Trump’s rhetoric about DC echoes a history of racist narratives about urban crime

President Trump has activated 800 National Guard members to address what he calls a crime emergency in Washington, D.C. Some residents are reacting. (AP Video: River Zhang)

BY  MATT BROWN Updated 8:30 AM PDT, August 12, 2025 (APNews.com)

▶ Follow live updates on President Donald Trump and his administration

WASHINGTON (AP) — President Donald Trump has taken control of D.C.’s law enforcement and ordered National Guard troops to deploy onto the streets of the nation’s capital, arguing the extraordinary moves are necessary to curb an urgent public safety crisis.

Even as district officials questioned the claims underlying his emergency declaration, the Republican president promised a “historic action to rescue our nation’s capital from crime, bloodshed, bedlam and squalor and worse.” His rhetoric echoed that used by conservatives going back decades who have denounced cities, especially those with majority non-white populations or led by progressives, as lawless or crime-ridden and in need of outside intervention.

“This is liberation day in D.C., and we’re going to take our capital back,” Trump promised Monday.

Trump’s action echoes uncomfortable historical chapters

As D.C. the National Guard arrived at their headquarters Tuesday, for many residents, the prospect of federal troops surging into neighborhoods represented an alarming violation of local agency. To some, it echoes uncomfortable historical chapters when politicians used language to paint historically or predominantly Black cities and neighborhoods with racist narratives to shape public opinion and justify aggressive police action.

President Donald Trump speaks with reporters in the James Brady Press Briefing Room at the White House, Aug. 11, 2025, in Washington, as Secretary of Defense Pete Hegseth, left, and Attorney General Pam Bondi look on. (AP Photo/Alex Brandon, File)
President Donald Trump speaks with reporters in the James Brady Press Briefing Room at the White House, Aug. 11, 2025, in Washington, as Secretary of Defense Pete Hegseth, left, and Attorney General Pam Bondi look on. (AP Photo/Alex Brandon, File)

April Goggans, a longtime D.C. resident and grassroots organizer, said she was not surprised by Trump’s actions. Communities had been preparing for a potential federal crackdown in D.C. since the summer of 2020, when Trump deployed troops during racial justice protests after the murder of George Floyd.

RELATED STORIES

Trump deploys troops to DC in the latest use of the National Guard

Trump deploys troops to DC in the latest use of the National Guard

Bondi names DEA head as DC's 'emergency police commissioner'

Bondi names DEA head as DC’s ’emergency police commissioner’

Federal agents will be out 24/7 on patrol in DC, White House says

Federal agents will be out 24/7 on patrol in DC, White House says

“We have to be vigilant,” said Goggans, who has coordinated local protests for nearly a decade. She worries about what a surge in law enforcement could mean for residents’ freedoms.

“Regardless of where you fall on the political scale, understand that this could be you, your children, your grandmother, your co-worker who are brutalized or have certain rights violated,” she said.

Other residents reacted with mixed feelings to Trump’s executive order. Crime and homelessness has been a top concern for residents in recent years, but opinions on how to solve the issue vary. And very few residents take Trump’s catastrophic view of life in D.C.

“I think Trump’s trying to help people, some people,” said Melvin Brown, a D.C. resident. “But as far as (him) trying to get (the) homeless out of this city, that ain’t going to work.”

“It’s like a band-aid to a gunshot wound,” said Melissa Velasquez, a commuter into D.C. “I feel like there’s been an increase of racial profiling and stuff, and so it’s concerning for individuals who are worried about how they might be perceived as they go about their day-to-day lives.”

Mayor Brandon Johnson responds to an overnight shooting during a news conference at City Hall in the Loop, July 3, 2025. (Ashlee Rezin/Chicago Sun-Times via AP, File)
Mayor Brandon Johnson responds to an overnight shooting during a news conference at City Hall in the Loop, July 3, 2025. (Ashlee Rezin/Chicago Sun-Times via AP, File)
Washington Mayor Muriel Bowser speaks during a news conference on President Donald Trump's plan to place Washington police under federal control and deploy National guard troops to Washington, Monday, Aug. 11, 2025, in Washington. (AP Photo/Julia Demaree Nikhinson)
Washington Mayor Muriel Bowser speaks during a news conference on President Donald Trump’s plan to place Washington police under federal control and deploy National guard troops to Washington, Monday, Aug. 11, 2025, in Washington. (AP Photo/Julia Demaree Nikhinson)

Uncertainty raises alarms

According to White House officials, troops will be deployed to protect federal assets and facilitate a safe environment for law enforcement to make arrests. The Trump administration believes the highly visible presence of law enforcement will deter violent crime. It is unclear how the administration defines providing a safe environment for law enforcement to conduct arrests, raising alarm bells for some advocates.

“The president foreshadowed that if these heavy-handed tactics take root here, they will be rolled out to other majority-Black and Brown cities, like Chicago, Oakland and Baltimore, across the country,” said Monica Hopkins, executive director of the American Civil Liberties Union’s D.C. chapter.

“We’ve seen before how federal control of the D.C. National Guard and police can lead to abuse, intimidation and civil rights violations — from military helicopters swooping over peaceful racial justice protesters in 2020 to the unchecked conduct of federal officers who remain shielded from full accountability,” Hopkins said.

A history of denigrating language

Conservatives have for generations used denigrating language to describe the condition of major cities and called for greater law enforcement, often in response to changing demographics in those cities driven by nonwhite populations relocating in search of work or safety from racial discrimination and state violence. Republicans have called for greater police crackdowns in cities since at least the 1965 Watts Riots in Los Angeles.

President Richard Nixon won the White House in 1968 after campaigning on a “law and order” agenda to appeal to white voters in northern cities alongside overtures to white Southerners as part of his “Southern Strategy.” Ronald Reagan similarly won both his presidential elections after campaigning heavily on law and order politics. Politicians, including former New York Mayor Rudy Giuliani and former President Bill Clinton have cited the need to tamp down crime as a reason to seize power from liberal cities for decades.

D.C. Mayor Muriel Bowser called Trump’s takeover of local police “unsettling” but not without precedent. Bowser kept a mostly measured tone during a Monday news conference but decried Trump’s reasoning as a “so-called emergency,” saying residents “know that access to our democracy is tenuous.”

Trump threatened to “take over” and “beautify” D.C. on the campaign trail and claimed it was “a nightmare of murder and crime.” He also argued the city was “horribly run” and said his team intended “to take it away from the mayor.” Trump on Monday repeated old comments about some of the nation’s largest cities, including Baltimore, Chicago, Los Angeles, Oakland and his hometown of New York City. All are currently run by Black mayors.

