A witness at SFO Sunday filed a complaint that SFPD officers violated sanctuary laws by shielding ICE agents in plainclothes from bystanders who were asking them to identify themselves, as the ICE agents attempted to restrain a woman being deported with her young daughter.
Witness Nicole Killian filed a complaint with the California Department of Justice and the SF City Attorney, as Mission Local reports, alleging that SFPD officers assisted ICE agents who were restraining a mother and her daughter at San Francisco International Airport Sunday as they were being deported to Guatemala.
Attorneys knowledgeable about local sanctuary policies told Mission Local the actions of SFPD officers may have violated SF’s sanctuary ordinance as well as SFPD’s policy directives.
As SFist reported Monday, the arrest was not related to President Donald Trump’s recent directive to send ICE agents to some US airports amid the partial government shutdown — and SFO employs private contractors to manage security checkpoints, so therefore doesn’t rely on federal TSA employees.
The Chronicle reports that the woman being restrained, Angelina Lopez-Jimenez, had tried to escape custody, and officials said she may have been detained elsewhere and was being transported through SFO. An immigration judge had reportedly issued a final order for Lopez-Jimenez and her daughter’s deportation seven years ago, in 2019.
Mission Local reports that a total of 20 SFPD officers were on the scene of the arrest. A group of bystanders filmed police officers forming a buffer around ICE agents in plainclothes, who witnesses say refused to identify themselves. SFPD officers were also filmed escorting ICE agents as they transported the woman in a wheelchair away from the scene.
SFPD released a statement that officers were responding to a 911 call about the incident, and they stayed on the scene to “maintain public safety.”
“The crowd was furious, but was giving them their distance and was only asking reasonable questions about the identification and documenting what was happening,” Killian told Mission Local. “I was like, you’re not supposed to be helping, but if you’re allowed to crowd control, how is that not helping them?”
Grisel Ruiz, the senior managing attorney at the Immigrant Legal Resource Center, pointed out that SFPD’s crowd control role amounted to providing resources that supported ICE operations.
“Creating a perimeter around an ICE arrest to keep the public at a distance so that ICE can conduct an arrest appears to be the SFPD using its resources to support an ICE arrest,” Ruiz told Mission Local.
Bill Ong Hing, a longtime immigration attorney, professor of law at University of San Francisco, and a former police commissioner, told Mission Local that SFPD is only allowed to assist ICE in an emergency or if the public potentially poses harm to ICE agents. Otherwise, police may have violated both the city’s ordinance and SFPD’s directive.
“SFPD may argue [the woman being arrested] created a situation where there was a danger to the public,” Hing says.
Angela Chan, assistant chief attorney at the San Francisco public defender’s office, told Mission Local, “It does not appear there is any crime being committed by any members of the public.”
“A dozen officers stand in a circle to help officials to take or keep someone in custody, that seems to fit the definition of ‘assisting,’” Chan said, calling the incident “alarming and horrifying.”
By Joe Garofoli, Political Columnist Updated March 24, 2026 (SFChronicle.com)
Gift Article
From left, Xavier Becerra, Steve Hilton, Matt Mahan, Tom Steyer, Tony Thurmond, Antonio Villaraigosa and Betty Yee take part in a gubernatorial candidate debate on Feb. 3 in San Francisco.Laure Andrillon/Associated Press
California’s Democratic Party appears to be stuck in neutral: The party’s leaders are still unwilling to take decisive steps to push low-polling candidates out of the governor’s race, even as the prospect of the deep-blue state electing a Republican leader looms.
Tuesday marked two developments that underscored the party’s dilemma. First, the University of Southern California canceled a high-profile debate after days of controversy over four lower-polling candidates being excluded under the organizers’ criteria. The party also released a new poll intended to pressure low-performing candidates to drop out. But even those at the bottom immediately signaled their intention to stay in the race.
State Democratic Party leaders, including Gov. Gavin Newsom, appear unwilling to force lower-polling Democrats out of the race, which could help consolidate support behind a Democratic candidate and virtually eliminate the chance of a Republican becoming governor in a state where Democrats have nearly twice as many registered voters. The top two finishers in the June 2 primary, regardless of party affiliation, advance to the general election in November. California has not elected a Republican since 2006. And that person was a global superstar with near-universal name recognition: Arnold Schwarzenegger.
The chance of two Republicans facing off in the general election was 22% on Tuesday, according to an online tool developed by political data expert Paul Mitchell that runs thousands of simulations of the race. Mitchell on Tuesday advised Democrats to unite behind a candidate.
“Dems should consolidate, but there is a chance they won’t,” Mitchell said. “(Republicans) should consolidate, but there is a chance they won’t. In the overlap where the two parties don’t consolidate, Democrats get boxed out of the general election.”
