Race for Nancy Pelosi’s seat goes to Chinatown, where Taiwan takes the stage

It was Taiwan, not Gaza, that got top billing as Chinese-speaking grandpas took meticulous notes throughout the evening. 

A woman with short black hair wearing a light gray sweater stands in front of a plain white background, looking directly at the camera with a neutral expression.by Yujie Zhou March 15, 2026 (MissionLocal.org)

Six people stand side by side indoors, dressed in business attire, posing and smiling for a group photo.
Congressional candidates Saikat, Chakrabarti, Connie Chan, Marie Hurabiell and Scott Wiener participate in a forum at Chinatown’s Victory Hall on March 14, 2026. Photo by Yujie Zhou.

Supervisor Connie Chan, a self-described “Chinatown daughter” and the only major Chinese American candidate in the race to replace Nancy Pelosi in Congress, leaned into identity politics at a Saturday forum in front of more than 200 residents at Chinatown’s Victory Hall.

“This is a historical moment for us, for our community to take our voice from San Francisco to Washington, D.C,” said Chan who talked about immigrating with her single mother and a brother to San Francisco’s Chinatown without knowing a single word of English. “I understand our pain and I understand our voices.” 

Although there have been two earlier forums, Saturday was the first time the three leading candidates shared a stage since Jan. 7. In that forum, State Sen. Scott Wiener’s failure to clearly answer a question about genocide in Gaza created a backlash. Wiener now uses the word genocide in regard to Gaza.

It was Taiwan, not Gaza, however, that got top billing on Saturday night. The audience listened closely to the candidate’s answers, with Chinese-speaking seniors taking meticulous notes on slips of paper throughout the evening. 

Taiwan is the foreign policy issue that figures most prominently among Chinese American voters, who account for more than 16 percent of the electorate in California’s 11th congressional district. Whoever wins this race will replace Rep. Pelosi, who in 2022 became the highest-ranking U.S. official to visit the island in 25 years. That visit aggravated mainland China’s government, which subsequently encircled the island with unprecedented military exercises.

“I do not agree with her decision,” said Saikat Chakrabarti, a centimillionaire candidate, who received the loudest applause and cheers of the evening in response to that question on Pelosi’s visit.

Chinese American voters here largely saw the visit as inflammatory. They rank maintaining peace with China around Taiwan as a top priority

“That was a provocative action, and the absolute worst thing that could happen right now is a full-on war with China,” Chakrabarti added.

He said he sees a bipartisan hawkishness towards China in Washington, which has resulted in a Cold War that led to an increase in anti-Asian hate within the United States. “In Congress, I will fight to stop the Cold War with China,” he said. The audience burst into applause. 

In January, however, Chakrabarti was the only candidate who, when asked whether the United States should use force to defend Taiwan if it was invaded by China, said yes, it should. Both Wiener and Chan sidestepped the question.

Wiener got booed, a bit, when he said he supports Pelosi’s decisions. 

Chan, who needs both Chinese votes and Pelosi’s endorsement, avoided directly answering the question, simply emphasizing that the Taiwan issue “is deeply personal” given her years in Hong Kong and Taiwan, and said the United States should be an agent for peace. “I advocate for us to really make sure that we encourage Taiwan and China that direct dialogue is important.”

For much of the evening, the candidates stressed their bona fides. As the only Cantonese speaker, Chan had an apparent advantage, doubling her speaking time by deftly interpreting her own answers into Cantonese. The other candidates relied on interpreters.

Wiener emphasized his contributions to the Chinese community, citing work on affordable housing, expanding access to healthcare, acupuncture benefits, protecting funding for Muni and BART, reinstating eighth-grade algebra, pushing back against anti-Asian hate, fighting against vehicle break-ins, and delivering resources for the Chinese Hospital, the Chinese Cultural Center, Wah Mei School, and Portsmouth Square.

The list he wanted to present was so long that the time-up alert rang before he finished. 

Chakrabarti, who has spent less time courting Chinese American voters and only finalized his Chinese name months ago, tried to dazzle the audience by spotlighting his resume: a Harvard University graduate, a main contributor to Bernie Sanders’ 2016 presidential campaign, a leading role on Alexandria Ocasio-Cortez’s 2018 congressional campaign, and an author of the Green New Deal. 

An unexpected participant was Marie Hurabiell, whose resume is in a league of its own compared to the other three. Hurabiell was a Trump appointee to the Presidio Trust board, remained a registered Republican until 2022 and wrote in a June 2025 social media post that “Trans women are NOT women.”

“For one end of the spectrum, there are three people in the race. The entire rest of the spectrum … there’s no one,” Hurabiell said in an interview. She said she entered the race two weeks ago because she felt compelled to “give people a choice.” 

During the forum, Hurabiell was often the lone candidate who did not blame Trump for the current state of affairs with China. Hurabiell also runs the pressure group Connected SF, and previously ran unsuccessfully twice for the City College Board of Trustees. Chakrabarti frequently invokes Sanders and Ocasio-Cortez; Hurabiell does not criticize President Donald Trump, and she is running on her association with Mayor Daniel Lurie — her campaign website claims Connected SF played a key role in electing Lurie. 

Hurabiell believes a significant portion of the Chinese American community belongs to the spectrum that she represents, so at Victory Hall she pointed to the ideological similarities. “We have stood shoulder to shoulder in these fights,” she said at her first forum, referring to the 2022 recall of former District Attorney Chesa Boudin, the 2022 recall of school board members, and the fights for algebra in school and to keep merit-based admission at Lowell. 

The forum was co-hosted by San Francisco’s three Chinese political clubs, the Chinese American Democratic club, the Edwin M. Lee Asian Pacific Democratic Club, and Rose Pak Asian American Club. “All three clubs have worked very hard over the past several weeks to make this event possible,” said Jeremy Lee, president of Rose Pak Asian American Club.

To protect the monolingual Chinese-speaking audience and non-Chinese speaking candidates, moderators warned all interpreters that they would be replaced if their interpretation was materially different from the candidate’s statement three times. It worked. 

On several occasions, the bilingual organizers and campaign staff pointed out inaccuracies in the nuanced political translation, and interpreters corrected them immediately.

Throughout the forum, Chakrabarti emphasized cutting the military budget and ending corruption in Congress, including banning members of Congress from doing insider stock trading and ending corporate money in politics. “I’m also the only one willing to take on not just Republicans, but a corrupt Democratic establishment,” he said. He also committed to doing town halls multiple times a year when he becomes San Francisco’s representative.  

Chan pledged to fight for working families and a future that has free City College for all. “We will take our working people’s agenda, our immigrant agenda from Chinatown, from San Francisco, and all the way to Washington, D.C.,” she said. 

Wiener, who recently unveiled an ambitious housing platform to build eight million homes over the next decade, returned repeatedly to housing policy. 

After being led for four decades by a leader “who has moved mountains for San Francisco,” said Wiener, who does the city need next? 

Wiener’s answer: “We need someone who wakes up every morning thinking, what am I going to do for San Francisco today? That is what I do.” 


An earlier version of this article included guidelines the Scott Wiener campaign sent to previous debate organizers, but not the organizers of this event. The reference has been removed.

A group of ten people standing outdoors in a park with a city skyline in the background.

Join the 3,300 readers who keep Mission Local free for all!

Because of you, Mission Local reached and surpassed our $300,000 year-end fundraising goal. All we can say is thank you. 

Thank you for choosing to invest in a local newsroom rooted in San Francisco’s communities — one that listens first and reports deeply. 

If you haven’t yet had a chance to give, it’s not too late to be part of this community. Your contribution today helps sustain the reporting our city relies on all year long.

We’re grateful you’re here — and we’d be honored to have you join our donors.

Donate

Latest election coverage

Sunset Dunes park supporters face an election with no clear candidate

Sunset Dunes park supporters face an election with no clear candidate

S.F. ethics probe flags lapses in Mark Farrell’s 2024 mayor campaign

S.F. ethics probe flags lapses in Mark Farrell’s 2024 mayor campaign

Meet the District 2 Candidates: Should S.F. loosen rules for planting and removing trees?

Meet the District 2 Candidates: Should S.F. loosen rules for planting and removing trees?

Yujie ZhouStaff reporter

yujie@missionlocal.com

Yujie is a staff reporter covering city hall with a focus on the Asian community. She came on as an intern after graduating from Columbia University’s Graduate School of Journalism and became a full-time staff reporter as a Report for America corps member and has stayed on. Before falling in love with San Francisco, Yujie covered New York City, studied politics through the “street clashes” in Hong Kong, and earned a wine-tasting certificate in two days. She’s proud to be a bilingual journalist. Find her on Signal @Yujie_ZZ.01More by Yujie Zhou

As His Iran War Drives Up Oil Prices, Trump Orders Restart of California Offshore Drilling

Offshore oil platform with Santa Cruz Island in the background, Santa Barbara Channel, California

An offshore oil platform with Santa Cruz Island in the background is seen in Santa Barbara Channel, California. 

(Photo by Marli Miller/UCG/Universal Images Group via Getty Images)

“Mandating a restart of these defective oil pipelines won’t curb high gas prices, but it will put coastal wildlife at huge risk of another oil spill,” one advocate said.

Olivia Rosane

Mar 14, 2026 (CommonDreams.org)

State leaders and environmental advocates responded with outrage after the Trump administration on Friday ordered the restarting of a California pipeline that caused one of the largest oil spills in the state’s history, a move that comes as oil prices have skyrocketed following President Donald Trump’s launching of an illegal war against Iran and Iran’s subsequent closure of the Strait of Hormuz.

After Trump issued an executive order on Friday authorizing the Department of Energy (DOE) to ramp up oil and gas development under the Defense Production Act, Energy Secretary Chris Wright ordered Sable Offshore Corp. to restart operations on the Santa Ynez Unit and Pipeline System, which include an offshore rig and a network of offshore and onshore pipelines along the Santa Barbara coast. Among them is a pipeline that ruptured in 2015, spilling around 450,000 gallons of oil into Refugio State Beach and killing hundreds of marine mammals and sea birds.

RECOMMENDED…

Trump's Unprovoked War on Iran Triggers 10% Spike in Global Oil Prices

Trump’s Unprovoked War on Iran Triggers 10% Spike in Global Oil Prices

Gas Prices Continue To Rise Amid Iran War

With War on Iran, Trump Is ‘Flooring the Gas Pedal as He Drives US Economy Over a Cliff’

“Californians have repeatedly rejected dangerous drilling off our coast for decades,” Sen. Alex Padilla (D-Calif.) said in a statement on Saturday. “Now, after dragging the US into a war with Iran and driving up oil prices, the Trump administration is trying to exploit this crisis to further enrich the oil industry at the expense of our communities and our environment.”

In his statement, Wright emphasized the defense benefits of resuming drilling, arguing that “today’s order will strengthen America’s oil supply and restore a pipeline system vital to our national security and defense, ensuring that West Coast military installations have the reliable energy critical to military readiness.”

“Directing a private oil company to push its project through without safety checks and adherence to California laws that keep our coast safe is appalling and illegal.”

The DOE added that “Sable’s facility can produce approximately 50,000 barrels of oil per day, a 15% increase to California’s in-state oil production, that can replace nearly 1.5 million barrels of foreign crude each month.”

Yet, far from a novel response to an unexpected emergency, the order is actually an escalation in a preexisting battle between California and the Trump administration over the future of the pipeline system. The state’s Attorney General Rob Bonta sued to stop the administration from a federal takeover of two of the pipelines in January.

Sable also faces several lawsuits due to its attempts to restart the system after it purchased it from ExxonMobil in 2024, and has not yet cleared all of the state permitting requirements, according to the Center for Biological Diversity.

“In its latest brazen abuse of power, the Trump administration is attempting to seize exclusive federal control over two of California’s onshore pipelines,” Bonta said on social media Friday evening. “We will not stand by as this administration continues their unlawful all-out assault on California and our coastlines, and we are reviewing all of our legal options.”

California Gov. Gavin Newsom also spoke out against Wright’s announcement.

“Trump knew his war with Iran would raise gas prices,” he wrote on social media. “Now he wants to illegally resurrect a pipeline shut down by courts and facing criminal charges. And it won’t even cut prices. I refuse to let Trump sacrifice Californians, our environment, or our $51 billion coastal economy.”

The Center for Biological Diversity noted that this order would mark the first time that the Defense Production Act was used to force an oil company to restart out-of-use Infrastructure and to disregard the state permitting process.

“This is a revolting power grab by an extremist president. Trump is misusing this Cold War-era law just to help a Texas oil company skirt vital state laws that protect our coastline, and Californians will pay the price,” Talia Nimmer, an attorney for the center, said. “Mandating a restart of these defective oil pipelines won’t curb high gas prices, but it will put coastal wildlife at huge risk of another oil spill. Overriding state law to let an oil company restart pipelines sets a radically dangerous precedent. It’s clear that no state is safe from Trump.”

The center also promised to push back against the order.

“Directing a private oil company to push its project through without safety checks and adherence to California laws that keep our coast safe is appalling and illegal,” Nimmer said. “We’re exploring all legal avenues. This dangerous action should be swiftly blocked by the courts.”

Our work is licensed under Creative Commons (CC BY-NC-ND 3.0). Feel free to republish and share widely.

Olivia Rosane

Olivia Rosane is a staff writer for Common Dreams.

Full Bio >

Trump’s FCC Chair Threatens to Pull Broadcast Licenses Over Negative Iran War Coverage

FCC Chairman Brendan Carr Testifies On Capitol Hill During House Hearing

Federal Communications Commission Chairman Brendan Carr testifies before the House Appropriations Subcommittee on Financial Services and General Government at the Rayburn House Office Building on May 21, 2025 in Washington, DC. 

(Photo by John McDonnell/Getty Images)

“Brendan Carr is threatening the media to cover the war the way the Trump regime wants. It’s one of the most anti-American messages ever posted by a government official,” one news network said.

Olivia Rosane

Mar 14, 2026 (CommonDreams.org)

In a move one administration critic described as “fragrantly unconstitutional,” Federal Communications Commission Chair Brendan Carr wrote a post on social media on Saturday that appeared to threaten the broadcast license of any media outlet that reported information concerning President Donald Trump’s war on Iran that the president did not like.

“Broadcasters that are running hoaxes and news distortions—also known as the fake news—have a chance now to correct course before their license renewals come up. The law is clear. Broadcasters must operate in the public interest, and they will lose their licenses if they do not,” Carr’s message began.

RECOMMENDED…

US President Donald Trump speaks to members of the media

Trump Floats ‘Charges for Treason’ Against Media Outlets Over Iran War Coverage

US-POLITICS-CONGRESS-DEMOCRATS

As Trump Marches US Toward Iran War, Critics Ask: Where’s the ‘Pushback’ From Dems and Media?

Carr also shared a screenshot of a Trump post on Truth Social complaining about “Fake News Media” coverage of five US Air Force refueling planes that were reportedly hit and damaged in an Iranian missile strike on Prince Sultan air base in Saudi Arabia.

“The[is] is the federal government telling news stations to provide favorable coverage of the war or their licenses will be pulled,” wrote Sen. Chris Murphy (D-Conn.) on social media in response to the post. “A truly extraordinary moment. We aren’t on the verge of a totalitarian takeover. WE ARE IN THE MIDDLE OF IT. Act like it.”

Several other media professionals, free speech advocates, and Democratic politicians understood Carr’s post as a threat.

“The truth is this war has been a failure of historic proportions. They don’t want Americans to know that.”

“The FCC is threatening the licenses of news stations that report on the effects of Iranian attacks on the American military,” wrote journalist Séamus Malekafzali.

Bulwark economics editor Catherine Rampell wrote, “FCC Chair Brendan Carr threatens broadcast licenses over Iran War coverage.”

Journalist Sam Stein posted, “The state doesn’t like the war coverage, threatens the license of the broadcasters.”

Independent news network MediasTouch wrote: “Brendan Carr is threatening the media to cover the war the way the Trump regime wants. It’s one of the most anti-American messages ever posted by a government official.”

“The truth is this war has been a failure of historic proportions. They don’t want Americans to know that,” the group continued.

“This is worse than the comedian stuff, and by a lot. The stakes here are much higher. He’s not talking about late night shows, he’s talking about how a war is covered.”

Several pointed out that such a threat would be in violation of the First Amendment of the US Constitution, which guarantees freedom of speech and of the press.

“Constitutional law 101: It’s illegal for the government to censor free speech it just doesn’t like about Trump’s Iran war,” Sen. Elizabeth Warren (D-Mass.) posted on social media. “This threat is straight out of the authoritarian playbook.”

Sen. Mark Kelly (D-Ariz.), who has faced scrutiny from the administration for advising service members to disobey illegal orders, wrote: “When our nation is at war it is critical that the press is free to report without government interference. It is literally in the Constitution. This is overreach by the FCC because this administration doesn’t like the microscope and doesn’t want to be held accountable.”

California Gov. Gavin Newsom wrote, “If Trump doesn’t like your coverage of the war, his FCC will pull your broadcast license. That is flagrantly unconstitutional.”

Aaron Terr, the director of public advocacy at the Foundation of Individual Rights and Expression, said: “The president’s hand-picked misinformation czar is at it again, singling out ‘fake news’ that conflicts with his boss’ political agenda. The First Amendment doesn’t allow the government to censor information about the war it’s waging.”