“You look at Chicago, how bad it is. You look at Los Angeles, how bad it is. We have other cities in a very bad, New York is a problem. And then you have, of course, Baltimore and Oakland. We don’t even mention that anymore. They’re so far gone. We’re not going to let it happen,” he said.

Civil rights advocates see the rhetoric as part of a broader political strategy.

“It’s a playbook he’s used in the past,” said Maya Wiley, CEO of the Leadership Conference on Civil and Human Rights.

Oakland Mayor Barbara Lee speaks to the crowd at Wilma Chan Park before they march through downtown during a "No Kings" protest, June 14, 2025, in Oakland, Calif. (Jessica Christian/San Francisco Chronicle via AP, File)
Oakland Mayor Barbara Lee speaks to the crowd at Wilma Chan Park before they march through downtown during a “No Kings” protest, June 14, 2025, in Oakland, Calif. (Jessica Christian/San Francisco Chronicle via AP, File)

Trump’s rhetoric “paints a picture that crime is out of control, even when it is not true, then blames the policies of Democratic lawmakers that are reform- and public safety-minded, and then claims that you have to step in and violate people’s rights or demand that reforms be reversed,” Wiley said.

She added that the playbook has special potency in D.C. because local law enforcement can be directly placed under federal control, a power Trump invoked in his announcement.

Leaders call the order an unjustified distraction

Trump’s actions in Washington and comments about other major cities sent shock waves across the country, as other leaders prepare to respond to potential federal action.

Democratic Maryland Gov. Wes Moore said in a statement that Trump’s plan “lacks seriousness and is deeply dangerous” and pointed to a 30-year-low crime rate in Baltimore as a reason the administration should consult local leaders rather than antagonize them. In Oakland, Mayor Barbara Lee called Trump’s characterization of the city “fearmongering.”

The administration already faced a major flashpoint between local control and federal power earlier in the summer, when Trump deployed National Guard troops to quell protests and support immigration enforcement operations in LA despite opposition from California Gov. Gavin Newsom and LA Mayor Karen Bass.

Civil rights leaders have denounced Trump’s action in D.C. as an unjustified distraction.

“This president campaigned on ‘law and order,’ but he is the president of chaos and corruption,” said NAACP President Derrick Johnson. “There’s no emergency in D.C., so why would he deploy the National Guard? To distract us from his alleged inclusion in the Epstein files? To rid the city of unhoused people? D.C. has the right to govern itself. It doesn’t need this federal coup.”

Associated Press writer River Zhang contributed reporting.

MATT BROWN

MATT BROWN

Brown covers national politics, federal policy and democracy issues for The Associated Press.

twitterinstagrammailto

‘Despicable’: Ex-Trump lawyer reveals underage rape claims made against president in 2016

RawStory

JOIN RAW STORY FOR JUST $1

‘Despicable’: Ex-Trump lawyer reveals underage rape claims made against president in 2016

Travis Gettys

August 13, 2025 (RawStory.com)

'Despicable': Ex-Trump lawyer reveals underage rape claims made against president in 2016

U.S. President Donald Trump speaks with reporters, as he departs for travel to Pennsylvania from the South Lawn at the White House in Washington, D.C. U.S., July 15, 2025. REUTERS/Jonathan Ernst

President Donald Trump’s former fixer Michael Cohen revealed in a new interview that he handled a rape complaint against him and the late financier Jeffrey Epstein just weeks before the 2016 election.

Cohen mentioned the Jane Doe complaint almost in passing during an interview with journalist Tara Palmieri, who wrote on her “Red Letter” website that the details revealed by the former attorney resembled allegations made at that time by a woman known as Katie Johnson.

“She was a Jane Doe who accused President Trump in three different lawsuits of raping her in Jeffrey Epstein’s Manhattan townhouse in 1994, when she was a 13-year-old aspiring model,” Palmieri wrote. “She was planning to hold a press conference in Los Angeles days before the 2016 election, but instead, she dropped her suit and vanished. Her attorney Lisa Bloom cited death threats. Her lead lawyer, Thomas Meagher, filed a one-page dismissal in Manhattan federal court.”

“For years, I’ve wondered why,” the journalist added.

Palmieri has been thinking about that accuser as the Epstein case has been foregrounded by the Justice Department’s announcement that no new details would be released, and she decided to speak to Cohen after he seemingly cleared Trump’s involvement in the disgraced financier’s sex trafficking network.

“If anyone knew what happened to Katie Johnson’s case, it would be Cohen,” Palmieri wrote. “He was in Trump’s orbit in September 2016 when her final suit was filed in the Southern District of New York. He was simultaneously arranging payouts for Stormy Daniels and Karen McDougal. This was exactly the kind of mess Trump’s fixer would ‘fix.'”

Cohen insisted he had never met Epstein, who’d had a falling out with Trump a year or so before Cohen joined the Trump Organization, and he also said he had never spoken to co-conspirator Ghislaine Maxwell – although he said lawmakers asked him about the pair during his February 2019 testimony about Russia collusion.

“Do you really think that of all of these members of Congress that asked me questions for a total of 63 hours, do you think they didn’t bring up this sort of stuff with Jeffrey Epstein?” Cohen said. “And I turn around and I say the same thing. I have no knowledge of anything with Jeffrey Epstein. Zero, I didn’t handle it.”

But he did bring up work he had done for Trump on one Epstein-related case, which Palmieri said had a similar timeline and details from Katie Johnson’s rape complaint, which was filed right before the election and then withdrawn on November 4, 2016.

“As far as the only case that I was involved with was a Jane Doe, an infant, by and through her mom, Mary Jane Doe, right, as legal guardian,” Cohen said, “and the allegations in it are awful. They’re despicable. It talks about, basically, rape of an underage female, claiming and alleging that Donald was involved in it and all that other nonsense.”

Copyright © 2025 Raw Story Media, Inc. PO Box 21050, Washington, D.C. 20009 | Masthead | Privacy Policy | Manage Preferences Debug Logs
For corrections contact corrections@rawstory.com , for support contact support@rawstory.com .