The survey showed two Republicans — former Fox News commentator Steve Hilton (16%) and Riverside County Sheriff Chad Bianco (14%) — are poised to advance to the general election. They are followed by a tie for third place between Rep. Eric Swalwell, former Rep. Katie Porter and billionaire climate activist Tom Steyer with 10% each.
They were followed by former Los Angeles Mayor Antonio Villaraigosa (4%), former Secretary of Health and Human Services Xavier Becerra and San Jose Mayor Matt Mahan each tied with 3% support. Former state Controller Betty Yee had 2% and state Superintendent Tony Thurmond had 1%. The survey found that 24% of voters were undecided.
State Party Chair Rusty Hicks said the polling was conducted by California’s largest Black- and Latina-led polling firm and over-sampled Black, Latino, and Asian American and Pacific Islander voters to ensure their voices are heard.
Equally foreboding for Democrats was a Berkeley IGS Poll released last week that showed a “historically high” level of unawareness of the election. Democrats have long relied on their advantage in voter registration to overwhelm Republicans in California.
Yet Hicks, the leader of the party and the person responsible for its success, declined to say whether he has directly asked candidates to bow out.
“I’m not going to disclose any private conversations that have been had or will have, or any future tactics between now and Election Day,” Hicks said Tuesday. “I have deep respect for all of the candidates that have taken the courageous step to put their name forward. They believe that they have a viable path to win.”
Later, when pressed about what constituted a “viable” candidate, Hicks said, “If you’re polling at 1 to 2%, do you have a path to get to 20(%)? That’s the question. Do you have a path to put you in a position to win the primary election that puts you into the general election?”
Yee, who is polling at 1%, said Tuesday that no state party leaders have asked her to leave the race. At a press conference Tuesday, Yee would not answer directly when asked to lay out her path to win 20% of the vote but said she didn’t think it would take 20% to advance. She also said she would reevaluate her campaign again in mid-April.
Yet for now, Hicks is unwilling to do anything — including ask Newsom, the most popular Democrat in the state and likely a future presidential candidate — to ask the unviable candidates to leave. Hicks insists there is a lot of time left (about 40 days) between now and when ballots arrive in the mail to voters. But Hicks already missed his window, as all of the above candidates will appear on ballots.
“I have long said that we are prepared to do what is required to ensure that we elect a governor in November of 2026. I want to ensure that everybody has the opportunity to make their voices heard in this campaign, and there’s a lot of road between here and there.”
Earlier this month, Newsom acknowledged that with so many Democrats running and a public largely disengaged from the race, he may be forced to endorse a candidate.
“When I’m out in the community, people aren’t talking to me about it, which is interesting this late, just weeks before early voting,” Newsom told reporters. “As a consequence, I’m not directly as engaged as perhaps I might need to be.”
Asking candidates to suspend their campaigns has become a very sensitive issue because many of the lowest-performing hopefuls are people of color.
Four of the lower-polling candidates complained last week in a joint press conference about being excluded from a televised debate that was scheduled to be held Tuesday at USC, noting that the only four candidates of color in the race were not invited. Leaders of the Legislature wrote to USC on Monday, asking the university to include the four candidates, saying if USC doesn’t “do the right thing,” voters should “boycott.”
USC canceled the debate.
And now, Democrats are in a deeper hole.
There’s one fewer statewide televised debate that could have helped voters consolidate behind a single candidate. And the lower-polling candidates are digging in, refusing to leave.
“Instead of wasting hundreds of thousands of dollars on polling, the (California Democratic Party) should be focused on stopping Donald Trump by winning back the House after we passed Prop 50,” said Ajay Mohan, Villaraigosa’s campaign manager.
Yee, polling at 2%, appeared to be oblivious to the latest polling. “The poll confirms what we’ve been saying all along: The race is wide open,” she said. “We’ve never been more confident that when voters begin to focus on the election and see our new ad campaign, we will rise above the field of billionaire-backed candidates and build a grassroots victory for working people across the state.”
Mahan, despite being supported by more billionaires than any other candidate, hasn’t taken off with voters either. The state party-commissioned poll showed him at 3%, slightly lower than where the Berkeley IGS poll clocked him (4%). Yet he said Tuesday he is not quitting.
“We don’t plan on leaving the race,” Mahan said. “We plan on going up in the polls and winning the race, because voters are looking for an alternative to what the field has offered over the past year.
Becerra and Thurmond, the other low single-digit polling candidates, did not respond to requests for comment.
Swalwell’s campaign said the new poll drove home that he is the candidate Democrats should rally behind.
“It’s time for leaders to come together to coalesce around the candidate who has consistently led in support, public polls and primary donations since entering this race,” said Micah Beasley, a campaign spokesperson.
Steyer was trying to organize an alternative forum to be held Tuesday night in Los Angeles for all of the candidates, but those plans fell through. Steyer spokesman Kevin Liao said all of the candidates of color declined to attend. Thurmond said he would instead appear on social media platforms with a former public school teacher to talk about his platform. Yee said she had two other events to attend.
Meanwhile, Republicans are gloating.
“What a total joke California Democrats have become,” Hilton said. “Hours before a debate, they kill it after their LPDs (Low Polling Democrats) whined about being excluded. These people can’t organize anything.”
Joe Garofoli is the San Francisco Chronicle’s senior political writer, covering national and state politics. He has worked at The Chronicle since 2000 and in Bay Area journalism since 1992, when he left the Milwaukee Journal. He is the host of “It’s All Political,” The Chronicle’s political podcast. Catch it here: bit.ly/2LSAUjA
He has won numerous awards and covered everything from fashion to the Jeffrey Dahmer serial killings to two Olympic Games to his own vasectomy — which he discussed on NPR’s “Talk of the Nation” after being told he couldn’t say the word “balls” on the air. He regularly appears on Bay Area radio and TV talking politics and is available to entertain at bar mitzvahs and First Communions. He is a graduate of Northwestern University and a proud native of Pittsburgh. Go Steelers!
Federal immigration agents walk through Terminal 5 at John F. Kennedy International Airport (JFK) in the Queens borough of New York, Monday, March 23, 2026. (AP Photo/Ryan Murphy)
Travelers throughout the country are dealing with endless lines and Immigration and Customs Enforcement agents, who’ve been deployed by President Trump to support TSA agents during the government shutdown. But the agents haven’t been deployed to the Oakland San Francisco Bay Airport or San Francisco International Airport.
According to CNN, ICE agents have been deployed at 14 airports as of Monday, while the New York Times reports that between 100 and 150 agents have been sent in to help with long security lines. None of the listed airports are in the Bay Area, but several outlets reported that ICE agents appeared to restrain a woman and her daughter inside SFO’s Terminal 3 on Sunday night. SFO officials said federal officers were escorting individuals on an outbound flight, and the Trump administration said it was unrelated to its deployment of ICE agents to airports..
White House border czar Tom Homan said Monday that residents should expect to see ICE agents at more airports in the future.
The deployment follows weeks of fighting in Congress over a funding package for the Department of Homeland Security. Democrats have refused to fund ICE or Customs and Border Protection without changes to their operations after agents killed two people in Minneapolis. Trump has pushed Republicans in Congress to not accept any deal unless Democrats agree to pass a bill that would make it more difficult for millions of Americans to vote in elections.
Airport spokesperson Kaley Skantz said that OAK hasn’t been advised of any deployments of ICE agents to the airport at this time, or any other operational changes.
SFO is one of around 20 U.S. airports that staff security checkpoints with private contractors instead of federal TSA agents, the SF Chronicle reported, noting that the contractors are still being paid.
In a statement, DHS Acting Assistant Secretary Lauren Bis declined to confirm the locations of officers. “President Trump is taking action to deploy hundreds of ICE officers, who are currently funded by Congress, to airports being adversely impacted,” Bis said in an email. “This will help bolster TSA efforts to keep our skies safe and minimize air travel disruptions.”
As unpaid TSA agents call out of work, airports in some cities have seen nightmarish lines. CNN reported that wait times at Houston hit 270 minutes, while at JFK in New York, it’s over an hour. An airplane crash at one of New York’s other major airports early Monday morning resulted in numerous flight cancellations.
Travelers in Oakland thus far haven’t been impacted. Skaley said that OAK “has not experienced longer than typical TSA passenger lines recently.”
“We continue to recommend that passengers arrive at the airport at least two hours prior to their flight for domestic travel, and at least three hours prior for international,” Kaley said in an email.
Several Reddit users have also reported nothing amiss at OAK.
“I arrived at 8:11am on 3/23 for a flight,” one commenter reported Monday morning. “No lines at check point. 5 minutes to clear the bags through the scanner. This was for all lines.”
We will gather at 11:30 AM at Embarcadero Plaza, with overflow to Sue Bierman Park.
At 12:00 noon, we will march up Market St. and McAllister St. to Civic Center Plaza.
At 2 PM, the rally at Civic Center Plaza will start. There will also be a resistance tabling fair at the neighboring Fulton Plaza.
Please join us and spread the word so that we can have the biggest, most powerful march yet.
Join us for a March from Embarcadero Plaza to Civic Center Plaza, with a rally and resistance fair to follow. We will come together to promote ways to stand strong against the Trump and MAGA regime, protect our communities from ICE, and get ready for a Blue Wave in 2026.
What began in 2025 as a single day of defiance has become a sustained national resistance to tyranny, spreading from small towns to city centers and across every community determined to defend democracy. Our peaceful movement is bigger than ever.
When our families are under attack and costs are pushing people to the brink, silence is not an option. We will defend ourselves and our communities against this administration’s unjust and cruel acts of violence.
On March 28th, rise up, take to the streets, and say it loud: no thrones, no crowns, no kings. We’re not watching history happen—we’re making it. Join us.