Free Press senior director of strategy and communications Timothy Karr responded to Carr with a screenshot of the First Amendment and the words: “Here it is—as it seems you’ve forgotten what you swore an oath to ‘support and defend.’”

This is not the first time that Carr has been accused of putting his loyalty to Trump over his duty to the Constitution. In September, he pressured ABC to take comedian Jimmy Kimmel off the air over remarks Kimmel had made following the murder of Charlie Kirk.

While ABC eventually reinstated Kimmel’s show following public backlash, free speech advocates warned at the time that the Trump administration would not stop trying to censor opposing views.

“The Trump regime’s war on free speech is no joke—and it’s not over,” Free Press co-CEO Craig Aaron said at the time.

Indeed, Sen. Brian Schatz (D-Hawaii) wrote of Carr’s Saturday statement: “This is worse than the comedian stuff, and by a lot. The stakes here are much higher. He’s not talking about late night shows, he’s talking about how a war is covered.”

Carr’s note comes at a particularly urgent time for independent media coverage in the US, as Paramount Skydance, which is run by the son of pro-Trump billionaire Larry Ellison, is set to acquire Warner Bros. Discovery, which owns CNN. The Trump administration has often criticized CNN’s coverage, including of the war.

On Friday, Secretary of Defense Pete Hegseth told reporters, “The sooner David Ellison takes over that network, the better,” as he complained about a CNN report on how the Pentagon underestimated the risk that Iran would close the Strait of Hormuz in response to US aggression.

Carr has already spoken out in favor of the merger, telling CNBC he thought it was a “good deal, and I think it should get through pretty quickly.”

This piece has been updated with quotes from Sens. Chris Murphy, Elizabeth Warren, and Mark Kelly.

Our work is licensed under Creative Commons (CC BY-NC-ND 3.0). Feel free to republish and share widely.

Olivia Rosane

Olivia Rosane is a staff writer for Common Dreams.

Full Bio >

“Mr. Nobody Against Putin” Wins Oscar; Meet the Russian Teacher Who Confronts State Propaganda

Democracy Now! Mar 16, 2026 Latest Shows Support our work: https://democracynow.org/donate/sm-de… “Mr Nobody Against Putin” won the Academy Award for Best Documentary Feature on Sunday. Democracy Now! recently spoke with co-director David Borenstein and the subject of the film, the Russian teacher Pavel “Pasha” Talankin, who personally documented Russia’s use of wartime propaganda. “I need for as many people as possible to see what is happening inside of Russian schools,” says Talankin. “Putin is forcing propaganda into their schools, and [the children are] absorbing all of this.” Democracy Now! is an independent global news hour that airs on over 1,500 TV and radio stations Monday through Friday. Watch our livestream at democracynow.org Mondays to Fridays 8-9 a.m. ET. Subscribe to our Daily Email Digest: https://democracynow.org/subscribe

Missile Fragment From Iran School Massacre Marked ‘Made in USA’—But Trump Keeps Lying

Iranian officials display missile fragments with US markings

Iranian officials display Tomahawk missile components with US markings at the site of the massacre of around 175 people, mostly children, at a school in Minab, Iran on February 28, 2026. 

(Photo by Islamic Republic of Iran Broadcasting/Telegram)

Trump falsely claimed that Iran has “some” highly restricted Tomahawk missiles as additional evidence pointed to US culpability for the deadly strike.

Brett Wilkins

Mar 10, 2026 (CommonDreams.org)

As Iranian officials displayed US-marked fragments of a missile believed to have been used in Saturday’s massacre of around 175 mostly school children in Minab, President Donald Trump on Monday doubled down on his unfounded claim that Iran carried out the strike.

The president suggested during a press conference at his Trump National Doral Miami resort that Iran may have used a US Tomahawk missile to carry out the February 28 attack on the Shajareh Tayyebeh girls’ elementary school in Minab.

RECOMMENDED…

President Trump Spends Weekend At Mar-a-Lago Resort In Florida

‘That Was Done by Iran,’ Trump Lies as More Evidence Shows US Was Behind School Massacre

New Yorkers mourn the 180 Iranian children killed by the US-Israeli bombing in Iran

Preliminary Pentagon Findings Betray Trump’s Outrageous Lies About Iranian School Massacre

Trump falsely claimed that Iran has “some” of the highly restricted cruise missiles after one of them was recorded hitting an Iranian military facility near the school just after Saturday’s strike there.

“A Tomahawk is very generic,” Trump added. “It’s sold to other countries.”

New York Timesreporter Shawn McCreesh pressed Trump on his claim, asking, “You just suggested that Iran somehow got its hands on a Tomahawk and bombed its own elementary school on the first day of the war… Why are you the only person saying this?”

Trump replied: “Because I just don’t know enough about it. I think it’s something that I was told is under investigation, but Tomahawks are, are used by others. As you know, numerous other nations have Tomahawks. They buy them from us.”

https://embed.bsky.app/embed/did:plc:iu4j537hox5huj4bwnwgub4z/app.bsky.feed.post/3mgnwdzycql2u?id=2634359967845902&ref_url=https%253A%252F%252Fwww.commondreams.org%252Fnews%252Ftrump-lying-about-iran-school-strike&colorMode=system

Iran has no Tomahawks, which are not “generic.” Originally developed by General Dynamics and now manufactured by Raytheon, the BGM‑109 Tomahawk is a specific long-range cruise missile designed and produced in the United States. Only two other countries—Australia and the United Kingdom—are known to have Tomahawks in their arsenals, although Japan and the Netherlands have also agreed to buy them.

The US also does not sell weaponry to the Iranian government—with the extraordinary exception of the Iran-Contra Affair, in which the Reagan administration secretly sold arms to Iran in order to fund anti-communist Contra terrorists in Nicaragua.

Trump’s Monday remarks followed his Saturday comments to reporters aboard Air Force One, where he said that the bombing “was done by Iran.”

However, Defense Secretary Pete Hegseth, who was accompanying Trump, notably declined to back Trump’s claim, saying only that “we’re certainly investigating” the strike.