How Chicago’s Division Street Rebellion Brought Latinos Together

In 1966, Police Shot a Young Puerto Rican Man. What Followed Created a Blueprint for a New Kind of Solidarity

By Felipe Hinojosa August 13, 2025 (ZocaloPublicSquare.org)

The 1966 Chicago uprising on Division Street isn’t as well-known as other 1960s protests, but it’s significant for paving the way for multiracial and pan-Latino coalitions and organizations across the United States, writes historian Felipe Hinojosa. Credit: Illustration by Rafael Francisco Salas

Chicago hit a boiling point on Sunday evening, June 12, 1966, just one day after the city’s first Puerto Rican Day parade. Police shot a young Puerto Rican man, Arcelis Cruz, in an alley near the Humboldt Park area. Officers said Cruz had pulled a gun. Witnesses refuted the claim. Crowds of young Puerto Ricans, continuing the celebration at a nearby music festival, heard the shot and poured in to see what was happening. Anger mounted quickly; protesters hurled rocks at police and busted store windows along Division Street as police threatened them with their guns and riot sticks. Over three days, what started as a protest turned into a full-scale rebellion. The unrest stretched a mile along Division Street, one of Chicago’s major east-west thoroughfares, from West Town to Humboldt Park, involved more than 80 police officers and a K-9 unit, and resulted in 50 arrests, countless injuries, and millions of dollars of destruction.

The Division Street “riots,” as they came to be called, marked an important moment in U.S. history. They were part of a wave of charged protests during the 1960s, from Harlem and Newark to Watts, as Black and Brown Americans expressed frustration over poverty, police brutality, joblessness, and housing. The Chicago uprising isn’t as well-known as others, but it’s significant for paving the way for multiracial and pan-Latino coalitions and organizations across the U.S. Led by a pair of Mexican immigrant brothers, Obed and Omar López, the movement for solidarity seeded by Division Street would shift the city’s landscape of activism and coalition building, uniting Puerto Ricans with Mexicans and other recent arrivals. Ultimately, it helped create a new style of democracy, rooted in rage, that established Latinos as a legitimate local political force.

Located just west of the Chicago River and northwest of downtown, the West Town and Humboldt Park neighborhoods had long been home to an ethnic mix of Europeans (primarily Polish, German, and Norwegian). Puerto Ricans began moving in during the late 1950s and early 1960s after highway construction projects in the name of urban renewal pushed them out of Chicago’s Near West Side “just steps ahead of the bulldozers,” as historian Lilia Fernández wrote.

They brought with them the smell of Caribbean foods, the sight of Puerto Rican flags hanging from rearview mirrors, and the sound of salsa music on Sunday afternoons at the park. By 1970, Puerto Ricans made up nearly 40% of the neighborhood’s residents. But as the deindustrializing economy wobbled, racial tensions escalated as the ethnic whites blamed declining property values on the newcomers.

Troubles also flared between Puerto Ricans and police, who harassed and targeted them—sometimes simply for gathering on street corners or walking through the park. In the summer of 1965, just a year before the rebellion, police brutally beat several young Puerto Rican men in a dispute over fire hydrants. “Residents of the Division Street area shared a pervasive belief,” sociologist Félix M. Padilla wrote, “that policemen were physically brutal, harsh, and discourteous to them because they were Puerto Ricans; that policemen did not respond to calls, enforce the law, or protect people who lived in this community because they were Puerto Ricans.”

So it was hardly a surprise when the streets erupted, calming down only on the third day, when an overwhelming police presence flooded the area. But what happened in the weeks and months that followed changed the course of the Latino experience in Chicago forever.

When the shooting occurred and the commotion began, brothers Omar and Obed López were standing a block away, waiting for an order of tacos at Doña Maria’s restaurant. They sprang into action, joining friends and community leaders to calm the fury, and helping keep others safe by pointing them to hiding spots. The Lópezes were from Mexico, which made them unusual in the neighborhood; while Mexicans and Puerto Ricans lived in proximity in the Near West Side in the 1940s, urban renewal projects largely drove them to different parts of the city in the next two decades. Rebellion, however, would join them together again. Relative unknowns in the neighborhood, in the coming months and years, the López brothers would become known across Humboldt Park and Chicago as leaders of the Latino community.

Led by a pair of Mexican immigrant brothers, Obed and Omar López, the movement for solidarity seeded by Division Street would shift the city’s landscape of activism and coalition building, uniting Puerto Ricans with Mexicans and other recent arrivals.

In the immediate aftermath of Division Street, neighborhood activists who had been touched by the rebellion—youth, families, religious leaders—decided there was no going back. Cultural recognitions like a Puerto Rican Day parade, they vowed, would no longer be enough. Chicago’s Puerto Ricans began planning direct political action. Throughout the second half of 1966, they organized peaceful rallies at Humboldt Park, participated in the Chicago Commission on Human Relations hearings on police brutality, and marched to city hall. There, they demanded full citizenship rights and decried how housing discrimination, lack of jobs, poor city services, and police brutality structured everyday life.

But it would be the work of grassroots organizations, and leaders like the López brothers, that built lasting Puerto Rican political power and laid the foundation for multiracial and pan-Latino community organizing. In the months after the Division Street rebellion, Obed López tried to help the cause by joining the Puerto Rican-only Spanish Action Committee of Chicago (SACC). “I thought to myself, if I can’t be in SACC because I’m Mexican, I still wanted to do something,” López told his fellow activist and Chicago organizer José “Cha Cha” Jiménez in a 2012 interview. So López founded the Latin American Defense Organization (LADO).

LADO was non-violent but “aggressive in the political sense,” López said, as well as welcoming to all Latin Americans in Chicago. LADO first worked to get Division Street protesters out of jail. Soon, it turned attention to delivering resources to the community, including helping families navigate the welfare system. And in 1969, LADO was part of a major political action in partnership with the group Cha Cha Jiménez had founded, the radical Young Lords Organization—whose minister of information was Omar López.

Originally a Puerto Rican gang, the Young Lords evolved into a radical political organization just two years after the rebellion in order to fight urban renewal policies that targeted Puerto Rican families in the Lincoln Park neighborhood, just two miles from where the rebellion started on Division Street. The Young Lords were also pioneers in coalition-building; together with white radicals and the Black Panther Party, they formed the first Rainbow Coalition, which brought together groups along shared antiracist class struggles. And along with LADO, in 1969, they occupied McCormick Seminary in response to the school’s indifference to Latino families losing their homes in Lincoln Park. The López brothers played an integral role in the occupation—Omar as a member of the Young Lords and Obed as the key spokesperson for the entire occupation, which he called “an act of love.” After five days of peaceful protest, the Seminary agreed to provide funding for social services like daycare and a public health clinic in the Armitage Methodist Church, community educational workshops on Puerto Rican history, and an architectural plan for mixed-income housing. The occupation brought national attention to the struggles of Latinos in Chicago that inspired similar movements in barrios across the country including in Houston, New York, and Los Angeles.

