Federal judge in California bans ICE from arresting immigrants at courthouses

National win for civil rights group behind Northern California class-action lawsuit also barred long-term detentions

A young woman with long dark hair, wearing a white shirt and brown jacket, smiles at the camera against a plain light background. by Abigail Vân Neely June 24, 2026 (MissionLocal.org)

Several police officers in uniform stand outside a building’s glass doors, with one officer handling a metal chain and lock attached to the door handles during an immigration enforcement operation.
Federal police removing the chains used to block the entrance to 630 Sansome St. on Dec. 16, 2025. Photo by Mariana Garcia.

Immigration and Customs Enforcement can no longer arrest immigrants at courthouse hearings or detain them for over 12 hours in short-term holding cells anywhere in the country, a federal judge in California ruled Tuesday. 

The ruling expands a temporary order from December that had prohibited both practices in Northern California.

Courthouse arrests came under legal scrutiny last year. Dramatic scenes of ICE agents arresting people during routine hearings were broadcast from 26 Federal Plaza in New York and other courthouses. In San Francisco, protesters clashed with federal agents outside the main immigration court, where hundreds were arrested. 

Mission Local logo, with blue and orange lines on the shape of the Mission District

Want the latest on the Mission and San Francisco? Sign up for our free daily newsletter below.Sign up

The practice had all but ceased in San Francisco since October 2025. However, it continued in other parts of the country like New York and Texas, said Nisha Kashyap, an attorney at the Lawyers’ Committee for Civil Rights of the San Francisco Bay Area. 

When immigrants were arrested after their hearings, they were often held in cells meant for short-term detention, sometimes for several days, before being transferred to a long-term detention center. San Francisco attorneys, in their lawsuit, demanded and won an end to the practice of holding people longer than 12 hours in these short-term cells. 

ICE’s recent practices of arresting people outside court and then detaining them for days in a holding cell were new. 

In January 2025, ICE and the Department of Justice’s Executive Office for Immigration Review reversed years of guidance against courthouse arrests when it issued a policy that agents could “conduct civil immigration enforcement actions in or near courthouses” whenever they believed a noncitizen would be present, not just someone who posed a public safety threat. 

ICE also used to require its agents to ensure that no one was detained in a holding facility for longer than 12 hours. As enforcement increased, however, the number of people in detention “significantly increased,” an ICE official wrote. 

In June 2025, the agency said field offices nationwide could begin detaining people for up to three days or longer in “exceptional circumstances.”

Judge Casey Pitts of the Northern District of California court wrote that neither decision was backed up by clear reasoning required by Congress’ Administrative Procedures Act. He banned both practices, describing them as “arbitrary and capricious.” 

Pitts’ ruling was a “crushing blow to some of the Trump administration’s most extreme immigration enforcement tactics,” the plaintiffs wrote in a press statement. 

“The courthouse is meant to be a refuge for the pursuit of justice, not a hunting ground for ICE,” wrote Jordan Wells, a senior attorney at the Lawyers’ Committee for Civil Rights of the San Francisco Bay Area. “No one, immigrants included, should be forced to choose between their liberty and their day in court.”

We won’t ignore your neighborhood

When a San Francisco neighborhood has a Mission Local reporter, it means someone is there. We’re following new housing projects proposed on your block, keeping tabs on what your district supervisor is up to at City Hall, and letting you know when longtime businesses close (and new ones open). When big news breaks, we already know the context.

Most neighborhoods don’t have that. Yours could. 

That’s what Mission Local is building. Our reporters don’t parachute in — they write consistently on San Francisco, so you’re never reading about your neighborhood from someone who just looked it up.

So far we are in five of San Francisco’s neighborhoods. But we know all San Franciscans deserve our kind of coverage. Will you join us?

Put a reporter on your block!

Latest News

S.F. supervisors will hammer out the city budget tonight. Here’s what’s at stake. 

S.F. supervisors will hammer out the city budget tonight. Here’s what’s at stake. 

What losing the Make Out Room would mean to San Francisco

What losing the Make Out Room would mean to San Francisco

After a year without a pharmacy, Bayview is finally getting one

After a year without a pharmacy, Bayview is finally getting one

Abigail Vân NeelyStaff reporter

abigail@missionlocal.com

Abigail is a staff reporter at Mission Local covering criminal justice and public health. She got her bachelor’s and master’s from Stanford University and has received awards for investigative reporting and public service journalism.

Abigail now lives in San Francisco with her cat, Sally Carrera, but she’ll always be a New Yorker. (Yes, the shelter named the cat after the Porsche from the animated movie Cars.)

Message her securely via Signal at abi.725More by Abigail Vân Neely

Tagged . Bookmark the permalink.

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *