Billionaires bought the SF Democratic Party. Why are we suprised at its endorsements?

The Big Tech slate won control of the DCCC. Now they’re using it for their agenda. It’s a total embarrassment

By Tim Redmond

August 27, 2026 (48hills.org)

I’m not sure how much it helps the campaign of Manny Yekutiel for supervisor to get the endorsement of the local Democratic Party with these sorts of headlines:

Mission Local: “S.F. Dems endorse Manny Yekutiel in tense meeting despite sexual assault allegation, plea from accuser”

SF Standard: “Manny Yekutiel was accused of sexual assault. The SF Democratic Party just endorsed him”

But I wasn’t a bit surprised. The overwhelming majority of the Democratic County Central Committee won office as part of a slate financed entirely by a handful of tech billionaires who wanted a local party that would promote their interests.

Manny Yekutiel got the DCCC nod. The majority cared nothing about assault allegations. Campaign photo.

The billionaires clearly think that Yekutiel is the best candidate in District 8. So the DCCC members they funded bowed to their will, and voted for a guy who was credibly accused of sexual assault.

None of the allegations were going to matter. The mayor and his pals want Manny; the DCCC caved. Even Sup. Matt Dorsey, who supported Gary McCoy and who said that McCoy’s role in the recovery community was critical, bowed at the last minute and went with Yekutiel.

Here’s the list of people who think sexual assault allegations don’t matter when the billionaire candidate is up for endorsement:

  • Cedric Akbar
  • Michaela Alioto-Pier
  • Joshua Arce
  • Patrick Boileau
  • Trevor Chandler
  • Lanier Coles
  • Lily Ho
  • Marjan Philhour
  • Joe Sangirardi
  • Matt Dorsey
  • Fiona Ma
  • Nancy Tung

Then the local party went on to do something that hardly ever happens: It broke with the state party to oppose Prop. 40, the billionaire tax on the November ballot. Again, this is no surprise at all: The rich tech bros now completely control San Francisco’s Democratic Party. They paid for it, and they got it.

So let’s not pretend that any “investigation” or party protocol on sexual assault made any difference at all here. I’ve been watching Democratic Party politics in SF for 40 years, and I don’t think I’ve even seen a DCCC majority this bad.

An earlier version of this article mistakingly said Eric Kingsbury voted for Manny. He supported McCoy.

48 Hills welcomes comments in the form of letters to the editor, which you can submit here. We also invite you to join the conversation on our FacebookTwitter, and Instagram

Tim Redmond

Tim Redmond has been a political and investigative reporter in San Francisco for more than 30 years. He spent much of that time as executive editor of the Bay Guardian. He is the founder of 48hills.

The battle over mail-in ballots

August 28, 2026 (Prospect.org)

KUTTNER ON TAP
We can expect the courts to foil Trump’s scheme to have the Postal Service block mail ballots—but it will be a close call.