Born in rebellion, in a city marked by segregation, LADO and the Young Lords propelled Latinos into the center of a multiracial civil rights movement that encouraged families to speak out on the issues that mattered to them. The solidarity of the movement would later fuel political coalitions like the one that elected Harold Washington, the city’s first Black mayor, in 1983. Chicago’s Latinos were no longer invisible; “the riots,” as Obed López made clear, “were what gave birth to the political movement in this community.”

Almost 60 years later, most Americans know nothing about the rage that fueled change in Chicago’s neighborhoods, next to nothing about the place of Latinos in American history, and just barely more than that about the struggles across the country to secure equal rights, dignity, and the right to call this place home. And yet even in this moment of ICE raids on the streets, I’m hopeful that a new story of the Americas and the United States is being written; one where (im)migrant struggles and grassroots organizing can once again show us what solidarity and democracy look like.


Felipe Hinojosa was born and raised in Brownsville, on the Texas-Mexico border. A historian, he holds the John and Nancy Jackson Endowed Chair at Baylor University.


This piece publishes as part of “What Can Become of Us?,” a collaboration between the Stanford Institute for Advancing Just Societies and Zócalo Public Square.


Primary editor: Eryn Brown | Secondary editor: Sarah Rothbard

DSA Convenes, Argues, and Celebrates

Energized by Zohran Mamdani’s primary triumph, 1,200 DSA members came to Chicago to chart the group’s future.

BY EMMA JANSSEN 

AUGUST 14, 2025 (Prospect.org)

Janssen-DSA 081425.jpeg

ZACH CADDY

The Democratic Socialists of America meeting in Chicago this month

https://trinitymedia.ai/player/trinity-player.php?pageURL=https%3A%2F%2Fprospect.org%2Fpolitics%2F2025-08-14-dsa-convenes-argues-and-celebrates%2F%3Futm_source%3DActiveCampaign%26utm_medium%3Demail%26utm_content%3DDSA%2520Convenes%252C%2520Argues%252C%2520and%2520Celebrates%26utm_campaign%3DDaily%2520Prospect%252008-14-2025&GDPR=%24%24GDPR_MACRO%24%24&GDPR_CONSENT=%24%24GDPR_CONSENT_MACRO%24%24&contentHash=9da0e5f6989f0f025ac9bfe511454f5c4e731de923bcf942c199bcce5ddf1811&unitId=2900001720&userId=a143de11-b5db-4fd1-bdec-b0e6b692767c&isLegacyBrowser=false&isPartitioningSupport=1&version=20250806_0a5cc818db4a5e97910f842e941d2c543416f1d1&useBunnyCDN=0&themeId=140&isMobile=0&unitType=tts-player

CHICAGO – It’s been a tumultuous decade for the Democratic Socialists of America (DSA), and an even more intense year. So when 1,200 delegates from across the country came to Chicago last weekend for the group’s biannual convention, there was much to debrief. And argue about. And celebrate.

Most recently, New York City DSA member Zohran Mamdani burst into national attention after winning the city’s Democratic mayoral primary, beating Andrew Cuomo and becoming a national target for Republicans (and some Democrats). It’s impossible to ignore DSA’s hand in his win: The organization created a network of tens of thousands of canvassers who spent months going door-to-door in all five boroughs to bring voters Mamdani’s socialist message, tightly focused on basic economic issues.

DSA badly needed that victory. Last summer, the organization was hit with three major electoral defeats. First, in the most expensive House primary in history, AIPAC money and corporate Democrats pushed Rep. Jamaal Bowman from his New York seat. Bowman had a complicated history with DSA over his record on Israel (some members had sought to expel him) but nonetheless was endorsed by the group and had been proof that socialists could gain federal office.

More from Emma Janssen

Just two months after Bowman’s loss, Missouri Rep. Cori Bush lost her seat in much the same way. The third defeat was the dispiriting presidential campaign and Trump’s eventual election, which left many DSA members all the more disillusioned with American electoral politics and the Democratic Party’s stance on Palestine.

Every two years, DSA delegates from across the country meet to vote on resolutions and elect their National Political Committee (NPC), which largely steers the group’s direction, though local chapters retain a great deal of autonomy. This year, reckoning with the wins and losses of 2024 and 2025 was top of mind, along with crafting the organization’s response to the genocide in Palestine.

Walking around the massive Chicago convention center that housed the convention, I could see the organization’s concerns and tensions just by looking around. Members wore keffiyehs on their heads or draped over their shoulders. Some caucuses (ideological groups within the DSA) had their own hats (green for the electorally focused Groundwork Caucus), T-shirts (the communist Emerge Caucus had a nice cherry blossom design), and bandanas (worn by the moderate Socialist Majority Caucus). I worried at first that some of these caucus dynamics would unfocus the group and push so-called “sectarian” debate to the forefront. But I left with a much stronger view of the organization, which emerged united on many of its most crucial questions.

“I think it is a critical juncture for the organization. This moment is clearly very dire,” said Colleen Johnston, who joined DSA after President Trump took office in 2017. “Fascism is barreling through the country. And so the urgency is definitely there. And the question for us is: How seriously and clearly are we going to be meeting the moment with urgent, focused power-building demands that are going to unite a broad coalition of people to fight fascism?”

Though some might be concerned by the infighting they saw at the convention (or on social media), I have a more optimistic view after three days of observing debate and speaking to delegates from across the ideological spectrum. Regardless of what happens at the convention, serious material work is being done on the local chapter level across the country, which builds local power.

The Mamdani Effect

One obvious route to power is by winning elections at all levels of government. The majority of DSA members, delegates told me, support its moves into the American electoral system, regardless of their ideological leanings. Many of the group’s furthest-left members, those who might otherwise reject the Democratic Party, actively canvassed for Mamdani, who ran as a Democrat—as have virtually all DSA elected officials who’ve run in partisan elections.

Sammy Zimmerman, a member of the left-wing Emerge Caucus, is one of those members. “I volunteered for several canvassing shifts and petitioning shifts for Mamdani. It was really, really heartening,” they said. “It was definitely the most helpful I felt about a candidate for office in a long time.”

Expand

Janssen-DSA 081425 4.jpg

LEV RADIN/SIPA USA VIA AP IMAGES

Democratic nominee for New York City mayor Zohran Mamdani

That hope helped kick-start a massive growth in NYC-DSA’s membership. Grace Mausser, a co-chair of NYC-DSA and longtime adviser of Mamdani’s, said that the chapter has grown by several thousand members since the June victory. That brings the total number of members in the chapter to 10,500.

These new members are eager to build on Mamdani’s momentum, Mausser said. “[They’re] very excited to see what the organization will be doing in 2026 with our electoral work.” Mausser also noted a number of legislative campaigns built around Mamdani’s agenda, such as their effort to pass revenue-raisers in Albany, which still controls the tax funding necessary to any city initiatives.

