Khanna Becomes First in Congress to Sign ‘Peace Pledge’ Promising to Reject AIPAC Funds

Rep. Khanna Speaks At The National Press Club On The Epstein Files

US Rep. Ro Khanna (D-Calif.) delivers remarks during a National Press Club Headliners Newsmaker event on April 14, 2026 in Washington, DC.

 (Photo by Alex Wong/Getty Images)

The co-founder of AIPAC Tracker said the pledge is meant to give lawmakers who once backed Israel “a bridge to get on the right side of history.”

Stephen Prager

Jun 17, 2026 (CommonDreams.org)

Rep. Ro Khanna has become the first member of the US Congress to sign a “peace pledge” promising to swear off funds from the Israel lobby and block US support for countries that violate human rights.

The pledge was created by the political action committee Citizens Against AIPAC Corruption, which runs the widely shared “AIPAC Tracker” social media campaign that names and shames politicians who receive support from the American Israel Public Affairs Committee and other pro-Israel groups that have spent tens of millions in recent election cycles to influence members of Congress.

RECOMMENDED…

Pete Hegseth And Dan Caine Appear For House Budget Request Meeting

Ro Khanna Urges Fellow Democrats to Stop Trying to Out Hawk Trump on Iran War

Reps. Ro Khanna (D-Calif.) and Thomas Massie (R-Ky.)

Khanna Vows Amendment to Kill ‘Insidious’ Effort to Deepen Military Ties Between US, Israel

Lawmakers who sign the pledge agree not to take money from AIPAC or pro-Israel lobbying groups and promise to make campaign finance reform a key priority.

Acknowledging the consensus among human rights organizations that Israel is committing a genocide in Gaza, signatories also commit to taking actions in Congress to oppose US military and diplomatic support for Israel or any other nation whose military commits gross human rights violations.

They also agree to oppose efforts by the US government to sanction members of the International Criminal Court who seek the arrest of accused war criminals, including Israeli Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu.

No paywall. No ads. No billionaire owner. Just you.

Common Dreams is funded exclusively by readers tired of news beholden to corporate interests. Our monthly supporters are the backbone of what makes that possible. Help us reach our Mid-Year Campaign goal of 450 new monthly supporters by July 1.

about:blank

Signatories also agree to support First Amendment protections for speech critical of Israel as well as efforts to use financial pressure against the country, like the Boycott, Divestment, and Sanctions (BDS) movement, which members of Congress have sought to criminalize.

In a video in which he signed the pledge on Wednesday, Khanna (D-Calif.) described its commitments as “pretty common sense.”

“It means that we shouldn’t be sending our tax [money] for foreign wars overseas, we should be spending it here at home,” he said. “And it says we shouldn’t be taking money from AIPAC or all of its affiliate PACs or bundled money from those organizations, and that we have to recognize the genocide that took place in Gaza.”

He said, “I’m going to be signing this pledge, and I hope others will follow.”

The push for lawmakers to sign the pledge comes as support for Israel has plummeted to historic lows, especially among Democratic voters in the wake of the Gaza genocide, its accelerating ethnic cleansing campaigns in the illegally occupied West Bank and southern Lebanon, and its role in pressuring the Trump administration to launch and continue a devastating war against Iran.

Voters increasingly view AIPAC as having undue influence over American lawmakers, and many Democrats—including longtime supporters of Israel—have seen the writing on the wall and become vocal critics of the lobby.

Khanna is one of them, having previously accepted money from the liberal Zionist group J Street and voted to fund Israel’s Iron Dome in 2021 and in favor of a resolution conflating anti-Zionism with antisemitism in the wake of October 7, 2023.

Cory Archibald, the co-founder of Track AIPAC, said the goal of the pledge is to give these politicians an opportunity to transform themselves on the issue while also forcing them to put their votes where their mouths are.

“While we have created a very successful pressure campaign to highlight and expose the extent of the influence of AIPAC and their allies on our lawmakers,” she said Wednesday on the Breaking Points podcast, “we also have a responsibility as an organization to give people a bridge to get on the right side of history and to reflect that their policy positions have changed and to chart a new course.”

Our work is licensed under Creative Commons (CC BY-NC-ND 3.0). Feel free to republish and share widely.

Stephen Prager

Stephen Prager is a staff writer for Common Dreams.

Full Bio >

Terror-ICEd: Trump’s Immigration Crackdown Through the Eyes of Frightened Kids

Image Alt Text: Sign, Minnesota Shut It Down, The People have the power to stop ice terror Minnesota
Protest sign reading, “Minnesota Shut It Down!” at an anti-ICE protest in downtown Minneapolis, MN on January 30, 2026. Photo credit: Fibonacci Blue / Flickr (CC BY 4.0)

Opinion

Klaus Marre 06/17/26 (whowhatwhy.org)

To better understand how ICE terrorizes US communities, it’s important to know how it affects children when they see masked goons round up people on the streets, leaving care-giving adults in fear. Our recent series documented just that.

According to the FBI’s definition, by carrying out “violent, criminal acts” to “further ideological goals stemming from domestic influences, such as those of a political, religious, social, racial, or environmental nature,” ICE is the best-funded domestic terrorist organization in the United States.

Now, if you argue that this definition stems from the previous administration, here is another one from Donald Trump’s first term in office.

It says that domestic terrorism involves “acts dangerous to human life that are a violation of the criminal laws of the United States.” That certainly applies, even though ICE agents routinely get a pass for committing all manner of crimes against the civilian population of the United States.

And we’re not just talking about the Americans who were directly killed or injured but also the immigrants who died in custody or through negligence.

The key is that these acts are defined as intended to “intimidate or coerce a civilian population,” and there is no doubt that this is what’s happening.

After all, ICE isn’t exactly shy about what it is doing.

To be fair, there is a problem with using the Trump administration’s own domestic terrorism definition. That’s because it also states that those dangerous acts are intended to “influence the policy of government by intimidation or coercion” or “affect the conduct of a government by mass destruction, assassination or kidnapping.”

While there is plenty of kidnapping going on, and the deaths of Renee Good and Alex Pretti in Minneapolis at the beginning of the year might be viewed as assassinations, ICE is not trying to influence the policy of government by intimidation or coercion; it is carrying it out by using those tactics.

Which is why Republicans in Congress just gave ICE and US Customs and Border Patrol another $70 billion through the end of Trump’s term to limit the Democrats’ ability to curb the power of these lawless agencies if they manage to win the midterms.

So, by definition, the president’s immigrant hunters are engaging in a form of domestic terrorism; it just happens to be government-sponsored, which means that nobody is getting prosecuted for any of it — at least not for the next couple of years.  

However, it is important to remember that there are different kinds of terror.

Today, we don’t want to talk about the specific crimes that masked federal thugs are committing to intimidate regular Americans and immigrants — the ones we primarily know about because brave patriots have recorded them.

We also don’t want to talk about the atrocities being committed behind closed doors in detention centers, or the neglect suffered by those kept there.

We don’t want to talk about citizens being wrongfully whisked away.

Instead, we want to talk about the kind of terror that one of our interns reported on in a four-part series documenting the impact that “Operation Metro Surge” had on students in Minnesota at the start of this year.

We are doing this for two reasons: The first is that we are very proud of our Mentor Apprenticeship Program and the work that the young reporters do when they come to us to learn about journalism. The second is to remind people that this government terror reaches far beyond the immigrants who now live in fear for themselves and loved ones, or the protesters who are roughed up, followed, held at gunpoint, or arrested.

In talking to students, teachers, a superintendent and a child psychologist, what our intern found is that living in a state resembling an occupation by an outside force was extremely traumatizing for many of these children.

And we don’t just mean the dozens of kids who were detained or their friends and family members.

This trauma also extends to students who were familiar with the places where Good and Pretti were killed by government agents, or who got to know the smell of tear gas.

Teachers told stories of younger children being frozen in fear when ICE was nearby and others who were puzzled about not hearing Spanish being spoken in the hallways of their schools anymore.

These kids don’t view their own government as a positive force in their lives. Instead, they experienced it as an army of masked and weapon-wielding goons trying to intimidate them and their communities — similar to what they learned about foreign dictatorships in their world history classes.

Or, as one of the students interviewed for the series said, “It feels like we’re advocating for and fighting for the exact same things that generations before us have been fighting for.”

We urge readers to read the entire series — not only because it is important but also because it ultimately inspires hope.

You can read Part 1Part 2Part 3, and Part 4 here. 

What our reporter found is that many students in Minneapolis, along with their teachers and school administrators, took action to stand up to the brutality of the Trump administration.

They marched in sub-zero temperatures, carried whistles to alert their peers to the local presence of ICE, shared tips of how to behave when confronted by government agents, and, in general, were there for each other.

Perhaps most importantly, they realized that even an overwhelming government force that seems intent on intimidating their communities is not all-powerful.

Because, in the end, the people of Minneapolis, through protests and recording ICE’s misdeeds and efforts to terrorize them, built up enough pressure to force the administration to scale down Operation Metro Surge.

It wasn’t a perfect victory because there has been precious little accountability on the ground and in Washington, DC, for those crimes. ICE is still getting a blank check, and its terror campaign has moved on to new targets — less visible, because of the backlash.

Still, in the end, the students and adults covered in the series didn’t just learn a valuable lesson, they also taught one to everybody else: Nothing is inevitable – and resistance is not futile.

  • Klaus MarreKlaus Marre, a former congressional reporter, is a senior editor for US politics at WhoWhatWhy. He writes regularly here, and you can also follow him on Bluesky and Substack.

‘Monumental Civil Rights Victory’: Georgia Democrats Celebrate as State GOP Drops Plan to Redraw Maps

'Monumental Civil Rights Victory': Georgia Democrats Celebrate as State GOP Drops Plan to Redraw Maps

US Sens. Jon Ossoff (D-Ga.) and Raphael Warnock (D-Ga.) take the stage at the Georgia State Convocation Center in Atlanta, Georgia, on July 30, 2024.

 (Photo by Demetrius Freeman/The Washington Post via Getty Images)

“Today, thanks to the people showing up and showing out, we won. Racist, rigged maps are dead for now.”

Brad Reed

Jun 17, 2026 (CommonDreams.org)

Democrats in Georgia are celebrating as Republicans in the state abandoned efforts to redraw congressional maps that would have taken effect in 2028.

Eight Georgia Republicans, including Speaker of the House Jon Burns, sent a letter to Gov. Brian Kemp on Wednesday informing him that they would not be going through with his request to enact redistricting ahead of the 2028 election cycle.

RECOMMENDED…

Black women march for voting rights in Alabama

Citing ‘Intentional Race-Based Discrimination,’ Court Blocks Alabama’s GOP-Rigged Electoral Map

Supreme Court justices

‘Debases the Democratic Process,’ Sotomayor Warns as Supreme Court Allows Racist Alabama Map

“Changes to Georgia’s maps should take place only when members of the General Assembly and citizens have been given ample opportunity to gather the facts, provide input, and engage in meaningful discussion,” the letter states. “For this reason, we will not be taking up congressional or legislative redistricting for the 2028 election cycle during this special session.”

However, there is still a chance that Georgia Republicans could ram through new maps later this year. According to Democracy Docket, Kemp “could still call another special session later this year—and if Republicans lose the midterms, they could try to lock in a 2028 advantage by passing new maps before Kemp leaves office next year.”

Democrats in the state nonetheless celebrated Republicans’ decision to shelve Kemp’s redistricting plan.

In a joint statement, Georgia Senate Minority Leader Harold Jones II and House Minority Leader Carolyn Hugley called on supporters to celebrate “a monumental civil rights victory.”

“Republicans thought they could get away with drawing racist, rigged maps without a fight,” they said. “Today, thanks to the people showing up and showing out, we won. Racist, rigged maps are dead for now.”

Sen. Raphael Warnock (D-Ga.) praised the work of activists who protested against the redistricting plan earlier in the day, putting pressure on Republicans to drop it.

“Hours after I visited the State Capitol with thousands of Georgians, Georgia House Republicans announced they are backing down from gerrymandering our maps, potentially giving them two extra seats,” wrote Warnock.

“John Lewis never backed down from getting into good trouble and I won’t either,” he added, referring to the late civil rights icon and Democratic member of Congress.

Trump last year sparked an unprecedented mid-decade redistricting battle when he pushed Texas to redraw its congressional map to gain extra Republican seats, and GOP-led states including North Carolina, Missouri, and Florida have since followed suit.

Our work is licensed under Creative Commons (CC BY-NC-ND 3.0). Feel free to republish and share widely.

Brad Reed

Brad Reed is a staff writer for Common Dreams.

Full Bio >

Your Power in Action: What You Can Do Today

People Power United

The movement for freedom over fascism, progress, and power to the people starts here.

For Decades, Americans Learned the Treasonous Truth After the Votes Were Counted. This Time Is Different.

For half a century, the evidence surfaced after the winners took office. This election may be the first where the public sees it beforehand…

Thom Hartmann

Jun 17, 2026 (HartmannReport.com)

Share

Republicans have gotten away with it four times now, in a big way. Each time it was because Democrats didn’t realize — until it was too late — the crimes the GOP was willing to perpetrate just to seize and hold power.

This time, for the first time since 1968, it may be different.

In August of 1968, President Lyndon Johnson and Vice President Hubert Humphrey negotiated an end to the Vietnam War with both the North and South Vietnamese. Humphrey was running against Richard Nixon for president in that year’s election and planned to announce the deal in September or early October. He was running ahead and would’ve easily won the presidency with the peace deal.

Unfortunately, Nixon learned of the deal. His people reached out to the corrupt South Vietnamese administration and promised them riches if they’d refuse to go to Paris and sign the peace deal as planned. The FBI had been wiretapping the South Vietnamese and intercepted one of the conversations and handed it over to LBJ.

President Johnson called Everett Dirksen, the head of the Senate Republicans, and pointed out that Nixon was trying to “commit treason.” Dirksen agreed and promised that he’d reach out to Nixon to try to stop it. He failed, and Nixon went ahead and sabotaged the peace deal, leading to another ~24,000 American and ~400,000+ Vietnamese deaths before Jerry Ford ended the war in 1975.

Johnson told Dirksen that he didn’t want Americans to know that Nixon was committing treason to become president because he was afraid it’d shatter our faith in the American system; Dirksen agreed, and the secret went to their graves, only to be revealed to the public 25 years later when the LBJ library published the audiotapes of their conversations.

If Democrats had known, they could have shown up in the streets and stopped Nixon, but LBJ didn’t think there was enough time (he was probably right; Nixon would have just denied it and claimed it was a political hit job, fake news). So Nixon became president and, with his appointments of justices Harry Blackmun and Lewis Powell to the Supreme Court making it majority Republican for the first time since the 1930s, changed the course of American history.

Then it happened again.

In November, 1979, Iranian “students” took the US Embassy and its staff hostage. Two months later, Abolhassan Bani-Sadr was elected prime minister of Iran on a platform of “release the hostages and normalize relations with the United States.” President Jimmy Carter reached out to Bani-Sadr and the two of them began the process of organizing the release of the hostages.

As Bani-Sadr later told The Christian Science Monitor after he fled to America, that year Ronald Reagan was running against Carter for the White House and his campaign reached out to the mullahs, who were the real power base in Iran, and offered them a deal. They had all this US-manufactured military hardware the Shah had bought and they desperately needed spare parts and compatible missiles; Reagan would help cement the power of the radical new regime by selling them the weaponry they needed if they’d just help him become president by hanging onto the hostages until after the election.

Carter and Bani-Sadr knew the mullahs had suddenly turned against releasing the hostages but didn’t learn until 1981 that it was because the Reagan campaign had committed treason to humiliate Carter and win the 1980 election. Reagan became president, illegally sold the Iranians weapons for the next five years (Iran/Contra), and used the money to illegally fund neofascists in Central America. He then declared war on unions, cut taxes on the morbidly rich, cut education funding, and flipped us out of the New Deal that had built the American middle class, leading straight to today’s widespread poverty and oligarchy.