US Ambassador to the United Nations Michael Waltz also did not endorse the president’s assertion, telling ABC News’ Martha Raddatz Sunday that he would “leave that to the investigators to determine.”

Waltz—a former Army Special Forces officer who served in Afghanistan—also told NBC News’ Meet the Press Sunday that “we never deliberately attack civilians.”

More than 400,000 civilians in over half a dozen countries have been killed in US-led wars since 9/11according to the Costs of War Project at Brown University’s Watson Institute for International and Public Affairs.

Hundreds of Iranian civilians have been killed by US and Israeli bombing since February 28. Israeli airstrikes have also killed hundreds of Lebanese civilians during the same period.

During Monday’s press conference, Trump said that he is “willing to live with” whatever the probe into the Minab school strike shows.

A preliminary US intelligence assessment reportedly concluded that the United States is “likely” responsible for the strike, although a probe is ongoing.

On Monday, the New York Times published photos of fragments purportedly from a missile used in the school strike, which were marked with the names of multiple companies that produce Tomahawk components, a unique Department of Defense contract number, and “Made in USA.” Another remnant is marked SDL ANTENNA, a key satellite data link component of Tomahawk missiles.

Paramedics and victims’ relatives said the school bombing was a so-called “double-tap” airstrike—a common tactic used by US, Israeli, and Russian forces in which attackers bomb a target and then follow up with a second strike meant to kill survivors and first responders.

If carried out by the US, the Minab school strike would be one of the deadliest US civilian massacres in modern times, ranking with the bombing of a Baghdad bomb shelter during the 1991 Gulf War—which killed more than 400 people—and the March 2017 slaughter of at least 105 people in an apartment building in Mosul, Iraq during Trump’s “war of annihilation” against the so-called Islamic State.

Trump’s claim that Iran may have bought a US missile whose sale is restricted to just a handful of close allies and used it to bomb its own school prompted worldwide ridicule.

US Senate Majority Leader Chuck Schumer (D-NY) said on the upper chamber floor Tuesday that “Iran doesn’t have Tomahawk missiles, Donald Trump!”

“The claim is beyond asinine,” he continued. “He says whatever pops into his head no matter what the truth is. And we all know he lies, but on something as formidable as this, it’s appalling.”

“Trump is lying through his teeth,” Schumer added.

https://embed.bsky.app/embed/did:plc:4llrhdclvdlmmynkwsmg5tdc/app.bsky.feed.post/3mgplubwduv2p?id=3634869833902481&ref_url=https%253A%252F%252Fwww.commondreams.org%252Fnews%252Ftrump-lying-about-iran-school-strike&colorMode=system

Barry Andrews, an Irish politician who serves as a Member of the European Parliament for the Dublin constituency, said on X that Trump’s “latest use of the ‘big lie’ tactic… was to claim that Iran somehow possesses US-made Tomahawk missiles and fired upon its own girls school.”

“Such blatant lies are meant to distract,” Andrews added. “He knows the world will move on.”

New Yorker cartoonist Mark Thompson quipped, “How Iran fired a Tomahawk missile at their own school is beyond me, but President Trump wouldn’t lie to us.”

Reza Nasri, an international law expert at the Graduate Institute of International and Development Studies in Geneva, said on X that “Trump claims that Iran somehow got its hands on a US Tomahawk cruise missile and used it to bomb its own elementary school.”

“Ask him how Iran could possibly have obtained such missiles—and how it allegedly launched one, given that Tomahawks are typically fired from naval platforms, primarily warships and submarines,” Nasri added. “Did Iran get its hands on US warships and submarines too?”

Our work is licensed under Creative Commons (CC BY-NC-ND 3.0). Feel free to republish and share widely.

Brett Wilkins

Brett Wilkins is a staff writer for Common Dreams.

Full Bio >

‘Pete Hegseth Needs to Be Fired—Immediately’ After Slaughter of 150 Iranian School Children

Trump with Pete Hegseth

President Donald Trump speaks to members of the media traveling on Air Force One while heading to Miami on March 7, 2026, while Secretary of Defense Pete Hegseth grimaces in the background. 

(Photo by Roberto Schmidt/Getty Images)

Sens. Chris Van Hollen and Elizabeth Warren make the case for the urgent ouster of President Donald Trump’s Defense Secretary.

Jon Queally

Mar 13, 2026 (CommonDreams.org)

“Pete Hegseth needs to be fired—immediately,” argues US Sen. Chris Van Hollen in a video statement posted Thursday night alongside Sen. Elizabeth Warren, who also backs the demand. Their joint call arrived as global outrage mounts over the bombing of a Iranian school on Feb. 28 that killed upwards of 175 civilians, mostly young children.

Warren cited preliminary findings of a Pentagon report out this week that determined the US was the highly likely culprit behind the school massacre in the southeastern city of Minab, she noted, “killing mostly little girls between the ages of seven and 14.”

RECOMMENDED…

New Yorkers mourn the 180 Iranian children killed by the US-Israeli bombing in Iran

Preliminary Pentagon Findings Betray Trump’s Outrageous Lies About Iranian School Massacre

Pete Hegseth

‘​Shameless’: Critics Hammer Pete Hegseth for Claiming ‘We Didn’t Start’ War on Iran

Human rights groups have condemned the bombing of the school—which had happened on the very first day of Trump’s unprovoked attack on Iran—as a possible “war crime” that demands independent investigation. Trump, for his part, has repeatedly lied about the bombing, claiming it was Iran who bombed the school, despite having access to internal intelligence assessments that appear to say otherwise.

Rep. Rashida Tlaib (D-Mich.) on Wednesday said there was more than enough evidence to conclude that the US was behind the attack, with reports bubbling up from inside the Pentagon only helping to confirm what outside analysts had determined. “Trump should be impeached. Hegseth should be fired,” Tlaib said. “And the administration must be held accountable in international courts for their heinous war crimes.”