Electoral Philosophy

Today, DSA is looking to replicate Mamdani’s success across the country. Minnesota State Sen. Omar Fateh is a democratic socialist running for mayor in Minneapolis. DSA’s National Electoral Commission has endorsed 12 candidates from across the country in municipal elections this year.

And the group made their first 2028 move, passing a resolution called “Unite Labor & the Left to Run a Socialist for President and Build the Party,” which encourages the group to run a presidential candidate in the next election. After Rep. Rashida Tlaib gave a fiery speech to open the convention—“The working masses are hungry for revolutionary change,” she said—some DSA members both on X and in person suggested that she could be a good fit for the role. Whomever the group runs, it will likely be on the Democratic ballot line, in recognition that third parties are not currently viable in the U.S.

Kareem Elrefai, a New York member who was elected to the NPC at the end of the convention, said that resolution was one of his biggest takeaways from the weekend, steering DSA in a power-building direction. He recounted that the body debated whether their 2028 candidate should run as a Democrat or a third-party candidate, but he was happy with the ultimate outcome. “There was an amendment that would have strongly urged us to go independent. I am very excited that it has kept us on the Democratic Party ballot line, not because I’m a proud Democrat, certainty not by any means,” he said. “Third-party agitational campaigns fail pretty consistently.”

It was a Democratic presidential primary campaign that first brought Elrefai to DSA. While working on the Bernie Sanders campaign in 2020, he met dozens if not hundreds of democratic socialists who were eager to build power together. On the day Sanders dropped out, just as the pandemic came crashing down on the country, Elrefai signed up to join DSA “through tears.” He certainly wasn’t alone: The group’s membership shot up by the thousands each time Sanders ran for president (indeed, membership growth had been moribund for three decades until Sanders first declared his candidacy in 2015).

A common criticism of DSA is that its members aren’t serious about gaining electoral power and making material change; the delegates I spoke to fervently denied this claim.

“We’re more electorally focused than we [were] five, six years ago,” said Mausser from NYC-DSA. “There are no longer live debates about whether socialists should participate in electoral contests.”

Now, Mausser said, the debates focus on “how we engage in those electoral contests.” The question of running candidates as Democrats versus as third-party candidates is still one such debate, as Elrefai mentioned.

Zimmerman believes that there isn’t a one-size-fits-all approach to party politics. “A strategic relationship with the Democrats necessarily looks very different in different parts of the U.S.,” they said. “You have places like New York where, basically, the Democratic primary determines the mayoral election. That’s very different than somewhere like Idaho, where … a plurality of people [is] more conservative and wouldn’t vote for a Democrat anyway.”

Some caucuses value electoral politics above other forms of organizing, while others prefer instead to prioritize mutual aid work or labor organizing. But the vast majority of DSA members don’t see these goals as mutually exclusive. “We want to win and wield power,” Johnston summarized. “One of the ways we can do that is through the power of the state, by actually changing conditions in people’s lives. I think there are a lot of other ways that can be done that are not oppositional to electoral politics but actually very complementary.”

Ethan, a member from New York, identified some of those other methods of organizing: “Our theory of change is defined by a diversity of tactics,” he said. “We have members of the organization that are really actively doing labor organizing, running people in elections, doing field organizing in elections and doing street organizing, organizing on college campuses.” The list goes on.

Red Lines for Palestine

Delegates also debated the criteria that would determine their support for politicians’ views and votes on Israel. One resolution passed by the group, “For a Fighting Anti-Zionist DSA,” called for DSA members and endorsed elected officials to be expelled from the group if they give material support to Israel or related lobbying groups like AIPAC or longtime two-state advocate and Likud critic J Street. Members could also be expelled for statements like “Israel has a right to defend itself.” An amendment that would have removed the expulsion clause was voted down. Fully 40 percent of the delegates opposed the unamended resolution, however, and by its criteria, DSA’s NPC could vote to expel Sanders if he were a member, and might also expel Rep. Alexandria Ocasio-Cortez.

The resolution’s passage comes after years of public disagreement within DSA about how to approach Israel and Palestine. Both AOC and Bowman faced censure from DSA due to their votes and comments on Israel. In 2021, Bowman voted to fund Israel’s Iron Dome, attended a trip to Israel sponsored by J Street, and met with Israeli Prime Minister Naftali Bennett. These actions prompted DSA’s NPC to re-evaluate their endorsement of him; they eventually decided to publicly condemn his actions but didn’t expel him from the group.

Last June, the NPC voted to endorse AOC if she followed a short list of demands on Palestine. Less than a month later, the committee withdrew their endorsement (she remained endorsed by NYC-DSA) in part due to her support for the Iron Dome, even as she has consistently joined Sanders in opposing the sale of offensive weapons to Israel and decrying the nation’s bloody apartheid policies.

Expand

Janssen-DSA 081425 2.jpeg

NICK WEBER

Rep. Rashida Tlaib (D-MI) speaking at the convention

After October 7, 2023, some longtime members of the organization left, citing comments other DSA members made in the wake of Hamas killing 1,200 Israelis, as well as the increasingly sectarian politics of many DSA caucuses. My colleague at the ProspectHarold Meyerson, was one such DSA member. Since late 2023, when Meyerson left the group, DSA has worked to articulate a clear anti-Zionist position. The new resolution comes in response to the debates around Bowman, AOC, and the nature of DSA’s policy on Palestine and Israel, drawing brighter red lines on the issue for members and elected officials alike, even as a sizable minority of delegates opposed it.

It was just one time of many that Palestine animated the convention’s attendees. One of the most pressing reasons that DSA is looking toward gaining more power in 2028 is Palestine. In 2024, DSA worked with the Uncommitted movement for delegates to the forthcoming Democratic convention as a way to protest the Biden administration’s continued support for Israel’s war on Palestine, and joined the call for a Palestinian American speaker at the Democratic National Convention. That call was rejected by nominee Kamala Harris and her team. In the early days of her campaign, Harris had tried to signal a superficial difference between her and Biden on Israel, but ultimately toed the party line. Now, Trump sits in the Oval Office and, of course, hasn’t put a stop to Israel’s destruction of Gaza, either. Sixty-one thousand Palestinians have been killed by Israel, and half a million are living in famine conditions.

“I think we as the left really felt the void that was left in 2024 with no presidential candidate,” Elrefai said. “There was nobody up there to anchor our ideas … and that was a mistake, especially in the midst of an ongoing genocide.”