Become a Hartmann Report insider

The hostages were released by the mullahs on January 20, 1981 when Reagan put his hand on the bible to be sworn into office — to the minute — by way of sealing the deal.

If Democrats had known before the election, they could have shown up in the streets and stopped Reagan, but nobody learned even the rough details for a year, and it wasn’t until former Texas Lt. Governor Ben Barnes made his confession to The New York Times in 2023 that we finally got solid confirmation from an American source. Reagan’s treason and 1980 election theft, then 43 years in the past, became a one-day story.

And then it happened again.

In 2000, Bill Clinton’s Vice President, Al Gore, was running against Texas Governor George W. Bush and the election was such a squeaker that it all came down to one state: Florida. Which was then run by George’s brother, Governor Jeb Bush.

Jeb ordered his Secretary of State (and the Florida head of George Bush for President) Katherine Harris to obtain a list of mostly-Black and Hispanic felons from George’s Texas penal system and run it against the Florida voter roll. The result was at least 10,000 — and by some estimates as many as 70,000 — mostly Black voters purged from the Florida voter list and unable to vote.

As a result, George W. Bush won Florida — and the presidency — by 537 votes. George’s father’s appointee to the Supreme Court, Clarence Thomas (whose wife was taking interviews for positions in George’s White House), was the deciding vote on the US Supreme Court to ignore/violate the 10th Amendment and stop the recount ordered by the Florida Supreme Court (which would have revealed how Jeb/Harris had rigged the election).

If Democrats had known at the time, they could have shown up in the streets and stopped Bush, but nobody learned even the rough details of the GOP election rigging for several months when BBC reporter Greg Palast broke the story to an international audience and, a year later, a recount done by a group of newspapers found that Gore would, indeed, have won the recount.

All of which brings us to today.

Trump is openly trying to rig this fall’s election, as multiple mainstream outlets have documented. He’s put “election deniers” willing to commit crimes against democracy into critical positions, crippled the two offices in the Executive branch responsible for election integrity, ordered the Post Office to refuse to carry ballots in Democratic-run states with mail-in voting, is positioning ICE agents to intimidate voters, launched a national gerrymandering campaign, and has a handful of other threatened sleazy actions.

Republicans want to outlaw married women voting if they haven’t gone before a judge to change their last names (the SAVE Act), and Trump is trying to build a national voter database — in defiance of the Constitution — so he can help Red states with Blue cities purge their Democratic voters.

Unlike with Nixon, Reagan, or Bush, however, this time we know. We can see this coming. They’re doing much of it right out in the open. And that’s a huge advantage that we all must prepare for.

You can support the Hartmann Report here

If it’s true that Trump became president in 2016, as Robert Mueller’s investigation found, because of major help from Putin, then the last legitimately elected Republican president who didn’t commit or at least flirt with treason was Dwight D. Eisenhower (1953-1961).

By coincidence, he was also the last Republican president to reject the influence of America’s oligarchs and instead kept the top 90% income tax rate on oligarchs and actually worked to increase union membership and expand Social Security.

So, get ready. We know in advance at least some of the dirty tricks they’re going to try to pull. Musk and Zuck spinning their social media outlets; Fox, CBS, and CNN under oligarch’s thumbs; ICE disruption; seized ballots; corrupted mail; and now realistic, highly deceptive AI-generated Republican deepfakes are already appearing in the Texas senatorial election.

It’s going to get worse — these guys are now legitimately afraid of suffering the same fate as Nixon’s Attorney General John Mitchell (who went to prison) — but, once again, this time we can see it coming.

Forewarned is forearmed.

Chakrabarti offers 220 jobs backing Chan congressional bid

In a potential boon to San Francisco Supervisor Connie Chan’s congressional campaign, centimillionaire Saikat Chakrabarti has endorsed her candidacy and is converting his campaign committee to support her against state Sen. Scott Wiener in the race to succeed U.S. Rep. Nancy Pelosi, a Chakrabarti spokesperson said.