In the latest twist in the saga of President Trump’s efforts to get the U.S. Postal Service to restrict or condition mail-in voting, a federal judge once again has enjoined the Postal Service from moving ahead with its plan. District Court Judge Indira Talwani’s order yesterday came after the Supreme Court had admonished her on Monday, overturning her earlier injunction on the grounds that the Postal Service had not finalized any changes; thus the suit and injunction were supposedly premature.
But as Judge Talwani wrote in her latest order, the Postal Service had actually gone ahead and issued a final rule providing that unless a state provides voter information to the USPS and meets other arbitrary conditions, the Postal Service will not deliver mail-in ballots. She wrote that the states which had sued “face irreparable harm where they are required to comply with a likely unconstitutional regulation for which compliance is practically impossible as to the 2026 midterm elections, now little more than two months away … Most Plaintiff States have already ordered their mail ballots, and some are required by state law to send them to eligible voters as early as next week.”
In fact, the Supreme Court overruled her previous order late last week just as the USPS was preparing to issue its final order. In a remarkable rebuke to the high court, Judge Talwani added, “The Supreme Court gave no indication that it was aware of the Final Rule when the [Court’s] Order was issued.”
What now? Judge Talwani’s order blocked the rule from taking effect for 14 days. A previously scheduled hearing on the legality of the rule is set for September 3. As this cat-and-mouse game continues and the clock runs, it becomes increasingly unlikely that the administration will be able to execute its plan to block or condition mail-in voting in time for the November election.
The courts have already held that Trump’s earlier effort in March by executive order to take direct control over voter lists was unconstitutional. Trump also instructed the USPS to refuse to deliver ballots in states that were not following rules issued by the federal government or the Postal Service.
How does Trump get to dictate Postal Service meddling in partisan politics? As our colleague David Dayen has been writing for more than a decade, one reason is that the last two Democratic presidents, Biden and Obama, have been asleep at the switch.
Obama did not fill a single vacancy on the Postal Service Board of Governors during his entire eight-year term of office. As Dayen pointed out in a piece for The New Republic in 2014 (long before he joined the Prospect), the inspector general of the Postal Service proposed that the USPS provide basic postal banking, but it never happened—because the Postal Service’s board was still dominated by George W. Bush appointees. And Biden left in place Trump appointee Louis DeJoy as postmaster general because he never bothered to appoint enough board members to fire him.
Trump has recently appointed four new members of the Postal Service board to fill vacancies. They face Senate confirmation in September. Three of them are explicit election deniers.
The Constitution explicitly says: “The Times, Places and Manner of holding Elections for Senators and Representatives, shall be prescribed in each State by the Legislature thereof,” subject only to congressional conditions, as in the case of the Voting Rights Act. It makes no provision for presidential executive orders.
Now, ironically, it will fall to the Supreme Court (with a 6-3 majority of Republican appointees) to prevent the Postal Service from helping Trump steal the election. The high court has been playing games with this, but the scheme is so flagrantly unconstitutional that in the end the Court will probably do the right thing, but barely.
Robert Kuttner
Co-Editor, Co-Founder

Trump Threats Overshadow Brazil’s Presidential Election

The Real News Network Aug 28, 2026 SÃO BERNARDO DO CAMPO President Luiz Inácio Lula da Silva launched his campaign for a fourth and final term before thousands of supporters in São Bernardo do Campo, promising to keep fighting poverty and investing in Brazil’s future. His challenger: Senator Flavio Bolsonaro, running in place of his father, former far-right President Jair Bolsonaro, who is under house arrest after being convicted of attempting a coup. US President Donald Trump has backed the Bolsonaros with tariffs, visa revocations, and open pressure — what experts call a new era of US dominance over Latin America. Michael Fox reports from São Paulo, with voices from Lula’s campaign launch, evangelical Bolsonaro supporters on the streets of São Paulo, and foreign relations professor Igor Fuser.

The Secret Behind High Electricity Bills

Robert Reich and Inequality Media Premiered Aug 25, 2026 Private utility companies like PG&E, Duke, and Exelon control electricity for nearly 70% of Americans — and they’re using that monopoly power to drive up your bills while pocketing record profits. It doesn’t have to be this way. Watch. Find an active Public Power campaign near you: https://ilsr.org/energy/public-power-…

FINAL UPDATE: MARCH ON WASHINGTON 2026: August 28

March on Washington 2026 final update: livestream details, arrival times, transportation, what to bring, and how to find People Power United.

Laurie Woodward Garcia and People Power United Aug 27, 2026

March on Washington 2026: Defend the Vote.

Tomorrow is the day. Whether you are joining us in Washington, D.C., or watching from home, you are part of this moment.

CAN’T MAKE IT TO D.C.? JOIN US VIRTUALLY!

The March on Washington 2026: Defend the Vote Livestream will be available through People Power United on Friday, August 28, from 9:00 AM to 1:00 PM Eastern.

Watch on your computer: https://substack.com/@peoplepowerunited or at https://peoplepowerunited.org

Watching through the Substack app?
Go to People Power United .

If you are not already subscribed, you may be prompted to subscribe first. It’s free.

Join us from wherever you are. Together, we can show up for voting rights, civil rights, liberty, justice, and power to the people in Washington and across the country.


FRIDAY, AUGUST 28, 2026

Lincoln Memorial | Washington, D.C.

8:00 AM — Arrive
9:00 AM — Program begins

The dream is unfinished. We rise to carry it forward.

As America marks 250 years, people from across the country are gathering to defend voting rights, civil rights, liberty, justice, economic dignity, and power to the people.