DSA is looking to 2028, but also hopes to make change in the three years before then. “Whether we’re talking about the genocide that’s happening in Gaza, the climate crisis, the rise of fascism, [or] the dismantling of civil society, we don’t have the luxury of time to be setting a plan for figuring things out in two or three or four years,” Johnston said. We have to be acting urgently now.”

Public Struggle

DSA’s debates—whether over Palestine, elections, or anything else—tend to get broadcasted to outsiders (especially over social media). After scrolling on X during the convention, it would be easy to take a cynical view of DSA, whose convention was chock-full of niche arguments, caucus callouts, and oblique and obscure references. But at least some DSA members say that disagreement within the organization is a feature, not a bug.

“Every organization has this level of dissent and disagreement, and we’re just open about it,” Mausser said. “Our debate and our disagreement [are] intentional.”

And on Palestine, Johnston said: “We’re not really interested in … focusing on that inward-facing stuff about who has the perfect position. If you’re against the genocide and you want to stop it, we want to work with you.”

It will remain to be seen if Johnston’s hope for unity comes true, especially due to the newly passed resolution’s expulsion clause. But it seems that years of debate on Israel and Palestine have cohered the organization around a set of guiding principles, including support for the BDS movement.

That’s not to say that all delegates welcomed the disagreements or supported everything the convention did or didn’t do. Elrefai and Mausser both pointed to losses in the convention that deeply concerned them. Elrefai, along with his caucus, Groundwork, wanted to amend the convention agenda to put two issues up for discussion: transgender rights and the Green New Deal. That effort failed.

“The reason I find that as upsetting as I do is that, at a moment where the Democrats have completely failed to be a bulwark against trans rights, at a moment when they’ve largely stopped talking about climate change, that’s an opportunity for us,” Elrefai said. “And if we don’t fill that void, somebody else will.”

Expand

Janssen-DSA 081425 3.jpeg

ZACH CADDY

The NYC-DSA choir leading convention-goers in song

Mausser echoed that frustration. “I am a little disappointed that at the convention we’re not spending a lot of time on the floor talking about some of the biggest existential fights of our time,” she said. “We’re not spending too much [time] on the floor talking about Trump himself, not spending too much time talking about trans rights, but we do have active programs on those things.”

Paul Garver, a longtime DSA member from the Boston chapter, said that he understands why delegates spent less time talking about Trump than they did about, say, Gaza. When it comes to Trump, he said, chuckling, “there’s nothing controversial, so people don’t think it’s interesting!” But speaking more seriously, he reflected on his own activism during the Vietnam War and said that he too had had a narrow focus on the atrocities he saw abroad. “It’s perfectly understandable that Trump didn’t come up” as frequently as some might have expected, he told me.

Mausser, despite her own disappointment about the lack of debate on Trump’s policies, cautioned against seeing convention arguments as definitive statements about DSA. “I think sometimes at convention, we focus on what we disagree on, which is actually pretty small in the scheme of things,” she said. “And it seems like we’re deprioritizing [things we agree on], but in reality … once we go home after this, that’s where most of the work is going to live.”

Marina, a member of the Emerge Caucus from NYC-DSA, said that she came to conference to build coalitions around resisting ICE, work that would follow her back home to New York. After working to pass a resolution calling for action against ICE, she started making connections with kindred members from across the country.

“I was also here to create a national network of immigrant justice organizers, which has now become an ongoing chat and a series of meetings,” she said.

Going Home

After I left the convention hall, I wondered if I’d been swept up in the excitement of being among so many hopeful people, all striving, roughly, in the same direction. At the end of the convention, the NYC-DSA choir led the thousand-strong ballroom in song. Delegates stood for “The Internationale,” some taking their hats off, others waving massive red flags over the crowd. Behind me, a man swayed with his fist held high for the whole song. The singers bounced and smiled as they sang; someone strummed a guitar. But I think there was really something there, behind all the singing.

“Things are starting to feel very real,” Zimmerman said. “I think that’s the vibe at this convention. It really feels like eyes are on us right now, and what we do next as an organization really matters.”

And now delegates have made it back to their home chapters, where the outside world awaits them: Metro DC DSA is organizing against Trump’s takeover of their city; NYC-DSA returns to canvas for Mamdani; DSA-LA teaches their ranks to resist ICE.

“People always say [DSA] is a big-tent organization,” Zimmerman said, “and that really allows it to be this dynamic thing that is able to adapt to the moment and what people are thinking and needing in the moment. So I think what DSA becomes is really always up for debate.”

EMMA JANSSEN

Emma Janssen is a writing fellow at The American Prospect, where she reports on anti-poverty policy, health, and political power. Before joining the Prospect, she studied political philosophy at UChicago and worked as an editor and freelancer.

‘Go Home Fascists’: Protesters Jeer Federal Agents in Streets of DC

Trump Increases Federal Law Enforcement Presence, Deploys National Guard In Nation's Capital

Police officers set up a roadside checkpoint on 14th Street Northwest on August 13, 2025 in Washington, D.C.

 (Photo: Tasos Katopodis/Getty Images)

Demonstrators yelled at federal agents to “get off our streets” as they set up a police checkpoint on a popular street in the nation’s capital.

JAKE JOHNSON

Aug 14, 2025 (CommonDreams.org)

More than 100 protesters gathered late Wednesday at a checkpoint set up by a combination of local and federal officers on a popular street in Washington, D.C., where U.S. President Donald Trump has taken over the police force and deployed around 800 National Guard members as part of what he hopes will be a long-term occupation of the country’s capital—and potentially other major cities.

The officers at the Wednesday night checkpoint reportedly included agents from the U.S. Department of Homeland Security, which is also taking part in immigration raids in the city. Some agents were wearing face coverings to conceal their identities.

After law enforcement agents established the checkpoint on 14th Street, protesters gathered and jeered the officers, chanting “get off our streets” and “go home fascists.” Some demonstrators yelled at the agents standing at the checkpoint, while others warned oncoming drivers to turn to avoid the police installation.

https://youtube.com/watch?v=Ho72b5YnfUc%3Frel%3D0

There was no officially stated purpose for the checkpoint, but it came amid the Trump administration’s lawless mass deportation campaign and its broader threats to deploy U.S. troops on the streets of American cities to crush dissent.

At least one person, a Black woman, was arrested at Wednesday’s checkpoint. One D.C. resident posted to Reddit that agents were “pulling people out of cars who are ‘suspicious’ or if they don’t like the answers to their questions.” The Washington Post reported that a “mix of local and federal authorities pulled over drivers for seat belt violations or broken taillights.”

The National Guard troops activated by Trump this week were not seen at the checkpoint, which shut down before midnight.

Wednesday night’s protests are expected to be just the start as public anger mounts over Trump’s authoritarian actions in the nation’s capital—where violent crime fell to a 30-year low last year—and across the country.