A core principle behind all No Kings events is a commitment to nonviolent action. We expect all participants to seek to de-escalate any potential confrontation with those who disagree with our values and to act lawfully at these events. Weapons of any kind, including those legally permitted, should not be brought to events.Read more
Accessibility
This event meets ADA standards
Accessible restrooms
Mainly flat ground
No stairs or steps
ASL interpretation
Wheelchair ramp
Have accessibility questions? Reply to your registration email to confirm your requirements or request more information.
We have the power and are claiming it together. No Thrones. No Crowns. No Kings.
What began in 2025 as a single day of defiance has become a sustained national resistance to tyranny, spreading from small towns to city centers and across every community determined to defend democracy. Our peaceful movement is bigger than ever.
When our families are under attack and costs are pushing people to the brink, silence is not an option. We will defend ourselves and our communities against this administration’s unjust and cruel acts of violence.
On March 28th, rise up, take to the streets, and say it loud: no thrones, no crowns, no kings. We’re not watching history happen—we’re making it. Join us.
A core principle behind all No Kings events is a commitment to nonviolent action. We expect all participants to seek to de-escalate any potential confrontation with those who disagree with our values and to act lawfully at these events. Weapons of any kind, including those legally permitted, should not be brought to events.
Join peaceful people from San Francisco Bay communities and all walks of life for a family-friendly, inclusive and peaceful event on March 28th where we will create a new work of human art together on Ocean Beach. We have more power than we know!
The exact design for this banner is still being developed, and the message’s theme (always subject to last-minute changes) will be announced closer to the event.
When: Saturday, March 28th – Arrive by 11:30 am Location: Ocean Beach, SF – Stairwell 17
Directly across from the Beach Chalet — 1000 Great Highway, SF, CA, 94121 — closest intersection is Fulton and Great Highway.
Please Plan to Arrive at the Beach by 11:30 am – This will ensure we are all in place for photography by our drone crews at NOON SHARP. The event will wrap up by about 1:00 pm.
PLEASE REMEMBER TO REGISTER – Knowing how many people will attend really helps us with the banner design calculations. THANK YOU!
UC Berkeley law professor Brian Galle: “It’s just fair for [the richest Americans] to pay the same share of their economic income as the rest of us.”Craig Lee/The Examiner
Although Brian Galle is one of the co-authors of California’s proposed billionaire tax, he said he doesn’t think it’s the be-all-and-end-all for getting the ultrawealthy to pay what he sees as their fair share.
Instead, the tax-law expert and law professor at UC Berkeley thinks there needs to be a more fundamental, permanent and national change to the way the country assesses the richest among us.
Earlier this year, the left-leaning Roosevelt Institute published online “How to Tax the Ultrarich,” Galle’s book-length proposal for how to do that. Revolving around what he calls FAST — short for the Fair Share Tax — his plan would significantly revise how the federal government taxes investments, a crucial part of assessing billionaires and centimillionaires.
Galle’s proposal is designed to make the tax system fairer by upping the often minuscule effective tax rate the ultraweatlhy pay. In doing so, it could limit the growth of wealth inequality while raising hundreds of billions and potentially trillions of dollars, he argues.
“It’s just fair for [the richest Americans] to pay the same share of their economic income as the rest of us,” he said in an interview with The Examiner. “Right now, they mostly escape from that obligation.”
Guests including Mark Zuckerberg, Jeff Bezos, Sundar Pichai and Elon Musk, arrive before the 60th Presidential Inauguration in the Rotunda of the U.S. Capitol in Washington, Monday, Jan. 20, 2025. Zuckerberg’s Meta and Musk have sought to stop OpenAi’s transition to a for-profit company.Julia Demaree Nikhinson
For his part, Galle has been working on proposals to tax billionaires and the richest Americans for years. In addition to his work on the California billionaires tax, his new book builds on his previous academic work in the field as well as prior policy plans he’s contributed to, including former President Joe Biden’s Billionaires’ Minimum Income Tax proposal, which ultimately died in Congress.
What Galle’s new proposal and related other ones attempt to rectify is the fact that the ultrawealthy tend to pay exceedingly low tax rates even as their wealth balloons.
The federal income tax is an imposition on wages and salaries, but many of the richest people in the country report relatively modest income from such sources. That’s because for people in that class, most of the growth in their wealth generally comes not from high salaries but from the appreciation of the assets they hold, such as stocks, bonds and real estate.
The government does tax income from investments through the capital-gains tax, but the rate is significantly lower than the top income-tax rate. People only have to pay the capital-gains tax when they sell assets and make gains on them. And they can wipe out other gains or income — and any corresponding tax liabilities — if they sell assets at a loss.
Instead of taking a salary or selling assets, many of the ultrarich fund their regular activities and lifestyles by borrowing against their assets. Even though the cash from such loans is used like regular income, the loans aren’t subject to income taxes.
