percent of self-identified Democrats have a positive image of socialism, while only 42 percent feel that way about capitalism. The younger the voter and the further removed from memories of the Cold War, the more approval of socialism increases.<br><br>That doesn\u2019t mean socialism is a good word everywhere. In more traditionally conservative areas of the country, such as Georgia or Texas, pocketbook progressives will not call themselves socialists, and the right will try to use the presence of more explicit socialists in the Democratic Party to tar candidates like Jon Ossoff or James Talarico as closet socialists. But ultimately, voter revulsion against the excesses of capitalism and the articulation of compelling alternatives matter more than the label.<br><br>The corporate right called FDR every name in the book. He wore the slurs as a badge, and the people knew whose side he was on.<\/td><\/tr><tr><td><img decoding=\"async\" src=\"https:\/\/ecp.yusercontent.com\/mail?url=https%3A%2F%2Fcontent.app-us1.com%2Fcdn-cgi%2Fimage%2Ffit%3Dscale-down%2Cwidth%3D650%2Cdpr%3D2%2Cformat%3Dauto%2Conerror%3Dredirect%2FDE2wl%2F2025%2F07%2F23%2F662ad4cd-6628-4e8e-82b5-f169de2bf4f0.png&amp;t=1783107132&amp;ymreqid=d41d8cd9-8f00-b204-1cc1-c4018f01b200&amp;sig=ajoW3pg0lqOsdv8GuejC7w--~D\" alt=\"\" width=\"80\"><strong>Robert Kuttner<\/strong><br>Co-Editor, Co-Founder<\/td><\/tr><\/tbody><\/table><\/figure>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"<p>KUTTNER ON TAP July 1, 2026 (Prospect.org) The misleading panic attack on the part of the right and the center in the face of the Democratic left\u2019s recent electoral victoriesIn the past week, candidates backed by the Democratic Socialists of America (DSA) won nine out of the ten state and&#8230; <a class=\"continue-reading-link\" href=\"https:\/\/occupysf.net\/index.php\/2026\/07\/03\/omg-socialism\/\"> Continue reading <span class=\"meta-nav\">&rarr; <\/span><\/a><\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":1,"featured_media":0,"comment_status":"open","ping_status":"open","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"footnotes":""},"categories":[2006,2088,1968],"tags":[2142],"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/occupysf.net\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/48993"}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/occupysf.net\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/occupysf.net\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/occupysf.net\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/1"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/occupysf.net\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=48993"}],"version-history":[{"count":1,"href":"https:\/\/occupysf.net\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/48993\/revisions"}],"predecessor-version":[{"id":48994,"href":"https:\/\/occupysf.net\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/48993\/revisions\/48994"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/occupysf.net\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=48993"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/occupysf.net\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=48993"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/occupysf.net\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=48993"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}