Radley Balko, a journalist who has documented the growing militarization of U.S. police, wrote earlier this week that “the motivation for Donald Trump’s plan to ‘federalize’ Washington, D.C., is same as his motivation for sending active-duty troops into Los Angelesdeporting people to the CECOT torture prison in El Salvador, his politicization of the Department of Justice, and nearly every other authoritarian overreach of the last six months: He is testing the limits of his power—and, by extension, of our democracy.”

“He’s feeling out what the Supreme Court, Congress, and the public will let him get away with. And so far, he’s been able to do what he pleases,” Balko wrote. “We are now past the point of crisis. Trump has long dreamed of presiding over a police state. He has openly admired and been reluctant to criticize foreign leaders who helm one. He has now appointed people who have expressed their willingness to help him achieve one to the very positions with the power to make one happen. And both he and his highest-ranking advisers have both openly spoken about and written out their plans to implement one.”

“It’s time to believe them,” Balko added.

Our work is licensed under Creative Commons (CC BY-NC-ND 3.0). Feel free to republish and share widely.

JAKE JOHNSON

Jake Johnson is a senior editor and staff writer for Common Dreams.

Full Bio >

Another to-do list

Donald Trump’s authoritarian house of cards is propped up by the cowardice and compliance of others in positions of power: business leaders, universities, law firms, media, and more. His authority collapses without their support. But right now, too many powerful institutions are bending and bowing.

We need to show our institutions that we’ll have their back when they fight — and that there’s a real price to pay when they don’t.

In the One Million Rising series that wrapped up last night, we laid out strategies and actions nearly anyone can use to hit Trump’s enablers where it hurts. If you didn’t catch One Million Rising, you can watch all three trainings here.

Now, we’re putting non-cooperation into action on a massive scale! Here are three nationwide initiatives you can join to undermine Trump’s power structures.


1) Slow down ICE with Signs of Solidarity

Masked ICE agents are raiding businesses and workplaces in broad daylight, rounding up our neighbors and purposefully cultivating an atmosphere of chaos and fear. We need business leaders to stand their ground and show immigrant communities we stand with them.

Our Signs of Solidarity program is how you can help make that happen! We’re asking Indivisibles to visit local businesses, speak to small business owners or store managers, and distribute signs that do two things:

  1. Clearly mark “Staff Only” areas to create safe zones where ICE can’t legally operate without a signed judicial warrant
  2. Unequivocally show they stand WITH immigrant workers and clientele and AGAINST Trump’s secret police tactics

Once you’ve signed on below, we’ll give you everything you need to succeed, like guidelines for speaking to businesses, tools to track progress/success, and the signs you’ll help businesses post.

Protect your community from fascist ICE raids by signing up to complete a Signs of Solidarity canvass!

Get started >>

2) Ground Avelo Airlines’ deportation flights

Avelo Airlines is profiting off Trump’s terror tactics. By contracting with the Department of Homeland Security to run their (often illegal) deportation flights, Avelo is complicit in destroying the very same communities it relies on for its business to succeed.

With our allies on the frontlines, we’ve been keeping pressure on Avelo for months — and there are signs that they’re feeling the heat. Now, we need to take our pressure campaign to the next level and finally force Avelo to disavow its work with Trump’s terror cops for good.

Join our campaign to make Avelo’s deportation flights too costly to continue! Use this link to find at-home actions and in-person events in your area.

Ground Avelo >>

3) Fight the Trump redistricting coup

Texas Democrats are bravely showing us what non-cooperation looks like in action! By leaving behind their homes and families — even risking arrest in the process — to block redistricting in Texas, they’re throwing sand in the gears of Trump’s power-grab and reminding us how much courage matters.

But Trump’s map-rigging scheme won’t end in Texas, so we need Democratic leaders and everyday people in every state ready to be brave and fight hard. That’s why we’re proudly supporting a nationwide day of action and rolling out a new toolkit to lead the fight against GOP map-rigging.

Here’s what you can do:

  1. Join a protest this Saturday, August 16, to raise hell and rally support in the fight against the MAGA redistricting coup. We’re gathering across the country to show support for the brave TX Dems, demand courage from Dems everywhere else, and show the GOP their scheme won’t go unanswered.
  2. Check our toolkit to see how folks in your state can respond to Trump’s map-rigging scheme. We lay out where GOP redistricting threats are most dangerous, where Dems can counter with new maps, and how folks in other states can support those on the front lines.

It’s on us — all of us — to hold the line against this new threat, so please make sure you do your part whether you’re in a red, blue, or purple state.


To close out our One Million Rising series, Texas House Democrats’ leader, Gene Wu, reminded us of this:

“It’s fine that people are waking up late. It’s fine that people didn’t get it until now. It’s fine that people didn’t see it until now. But the real question is: Can we change it?”

We can change the direction of this country and stop Trump’s hostile takeover! But it’ll take all of us pulling together — not just on single days of mass action, but through relentless daily organizing and sustained non-cooperation.

The three initiatives above are a start, and there’s so much more to come. Please stay tuned, and thanks for being with us.

In solidarity,
Indivisible Team

Fact-Checking Trump On Crime

Published: August 14, 2025 (TheOnion.com)

President Donald Trump has claimed that crime is “out of control” in the nation’s capital and beyond. The Onion assesses the veracity of the president’s claims. 

Claim: D.C. has endured a record amount of robberies.

Partially true: Some places in Georgetown sell a cup of coffee for $9.

Claim: Chicago, New York, and Los Angeles are crime-ridden cesspools.

False: These cities are safe, vibrant cesspools.

Claim: The National Guard is being deployed to crack down on crime.

False: The National Guard is being deployed to give Stephen Miller an erection.

Claim: Just last week, a high-ranking politician was shot in the head at a D.C. theater. 

False: Trump is mixing up last week with April 14, 1865. 

Claim: Violent foreigners traveled to D.C. to savagely beat Americans.

False: The UFC fight on the White House South Lawn isn’t until next year.

Claim: Basically anything.

False: “False” continues to be a very safe assumption to make.

‘You Have Poked the Bear’: Defiant Gavin Newsom Puts Trump on Notice in Speech Pushing New Maps

'You Have Poked the Bear': Defiant Gavin Newsom Puts Trump on Notice in Speech Pushing New Maps

Gov. Gavin Newsom speaks at Google San Francisco office in San Francisco, California, on August 7, 2025.

 (Photo: Tayfun Coskun/Anadolu via Getty Images)

“Who else sends ICE at the same time while having a conversation like this? Someone who is weak. Someone who’s broken. Someone whose weakness is masquerading as a strength,” said Newsom.