The proposed billionaire tax would get around all of that by assessing a direct tax on the wealth — other than personal property — held by California residents who have more than $1 billion in assets. Such people would be required to pay a 5% one-time imposition on their assets.
Politicians such as U.S. Senators Bernie Sanders of Vermont and Elizabeth Warren of Massachusetts have proposed similar wealth taxes that would be imposed nationwide. Other politicians have proposed what are called mark-to-market taxes, in which people would pay a tax on the amount by which their wealth increased — or earn credit based on how much it decreased — each year. Additionally some politicians have proposed treating borrowing used to fund personal consumption as essentially income and taxing it as such.
The problem with wealth and mark-to-market taxes is that the Supreme Court in a 2024 ruling indicated it could rule both kinds of taxes unconstitutional, Galle and other legal scholars believe.
The 16th Amendment to the Constitution legalized income taxes, but the Court suggested in Moore et ux. v. United States, that it wouldn’t sign off on allowing unsold assets to be considered income. Taxing borrowing as income could face similar constitutional problems, Galle argues.
Because of the Court’s ruling, if you want to have a tax that acts like a wealth or mark-to-market imposition, “you need to have an alternative structure,” said David Gamage, a law professor at the University of Missouri who focuses on tax law and is one of Galle’s frequent collaborators.
Galle designed FAST to be just such an alternative. Unlike a straight wealth or mark-to-market tax, it would be enforced only after people sold their assets, so it would get around the obstacle the Supreme Court hinted at in the Moore case. But people’s tax liabilities would increase in tandem with the returns on their investments, mimicking a wealth or mark-to-market tax. To ensure that the tax only hit the wealthiest Americans, it would exempt the first $15 million of assets.
So, assuming a base 23.8% rate on long-term investment gains — the rate applicable to those in the highest income bracket — those whose assets had doubled in value would pay a tax equivalent to 15% of the total value of their assets. Those whose assets had increased in value by 10 times would pay a tax equivalent to 42% of their assets’ total value. And those who had seen a return of 100 times would owe a tax equal to 67% of their assets.
Under Galle’s proposal, people choose to pay early, before they sell their assets, and even as often as every year. Those that do so would have incentive to do so — they would effectively pay lower rates on their unrealized gains. That option to pay early would allow the tax to function in practice — at least in part — similar to an annual wealth or mark-to-market tax, bringing in regular revenue, rather than only at the time of sale.
FAST would get around borrowing by focusing on people’s assets. People would have no incentive to sell assets early for a loss to decrease their reported incomes, because the FAST liability applies to all of their assets.
Reuven Avi-Yonah, a law professor at the University of Michigan who also focuses on tax policy, said he was impressed with the proposal.
Given the Supreme Court’s ruling, “this is the most practically feasible proposal that’s out there,” he said.
Galle said reforming the federal tax code is important in part to address growing inequality and the political and economic instability that comes with it.
“That looks like disproportionate power,” Galle said.
But he said reform is also necessary to address the fundamental unfairness that results in the ultrawealthy often having effective tax rates that are a fraction of what even middle- or working-class people pay.
Between 2014 and 2018, then-Berkshire Hathaway CEO Warren Buffet saw his wealth increase by $24 billion — but he only paid $23.7 million in taxes, an effective rate of about 0.1%, according to the investigative-journalism website ProPublica. Former Amazon CEO Jeff Bezos’ wealth jumped by $99 billion over the same time frame. He paid $973 million in taxes, or about 1% of that increase, ProPublica reported.
And in numerous cases, the ultrawealthy paid no income taxes at all in particular years. Bezos, for example, didn’t pay any federal income tax in 2007 or 2011, according to ProPublica.
From 2006 to 2018, Bezos’ wealth grew by $127.8 billion, but he only paid $1.4 billion in taxes, ProPublica reported. By contrast, the report said, the typical American household paid $142,000 in taxes over that same period while seeing its wealth only go up by $89,000, thanks largely to the hits home values took from the Great Recession.
Because the tax rates paid by the ultrarich on their wealth accumulation are so much lower than those paid by everyone else, the tax system is “helping them to become richer faster,” Galle said.
In theory, estate and gift taxes should level the playing field, allowing the federal government to take a sizable chunk of that accumulated wealth at the time billionaires or centimillionaires die, and limiting the creation of multigenerational dynasties.
But that’s not actually what happens in practice, tax experts say. Instead, when someone dies, the cost basis for the investments they hold is “stepped up” to the fair market value at the time of their death. That allows the gains from those investments up to that point to permanently avoid being taxed.
Meanwhile, the affluent have found legal ways, including using trusts, to pass on much of their wealth to their heirs tax-free. In a previous report, Galle and some fellow researchers estimated that the wealthy have stocked away in trusts more than $5 trillion in assets that would otherwise be subject to tax but now won’t ever be.