For Van Hollen and Warren, the massacre in Minab is only the latest and most gruesome example of the US military’s bloodthirsty and careless conduct under Hegseth, whose time at the Pentagon has been marked by controversy and accusations of human rights abuses, national security blunders, and violations of international law as a matter of policy.

“We had ‘Signalgate,’ where he put out troops at risk,” says Van Hollen in the video, a reference to Hegseth using a public encryption communication tool to share national security details of a military operation that had yet to be carried out.

“We had him blowing up ships in the Caribbean,” he continues, attacks that have killed over 160 people and been called nothing short of murder by human rights experts. “We had them targeting defenseless swimmers” who survived some of those attacks, said Van Hollen.

“That’s right,” Warren interjects in the video, “with no accountability” for any of that behavior. On top of all that, Van Hollen adds, Hegseth has “no idea what he’s doing in this war in Iran. And now an American missile hit an Iranian school, killing about 150 innocent school kids.”

X post: https://x.com/RepMcGovern/status/2032235569942552930?ref_src=twsrc%5Etfw%7Ctwcamp%5Etweetembed%7Ctwterm%5E2032235569942552930%7Ctwgr%5Ea22663d8bbbdd035a60b173781bda7bf071d6814%7Ctwcon%5Es1_c10&ref_url=https%3A%2F%2Fwww.commondreams.org%2Fnews%2Fpete-hegseth-fired

Hegseth has aggressively denounced restrictive “rules of engagement” for the military—calling such guardrails “stupid” and disparaging what he has termed “woke” warfare. As The New York Times details Friday, Hegseth’s entire career has been colored by his criticism of what he views as the restrictive nature of rules designed to curb atrocities. Now serving as Secretary of Defense, he has been empowered to put his theories into action:

[Hegseth] has tried to reshape Pentagon culture, reveling in lethality with “no apologies, no hesitation.” He has portrayed this approach as a “warrior ethos,” one that is tough and manly.

He came up as an Army infantry officer and, as he wrote in his 2024 memoir “The War on Warriors,” loathed strict rules of engagement imposed to minimize risk to civilians, seeing heightened standards for when his platoon could open fire as putting soldiers at greater risk on the battlefield. He blamed judge advocate general lawyers, or JAGs, for such rules — even though it is commanders, not lawyers, who issue them.

Mr. Hegseth later continued that line of thinking as a Fox News contributor and host and as an advocate for U.S. service members charged with war crimes. In his 2024 book, he questioned the need to obey the Geneva Conventions and derisively referred to military lawyers as “jagoffs.”

In the video with Van Hollen, Warren says the key reason behind the call for his immediate ouster has to do with Hegseth’s hostility toward mechanisms designed to mitigate “civilian harm” during war time or other military operations.

As legislators, Van Hollen and Warren describe how they helped put in place stronger rules to prevent civilian harm. “Whenever the military is thinking about an attack,” says Warren, “where there are civilians in the area and innocent people could get harmed, it’s how to think through ‘What are the risks? Are there ways to minimize the risks? Have we checked and double checked?’”

“But what did Pete Hegseth do?” asks Warren. To which Van Hollen answers: “Hegseth came in and he dismantled the whole system. He said they were ‘stupid rules of engagement.’ But we know rules of engagement are intended to prevent civilian harm, they’re intended to prevent war crimes.”

Our work is licensed under Creative Commons (CC BY-NC-ND 3.0). Feel free to republish and share widely.

Jon Queally

Jon Queally is managing editor of Common Dreams.

Full Bio >

American Citizens Are Being Detained at U.S. Airports. Some Vanish Inside the System. Read This Before You Fly.

If a Loved One Disappears at the Airport: What Families Must Do to Make Authorities Respond

W. A. Lawrence Mar 13, 2026

An American citizen can now return to a United States airport, present a valid passport, and disappear inside a for-profit detention system under the Trump administration’s vague category of “suspicious travel.” This is not theoretical; someone I love endured that experience. The system is rapidly expanding.

For generations Americans returning from international travel treated the passport as proof that they belonged on this soil, a guarantee embedded in citizenship. That guarantee now erodes quietly without announcement and without the knowledge of the people meant to receive its protection. Anyone who has stepped off a plane believing a passport confirmed arrival at home should read what follows carefully.

In January 2026 a CBP officer delivered a sentence that revealed the shift: You will know when you need to know. The remark came after five hours of interrogation inside a windowless inspection room at Newark Liberty International Airport.

A member of my family approached passport control carrying a valid United States passport, the document generations of Americans trusted as proof that returning home remained a routine act inside a constitutional republic.

Five hours later a federal officer made clear that the document meant nothing and left behind a cloud of future threat hanging over every trip that might follow.

An officer abruptly confiscated the traveler’s phone without explanation and directed movement through a door marked secondary inspection into an enclosed room where federal scrutiny replaced the ordinary rhythms of civilian life. Agents retained the device for hours with messages and photographs becoming material for government examination and retention.

Questioning returned repeatedly to one subject: travel to Palestine, even though the passport already recorded the full history of international movement. The passenger had never been to Palestine.

A surprise release followed five hours later. The traveler asked the only question that mattered: WHY? A CBP officer repeated the warning that explanation would arrive only when authorities decided explanation became necessary.

No written justification appeared. The passport guaranteed nothing beyond the name printed inside the booklet.

National attention erupted on March 5, 2026 when Sundas Sunny Naqvi, a 28-year-old American citizen from the Chicago area, returned through O’Hare Airport after travel abroad.

US Citizen Sundas Sunny Naqvi, a United States citizen and scientist from Chicago, photographed on a university campus. Photo credit: Image circulated in reporting and public posts related to the case. Original photographer unknown.

Sunny Naqvi came home through O’Hare and entered a Wisconsin deportation facility.

A daughter returned home while relatives waited for the routine message confirming safe arrival. Instead, the family learned that federal agents had taken her into custody for nearly two days and moved her through multiple facilities before release. The Department of Homeland Security later minimized the episode as a brief secondary inspection, yet the family account triggered national outrage that official statements failed to quiet.