BRAD REED

Aug 14, 2025 (CommonDreams.org)

Democratic California Gov. Gavin Newsom on Thursday struck a defiant tone during a political rally in Los Angeles aimed at promoting a ballot initiative that would allow the state legislature to redraw the Golden State’s electoral maps.

During his speech, Newsom emphasized his preference to having an independent commission draw up districts in California and across the country. However, he said that U.S. President Donald Trump’s push to have Texas Republicans redraw their state’s map in the middle of the decade to gain five more Republican seats in the U.S. House of Representatives has left him with no choice but to return the favor.

“You have poked the bear, and we will punch back,” Newsom said during the speech, addressing Trump directly.

The California governor then explained why doing nothing in response to Trump’s pressure on Texas is not an option.

“[Trump] doesn’t play by a different set of rules—he doesn’t believe in the rules,” Newsom said. “And as a consequence, we need to disabuse ourselves of the way things have been done. It’s not enough to just hold hands, have a candlelight vigil, and talk about way the world should be. We have got to recognize the cards that have been dealt, and we have got to meet fire with fire!”

Newsom also pointed out that several Immigration and Customs Enforcement (ICE) officials had stationed themselves nearby where California Democrats were holding their rally, which he called a deliberate attempt at intimidation.

However, Newsom said that instead of subduing lawmakers and advocates with the mass deportation force, Trump was only exposing his weakness.

“He is a failed president,” Newsom declared. “Who else sends ICE at the same time while having a conversation like this? Someone who is weak. Someone who’s broken. Someone whose weakness is masquerading as a strength. The most unpopular president in modern history.”

Newsom encouraged voters in his state to approve a ballot initiative this coming November 4 that would allow the redrawing of California’s congressional map on a temporary basis before returning to the independent commission that has long been used in the state starting in 2030.

Our work is licensed under Creative Commons (CC BY-NC-ND 3.0). Feel free to republish and share widely.

BRAD REED

Brad Reed is a staff writer for Common Dreams.

Full Bio >

To Beat Back Trump’s GOP in 2026, Progressive Leader Says ‘Corporate’ Dems Must Go

Senate Lawmakers Work On Capitol Hill Ahead Of Summer Recess

Senate Minority Leader Chuck Schumer (D-N.Y.) holds a news conference criticizing President Donald Trump’s trade policy at the US Capitol on July 31, 2025, in Washington, DC.

 (Photo: Chip Somodevilla/Getty Images)

“Voters have made their feelings clear,” said the leader of Justice Democrats. “The majority do not see themselves in this party and do not believe in its leaders or many of its representatives.”

STEPHEN PRAGER

Aug 14, 2025 (CommonDreams.org)

A top progressive leader has given her prescription for how the Democratic Party can begin to retake power from US President Donald Trump: Ousting “corporate-funded” candidates.

Justice Democrats executive director Alexandra Rojas wrote Thursday in The Guardian that, “If the Democratic Party wants to win back power in 2028,” its members need to begin to redefine themselves in the 2026 midterms.

“Voters have made their feelings clear, a majority do not see themselves in this party and do not believe in its leaders or many of its representatives,” Rojas said. “They need a new generation of leaders with fresh faces and bold ideas, unbought by corporate super [political action committees] and billionaire donors, to give them a new path and vision to believe in.”

Despite Trump’s increasing unpopularity, a Gallup poll from July 31 found that the Democratic Party still has record-low approval across the country.

Rojas called for “working-class, progressive primary challenges to the overwhelming number of corporate Democratic incumbents who have rightfully been dubbed as do-nothing electeds.”

According to a Reuters/Ipsos poll conducted in June, nearly two-thirds of self-identified Democrats said they desired new leadership, with many believing that the party did not share top priorities, like universal healthcare, affordable childcare, and higher taxes on the rich.

Young voters were especially dissatisfied with the current state of the party and were much less likely to believe the party shared their priorities.

Democrats have made some moves to address their “gerontocracy” problem—switching out the moribund then-President Joe Biden with Vice President Kamala Harris in the 2024 presidential race and swapping out longtime House Speaker Rep. Nancy Pelosi (Calif.) for the younger Rep. Hakeem Jeffries (N.Y.).

But Rojas says a face-lift for the party is not enough. They also need fresh ideas.

“Voters are also not simply seeking to replace their aging corporate shill representatives with younger corporate shills,” she said. “More of the same from a younger generation is still more of the same.”

Outside of a “small handful of outspoken progressives,” she said the party has often been too eager to kowtow to Trump and tow the line of billionaire donors.

“Too many Democratic groups, and even some that call themselves progressive, are encouraging candidates’ silence in the face of lobbies like [the America-Israel Public Affairs Committee] (AIPAC) and crypto’s multimillion-dollar threats,” she said.

Public Citizen report found that in 2024, Democratic candidates and aligned PACs received millions of dollars from crypto firms like Coinbase, Ripple, and Andreesen Horowitz.

According to OpenSecrets, 58% of the 212 Democrats elected to the House in 2024—135 of them—received money from AIPAC, with an average contribution of $117,334. In the Senate, 17 Democrats who won their elections received donations—$195,015 on average.

The two top Democrats in Congress—Jeffries and Senate Minority Leader Chuck Schumer (D-N.Y.)—both have long histories of support from AIPAC, and embraced crypto with open arms after the industry flooded the 2024 campaign with cash.

“Too often, we hear from candidates and members who claim they are with us on the policy, but can’t speak out on it because AIPAC or crypto will spend against them,” Rojas said. “Silence is cowardice, and cowardice inspires no one.”

Rojas noted Rep. Summer Lee (D-Pa.), who was elected in 2022 despite an onslaught of attacks from AIPAC and who has since gone on to introduce legislation to ban super PACs from federal elections, as an example of this model’s success.

“The path to more Democratic victories,” Rojas said, “is not around, behind, and under these lobbies, but it’s right through them, taking them head-on and ridding them from our politics once and for all.”

Our work is licensed under Creative Commons (CC BY-NC-ND 3.0). Feel free to republish and share widely.

STEPHEN PRAGER

Stephen Prager is a staff writer for Common Dreams.

Full Bio >

Today’s to-do list

Join us on the front lines for our rights, freedoms, democracy and rule of law. We can do this!

  • Click here to Protect the 2026 Elections
  • Click here to Demand Congress protect more than $100 million in funding for Tribal colleges now
  • Click here to Ban members of Congress and their families from trading individual stocks now!
  • Click here to Oppose Trump’s AI plan. Don’t give more power to Google & Musk’s xAI!