Part of Galle’s proposal is to eliminate that step-up provision at death and to have the FAST liability carry over to inheritors. He also would impose a 40% inheritance tax on everything not covered by FAST. But that liability would work much like FAST, being enforced only when people sell their assets, but increasing in tandem with the rise in the assets value.
Gamage said that he generally likes Galle’s plan, but its increase in liability as assets rise in value over time could give the wealthiest Americans an incentive to game the system. Without provisions forcing them to pay taxes on their gains early, they could try to hold out until they can persuade politicians to change or eliminate the tax or give them some kind of tax holiday. Congress has done similar things numerous times in the past, he noted.
“I would put more pressure than he does on taxing what you can in the interim,” Gamage said.
Avi-Yonah said the problem with Galle’s proposal is that it wouldn’t do much to address rising inequality. For him, a better method would be to bolster entitlement programs. The expansion of the Child Tax Credit in 2021 dramatically reduced poverty levels, he noted, bringing child poverty down to its lowest recorded level ever.
Avi-Yonah said he advocates not for a FAST or wealth tax but a consumption tax, similar to those seen in Europe, as a way to fund such efforts, because they could easily bring in vastly more revenue.
“The key” to addressing inequality “is less taxing the rich and more raising the bottom and the middle class,” he said. “But both are necessary.”
Any effort to reform the tax system is likely to nowhere as long as Trump is in the White House and Republicans control the Congress, Galle said.
In his two terms in office, Trump has pushed through two major rounds of tax cuts favoring the wealthy, including last year’s One Big Beautiful Bill. And Republicans have made cutting taxes central to their brand, even at the expense of ever-widening deficits, not to mention income and wealth inequality.
Galle said he started working on his proposal before the 2024 election that brought unified Republican control to Washington, but he was thinking of abandoning the effort in the wake of that outcome.
But that November, he said, he ended up sharing a cab ride with a Treasury Department official he declined to name who worked under Joe Biden. When Galle expressed his doubts, the official advised him to go forward anyway.
“It takes a long time to write good tax legislation,” he said she told him. “You should get started on it.”
When George W. Bush invaded Iraq in March, 2003, protesters shut down San Francisco. Tens of thousands took the streets; Market St. was closed for 24 hours. Hundreds were arrested. Similar actions happened around the country.
That invasion, of course, involved troops on the ground, and was a spectacular failure.
The last No Kings protest in SF attracted a huge crowd. This weekend could be bigger.
Now Donald Trump is bombing Iran, and (so far) hasn’t send US soldiers into that country, and we haven’t seen mass protests—yet. That’s in part because in 2003, we all knew what Bush was about to do, and had time to prepare: I remember writing editorials in the Bay Guardian weeks in advance saying that the minute an invasion happens, we should all walk out of work and take to the streets. Trump sprung this on everyone without warning.
Also: We are, I think, so weary of outrages—the deportations, the killings, the end of due process, the decimation of climate science, the attack on education and free speech, the decimation of Gaza, the racism and undermining of women’s basic rights to body autonomy, the oligarchy and corruption … it’s endless.
But we have a chance to show widespread opposition to All Things Trump with the Saturday/28 nationwide No Kings rallies. Two events happen in San Francisco: A main rally starting at 11:30 am at Embarcadero Plaza, and a No Kings human banner at Ocean Beach, starting at 11am.
The Democratic Party, which is poised to win the Congressional midterms, has a long history of snatching defeat from the jaws of victory. If the candidates manage to turn some of the energy of the protests into organizing and votes in November, they could see substantial gains.
Or the leaders could ignore the grassroots once again, and lose races they had every chance to win.
Nasty hit pieces in political campaigns often come late, just before ballots drop, when the candidate under attack has less time to respond. But the Big Tech and Big Real Estate allies of State Sen. Scott Wiener aren’t waiting until the last minute; they just sent out a hit piece on Saikat Chakrabarti implying that he lives in Maryland, not San Francisco.
Sponsored link
Paid for by tech lords Chris Larsen and Gary Tan, among others
Some mortgage lenders charge different rates for primary and secondary homes, and some states give tax exemptions for primary residences. (In Maryland, the Homestead Exemption caps property tax increases for primary homes at 10 percent a year).
Chakrabarti says he made a mistake, that he never lived at the Maryland house, and that he never filed for a tax exemption. He gave the Standard a loan document that said the place was not his primary residence.
(I don’t understand why someone worth more than $100 million would take out a loan to buy a $1.6 million house, but I don’t live in that world.)
Chakrabarti says he has lived in SF since 2019. Records at the Department of Elections show that he started voting here in 2020, and voted in every local and state election since. (If he voted here and didn’t live here, that would be way more serious than the homestead paperwork.)