Federal custody moved Naqvi through several locations before arrival at a detention center in Wisconsin, a transfer that pushed the process far beyond airport inspection space. Once Customs and Border Protection transfers someone to Immigration and Customs Enforcement, the detention machinery engages and transparency disappears. The ICE locator database routinely fails to identify where detainees are held. Reporting by the American Immigration Council documents cases in which people vanish from that system while families search for answers that never come.

The transfer exposes a deeper institutional failure. The detention network exists to confine people awaiting deportation proceedings. Naqvi carried a valid United States passport and possessed the full right of return guaranteed to every American citizen.

Across the United States more than 200 detention facilities operate through a national network of federal centers and privately run prisons designed to warehouse people awaiting deportation. Contractors such as CoreCivic and GEO Group receive federal payments tied to guaranteed bed quotas, a financial structure that rewards filled cells rather than resolved cases.

Federal spending on immigration detention now exceeds $3 billion each year under the Trump administration’s 2025 to 2026 enforcement expansion.

Within that structure, immigration enforcement functions as the legal gateway feeding bodies into detention while bed occupancy remains the operational objective.

The administration has accelerated that machinery while directing CBP to widen the intake funnel. Constitutional attorneys warn that citizens entering this infrastructure upon return represents a rupture in the system’s original design. Detention facilities were built for individuals facing removal proceedings. American citizens whose constitutional right of return is absolute were never meant to pass through those gates

Understanding how such a situation exists requires examining a structural feature rarely discussed in public debate. Constitutional protections function differently at international borders than inside the country because federal courts recognize the border search exception, a doctrine granting CBP broad authority to detain and search people entering the United States. The authority applies to citizens and noncitizens alike, and digital device searches frequently occur without warrants during entry.

Immigration enforcement doctrine also defines an operational zone extending 100 miles inland from every external boundary of the United States, a perimeter that encompasses most of the national population.

Passenger data enters federal screening databases before aircraft arrival. Overseas contacts and itinerary records undergo automated analysis designed to flag risk patterns within a surveillance system largely hidden from public oversight. The second Trump administration widened discretionary screening authority during 2025 and 2026 through vague classifications such as suspicious travel history, language elastic enough to justify extended detention for almost any itinerary.

Early executive actions by President Trump directed agencies to compile gang membership indicators and alleged antifa affiliations as grounds for enforcement, prompting civil liberties organizations to warn that those categories erase the boundary separating security screening from political targeting. Federal databases already contain documented inaccuracies and identification methods previously rejected by federal courts.

Federal data show that CBP electronic device searches surged from roughly 8,500 in 2015 to more than 41,000 within four years. Attorneys report the same enforcement pattern continuing through 2025 and 2026 as travelers describe device seizures and prolonged detention at major American ports of entry.

Constitutional attorneys now describe nearly identical accounts from travelers nationwide: phones seized at passport control, overseas contacts turned into interrogation subjects, and agents demanding access to private communications even though passports and travel records already contain the information officials claim to seek.

Viewed alone the incidents appear isolated. Taken together they reveal a pattern.

History clarifies the pattern. Soviet citizens required government issued exit visas before crossing any border, and those who traveled without authorization faced prosecution upon return because contact with the outside world produced knowledge the state considered politically dangerous.

Nazi Germany applied similar logic during the late 1930s. Border crossings operated under Gestapo scrutiny while journalists and scholars with international ties faced document seizures as surveillance spread through civic institutions.

Such practices belong to a familiar tradition in which state power dismantles the liberty of the population it claims to govern. Generations of Americans believed their country stood apart because citizens retained the freedom to leave and return without interrogation by agents of the state.

What happened to my family member should never happen in a country where the Fifth Amendment protects the liberty of citizens to return home. No American life should be upended to fill for profit detention beds.

International lawyers, journalists, and security professionals who cross borders now assume every device may face inspection.

Before travel, send flight number, airline, departure time, arrival time, and airport to at least one trusted contact. Your contact(s) knows when you should land and when silence signals trouble.

Carry emergency contact information somewhere that remains with the body if belongings are taken. A small card can be placed inside a sock, waistband, or taped inside clothing so the information stays with the traveler even if a phone, bag, or wallet is seized. The card should list an emergency contact, an attorney if available, and a request that the person be notified if detention occurs.

Memorize at least one phone number. Phones disappear during inspection but memorized numbers remain available when a call becomes possible.

Write names, badge numbers, times, and locations immediately after release. Small notebooks pass through inspections more easily than phones and allow memory reconstruction later.

Ask directly for officer names and badge numbers during questioning. Officers often refuse but the request itself sometimes produces identifying information.

Airport surveillance cameras record most inspection areas. Attorneys can request those recordings if a detention becomes contested.

Family members should contact the airline, airport police, and the local office of U.S. Customs and Border Protection if a traveler does not emerge after an international arrival. Civil liberties attorneys or immigration attorneys familiar with border detention should also be contacted because those lawyers regularly confront CBP inspection and detention cases.

The traveler’s congressional representative or senator should be notified because congressional offices can demand information directly from federal agencies.

Local news organizations should be alerted, and families can launch a social media campaign naming the airport, the flight, and the missing traveler. Public attention often forces faster answers when someone disappears inside the federal inspection system.

No precaution guarantees protection, yet each step reduces the portion of personal life exposed during border inspection.

The Soviet Union banned citizens from leaving the country while the current administration has created a different calculation. Departure remains technically legal in the United States, yet return now carries uncertainty.

United States citizen, Sunny Naqvi came home through O’Hare and was trafficked to a Wisconsin deportation facility.

Family members who watched that event unfold now reconsider every future flight because that hesitation reflects the outcome such policies were designed to produce.

A fascist government does not require an official travel ban when fear of returning home produces the same result.