Official March information:
https://marchonwashington2026.com/

People Power United sign-up:
https://www.mobilize.us/peoplepowerunited/event/996988/


FIND PEOPLE POWER UNITED AT THE MARCH

People Power United will be there!

We have a really cool People Power United banner, so keep an eye out for us.

On the day of the March, we will also share our live location tag so you can find where People Power United is gathering.

Follow our updates on People Power United Notes:

https://newsletter.peoplepowerunited.org/notes


WHAT TO BRING

Come prepared for a long and powerful day outside:

  • Water
  • Sunscreen
  • Hat
  • Comfortable walking shoes
  • Refillable water bottle

Check the weather before you leave and plan accordingly.


GETTING TO THE LINCOLN MEMORIAL

Metro is strongly encouraged.

Foggy Bottom–GWU, on the Blue, Orange, and Silver lines, is the closest Metro station to the Lincoln Memorial.

Smithsonian, also on the Blue, Orange, and Silver lines, is another option, but allow additional walking time and expect heavier crowds.

Driving?

There is no dedicated March participant parking at the Lincoln Memorial.

Limited metered street parking and commercial garages are available in Foggy Bottom and downtown Washington, but availability is not guaranteed.

Traffic, street closures, and event-day restrictions may affect access, so leave plenty of extra time.


IMPORTANT BUS UPDATE

People Power United shared our bus interest form with the main March organizers so they could help connect people with available transportation.

Organizers contacted people when they identified buses with available spaces near them.

If you have not heard from a bus organizer by now, we recommend making alternative transportation arrangements rather than waiting for a bus connection.

If getting to Washington is not possible, please join us virtually instead.

 Watch the livestream: https://substack.com/@peoplepowerunited


JOIN THE VIRTUAL MARCH

Not coming to Washington? You are still part of this moment.

Join the livestream from 9:00 AM to 1:00 PM Eastern:

Watch on your computer: https://substack.com/@peoplepowerunited or at

https://peoplepowerunited.org

Watching through the Substack app?
Go to People Power United .

Gather your family. Invite a friend. Share the livestream. Post from home. Help amplify the message.

Whether we are standing together at the Lincoln Memorial or joining from communities across the country, we are showing up together.

We are not gathering simply to remember history. We are gathering to make it.

See you in Washington — or online.

Power to the people.

Laurie Woodward Garcia
People Power United

‘Democracy Is Under Attack’: Civil Rights Lawsuit Aims to Block Trump Assault on Mail-In Voting

a person places a ballot in a madilbox

A voter places their ballot in a mailbox in Everett, Washington on July 30, 2020.

 (Photo by Cindy Shebley/flickr/cc)

“These mail-in ballot restrictions threaten to disenfranchise millions of eligible voters who rely on mail voting to participate in our democracy,” said one advocate.

Brett Wilkins

Aug 27, 2026 (CommonDreams.org)

A day after a federal judge lifted her injunction on President Donald Trump’s executive order targeting mail-in ballots, a quartet of civil rights groups on Thursday filed fresh claims in their lawsuit challenging the administration’s weaponization of the US Postal Service to attack the right to vote under the pretense of fighting nearly nonexistent fraud.

The Lawyers’ Committee for Civil Rights Under Law, NAACP, Common Cause, and Black Voters Matter Fund argued in the US District Court for the District of Columbia that Trump’s March 31 executive order unlawfully attempts to federalize important parts of election administration—especially voter eligibility verification and mail-ballot delivery—by presidential fiat, without authorization from Congress, while creating serious risks of disenfranchisement and misuse of personal data.

RECOMMENDED…

Georgia Ballots Are Processed And Counted On Election Day

Democrats, Groups Fight Back After Supreme Court Clears Way for Trump Attack on Mail Voting

Absentee ballots

‘Direct Violation of the Constitution’: Democratic States Sue to Stop Trump Assault on Mail-In Voting

The plaintiffs—and many legal experts—argue that the US Constitution gives the states and Congress the authority to regulate federal elections, not the president.

“Our democracy is under attack,” NAACP president and CEO Derrick Johnson said Thursday in a statement. “No federal entity should be allowed to implement last-minute rules that disenfranchise voters and override state election laws.”

“This new USPS rule is a direct assault on the fundamental freedoms of millions of Americans—particularly Black voters, communities of color, seniors, military members, and rural residents—just weeks before a critical election,” Johnson added, referring to November’s pmidterms. “We will not stand idly by while the voices of the people are silenced. We must protect every eligible citizen’s right to cast their ballot.”

Damon Hewitt, president and executive director of the Lawyers’ Committee for Civil Rights Under Law, warned that “these mail-in ballot restrictions threaten to disenfranchise millions of eligible voters who rely on mail voting to participate in our democracy while balancing work, caregiving responsibilities, disabilities, and other realities of daily life.”

“The Trump administration is trying to limit access to the ballot, sow confusion at the polls, and to use the ensuing chaos as an excuse to exert power over agencies and processes in a politicized way,” Hewitt added. “We will not let this or any administration further undermine our democratic process. We will fight to ensure our elections are free and fair, and that eligible voters are not shut out—especially Black voters and other voters of color, who are frequently targeted by voter suppression schemes.”

Several courts had ruled against Trump’s order. But this week, the US Supreme Court cleared the way for the administration to proceed with its plans, and on Wednesday US District Judge Indira Talwani, an appointee of former President Barack Obama, was compelled to lift her injunction on the executive order as a result of the high court’s decision.

Also on Wednesday, the groups behind the case before Talwani moved to block the Postal Service rule, as did a coalition of two dozen Democratic state attorneys general, whose initial challenge had resulted in the ruling from the Supreme Court—which found that the AGs filed their first suit prematurely.

Republicans including Trump—who has repeatedly voted by mail—have used fearmongering and disinformation to push the nearly nonexistent “threat” of voter fraud, especially in regard to mailed ballots, and noncitizens voting in US elections.

“Mail-in voting is so safe that even the president has used it twice this year,” Common Cause president and CEO Virginia Kase Solomón said on Thursday. “The Postal Service exists to deliver our mail, not to be weaponized by this administration to silence voters. Common Cause will keep fighting to protect a democracy where people choose their leaders—not the other way around.”

Trump’s March order is part of a broader attack on voting rights that includes pushing an updated version of Republicans’ so-called SAVE America Act, which would mandate proof of citizenship and strict photo ID requirements to register to vote in federal elections. The legislation, which was passed by the House of Representatives in February, is stalled in the narrowly split Senate, where it lacks the support of 60 lawmakers needed to avoid a Democrat filibuster.

“Mail-in voting gives people the freedom and flexibility to participate in our democracy, and we should be honest about what these efforts to restrict it are really doing: creating barriers to the ballot under the guise of election security,” Black Voters Matter Fund co-founders Cliff Albright and LaTosha Brown said in a joint statement Thursday. “We are not fooled. This is the same old playbook—manufacture confusion, create unnecessary hurdles, and chip away at voting access.”

“When the same politicians who defend their own access to mail-in voting move to restrict that access for others, the hypocrisy is hard to ignore,” Albright and Brown continued. “We cannot allow voter suppression to be repackaged as voter protection or allow political interference to determine who gets to participate and whose voice counts.”

“This is not about making democracy more secure; it is about reshaping who can fully participate in it,” they added. “We will continue to call these efforts what they are and fight for every eligible voter’s freedom to make their voice heard.”

Our work is licensed under Creative Commons (CC BY-NC-ND 3.0). Feel free to republish and share widely.

Brett Wilkins

Brett Wilkins is a staff writer for Common Dreams.

Full Bio >

‘I’m Going to Ask Tom’: Maine GOP Nominee for Governor Calls for ICE at Polling Stations

Republican gubernatorial nominee Bobby Charles

Republican gubernatorial nominee Bobby Charles of Maine said in audio released by the Bangor Daily News on August 26, 2026 that he would ask the Trump administration to deploy US Immigration and Customs Enforcement agents to polling places in the state. 

(Screenshot by Bobby Charles for Maine Governor Campaign Committee)

“His plan to ask Trump’s border czar to send ICE agents to Maine polling places just weeks before Election Day is not only deeply alarming—it is likely illegal,” said the head of the state Democratic Party.

Julia Conley

Aug 27, 2026 (CommonDreams.org)

By letting attendees at a Maine Young Republicans event in on his “secret” plan for the midterm elections, the state’s Republican nominee for governor detailed a proposal that, according to one public policy think tank, is wholly illegal.