A Political Action Committee called (sorry, but it’s true) “Abundant Future” paid for the ad. A quick look at federal election records shows that the PAC has exactly six donors, who represent the cream of tech and real estate in San Francisco, starting with Chris Larsen, Gary Tan, and Dianne Wilsey. Also: Jeremy Stoppelman, the CEO of Yelp, and Jeremey Liew, a tech investor.
Together they have put up 235,000, and while they have reported no spending yet, that’s clearly money to help Wiener.
The piece, which appears to be aimed at younger voters (I didn’t get one, neither did my partner, but younger people I know did) dropped the same week that Wiener held a press conference with Tan to announce legislation that will help tech startups.
The Issues and Resolutions Committee of the Democratic County Central Committee will hear arguments for and against the Overpaid CEO Tax Monday/23. The measure is backed by labor groups, and is an effort to blunt the impacts of Trump cuts on essential services. It’s another modest effort to tax the very rich and the biggest corporations in San Francisco.
The right wing of the party controls the DCCC in San Francisco, but it’s going to be hard for even the so-called “moderates” to side with the Chamber of Commerce over most of the labor unions in town. Or maybe not. You can watch the discussion here.
Full disclosure: My daughter works for Connie Chan for Congress.
48 Hills welcomes comments in the form of letters to the editor, which you can submit here. We also invite you to join the conversation on our Facebook, Twitter, and Instagram.
Tim Redmond has been a political and investigative reporter in San Francisco for more than 30 years. He spent much of that time as executive editor of the Bay Guardian. He is the founder of 48hills.
Get ready for No Kings (this Saturday, March 28)! Have you found your closest protest? Told three friends about it? Checked out our trainings and other resources? Great! Now keep spreading the word — on social media, among friends, at a local overpass, or wherever you can. In the face of Trump’s bloody war, ICE terror, Epstein cover-up, efforts to rig elections, and bottomless corruption, No Kings 3 has to be the biggest protest this country has ever seen. See you there!
Tell Congress: DON’T FUND TRUMP’S WAR! The war on Iran has been a disaster since Trump and his cabinet of warmongers and sycophants launched it. As of this writing, thirteen US servicemembers, 1,500 Iranians, and over 1,100 civilians across the region have been killed. That carnage has already cost taxpayers billions of dollars and sent the cost of basic necessities through the roof. Demand that your senators and representative use their power to refuse Trump’s demand for more money, conduct meaningful oversight, keep forcing votes on War Powers Resolutions, and oppose the war publicly.
This Sunday’s Town Hall: Announcing This Week’s Progressive Town Hall: Every Sunday at 4pm ET/1pm PT RSVP HERE Join PDA activists online from across the country to discuss the importance of progressives reclaiming the American story from the MAGA right, an issue of heightened importance as we’re now within one... Continue reading →
We protest Heritage Foundation EVERY MONDAY (Join us!!!!) By admin | September 2, 2025 | Uncategorized Cliff Cash Comedy Premiered Jul 26, 2025 Every Monday at The Heritage Foundation 214 Massachusetts Ave. Washington D.C. 4pm protest 6pm pizza Every Friday at Fox News D.C. 400 N. Capitol St. Washington D.C. 4pm protest 6pm pizza We are... Continue reading →
Join the San Francisco Public Press and KALW for a panel discussion about San Francisco’s propositions C and D, the competing business tax measures described in the articles linked above in this newsletter. Where: KALW, 220 Montgomery St., San Francisco When: Tuesday, May 19, at 6 p.m. RSVP via Eventbrite. What questions... Continue reading →
Milk Club May General Membership Meeting Date: Tuesday, May 19 Time: 7-9 PM Location: SF LGBT Center, 1800 Market Street, San Francisco Zoom Link: Click here
One Million Rising: Strategic Non-Cooperation to Fight Authoritarianism Virtual Event · Hosted by No Kings Time Wednesdays 8 – 9:30pm EDT Location Virtual event Join from anywhere About this event Across the country, authoritarian forces are getting bolder and more dangerous. Trump and his allies are not hiding their agenda: mass deportations,... Continue reading →
THURSDAY, JUNE 29, 2023 AT 2 AM – 4 AM PDT How to create trust in a group? Details Event by Extinction Rebellion Empathy Circles online EMPATHY CAFE Duration: 2 hr Public · Anyone on or off Facebook How to create trust in a group? This is the question that arose in our... Continue reading →