Chakrabarti — who finished behind Chan in the June 2 primary election despite having loaned or contributed nearly $10 million of his own money to his campaign — changed the name of his election campaign committee to the SF Solidarity PAC, an independent-expenditure committee, according to federal filings.

The former candidate had made offers to about 220 campaign employees who could work on Chan’s behalf as part of the independent effort, said spokesperson Nate Albee.

“What it comes down to for Saikat is about changing the direction of the Democratic Party,” Albee said. “As it currently stands, the party has been co-opted by corporations.”

Chan has committed to not taking money from corporate political-action committees, among other entities.

Chan campaign spokesperson Julie Edwards provided a statement in which Chan said she welcomed Chakrabarti’s endorsement.

“Together, we can stand up to corporate power and bring the voices of working families to Washington,” said Chan, who was first elected supervisor in 2020.

With almost all of the ballots from the election counted Monday, Wiener — a former San Francisco supervisor and a state legislator of nearly 10 years — won first place, with 95,720 votes, or 40.73%. Pelosi’s 11th Congressional District covers all but a southern chunk of The City.

Chan — who got Pelosi’s coveted endorsement on May 18, late in the primary race — came in second place with 69,823 votes, or 29.71%. Chakrabarti came in third with 41,990 votes, or 17.87%.

The results showed Wiener was dominant in most of The City, but Chan was particularly strong in the heavily Asian American Richmond and Sunset districts, according to data on the website Election Map.

Although Chakrabarti leveled far more broadsides against Wiener ahead of the primary election, Wiener campaign spokesperson Joe Arellano provided a statement Monday pointing out that Chakrabarti had criticized Chan on the stump.

Ex // Top Stories

SpaceX’s gonzo IPO could be good news for OpenAI, Anthropic

The successful Wall Street debut of Elon Musk’s space company could offer a path for the San Francisco-based AI giants to follow.

The race to be the new District 8 supervisor draws passionate candidates

Candidates include the owner of a cafe and civic events space, a longtime Nancy Pelosi aide, and a patent attorney who doubles as a drag performer 

State-controller candidate Morgan sees competence as winning issue

Although he’s trying to become the first Republican to win the office in more than 50 years, he’s touting his expertise over party ties

“Now he’s endorsing her?” Arellano said. “This is the cynical politics that voters hate.”

“Connie Chan has built a career on blocking housing and affordability for young people — the same voters Saikat claimed to speak for,” Arellano said. “With this move, it’s clear that Saikat never cared about what’s best for San Francisco. He was only in the race to stroke his massive ego.”

Both Chan and Wiener have been highlighting endorsements, with Wiener recently issuing a press release touting the fact that six of The City’s 11 supervisors, among others, have backed him.

Charkrabarti is a progressive activist who made a fortune as an early software engineer at the payments company Stripe. He loaned or contributed at least $9.9 million of the $10.3 million his campaign raised in the leadup to the election.

He paid some canvassers as much as $45 per hour, and his campaign said it built “one of the largest field operations in recent San Francisco history,” knocking on nearly a half-million doors as part of “a grassroots movement.”

Chan bested Chakrabarti in the primary despite declaring her candidacy relatively late, on Nov. 20, and had raised about $700,000 by the time of the election. Wiener raised about $4 million.

Chan’s campaign posted a video Sunday evening on social media featuring Chakrabarti bequeathing his endorsement while the two sat at a table at Joe’s Ice Cream in the Richmond district.

A co-founder of economic-policy think tank New Consensus, Chakrabarti said he and Chan agreed on “the most important issue right now, which is that if we actually want to create a society that works for working people, we have to break the stranglehold of corporate money in Washington.”

Chan responded, “Not only we have to break that stronghold, the corporate stronghold, but we also need to make sure we have progressive taxation, that billionaires and their corporations pay their fair share.”

Chakrabarti praised Chan for supporting “a wealth tax on the ultra rich, and you’ve been really clear that you’re going to stop sending endless bombs abroad, spending billions on wars and on genocides, and instead invest that back home here in housing, health care, and education.”