Every American who leaves this country and wonders whether a passport will still carry authority at passport control already understands the danger. A citizen who lands at a United States airport with a valid passport should walk through the gate and go home. When that certainty disappears, travel no longer carries inconvenience but the risk of detention inside a system designed to feed bodies into detention beds where rights vanish behind closed doors.

Sunny Naqvi had a passport. Sunny Naqvi came home. Sunny Naqvi entered a deportation facility.

When a passport no longer guarantees law abiding American citizens the right to return home without interrogation, the United States begins to resemble the Soviet Union under Stalin more than the republic Americans lived in before Trump.

Glass Empires follows wherever the evidence leads, refusing allegiance to parties, regurgitated narratives, or the comfort of the 99%. Founding members stabilize long-term investigations and ensure future inquiries reach the public before political narratives bury the evidence. Join the paid subscribers who keep Glass Empires going. Annual memberships remain 40% below the monthly rate for a limited time.

Upgrade to paid

Sources

U.S. Customs and Border Protection
Border Search of Electronic Devices Statistics

American Civil Liberties Union
Digital Privacy at the U.S. Border

Electronic Frontier Foundation
Border Device Search Data Analysis

American Immigration Council
ICE’s Expanding and Increasingly Unaccountable Detention System

Calif. governor’s race poll shows former Fox News host leading

By Anabel Sosa,Senior California politics reporter March 13, 2026 (SFGate.com)

Conservative commentator and Silicon Valley entrepreneur Steve Hilton announces his campaign for California governor at the Pier Plaza in Huntington Beach on April 22, 2025. Hilton received support from 19% of likely voters in a recent poll.Allen J. Schaben/Los Angeles Times/Getty Images

Republican Steve Hilton, a British-born former Fox News commentator, continues to lead the governor’s race as Democrats remain divided over a favored candidate.

Hilton received support from 19% of likely voters, according to a poll released Wednesday from the UC Berkeley Citrin Center for Public Opinion Research and Politico. Following him is Tom Steyer, a billionaire Democrat, with 13% support. Former Rep. Katie Porter, current Rep. Eric Swalwell, both Democrats, and Chad Bianco, the Republican sheriff of Riverside County, are tied with 11% support.

Even with a June primary election approaching, the governor’s race remains crowded, and polling has been anything but consistent. Prior polls have shown Hilton has an edge with likely voters and that there is oscillating support for the top three Democratic candidates, with Porter, Swalwell and Steyer playing political musical chairs in the rankings. It is clear, however, that they are the top three Democratic contenders right now.

Those leading candidates are followed by the lingering Democrats with polling in the single digits. Xavier Becerra, the former health and human services secretary in the Biden administration, had 5% of likely voter support in Politico’s latest poll. Antonio Villaraigosa, the former mayor of Los Angeles, had 4%; Matt Mahan, the mayor of San Jose, had 3%; former state Controller Betty Yee had 2%; and state Superintendent Tony Thurmond had 1%.

Ian Calderon, a former state legislator who was already at the bottom of the polls, is the only Democrat to drop out before the state’s March 6 deadline to officially declare candidacy. The remaining Democrats will appear on the June ballot. California Democratic Party Chairperson Rusty Hicks in February subtly pressured candidates who were polling in the single digits to drop out in order to make room for voters to coalesce around one clear Democrat.

Overall, 41% of likely voters said they were most looking for the next governor of California to bring a fresh perspective from outside politics. Meanwhile, 27% said the most important quality would be having prior state government experience; 25% said they wanted someone with business experience; and 24% said prior elected office experience was most important to them.

Another section of the poll examined voters’ second choices. Nearly 40% of voters who said they would vote for Swalwell said Porter would be their second choice; 25% of those who said they’d vote for Porter put Swalwell as their alternative choice. Meanwhile, Steyer was a popular second pick, with 18% of voters who said they’d cast a vote for Becerra or Villaraigosa choosing him next. 

Got a tip? Send us the scoop.

DO IT NOW

In California’s primary election system, the top two vote-getters in June, regardless of party, will move on to the general election in November. That means the final race can be between two Democrats, between two Republicans, or between a Democrat and a Republican. California has a high number of registered Democratic voters, which usually makes it unlikely for a Republican candidate to reach the general election, but with several polls showing Hilton with a steady lead, it’s increasingly possible the showdown this November will be between a Republican and a Democrat.

The poll was conducted between Feb. 25 and March 3 in both English and Spanish. It surveyed a random sample of 1,004 registered voters who are likely to vote in the June primary. There is a margin of error of plus or minus 3.3 percentage points.

In a separate poll also released Wednesday, this one conducted by Emerson College, Swalwell was in the lead with 17% support, followed by Hilton with 13%, Bianco and Steyer with 11%, and Porter with 8%.

More Politics

— Newsom is touring Southern states. It’s exposing some hurdles in his path to 2028.
— Latest Calif. governor’s poll brings unexpected Democrat to top
— Leading SF tech lab in standoff with Pete Hegseth
— The biggest problem for California Democrats just revealed itself in San Francisco

March 13, 2026

Anabel Sosa

Senior California politics reporter

Anabel Sosa is the senior California politics reporter at SFGATE. She previously covered the statehouse and elections for the Los Angeles Times. She has a masters degree in investigative journalism from UC Berkeley. You can reach her at anabel.sosa@sfgate.com.

Political Profile: James Talarico

Published: March 13, 2026 (TheOnion.com)

James Talarico is the Democratic nominee for U.S. Senate in Texas. The Onion shares everything you need to know about the rising star. 

Age: Whippersnapper

Inspirational Backstory: Survived several hours talking to Joe Rogan

Religion: Oh yeah, lots of that

Key Endorsements: God (Presbyterian), God (Catholic), God (Jewish), and God (Sikh)  

Level On Grant-Rogers Folksiness Scale: 1.21 Jimmy Stewarts

Voice Volume: 4

Diet: Whatever Mom’s making tonight

What’s Motivating Campaign: Would rather die before going back to teaching