Unstoppable: Milk Club 50th Anniversary Gayla Date: Friday, May 22 Reception: 6PM Dinner and Awards: 7:30PM Concert: 9PM Location: San Francisco Design Center Galleria Tickets: Click here to buy tickets
When you volunteer for Saikat, it’s on us to give you a great experience and a genuine chance to make a difference. We don’t want to waste a second of your time. That’s why we’re always optimizing. And I’m excited to report that this Saturday we talked with 300% more... Continue reading →
Trump Regime Takedown: Every Saturday Saturday, March 7, 2026 12:00 PM 2:00 PM Tesla San Francisco999 Van Ness AvenueSan Francisco, CA, 94109United States (map) Google Calendar ICS Keep democracy alive every Saturday by showing up, taking a stand, and sticking together for the long haul. Standing together is better than standing alone. Let’s get together... Continue reading →
![NO KINGS [Human Banner-SF Ocean Beach] organized by No Kings](https://mobilizeamerica.imgix.net/uploads/organization/NK3_March%2028_16x9_20260210190658163114.png?auto=format&crop=faces&fit=crop&h=494.24083769633506&w=944)
This Sunday’s Town Hall: Announcing This Week’s Progressive Town Hall: Every Sunday at 4pm ET/1pm PT RSVP HERE Join PDA activists online from across the country to discuss the importance of progressives reclaiming the American story from the MAGA right, an issue of heightened importance as we’re now within one... Continue readingMay18Mon4:00 pm Protest Heritage Foundation @ The Heritage FoundationProtest Heritage Foundation @ The Heritage FoundationMay 18 @ 4:00 pm – 6:00 pmWe protest Heritage Foundation EVERY MONDAY (Join us!!!!) By admin | September 2, 2025 | Uncategorized Cliff Cash Comedy Premiered Jul 26, 2025 Every Monday at The Heritage Foundation 214 Massachusetts Ave. Washington D.C. 4pm protest 6pm pizza Every Friday at Fox News D.C. 400 N. Capitol St. Washington D.C. 4pm protest 6pm pizza We are... Continue readingMay19Tue6:00 pm SF’s propositions C and D @ KALWSF’s propositions C and D @ KALWMay 19 @ 6:00 pm – 7:30 pm
Join the San Francisco Public Press and KALW for a panel discussion about San Francisco’s propositions C and D, the competing business tax measures described in the articles linked above in this newsletter. Where: KALW, 220 Montgomery St., San Francisco When: Tuesday, May 19, at 6 p.m. RSVP via Eventbrite. What questions... Continue reading7:00 pm Milk Club May General Membership... @ SF LGBT Center and Zoom San FranciscoMilk Club May General Membership... @ SF LGBT Center and Zoom San FranciscoMay 19 @ 7:00 pm – 9:00 pmMilk Club May General Membership Meeting Date: Tuesday, May 19 Time: 7-9 PM Location: SF LGBT Center, 1800 Market Street, San Francisco Zoom Link: Click hereMay20Wed5:00 pm One Million Rising @ Virtual eventOne Million Rising @ Virtual eventMay 20 @ 5:00 pm – 6:30 pm
One Million Rising: Strategic Non-Cooperation to Fight Authoritarianism Virtual Event · Hosted by No Kings Time Wednesdays 8 – 9:30pm EDT Location Virtual event Join from anywhere About this event Across the country, authoritarian forces are getting bolder and more dangerous. Trump and his allies are not hiding their agenda: mass deportations,... Continue readingMay21Thu10:00 am Extinction Rebellion Empathy Circle @ Online via ZoomExtinction Rebellion Empathy Circle @ Online via ZoomMay 21 @ 10:00 am – 12:00 pm
THURSDAY, JUNE 29, 2023 AT 2 AM – 4 AM PDT How to create trust in a group? Details Event by Extinction Rebellion Empathy Circles online EMPATHY CAFE Duration: 2 hr Public · Anyone on or off Facebook How to create trust in a group? This is the question that arose in our... Continue readingMay22Fri6:00 pm Unstoppable: Milk Club 50th Anni... @ SF Design Center GalleriaUnstoppable: Milk Club 50th Anni... @ SF Design Center GalleriaMay 22 @ 6:00 pm – 9:00 pmUnstoppable: Milk Club 50th Anniversary Gayla Date: Friday, May 22 Reception: 6PM Dinner and Awards: 7:30PM Concert: 9PM Location: San Francisco Design Center Galleria Tickets: Click here to buy ticketsMay23Sat11:00 am Door knock for Saikat @ Dolores ParkDoor knock for Saikat @ Dolores ParkMay 23 @ 11:00 am – 3:00 pm
When you volunteer for Saikat, it’s on us to give you a great experience and a genuine chance to make a difference. We don’t want to waste a second of your time. That’s why we’re always optimizing. And I’m excited to report that this Saturday we talked with 300% more... Continue reading12:00 pm Trump Regime Takedown @ Tesla San FranciscoTrump Regime Takedown @ Tesla San FranciscoMay 23 @ 12:00 pm – 2:00 pmTrump Regime Takedown: Every Saturday Saturday, March 7, 2026 12:00 PM 2:00 PM Tesla San Francisco999 Van Ness AvenueSan Francisco, CA, 94109United States (map) Google Calendar ICS Keep democracy alive every Saturday by showing up, taking a stand, and sticking together for the long haul. Standing together is better than standing alone. Let’s get together... Continue reading