In an audio clip released Wednesday by the Bangor Daily News, Bobby Charles, a lawyer and former Reagan administration staffer, boasted about his connections to the Trump administration’s border czar, Tom Homan, a key figure in President Donald Trump’s mass deportation operation.

RECOMMENDED…

Peggy Flanagan Unloads on GOP Rival for Saying ICE Treated Kids ‘Really Well’ During Minnesota Siege

Peggy Flanagan Unloads on GOP Rival for Saying ICE Treated Kids ‘Really Well’ During Minnesota Siege

Michigan Senate Candidate Abdul El-Sayed Holds Rally In Detroit With Sen. Bernie Sanders And Rep. Alexandria Ocasio-Cortez

Progressives Aim to Defeat AIPAC Cash, Democratic Establishment in Michigan and Missouri Primaries

“Here’s my secret. I have a friend named Tom Homan,” said Charles, drawing applause from the GOP voters. “I’m going to ask Tom… three or four weeks before the election, maybe three, I’m going to make an appeal for ICE and Marshals to be at our voting booths.”

Charles was referring to US Immigration and Customs Enforcement and the US Marshals, both armed federal law enforcement officers whose presence at polling sites to intimidate voters would be against the law, according to the Brennan Center for Justice .

Trump has also alluded to sending ICE and other armed federal agents to polling places during the midterm elections in November, saying in May when he was asked about the idea that he would “do anything necessary to make sure we have honest elections.”

At the Brennan Center for Justice last month, senior counsel Hayne Yoon wrote that “despite the implied threat, the law is clear.”

“Sending armed federal agents, including those from ICE, to election sites is illegal,” wrote Yoon. “Federal law and many states’ laws prohibit not only armed federal agents at polling sites, but also interference in elections or voter intimidation by any officials or private citizens. More important, using these tactics would be a flagrant attempt to hold on to power through force and intimidation and an affront to free and fair elections.”

In his comments at the Young Republicans event, Charles also asked rhetorically whether “illegals who are being paid money” to vote would “like” the deployment of ICE agents at polling places. The remark made the gubernatorial candidate one of several Republicans to push the baseless claim that undocumented immigrants or noncitizens have committed voter fraud in order to sway elections.

There are no documented reports of immigrants ever being paid to vote, and a 2024 American Immigration Council analysis of data collected by the right-wing Heritage Foundation found only 68 cases of proven noncitizen voting dating back to 2000, “amounting to less than 0.0001% of total votes.”

Democratic gubernatorial candidate Hannah Pingree said Wednesday that Charles’ comments make clear that he would push Trump’s MAGA agenda, despite his recent attempts to distance himself from the president, who is unpopular with Mainers.

“He is begging Trump’s ICE to come interfere with our free and fair elections,” said Pingree. “I think that conduct speaks for itself and I trust the Maine people to see it for what it is.”

Devon Murphy-Anderson, executive director of the Maine Democratic Partyadded that Charles “continues to prove that he is a MAGA extremist who will stop at nothing to put himself and his MAGA agenda ahead of Mainers. His plan to ask Trump’s border czar to send ICE agents to Maine polling places just weeks before Election Day is not only deeply alarming—it is likely illegal. This is a blatant attempt to intimidate voters and yet another reason Bobby Charles is too extreme for Maine.”

Charles’ comments come six weeks after an ICE agent fatally shot Biddeford, Maine resident Johan Sebastián Durán Guerrero in an incident that the Trump administration has not appeared to investigate. ICE has made more arrests in Maine so far this year than it did in all of 2024-25 combined, and out of 491 arrests made, 89% of those detained had no criminal convictions.

Homan recently told a Republican state lawmaker that the state would soon “see a lot more enforcement action” due to Trump’s decision to end Temporary Protected Status for Haitians and Syrians.

The Justice Department announced this month that it would deploy at least 1,000 federal officers to polling places as people vote in the November 3 elections. The administration has suggested the public should not be alarmed by the plan because anyone who is a citizen will not be targeted by the agents, but as the ACLU noted, at least 155 citizens in eight states last year, including 32 children, were detained, targeted, or subjected to misconduct by federal immigration agents.

Our work is licensed under Creative Commons (CC BY-NC-ND 3.0). Feel free to republish and share widely.

Julia Conley

Julia Conley is a senior editor and staff writer for Common Dreams.

Full Bio >