“We look forward to working together to make sure we stop [President] Donald Trump’s $1.5 trillion on war and making sure that money we bring that back and to invest in health care and public education,” Chan said.

San Francisco Faces Special Election Frenzy in 2027

by Randy Shaw on June 15, 2026 (BeyondChron.org)

The Upcoming Political Feast

Are you are a San Francisco voter glad that the June campaigns are finally over? Enjoy the brief break. The November campaigns are already in high gear and the Wiener-Chan congressional race could trigger three hotly contested special elections in 2027.

Here’s our breakdown of the likely contests.

State Senate/D1 Supervisor

If Connie Chan wins, a special election will be held for her D1 seat. Mayor Lurie will pick Chan’s replacement. The appointee will then face a Special Election.

The mayor will assuredly appoint a moderate supervisor who would be part of Team Lurie. We’d see the same combination of Lurie’s endorsement and the influx of Big Money we saw in Alan Wong’s D4 race D1 voters would probably see even more of Lurie on the campaign trail, as no moderate has won D1 since district elections returned in 2000.

Scott Wiener led the field in June. If he moves on to Congress, Assembly member Matt Haney plans to run for Wiener’s seat. Haney would face Christine Pelosi, who has already announced plans to run when Wiener’s term expires in 2028. His elevation to Congress would move Pelosi’s race to 2027.

Haney v. Pelosi

A Haney-Pelosi State Senate race would cover all of San Francisco.

I confirmed Haney’s State Senate plans with multiple sources because I assumed he would be happy to stay in the Assembly until 2034. Haney has never lost an election. He was elected to the School Board in 2012, the D6 Supervisor’s seat in 2018 and the Assembly in 2022.

Haney didn’t just defeat former Supervisor David Campos in the April 2022 Special Election; he trounced the progressive Campos 63%-37%. This was in the Assembly district that covers most of the city’s progressive electorate.

Haney offers a record of political success against a candidate who has never faced voters. That would normally lead to a Haney walkover. But Christine Pelosi is not a normal candidate.

Pelosi’s strength goes beyond being the daughter of the city’s most popular emeritus politician. She has carved out her own support among labor and progressive groups through years of work with the California Democratic Party. 

A lack of name recognition often holds first-time candidates back; it’s not a problem for Christine Pelosi.

If Wiener wins and a Haney-Pelosi special election happens, the contest will dominate San Francisco politics. It will be a true “which side are you on” moment for the city’s progressives. I see most going with Pelosi, particularly given how much Nancy Pelosi is helping Connie Chan.

If Haney Wins: The Assembly Special Election

If Haney defeats Pelosi there will have to be a special election to fill his Assembly seat. Board President Rafael Mandelman has long made it clear he plans to run for Haney’s seat if it is vacated. Mandelman has an Assembly campaign website and his campaign kickoff occurs on June 17.

Mandelman is termed out in November. So he can freely campaign for another office. The same is not true for a candidate that multiple sources have told me is set to run against Mandelman —D5 Supervisor Bilal Mahmood.

If it seems odd that Mahmood would run for Assembly before serving a full term as supervisor, that’s precisely what Haney did. Voters did not mind.  The special Assembly election would likely not occur until November 2027.

So while the November 2026 elections have tremendous national significance,  San Francisco voters could find themselves even busier with elections between Democrats in 2027.

It’s also possible that a special election to replace D9 Supervisor Jackie Fielder could occur in 2027. Reports have her leaving office soon, with the special election more likely this November.

Local political consultants could see 2027 as a banner year. The same is true for those who write about political campaigns.

Randy Shaw

Randy Shaw is the Editor of Beyond Chron and the Director of San Francisco’s Tenderloin Housing Clinic, which publishes Beyond Chron. Shaw’s new book is the revised and updated, The Tenderloin: Sex, Crime and Resistance in the Heart of San Francisco. His prior books include Generation Priced Out: Who Gets to Live in the New Urban America. The Activist’s Handbook: Winning Social Change in the 21st Century, and Beyond the Fields: Cesar Chavez, the UFW and the Struggle for Justice in the 21st Century.

More Posts